The Current Sa

South African Judiciary obstructs justice I am a South African Citizen teacher who is a litigant, suing the South African State in the 1stlawsuit for a deliberate unlawful arrest. Total amount: (some millions) Case number: 41273/2019 (Pretoria High Court) 1st Defendant: Minister of Justice and Constitutional Development 2nd defendant: William Seakamela 3rd Defendant: Minister of Basic Education Why is the arrest unlawful? A scar (Annexure A) that already existed on a learner at JB Matabane Secondary School was used to create fraudulent documents which were used to open an assault GBH case in Ivory park police station (Tembisa): case number: 370/09/2018 (Annexure B). I appeared in court four times. Because the evidence was fraudulent, the J88 form which was needed by the court to validate the case was not available, and the case was struck off the roll. The doctor who wrote the fraudulent medical report, which is not J88, could not write J88. Why were the people who orchestrated the arrest desperate to orchestrate? I am the one who submitted a grievance against the school principal who committed a verbal labour misconduct against me. The grievance was not resolved at school level, district level and ELRC level. Once ELRC refused to resolve the grievance, the school principal felt free to use more of his vulgar language and harassment against me. My attorney and myself fought with ELRC for resolution of the grievance. When ELRC was defeated, and agreed that the grievance must be resolved, the crew that thought it was free to harass me started to panic for their job security. This is the time they looked for a learner and her parents who agreed to lie about the scar that already existed on the learner in order to arrest me, thinking that the arrest would save them from facing the consequences of labour harassment. Why is Minister Angie Motshekga and MEC Panyaza Lesufi implicated? When I submitted the documented arrest orchestration evidence (Annexure C,D,E,F,G) to both Minister Angie Motshekga, and MEC Panyaza Lesufi, I got the biggest surprise of my life, both the Minister and MEC used my evidence against myself, with an intention of dismissing me, so that I run out of funds to pursue the lawsuit. In their disciplinary hearing (Annexure H,I), further fraudulent evidencewas used, in which a Tembisa Hospital doctor wrote a fraudulent medical report (Annexure J), and I therefore got hold of it. They still failed to dismiss me, and I am still working in the same school: JB Matabane Secondary in Gauteng Province. I then registered a 2ndlawsuit in Pretoria High court (some millions) against the state and their doctor for the use of the Department of health to produce fraudulent medical report. This is the biggest problem faced by Minister Angie and MEC Panyaza. The second lawsuit wouldn’t be there if they did the right thing when I submitted the organised crime evidence to them. How is the judiciary doing everything in their disposal to obstruct justice? They wrote court PRACTICE DIRECTIVE 1 OF 2023 that would give the state attorneys an advantage to refuse to signthe pre-trial minutes so that they say the matter does not comply with the court directive. I defeated the court directive, and the state attorney was compelled to sign the pre-trial minutes. The judiciary allocated the following dates: · Invalid date: 30 January 2024 (this date was allocated in October 2024) (Annexure K) · Unjustifiable date: 21 January 2030 (six years to come) (Annexure L). I lodged a complaint to the judiciary complaint officers on 19 February 2025 (Annexure M). Instead of answering the complaint another court DIRECTIVE INTRODUCING MANDATORY MEDIATION 22 April 2025 was written and published, and still shifting the goal post to the mediation process rather than allocating a court hearing date. The mediation date is still not allocated by the judiciary till to date (Annexure N). I have enough legitimate evidence, I will email any further requested evidence. Regards, The unlawfully arrested litigant

South African Judiciary obstructs justice I am a South African Citizen teacher who is a litigant, suing the South African State in the 1stlawsuit for a deliberate unlawful arrest. Total amount: (some millions) Case number: 41273/2019 (Pretoria High Court) 1st Defendant: Minister of Justice and Constitutional Development 2nd defendant: William Seakamela 3rd Defendant: Minister of Basic Education Why is the arrest unlawful? A scar (Annexure A) that already existed on a learner at JB Matabane Secondary School was used to create fraudulent documents which were used to open an assault GBH case in Ivory park police station (Tembisa): case number: 370/09/2018 (Annexure B). I appeared in court four times. Because the evidence was fraudulent, the J88 form which was needed by the court to validate the case was not available, and the case was struck off the roll. The doctor who wrote the fraudulent medical report, which is not J88, could not write J88. Why were the people who orchestrated the arrest desperate to orchestrate? I am the one who submitted a grievance against the school principal who committed a verbal labour misconduct against me. The grievance was not resolved at school level, district level and ELRC level. Once ELRC refused to resolve the grievance, the school principal felt free to use more of his vulgar language and harassment against me. My attorney and myself fought with ELRC for resolution of the grievance. When ELRC was defeated, and agreed that the grievance must be resolved, the crew that thought it was free to harass me started to panic for their job security. This is the time they looked for a learner and her parents who agreed to lie about the scar that already existed on the learner in order to arrest me, thinking that the arrest would save them from facing the consequences of labour harassment. Why is Minister Angie Motshekga and MEC Panyaza Lesufi implicated? When I submitted the documented arrest orchestration evidence (Annexure C,D,E,F,G) to both Minister Angie Motshekga, and MEC Panyaza Lesufi, I got the biggest surprise of my life, both the Minister and MEC used my evidence against myself, with an intention of dismissing me, so that I run out of funds to pursue the lawsuit. In their disciplinary hearing (Annexure H,I), further fraudulent evidencewas used, in which a Tembisa Hospital doctor wrote a fraudulent medical report (Annexure J), and I therefore got hold of it. They still failed to dismiss me, and I am still working in the same school: JB Matabane Secondary in Gauteng Province. I then registered a 2ndlawsuit in Pretoria High court (some millions) against the state and their doctor for the use of the Department of health to produce fraudulent medical report. This is the biggest problem faced by Minister Angie and MEC Panyaza. The second lawsuit wouldn’t be there if they did the right thing when I submitted the organised crime evidence to them. How is the judiciary doing everything in their disposal to obstruct justice? They wrote court PRACTICE DIRECTIVE 1 OF 2023 that would give the state attorneys an advantage to refuse to signthe pre-trial minutes so that they say the matter does not comply with the court directive. I defeated the court directive, and the state attorney was compelled to sign the pre-trial minutes. The judiciary allocated the following dates: · Invalid date: 30 January 2024 (this date was allocated in October 2024) (Annexure K) · Unjustifiable date: 21 January 2030 (six years to come) (Annexure L). I lodged a complaint to the judiciary complaint officers on 19 February 2025 (Annexure M). Instead of answering the complaint another court DIRECTIVE INTRODUCING MANDATORY MEDIATION 22 April 2025 was written and published, and still shifting the goal post to the mediation process rather than allocating a court hearing date. The mediation date is still not allocated by the judiciary till to date (Annexure N). I have enough legitimate evidence, I will email any further requested evidence. Regards, The unlawfully arrested litigant

South African Judiciary obstructs justice I am a South African Citizen teacher who is a litigant, suing the South African State in the 1stlawsuit for a deliberate unlawful arrest. Total amount: (some millions) Case number: 41273/2019 (Pretoria High Court) 1st Defendant: Minister of Justice and Constitutional Development 2nd defendant: William Seakamela 3rd Defendant: Minister of Basic Education Why is the arrest unlawful? A scar (Annexure A) that already existed on a learner at JB Matabane Secondary School was used to create fraudulent documents which were used to open an assault GBH case in Ivory park police station (Tembisa): case number: 370/09/2018 (Annexure B). I appeared in court four times. Because the evidence was fraudulent, the J88 form which was needed by the court to validate the case was not available, and the case was struck off the roll. The doctor who wrote the fraudulent medical report, which is not J88, could not write J88. Why were the people who orchestrated the arrest desperate to orchestrate? I am the one who submitted a grievance against the school principal who committed a verbal labour misconduct against me. The grievance was not resolved at school level, district level and ELRC level. Once ELRC refused to resolve the grievance, the school principal felt free to use more of his vulgar language and harassment against me. My attorney and myself fought with ELRC for resolution of the grievance. When ELRC was defeated, and agreed that the grievance must be resolved, the crew that thought it was free to harass me started to panic for their job security. This is the time they looked for a learner and her parents who agreed to lie about the scar that already existed on the learner in order to arrest me, thinking that the arrest would save them from facing the consequences of labour harassment. Why is Minister Angie Motshekga and MEC Panyaza Lesufi implicated? When I submitted the documented arrest orchestration evidence (Annexure C,D,E,F,G) to both Minister Angie Motshekga, and MEC Panyaza Lesufi, I got the biggest surprise of my life, both the Minister and MEC used my evidence against myself, with an intention of dismissing me, so that I run out of funds to pursue the lawsuit. In their disciplinary hearing (Annexure H,I), further fraudulent evidencewas used, in which a Tembisa Hospital doctor wrote a fraudulent medical report (Annexure J), and I therefore got hold of it. They still failed to dismiss me, and I am still working in the same school: JB Matabane Secondary in Gauteng Province. I then registered a 2ndlawsuit in Pretoria High court (some millions) against the state and their doctor for the use of the Department of health to produce fraudulent medical report. This is the biggest problem faced by Minister Angie and MEC Panyaza. The second lawsuit wouldn’t be there if they did the right thing when I submitted the organised crime evidence to them. How is the judiciary doing everything in their disposal to obstruct justice? They wrote court PRACTICE DIRECTIVE 1 OF 2023 that would give the state attorneys an advantage to refuse to signthe pre-trial minutes so that they say the matter does not comply with the court directive. I defeated the court directive, and the state attorney was compelled to sign the pre-trial minutes. The judiciary allocated the following dates: · Invalid date: 30 January 2024 (this date was allocated in October 2024) (Annexure K) · Unjustifiable date: 21 January 2030 (six years to come) (Annexure L). I lodged a complaint to the judiciary complaint officers on 19 February 2025 (Annexure M). Instead of answering the complaint another court DIRECTIVE INTRODUCING MANDATORY MEDIATION 22 April 2025 was written and published, and still shifting the goal post to the mediation process rather than allocating a court hearing date. The mediation date is still not allocated by the judiciary till to date (Annexure N). I have enough legitimate evidence, I will email any further requested evidence. Regards, The unlawfully arrested litigant

South African Judiciary obstructs justice I am a South African Citizen teacher who is a litigant, suing the South African State in the 1stlawsuit for a deliberate unlawful arrest. Total amount: (some millions) Case number: 41273/2019 (Pretoria High Court) 1st Defendant: Minister of Justice and Constitutional Development 2nd defendant: William Seakamela 3rd Defendant: Minister of Basic Education Why is the arrest unlawful? A scar (Annexure A) that already existed on a learner at JB Matabane Secondary School was used to create fraudulent documents which were used to open an assault GBH case in Ivory park police station (Tembisa): case number: 370/09/2018 (Annexure B). I appeared in court four times. Because the evidence was fraudulent, the J88 form which was needed by the court to validate the case was not available, and the case was struck off the roll. The doctor who wrote the fraudulent medical report, which is not J88, could not write J88. Why were the people who orchestrated the arrest desperate to orchestrate? I am the one who submitted a grievance against the school principal who committed a verbal labour misconduct against me. The grievance was not resolved at school level, district level and ELRC level. Once ELRC refused to resolve the grievance, the school principal felt free to use more of his vulgar language and harassment against me. My attorney and myself fought with ELRC for resolution of the grievance. When ELRC was defeated, and agreed that the grievance must be resolved, the crew that thought it was free to harass me started to panic for their job security. This is the time they looked for a learner and her parents who agreed to lie about the scar that already existed on the learner in order to arrest me, thinking that the arrest would save them from facing the consequences of labour harassment. Why is Minister Angie Motshekga and MEC Panyaza Lesufi implicated? When I submitted the documented arrest orchestration evidence (Annexure C,D,E,F,G) to both Minister Angie Motshekga, and MEC Panyaza Lesufi, I got the biggest surprise of my life, both the Minister and MEC used my evidence against myself, with an intention of dismissing me, so that I run out of funds to pursue the lawsuit. In their disciplinary hearing (Annexure H,I), further fraudulent evidencewas used, in which a Tembisa Hospital doctor wrote a fraudulent medical report (Annexure J), and I therefore got hold of it. They still failed to dismiss me, and I am still working in the same school: JB Matabane Secondary in Gauteng Province. I then registered a 2ndlawsuit in Pretoria High court (some millions) against the state and their doctor for the use of the Department of health to produce fraudulent medical report. This is the biggest problem faced by Minister Angie and MEC Panyaza. The second lawsuit wouldn’t be there if they did the right thing when I submitted the organised crime evidence to them. How is the judiciary doing everything in their disposal to obstruct justice? They wrote court PRACTICE DIRECTIVE 1 OF 2023 that would give the state attorneys an advantage to refuse to signthe pre-trial minutes so that they say the matter does not comply with the court directive. I defeated the court directive, and the state attorney was compelled to sign the pre-trial minutes. The judiciary allocated the following dates: · Invalid date: 30 January 2024 (this date was allocated in October 2024) (Annexure K) · Unjustifiable date: 21 January 2030 (six years to come) (Annexure L). I lodged a complaint to the judiciary complaint officers on 19 February 2025 (Annexure M). Instead of answering the complaint another court DIRECTIVE INTRODUCING MANDATORY MEDIATION 22 April 2025 was written and published, and still shifting the goal post to the mediation process rather than allocating a court hearing date. The mediation date is still not allocated by the judiciary till to date (Annexure N). I have enough legitimate evidence, I will email any further requested evidence. Regards, The unlawfully arrested litigant