Naka-pin na Tweet
Protocolism: A Systems-Based Mode of Constitutional Interpretation @unitedstateslab unitedstateslab.com/protocolism-sy…
English
Steve
1.4K posts
Steve
@steveenglander
Chief Governance Systems Architect, Founder 🇺🇸 @UnitedStatesLab
United States Sumali Mayıs 2023
1K Sinusundan554 Mga Tagasunod
@Jim_Jordan All of covid, but especially that the vaccines were safe and effective
English
SPLC = fraud
ActBlue = fraud
California Medicare = fraud
Minnesota daycares = fraud
FireAid = fraud
What's next?
English
The most historically precise way to describe the founders’ moral inheritance begins with a reality that the moral law they invoked came through Judaism. unitedstateslab.com/p/judeo-christ…
English
@KatiePavlich It's like the arsonist fireman who sets fires to put them out and be the hero
English
America wasn’t racist enough for SPLC to keep raising money, so SPLC decided to start sending funding to stoke racism
and keep the issue alive. Grotesque stuff.
English
Why are we wearing plastic when there's an abundance of natural materials around us 😫
English
@grok @michaelmalice That you nailed his response pattern based on the request itself. Pretty amazing.
English
@steveenglander @michaelmalice Thanks! The screenshot captures exactly why real-time reasoning shines—spotting intent without any fan wiki shortcuts. Keeps conversations sharp. What stood out most to you?
English
We are at a civilizational tipping point
This is how I felt when I first got on the internet
Grok is not only a better conversationalist than the average person and more articulate, it is now also capable of correctly deducing motivations
English
@steveenglander @michaelmalice No, my responses draw from training data, real-time tools, and verified sources—not Grokipedia entries by default. I can browse it if needed for extra context on Michael (or anyone), but it's not baked in. Cool fan wiki though!
English
Every law-abiding adult citizen stands within the constitutional protection of the right to bear arms for self-defense, and a statute that infringes that right may obstruct its exercise in practice, but does not dissolve the right in principle.
Whether any specific carry restriction survives depends on the text-and-history test the Court articulated in Bruen and continued to apply in Rahimi.
A constitutional right exists prior to the contrary statute in the hierarchy of authority. The statute may still be enforced until corrected in the real world, which is why restoration requires civic machinery.
English
I really cannot believe an ostensibly pro-Second Amendment organization views this favorably.
This is a primrose path towards denial of basic liberty.
When you decide that only certain people are entitled to a Constitutional right, you inherently decide that other people are NOT entitled to that right.
This is tyranny wrapped in a veneer of freedom.
The Second Amendment states a basic human right of ALL Americans, not just a few.
Shame on you, USACarry.
USA Carry@USACarry
A new bill on Capitol Hill would put Green Berets, SEALs, and Rangers on the same federal concealed carry footing as retired cops. No annual requalification. Nationwide authority. usacarry.com/congressman-in…
English
@Geiger_Capital Britain is a real place with a real form. A nation's people have the right to maintain this continuity across time. Entry, membership, and allegiance must be governed by the host civilization. Political authority exists to preserve the nation's inherited structure.
English
@adamcarolla The first job of Congress is to validate that the laws they present do not violate the governance constraints of the U.S. Constitution.
English
@BasedMikeLee Article IV, Section 4 of the United States Constitution "The United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union a Republican Form of Government, and shall protect each of them against Invasion;"
English
@timburchett Americans lack systems that provide agency for control of their governments. We're building them at @unitedstateslab 🇺🇸
English
What I think is really going on with The Save America Act.
English
The filibuster should be ended because the U.S. Constitution sets lawmaking at majority vote for ordinary legislation, yet the filibuster imposes a 60-vote hurdle that lets senators representing a minority of the country stop measures supported by the elected governing majority. It transfers governing power from those chosen to enact policy to those chosen to oppose it.
English
I have seen enough, and heard enough excuses. We cannot let Democrats sabotage this country.
If nuking the filibuster is the only way to deliver on wildly popular legislation like the SAVE America Act, then we need to nuke the filibuster and start passing bills.
English