Drawer Analysis

856 posts

Drawer Analysis

Drawer Analysis

@AnalysisDrawer

شامل ہوئے Ekim 2023
113 فالونگ210 فالوورز
پن کیا گیا ٹویٹ
Drawer Analysis
Drawer Analysis@AnalysisDrawer·
Hi all #MedTwitter ! Working on something. Lots of negativity surrounding the Physician Associate role,which is affecting PAs on the ground. Could you comment on how you see PAs working successfully within the NHS to support the medical team and maintain patient safety?
English
64
18
77
80.6K
Drawer Analysis
Drawer Analysis@AnalysisDrawer·
I have now been blocked. Their views will not be missed.
English
0
0
2
502
The Med Reg
The Med Reg@MedRegoncall1·
🛑 PAs and some other HCPs are fighting tooth and nail to stop anon Doctors raising concerns: ⛔️ We will contin to expose your lies ⛔️The public are more aware of scope creep now ⛔️They no longer entrust you to look after their loved ones. #MedTwitter
The Med Reg tweet media
English
3
18
90
26K
Dr Rachel Clarke
Dr Rachel Clarke@doctor_oxford·
Extraordinary happenings at @RCPhysicians today. In process not dissimilar to Putin’s recent re-election, Fellows are voting for a new College President. Except there is only one candidate and not voting for them is literally not an option 😳
Dr Rachel Clarke tweet media
English
77
491
1.3K
215.8K
Drawer Analysis
Drawer Analysis@AnalysisDrawer·
@traineENT @simondoyle87 If we assume that individuals who hold a significant opinion are much more likely to return the survey, would this negatively impact the generalisability of the survey?
English
2
0
0
125
Drawer Analysis
Drawer Analysis@AnalysisDrawer·
@traineENT @simondoyle87 Is that true? Will look into this and delete thread if I feel it's disingenuous! What would the value of these surveys hold if 10% was acceptable? I would presume this would be concentration of individuals wanting to vote and therefore not a true reflection on general feeling?
English
3
0
0
147
Drawer Analysis
Drawer Analysis@AnalysisDrawer·
@simondoyle87 It was just a mere observation! Do you agree that the return rate of 17.8% is poor though? Perhaps I was naive to think that many more would be involved with the PA debate?
English
2
0
0
105
Simon Laurence Doyle
Simon Laurence Doyle@simondoyle87·
@AnalysisDrawer Disappointing for whom. And for me, because I usually respect your fairly balanced viewpoint. Do you aspire to just 'not negative'? The idea that neutrality is considered a positive for an emerging profession boggles the mind.
English
1
0
3
96
Drawer Analysis
Drawer Analysis@AnalysisDrawer·
@simondoyle87 Disappointing for who? Only 17.8% of people replied to a survey for an EGM which has an extremely occurrence about a super polarising subject? Of which a significant proportion was indifferent or positive?
English
3
0
0
207
Drawer Analysis
Drawer Analysis@AnalysisDrawer·
Hi all #MedTwitter ! Working on something. Lots of negativity surrounding the Physician Associate role,which is affecting PAs on the ground. Could you comment on how you see PAs working successfully within the NHS to support the medical team and maintain patient safety?
English
64
18
77
80.6K
Drawer Analysis
Drawer Analysis@AnalysisDrawer·
@LukeAmos__ I understand your point! But even then, for an EGM that has only happened a handful of times which is so polarised, to have a response rate of 17.8? Do you agree that's quite poor?
English
0
0
0
109
Luke
Luke@LukeAmos__·
@AnalysisDrawer You’ve got to remember who is actually eligible to vote though, I’m not A lot of the members of the RCP are probably the less likely to be involved in the PA discussion than any ‘average’ doctor currently in the training world
English
1
0
5
142

دریافت کریں

@MedRegoncall1 @ConkerLover @fascinatorfun @AIDANTURNER4 @doctor_oxford @RocketRacer69 @RCPhysicians @mmamas1973