Bizzi

I got early access to Polymarket perps beta. So it’s crazy to see that prediction markets just got a leverage button. But it’s interesting for me and I will try all features there. What should I trade first? S&P500, NVIDIA or what?

@ascetic0x Thank you bro We will see

@Crypt0Bizzi yeah the market feels weak but I don't think they'll sell more BTC in June. a bounce is possible from here imo. anyway good luck with this bet man

I’ve started adding to my YES position in $60,000 also (at 62c & 65c first buys). I expect Strategy’s announcement of a major $BTC sale this coming Monday to be the first news trigger. And more ETF’s selling. Anyway, now we don’t have any triggers and signs to show crypto market strength. There are no buyers.

@ascetic0x So he must to deleverage by selling $BTC

@Crypt0Bizzi yeah he's definitely in a tougher spot than people want to admit

Saylor must sell bitcoin:native to buy back the debt. Or he must disregard his MSTR mNAV strategy and or $BTC per share approach. He isn’t in good situation fr (despite his infinite leverage machine).

@KyleDeWriter Delusional YES believers are the sponsors for brain owners with NO shares That’s it

Made the safest $8 in my life trading $1,400 on the market that has already been resolved. MicroStrategy saga came to it's logical end. UMA voters made a historical accurate decision and there's no things to wonder about. Honestly, I feel bad for those newcomers who were affected by YES KOLS. There's been too many noisy tweets across x feeds over the last few days and I believe some % of retail purchasing into YES shares just followed the wrong CTA. Definitely a reason to review who you are following in this space. Every YES holder donated their funds into usual bond opportunity, that was claimed by real traders.

@MaksimXBT We can go lower without it Saylor announcement will just be a great bonus

@Crypt0Bizzi $60,000 target doesn't account for the sell pressure after the announcement

@francescoinweb3 Because it’s comfortable for me to do that micro short on Polymarket. On the exchange I have another positions.

@Crypt0Bizzi just log in to the exchange

@korenssss Saylor changed the paradigm, so we are adapting

@Crypt0Bizzi interesting think

@francescoinweb3 What do you mean?

@Crypt0Bizzi Why not just go ahead and do the deal?

@Siebenontop Show him a guy with $13M on this market

This guy really risked 400k to make 3k lol I think we can now measure IQ based on X badges If you hold a PM badge your IQ is below 80 Hold a treadfi badge and it 110+ at least Im so happy this happened HIP-4 will eat up their marketshare like nothing

@DidiTrading I’m in on Portugal

Day 526: World Cup starts in 7 days. I bought YES shares on Belgium at 2c because I think they're undervalued. I don't expect them to win the World Cup at all, but they have one of the easier group stages and I give them a decent chance to reach the quarter finals. If they manage to get that far, I think the odds should reprice closer to 6c, which would be a 3x from my entry. The plan is simple: monitor every game after the group stage and decide whether to keep holding or start taking profits depending on the bracket and who they might face next.

@slash1sol Devs must watch closely

A DEVELOPER ONCE EXPLAINED A LANGUAGE FROM THE 1980s THAT ALREADY RAN MILLIONS OF TINY WORKERS IN PARALLEL UNDER ONE SUPERVISOR -- THE EXACT THING EVERYONE THINKS "300 AI AGENTS" JUST INVENTED Tim McNamara on what to steal from Erlang -- the language built for systems that can never go down, where thousands of independent processes run at once and a single supervisor watches every one of them. -> The moment it clicks, the whole "Swarm of agents" hype stops looking new. One coordinator that plans the work. A crowd of small workers that each do one thing and share nothing. A supervisor on top that kills and restarts whatever breaks. That's not a 2026 idea -- it's the actor model, and it's older than most engineers reading this. The trick was never raw parallelism. Anyone can spawn a thousand workers. It's the discipline around them: each one isolated, failures contained instead of cascading, and one layer with the authority to restart. "Let it crash" beats "Try to handle everything" because the supervisor already knows what to do. Running many things at once was never the skill -> orchestrating them so the whole thing doesn't collapse is. And now that people are pointing 300 AI agents at a single job and praying, the ones who win will be the teams who learned this pattern from a language that's been doing it for forty years. Everyone's racing to build the swarm. Almost no one is studying the one system that already solved how to keep a swarm from eating itself. Save it. It's the map for everything coming next ↓

@holy_moses7 @mustafap0ly UI bag I guess

Why am I getting liquidated at $1.3 @mustafap0ly

@slash1sol @predofficial Nice broski

Just went all-in on France to beat Senegal at the World Cup and I didn't wait a single second for the fill. The fastest sports prediction exchange just went public. @predofficial doesn't move like a betting site. It moves like an exchange. > Market order on France moneyline at 68¢. > Filled in under 200ms -- instant. > Spreads under 2%, zero house edge. > Cash sitting idle? Still earning 6% APY till kickoff. No book, no house taking the other side and no getting capped or banned the moment you start winning. It's peer-to-peer -- you trade sports outcomes like assets, against other traders, on Base. And the launch came loaded: > Brand new desktop UI -- full order book, long/short, market & limit. > New sports live on day one. > FIFA Friendlies. > World Cup markets running right now. > Exclusive future markets you will NOT find on any other platform. Sportsbooks were built to beat you. PRED was built so you can't be stopped. The Sports Prediction Exchange has arrived. Winners welcome and this time they mean it. Trade the game -> pred.app/?referral_code… Don't forget to bookmark it.

@slash1sol Insider I guess

He bet that the US would strike Iran -- when the whole market said it wouldn't. And it paid $383,000. This wallet rode one narrative through multiple 10x+ wins on Polymarket: > US strikes Iran by Feb 28 -- YES at 16.6¢ -> $169,800 > Iran ceasefire continues -- NO at 1.0¢ -> $66,200 > US strikes Iran by March 1 -- YES at 22.9¢ -> $55,600 > US strikes Iran by March 31 -- YES at 47.8¢ -> $55,200 $383,518 total PnL with $10.7M volume. Now he bets rarely -- but when he does, he's almost never wrong. He didn't believe the headlines. The chart shows what that conviction was worth. Watch this wallet: @0x1abe1368601330a310162064e04d3c2628cb6497?code=slash" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">predictparity.com/traders/p/@0x1…

@mahera777 @tsybka @Polymarket @PolymarketTrade All guys with brain could do that

haha what's going on here @tsybka bought NO at 99.4c and made an easy $1,900

@BrokieTrades Why not

Fun fact: the Polymarket community will happily lock up six figures to walk away with a less than 1% return. I put in $157,230. Won $870. AMA.

@tsybka @betmoardotfun They need to hope on smth Let them throw that money

Despite the decision made by Polymarket and the confirmation of the consensus through UMA’s formal vote, there are still idiots of not particularly strong intellect who gladly continue to feed both the whales and the platform itself. At this point, more than $223k has been earned in fees. Infographic was taken from @betmoardotfun

@BTCBeliever21 We will see more sells

Strategy sold 32 BTC. Average Sale Price $77,135. I realised that based on the average price of $77,135 you can find out the time when the transaction occurred. It appears that Strategy sold the 32 $BTC 18 minutes after market open on Tuesday 26th of May at 9:48 a.m. ET, because that's when the BTC price was $77,135. The only alternative possibility is that they sold 10:39 a.m. ET or 10:51 a.m. ET - 10:54 a.m. ET, also Tue 26 May. Tuesday 26th was the first day or the trading week, because Monday 25th was a holiday. They sold the Bitcoin on the first day of the week in the first hour(s). But the interesting thing is that they only transferred the $BTC 5 minutes after the market closed at 4:05 p.m. Eastern Time (ET) (arkm.com/explorer/tx/42…). The 31.95 BTC outflow above is the transaction. The 8-K always rounds up BTC amounts to whole numbers. They likely reason they didn't sell more that week, is that BTC dropped below their average purchase price of $75,699. That would be fine, but bad for optics.

@parlettodotbet @PolymarketTrade Thanks bro Hustle

@Crypt0Bizzi @PolymarketTrade solid profit on those two, nice way to close out

And the second one was closed with more sweet profit (~106%) because bitcoin:native just dropped below $65k. These two days were pretty good (can’t say similar about crypto market). But we must be adaptable because we are Polymarket traders. Well, I'm off to bed.