PPP GUY 🪐(PPP/arc)
1.8K posts

PPP GUY 🪐(PPP/arc)
@DecrypterMike
Innovation| Leading $PPP @playerpumpp on Jupiter Studio|| Decrypt Defi 🇬🇭 Proudly Ghanaian







the future of institutional liquidity is onchain. @xxjzhu in Miami!

Just in: @carlosdomingo just announced @Securitize's partnership with @jumptrading and @JupiterExchange to launch fully onchain, regulated trading for tokenized equities. Institutional liquidity, regulated execution, and global distribution for real equities on Solana rails.








this might be a bold prediction: but I think JUP goes easily back to $0.4–$0.5 if they fix ONE thing why? buybacks & burn work but only when unlock pressure is low → that’s why pump didn’t work → that’s why hyperliquid does work it has to be deflationary (+ no fear of unlocks) Jupiter finally moved in that direction with net-zero emissions. In theory, they could buy back +20% of supply over the next few years but here’s the problem (maybe two): Jupiter’s revenue is trending down, Hyperliquid’s is stable (Hyperliquid also generates ~10x more revenue than Jupiter) and it gets worse: ~60% of Jupiter’s revenue comes from perps and even tho they're the 3d biggest perps earner they only generate 1% of the total perps volume Since the canceled airdrop, even more users left Jupiter Perps, and honestly, it's understandable given the high fees and only three pairs. Perps revenue is among the top three earnings in crypto and if they want to stop the downtrend of revenue, there's just one way out (no card, no juplend, etc.) second issue: token utility JUP still lacks a strong reason to hold (→ compare that to Hyperliquid’s fee rebates model) I really hope they cooked in the background with perps because if they did the JUP token is coded for a huge rally














