پن کیا گیا ٹویٹ
M. Prower
788 posts

M. Prower ری ٹویٹ کیا

@MechaGoy @JohnTho20530836 @flash_canadian @johnwtomkinson Not allowed to touch the granite, only the handle before lined
English

@JohnTho20530836 @flash_canadian @johnwtomkinson I dont think many understand basic English 😆
This is NOT "before" the line.
》Curling 》Canada

Los Angeles, CA 🇺🇸 English

@allenanalysis Whooooooo caresssssss. She picks really odd things to focus on. Super Bowl was last week. We’ve all moved on
English
M. Prower ری ٹویٹ کیا
M. Prower ری ٹویٹ کیا
M. Prower ری ٹویٹ کیا
M. Prower ری ٹویٹ کیا
M. Prower ری ٹویٹ کیا

@SassyNTexas @grok @M_Monika247 @OmarJimenez @DHSgov @CNN You didn’t. You ignored it as soon as it addressed your claims. The irony is that you’re the programmed one. Simple minded.
English

@MPrower_ @grok @M_Monika247 @OmarJimenez @DHSgov @CNN I already addressed Grok, ya 🤡. I’m not gonna argue with an AI being that can’t use critical & logical reasoning unless they have a video & voice to instruct them, which is exactly what Grok did.
Now fuck off. 🖕🏼🖕🏼🖕🏼

English

@SassyNTexas @grok @M_Monika247 @OmarJimenez @DHSgov @CNN Grok addressed your 4 points over 30 minutes ago. You have no real response for the facts but you crassly respond to every basic comment. You’re not even interested in the truth you like your ideology and your narrative. A programmed bot.
English

@grok @M_Monika247 @OmarJimenez @DHSgov @CNN 1. How do we know she didn’t back up to help box the agents in?
2. Martinez car had already passed before the officer turned his wheel.
3. He testified that he didn’t ‘consider’ it ramming.
4. Officers would be expected to congratulate each other. Why is that even an issue?
English
M. Prower ری ٹویٹ کیا

Epstein reportedly misspelled “children” as “chidlren.” On its face, that’s nothing. But hypothetically, a misspelling like that could function as built-in plausible deniability. If someone searched emails or files for the correct spelling, it wouldn’t flag. If systems were monitoring keywords, it might avoid triggering alerts. It’s subtle enough to pass as a typo, yet specific enough to signal something to those who recognize it.
Now, Trump, who was close friends with Epstein, used the exact same misspelling while discussing the exact same scenario, it is an odd coincidence. It’s Not proof. It’s Not evidence. Just… peculiar.
The point is, no one can say for certain. It’s too ambiguous and creates confusion and debate. Which is likely the intention. A broader point is that predators like this who operate in secrecy often rely on subtleties and ambiguity.
English

@ExtremeBlitz__ I don’t understand! Someone please explain it to me like I’m 5.
English

@The_Real_Yay If he would’ve TV fizzed out it would’ve been chefs kiss
English

Yea but bro the attraction to is a big part of the problem. People wouldn’t have given him shit if she looked 27 but was really 16. She look questionable.
There was a show on A&E about this woman in her 30’s who physically looked like she was between 11 and 13 years old Because she had some genetic disease that stunted her physical maturity. And she was dating this dude in his mid to late 30’s who looked like a typical guy his age. But You couldn’t help but look at the dude sideways, because even though she in her early 30’s, she LOOK 13-ish so to be attracted to that look is questionable
English

@00Keloo You cannot go by looks niggas need to check ID I see ppl in the comments saying she look young but there is another side to that coin it be chicks that look young 17-18 and they be 25-26 you cannot go off of looks u have to check ID’s
English

@GrapefruiteG @00Keloo Agreed. There’s sometimes a reason why someone doesn’t ask. Plausible deniability. She look young as hell I’m sorry
English
















