Dan Allen

@thewritertype And reworked the plot of The Lion King with humans.

Sure, happy birthday to Shakespeare, but it's a fact that he stole most of his plots. Like, one play is a total ripoff of West Side Story, but set in the olden days.

@PhysInHistory So long as you dont confuse the mythology of religion with the science of reality. There is no conflict. In the same way, the magic of Harry Potter is also no in conflict with science.

@EduardoYukio_ @MudkipNerd_ If 2ab=0 then at least one a and b is 0. So you're dealing with a line or a point in which a+b=c. Not normally considered a triangle.

@MudkipNerd_ Por que 2ab>0? O que te garante isso?

Odeio esse meme. Pitágoras não garante que a hipotenusa é menor que a soma dos catetos. Isso é propriedade de espaços métricos!!!!!!!!

@_TightWadBill This tweet did not age well.

@_TightWadBill Don't speak so soon. Mathematically they could finish above West Ham. West Ham lose their remaining matches by at least 1 goal and Wolves win them all by an average of 3 goals.

Pretty sure no team has ever been bottom for the entire season, from week 1 to 38. Youuuuu Wolves

@Neosocratas @DeeWaynee94 No I don't. There's no external corroboration for the supernatural events of The Bible and all the fact-based evidence we have tells us with certainty at least most of them are mythological stories. We absolutely must not say they they're objective historical accounts.

@Persixty @DeeWaynee94 You confuse the Biblical record with mythology.

I know religion is man-made because it behaves exactly like something humans made up under fear, ignorance, power, and death anxiety. Thousands of gods. Thousands of sects. Endless contradictions. Somehow each one just happens to be “true” where its believers were born. What a miracle. 🙄 🥱

@Neosocratas @DeeWaynee94 No such logic exists unless you embed it in your premises. They're only based on objective historic fact if you confuse mythology with reality. If you do that Ancient Egyptian Hieroglyphs establish Anubis as objective historical fact.

The God of the Bible requires a different set of data. We can establish that only one God exist by logic. Who that God is can only be revealed historically. Judaism and Christianity are based from objective historic facts, they did not "pop out" fully formed from a single source as Buddhism, Confucianism, and Islam. "1 That which was from the beginning, which we have heard, which we have seen with our own eyes, which we have gazed upon and touched with our own hands—this is the Word of life. 2 And this is the life that was revealed; we have seen it and testified to it, and we proclaim to you the eternal life that was with the Father and was revealed to us. 3 We proclaim to you what we have seen and heard, so that you also may have fellowship with us." 1 John

@mrs_coyle No tea and crumpets flavour? Lasses would luvs 'em.

@Neosocratas @DeeWaynee94 We don't know so God must exist to be answer is a common but utterly flawed argument. Then assuming that it must be the specific God you believe in is doubling the flaw.

@DeeWaynee94 What happens when belief in God is the logical conclusion to scientific and historic evidence?

@southside_mafs It's called Apophenia. The tendency so perceive connections between unrelated things. Pareidolia is a form it. The most common is to see faces in things. We all do it but sometimes people take it far too seriously.

What level of mental disorder is this ?

@DeeWaynee94 Peer review by people clearly unable to distinguish between mythology and reality.

🤣 “The Bible is peer reviewed” is such a funny line. Studied by scholars is not the same as peer reviewed, and peer reviewed is not the same as true. People analyse Homer too. That doesn’t make Zeus real.

@Ernest1588761 Because when Christianity showed up people were already eating pigs and were unwilling to stop because bacon. To force people is to say because they believe some made-up nonsense they have to believe more.

Why do Christians eat pork when the Bible clearly tells them not to? Or maybe it taste better than the Bible lies?😂😂😂

@LloydGeorge57 Psalm 55:22 Castor your burden on the Lord, and he will sustain you; he will never permit the righteous to be moved.

From Britain First, a new flag-clad idiot emerges, I bring you…. CROSS NONCE. 😆

@Steve_in_gear @ick_real You are 100% wrong. I'd watch the hell out of that.

Your job is to pick the worst possible actor to play James bond. Go!

@bull_feath95552 @AwesomEmergency His humour seems to end at The Star Wars Holiday Special (1978).

@AwesomEmergency One of the best things about George Lucas is that he doesn’t take StarWars too seriously. He’s passionate about it, that’s obvious, but it’s totally cool with it being parodied. He even voiced himself for a robot chicken special.

When Mel Brooks made the First Spaceballs. George Lucas told him he was cool with it, as long as Lone Star didn't dress like Han Solo...So he dressed him like Indiana Jones 😂

@haveigotnews When did Keir Starmer join the Labour Party or start taking an interest in current affairs? How did he not know Mandy was dodge?

Keir Starmer says he was unaware of issues vetting Peter 'Prince of Darkness' Mandelson, but hopes the Civil Service will do a better job with the upcoming government appointments of Knuckles McGinty, Vlad the Impaler and Keith the Bastard

@BrockRiddickIFB Please confirm this is engagement farming clickbait.

@burny_tech Nobody knows. Mythology provides explanations but they have no rational basis in fact.

Why is there something rather than nothing?

@MissAlly_01 I assume the TARDIS has a pretty massive stockpile of toilet paper.

I just read that modern toilet paper was invented in 1857. However, it wasn't until the 1930s that "Splinter-Free" paper was developed. Until then the manufacturing process often included wood splinters in the paper. So I've just discovered my personal cut-off for time travel.

@BibleMilitant @Maximumatheist Thinking quoting The Bible proves anything is a cringeworthy embarrassment.

This is like listening to a Christian trying to poke holes in evolution.

@zerofawkesgavin @TheMekon_Venus HSBC doesn't stand for Hong Kong Shanghai Banking Corporation (according to HSBC) and BP doesn't stand for British Petroleum (according to BP).

@TheMekon_Venus They did it as a typical national rebrand to attract a younger, lazier, more illiterate audience. I could see the fried part maybe, have my doubts Kentucky could do anything about it. It isn't like it's bourbon. Not uncommon: Dunkin', WW, HP, PwC, FedEx...

Do you call it ‘Kentucky Fried chicken’? Or KFC? (apparently the rebrand was to avoid the word fried.. and to avoid licensing issues with the state of Kentucky’)