Skeptical

1.1K posts

Skeptical

Skeptical

@SkepticalShash

شامل ہوئے Şubat 2017
448 فالونگ157 فالوورز
Skeptical
Skeptical@SkepticalShash·
@WallStreetMav Yeah - maybe modify it as an echo chamber, which would defeat the purpose. Kind of like “Twitter” and not “X”.
English
0
0
0
25
Wall Street Mav
Wall Street Mav@WallStreetMav·
Hopefully something better related to the algo is coming. We all love X, because it is better than the other options especially for free speech.
Wall Street Mav tweet media
English
72
23
286
21.5K
MAGA Voice
MAGA Voice@MAGAVoice·
Testing…. Do you see this post ?
English
263
67
1K
13.6K
Skeptical
Skeptical@SkepticalShash·
WOW - in addition to my previous comments related to this post, all I’m seeing is “My account should have more relevance than others based on my following”. Umm to those very same accounts, maybe your posts aren’t as interesting or relevant as you all may seem to think all of the time - just throwing that out there as a possibility.
English
0
0
0
12
Diana Dukic
Diana Dukic@diana_dukic·
Went from scrolling 24/7 to not even wanting to log in. X just hasn’t been hitting the same lately.
English
469
130
3.9K
949.7K
Skeptical
Skeptical@SkepticalShash·
Probably nothing, just a matter of using the platform as is, as opposed assuming it’s specific to one particular group, account, opinion, etc. Participation, be that a like, repost or comment as opposed to “scrolling” alone does in fact help. Otherwise you’re viewing only the latest popular trending topics.
English
0
0
0
35
Skeptical
Skeptical@SkepticalShash·
@Rep_Stansbury So now the House of Reps rules the DOJ? I’m confused. Who then puts questionable House members on notice?
English
0
0
2
42
Rep. Melanie Stansbury
Rep. Melanie Stansbury@Rep_Stansbury·
We are putting DOJ on notice. If you do not comply with the law, we will hold you in contempt. Period.
English
1.2K
3.2K
11.4K
105.1K
Skeptical
Skeptical@SkepticalShash·
@JesseKellyDC He’s got a point Red Lobster is like fast food seafood. When’s the last time you ate there?
English
0
0
0
77
Jesse Kelly
Jesse Kelly@JesseKellyDC·
Matt Walsh makes fun of Red Lobster. That should tell you what kind of person he is. People who hate Red Lobster are EXACTLY the kind of people who praise Blood Meridian.
Orwell84@LiveNotByLies1

@JesseKellyDC Matt Walsh was just praising the writing and prose of this book on his podcast. I was entertaining reading it.

English
99
15
765
138.7K
Skeptical
Skeptical@SkepticalShash·
@ggreenwald Bingo! This one statement perfectly captures the conundrum of present day politics.
English
0
0
0
47
Glenn Greenwald
Glenn Greenwald@ggreenwald·
If Biden or Kamala had won, and started a serious war with Iran, and asked Congress for $200 billion in the first 3 weeks, every single MAGA influencer would be calling them warmongers and demanding impeachment. Neocons would be happy, but the MAGA influencers would be enraged.
Cenk Uygur@cenkuygur

You should be absolutely furious about this $200 billion ask for the war. I guarantee you if you asked for $200 billion in health care or food for American people, you'd be laughed out of Congress. There's no money for that! But as soon as Israel asks, it'll fly through Congress.

English
364
1.1K
7.8K
221.6K
Skeptical
Skeptical@SkepticalShash·
@Microinteracti1 Formation of new or “baby planets”. I’m tired of hearing how theoretical, complex mathematical concepts “almost” always fit the “black hole” equation but not quite exactly.
English
0
0
0
30
Gandalv
Gandalv@Microinteracti1·
The James Webb Space Telescope has a problem. A beautiful, maddening, keeps-you-up-at-night kind of problem. Scattered across nearly every deep image it captures are roughly 1,000 tiny red specks. They date from the universe’s first billion years. They are compact, they are bright, and after three years of serious scientific argument, nobody can agree what they actually are. Three camps have formed. The first says the dots are supermassive black holes wrapped in thick shrouds of dust, feeding voraciously in the infant cosmos. The second argues they are ancient stars in the final act of collapse. The third proposes something even stranger: direct-collapse black holes, objects that skipped the star stage entirely and simply fell straight into darkness. All three theories have problems. None fits the data cleanly. So the proposals keep coming. Dozens of them, queued up for Webb’s next observation cycle. Radio telescopes may eventually settle the argument, offering a signal that cuts through the dust and ambiguity alike. For now, the dots just sit there. Small, red, and completely unbothered by our confusion.​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​ What do you think this means? Stay connected, Follow Gandalv @Microinteracti1
English
147
127
1.1K
193.9K
Anti Left Memes
Anti Left Memes@AntiLeftMemes·
Joe Biden is writing a Presidential memoir book. What should it be named?
Anti Left Memes tweet media
English
5.3K
141
756
97.1K
David Frum
David Frum@davidfrum·
If you wonder why Europeans flinch from helping US in Gulf - in January, NATO allies were seriously preparing for a US sneak attack on Greenland, planning to blow up runways to prevent a Trump re-enactment of Putin's failed strike on Kyiv.
Orla Joelsen@OJoelsen

Denmark prepared for a possible U.S. attack: Flew blood supplies to Greenland and planned to blow up runways Key sources in Denmark and Europe are now revealing for the first time what happened during the most critical days, when Donald Trump threatened to take Greenland “the hard way.” When Danish soldiers were rapidly deployed to Greenland in January this year, they brought explosives with them. The plan was to destroy runways in Nuuk and Kangerlussuaq to prevent American military aircraft from landing troops on the island, should the U.S. president ultimately decide to seize Greenland by force. They also transported blood supplies from Danish blood banks so wounded personnel could be treated in case of combat. This is reported by DR, which over the past year has spoken with central sources in the Danish government, top military officers, and high-ranking officials and intelligence sources in Denmark, France, and Germany. All sources have played—and continue to play—key roles in the international crisis triggered by the United States’ demand for control over Greenland. Together, the sources describe an unprecedented year marked by sleepless nights. None of them had concrete intelligence of specific American attack plans against Greenland. Still, many feared in January that the historically important ally, the United States, could attack at any moment. At the same time, Denmark reached out to its European allies, leading to closer cooperation. “With the Greenland crisis, Europe realized once and for all that we must be able to handle our own security,” said a French senior official involved in the intense period. A rapid-response force consisting of Danish, French, German, Norwegian, and Swedish soldiers was first deployed to Nuuk and Kangerlussuaq. Shortly after, a main force followed, including: -Soldiers from the Danish Dragoon Regiment in Holstebro -Elite troops from the Jaeger Corps -French alpine troops trained for cold and mountainous warfare At the same time, Danish fighter jets and a French naval vessel were sent to the North Atlantic. According to several sources, the goal of having multinational troops on the ground was to ensure that any U.S. attempt to take Greenland would require a large-scale hostile action—thereby deterring such an attempt. “We have not been in such a situation since April 1940,” said a Danish defense source, referring to the days before Denmark’s occupation during World War II. Unlike in 1940, when Denmark chose not to resist militarily, the government and defense leadership this time decided—after extensive confidential discussions—to take the opposite approach: If the U.S. attempted an attack, Danish forces would be armed and ready to fight. Danish F-35 fighter jets deployed north were also fully armed. All this despite the understanding that Denmark could not realistically withstand a U.S. military attack. “The cost for the U.S. had to be raised. The U.S. would have to carry out a hostile act to take Greenland,” said a senior Danish defense source. Source: DR

English
529
2K
8.1K
511.4K
Skeptical
Skeptical@SkepticalShash·
@tedlieu Here we go / interchangeable terminology. So Ted - what is the difference between “manufacturing jobs” you may possibly be referring to and made in America manufacturing jobs?
English
0
0
0
49
Rushi
Rushi@rushicrypto·
If the last one was named “The Great” Depression, what’s this one going to be called?
English
5.3K
828
13.8K
471.5K
Skeptical
Skeptical@SkepticalShash·
@andreas_krieg I guess you’d have to have a PhD to do that nowadays.
English
0
0
0
69
Dr Andreas Krieg
Dr Andreas Krieg@andreas_krieg·
Never in history have people less qualified had more destructive power
Dr Andreas Krieg tweet media
English
689
2.6K
15.2K
241.7K
Skeptical
Skeptical@SkepticalShash·
@TheEconomist ??? So essentially “The Economist” editorial board doesn’t agree with the current administration’s foreign policy. Not news but possibly biased opinion. Did I get that right?
English
0
0
0
157
The Economist
The Economist@TheEconomist·
The reckless campaign against Iran will weaken America’s president. That will make him angry. Be warned: he makes a very bad loser econ.st/4lA7lEQ
The Economist tweet media
English
1.8K
14.7K
40.9K
2.1M
Skeptical ری ٹویٹ کیا
Jonathan Turley
Jonathan Turley@JonathanTurley·
...As I previously wrote, this is how unions are destroying public education and why voucher programs are increasingly popular to give families a choice. jonathanturley.org/2023/01/31/cap…
English
10
58
367
12.3K