Smokin'

798 posts

Smokin' banner
Smokin'

Smokin'

@SmokinFrazier

شامل ہوئے Nisan 2010
236 فالونگ23 فالوورز
Smokin'
Smokin'@SmokinFrazier·
@SophieJovi 100%. Liverpool have been good against City, Arsenal, Inter, Atletico etc this season. There's been plenty of frustration absolutely, but it's not like they're a million miles away. The first team isn't better than 4th and the squad arguably isn't top 6. That's the real issue.
English
2
0
4
109
Smokin'
Smokin'@SmokinFrazier·
@PhilipProudfoot Your argument assumes that the only expenditure for a business is controllable, ie stock, wages etc. It isn't. The external factors, the government's responsibility, are making it harder than ever to survive. Look at town centres and imagine the challenge faced by independents.
English
0
0
0
3
Smokin'
Smokin'@SmokinFrazier·
@PhilipProudfoot You can't assume that a failing business isn't viable. Many of the businesses that fail do so because of high taxation and business rates. If the government raised VAT tomorrow, many businesses would go under, not because they're not viable but because it's too expensive.
English
2
0
0
67
Smokin'
Smokin'@SmokinFrazier·
@SkyNews Very sad news. If people are fleeing persecution, they should not be skipping safe countries. It's an unnecessary, dangerous risk that's costing lives. The sooner it's international law that you must go to the nearest safe country, the more lives will be saved.
English
0
0
0
415
Smokin'
Smokin'@SmokinFrazier·
@ClarkeMicah Cannabis use may be linked to crime but the user still has to be radicalised by something in order to turn to extreme violence. That can be right wing, eco terrorism etc. but there is a very worrying amount of people committing violence who think the Quran rewards those acts.
English
0
0
0
243
Smokin'
Smokin'@SmokinFrazier·
@aarthmm @PeterMcCormack It should be easier and more simplistic to run a chain than it is to run an independent business. It should be independent businesses that find it easier to pay a proper wage because of the smaller overheads, no HR departments and so on.
English
0
0
0
31
Aart
Aart@aarthmm·
@PeterMcCormack If the business isn’t viable it closes. If this leads to problems it’s probably time to re-evaluate the rules. If a chain can give an employee a fair wage, and the independent kan not, then people are better off working for a chain
English
11
0
0
19.9K
Peter McCormack 🏴‍☠️🇬🇧🇮🇪
This argument would only have the mildest credibility if the minimum wage was the only thing the state mandated. In a world of rising taxes, regulation, inflation and energy costs, which are all the fault of the state, only a dummy blames the business owner.
Jon Thompson@JohnnyFocal

@1ohreally No — I’m saying if a business can’t survive paying basic wages, it’s not a viable model. That’s a management problem, not a policy problem.

English
28
18
331
14.5K
Smokin'
Smokin'@SmokinFrazier·
@OneSGW It's funny that when an injury crisis is mild, injuries are a valid excuse - Arteta and Guardiola, for example - but when it's severe, it's the manager at fault - Slot and Frank, for example. You think it'd be the other way around.
English
0
0
0
57
SAM G-W
SAM G-W@OneSGW·
Be a rough game later. First choice front 3 out, third choice keeper and we haven’t pulled up trees this year anyway! Ffs Anyone who still tried to say this season hasn’t been a mess is just lying to themselves at this point!
English
14
2
15
1.3K
Smokin'
Smokin'@SmokinFrazier·
@cezthesocialist So if the government increased VAT to 30% tomorrow, a decision that'd lose millions of jobs, would that also mean that those businesses were not viable? You don't seem to understand that it's hard to run a business because of the government.
English
0
0
0
75
cez
cez@cezthesocialist·
Your employees’ living costs are a business cost. If you can’t afford them, your business is unviable and should not exist.
English
201
82
646
13.1K
Smokin'
Smokin'@SmokinFrazier·
@IanJon407 @cezthesocialist The criminality in those towns makes it almost impossible to run a successful hospitality business. How can anyone run a nice business, when the customers have to be around antisocial behaviour? You can't sell cafe culture, when towns are full of balaclava clad, menacing thugs.
English
1
0
1
8
cez
cez@cezthesocialist·
We’re not upset by that at all, we simply don’t care about your business. You’re the one throwing a multiple day tantrum over the idea that your failed business, which doesn’t even provide anything people need, shouldn’t be propped up with our money so you can keep profiting.
Peter McCormack 🏴‍☠️🇬🇧🇮🇪@PeterMcCormack

A simple message to the silly socialists. You’re upset by businesses telling you that they will fail with the minimum wage increase. You’re telling business owners silly things like if you can’t pay the minimum wage then you don’t have a viable business. I want to make this easier to understand, because if you mean what you say, you want people to have jobs and earn a liveable wage. So listen, businesses fail for all kinds of reasons, mainly because they are unprofitable. We are seeing a wave of business closures at the moment because of the compounding costs from the state against a cost of living crisis. To make a cup of coffee profitable it has to eat a lot costs: - 20% VAT (the inputs can’t be claimed back) - Business rates (a tax before you earn) - Rising NI costs - Employment rights load - Rising energy costs - Inflation All these are imposed by the state. There is also a time tax with all the accounting, HR and regularity requirements which impose cost of consultants and time costs to ensure compliance, distracting owners from operating their businesses. Then there are the other normal costs. A business owner needs to make a profit else the business fails. If the business fails there are less jobs and lower tax receipts. If there are less jobs then public services crumble and welfare requirements increase. This is a compounding problem and what leads to the downward spiral of a country. So… where does the money come from if there are less jobs. The government borrows it, that increase in the money supply drives more inflation, making life more expensive for the people you want to help. Some who now don’t have the job they once had. So what now? What is your plan? I get it, you don’t really have one, this is what has happened to every socialist state, this is how a country goes from rich to poor. We have no divine right to be a wealthy nation and can certainly lose that status. So this is your challenge, can you accept society has a distribution of wealth which means there are rich and poor or would you rather everyone was poorer as long as there are no rich. That’s what socialists tend to want, though I have a secret for you, you can’t get rid of people being rich. I know you think profit is ugly, but the profit motive is what creates business and jobs. So anyway. I’m going to keep promoting proper economics because that’s how a nation becomes prosperous and prosperity leads to a net better outcome for all. This does mean I am going to have to make fun of your stupid socialist ideas. Good luck, read a book and stop being a dumb dumb.

English
79
40
549
11.4K
Smokin'
Smokin'@SmokinFrazier·
@PeterMcCormack The socialist dilemma is that they think government should be responsible for everything, but want it accountable for nothing. If you're defending high taxation, business rates etc, then you need to defend the inability to increase footfall, reduce inflation, reduce crime etc
English
0
0
3
174
Peter McCormack 🏴‍☠️🇬🇧🇮🇪
A simple message to the silly socialists. You’re upset by businesses telling you that they will fail with the minimum wage increase. You’re telling business owners silly things like if you can’t pay the minimum wage then you don’t have a viable business. I want to make this easier to understand, because if you mean what you say, you want people to have jobs and earn a liveable wage. So listen, businesses fail for all kinds of reasons, mainly because they are unprofitable. We are seeing a wave of business closures at the moment because of the compounding costs from the state against a cost of living crisis. To make a cup of coffee profitable it has to eat a lot costs: - 20% VAT (the inputs can’t be claimed back) - Business rates (a tax before you earn) - Rising NI costs - Employment rights load - Rising energy costs - Inflation All these are imposed by the state. There is also a time tax with all the accounting, HR and regularity requirements which impose cost of consultants and time costs to ensure compliance, distracting owners from operating their businesses. Then there are the other normal costs. A business owner needs to make a profit else the business fails. If the business fails there are less jobs and lower tax receipts. If there are less jobs then public services crumble and welfare requirements increase. This is a compounding problem and what leads to the downward spiral of a country. So… where does the money come from if there are less jobs. The government borrows it, that increase in the money supply drives more inflation, making life more expensive for the people you want to help. Some who now don’t have the job they once had. So what now? What is your plan? I get it, you don’t really have one, this is what has happened to every socialist state, this is how a country goes from rich to poor. We have no divine right to be a wealthy nation and can certainly lose that status. So this is your challenge, can you accept society has a distribution of wealth which means there are rich and poor or would you rather everyone was poorer as long as there are no rich. That’s what socialists tend to want, though I have a secret for you, you can’t get rid of people being rich. I know you think profit is ugly, but the profit motive is what creates business and jobs. So anyway. I’m going to keep promoting proper economics because that’s how a nation becomes prosperous and prosperity leads to a net better outcome for all. This does mean I am going to have to make fun of your stupid socialist ideas. Good luck, read a book and stop being a dumb dumb.
English
366
445
2.5K
151.1K
Smokin'
Smokin'@SmokinFrazier·
@owenjonesjourno It's a political cartoon. Every single British politician gets their features exaggerated by the press, whether it's Boris's hair, Major's glasses, Sunak's ears or whatever. This is pathetic. Especially coming from a grifter who seeks profit from peddling Jewish hate.
English
0
0
3
495
Owen Jones
Owen Jones@owenjonesjourno·
An obvious antisemitic caricature of Zack Polanski in The Times. But there will be no media or political outrage, which tells you all you need to know.
Owen Jones tweet media
English
1.3K
1.3K
6.3K
462.5K
Smokin'
Smokin'@SmokinFrazier·
@Gandalf_LFC Chiesa is celebrating and Ngumoha looks miserable. I presume this means that Liverpool should sell Ngumoha and start Chiesa all next season? Grow up. This is utterly bizarre.
English
0
0
1
103
Gandalf_the_Red
Gandalf_the_Red@Gandalf_LFC·
This is how Chiesa celebrated Liverpool goals despite the fact that he was never given many opportunities himself. The current manager has treated a lot of people like crap. We will remember it in the final reckoning.
Gandalf_the_Red tweet media
English
21
59
433
9.3K
Smokin'
Smokin'@SmokinFrazier·
@GoodwinMJ You're 100% right. A 'severe' level of threat should warrant a noticeable change. There isn't, nor has there ever been, so it's just words. Likewise, the words to Jews, who are rightly fearful, are meaningless when the government continues to oversee this failing experiment.
English
0
0
0
134
Matt Goodwin
Matt Goodwin@GoodwinMJ·
A thought experiment. The UK's terror threat level has just been lifted to "severe". After yet another hideous terror attack on British Jews. Which leads me to ask: What would a nation that was serious about dealing with a “severe” terror threat do? Would it run a policy of open borders, allowing 200,000 unvetted illegal migrants to stream across its border at will? Would it allow this while KNOWING the migrants have included known terrorists, murderers, & rapists? Would it then put these young, unvetted, fighting-age Muslim men in the very heart of its communities - next to schools & synagogues? Would it refuse to ban the Iranian Revolutionary Guards, the Muslim Brotherhood, or kick out Iranian officials who call for violence on its streets? Would it allow convicted Islamist terrorists - such as the would-be London Stock Exchange bomber from Bangladesh - to STAY in its country? Would it allow an army of left-wing activist lawyers to use the European Convention on Human Rights to keep foreign criminals and terror suspects in its country? Would it allow dozens of pro-Iran associations to flourish on its own university campuses? Would it allow terrorist sympathisers & anti-Semites to march on the streets of its own capital city week after week? Would it be led by a political class that is so cowardly it cannot even bring itself to say: “Islamism”? Would it insist on the myth that all threats are equal despite knowing that Islamism is responsible for 94% of terror-related deaths and three quarters of all police work linked to terrorism? Would it allow parallel Sharia courts, cousin marriage, and illegal ‘family voting’ to become a feature of its national life? Would it work to shut down any criticism of Islamism by imposing a definition of ‘anti-Muslim hostility’ on public institutions and calling for politicians who do voice these concerns to be ‘sacked’? And would it shut down any attempt to have a serious conversation about all this by denouncing those who raise it as ‘far right’, ‘hateful’, and insisting on platitudes like ‘diversity is our strength’? I wonder. Would a serious nation do all these things? Because that’s what the United Kingdom is currently doing.
English
187
1.3K
3.9K
60.4K
Smokin'
Smokin'@SmokinFrazier·
@MadelaineLucyH The left may condemn rapists after committing a rape, but the right are correct in pointing to statistical data and argue that we shouldn't let people into the country who carry a threat of violence with them. Prevent crimes, it means nothing to be outraged after the fact.
English
0
0
0
45
Madelaine Hanson
Madelaine Hanson@MadelaineLucyH·
Absolutely no one on the left gives a fuck about you wanting immigrants who are rapists and pedophiles deported. We all do. There is not a single left wing person who doesn’t support that. What we are criticising is your unhinged racist (and wrong) narrative that immigrants are dangerous and evil. You sound thick as mince when you start shouting about “Them wokes want raypists in ar cuntry”
English
95
51
465
16.4K
Smokin'
Smokin'@SmokinFrazier·
@SophieJovi If he's this good now, he will only get better by the time he's 26/27. If his progress is typical, he could be genuinely world class by then, like a Xabi Alonso. It's all hypothetical but it's exciting to think about. Liverpool are building a good young core.
English
0
0
0
62
Smokin'
Smokin'@SmokinFrazier·
@SophieJovi Wharton would definitely be an improvement. I see some of the criticism of him, but what I'd argue is that most players in that role get better with age. Normally because they drop deeper, like Pirlo or Scholes. Getting such a good, young playmaker would be really exciting.
English
1
0
0
20
Smokin'
Smokin'@SmokinFrazier·
@beesley_cathy But I'd rather a scenario with low taxes, low red tape and safe high streets. If the government could create that, there'd be no need for UC and business owners would be forced into offering £15 an hour because the climate would be so competitive.
English
0
0
0
2
Smokin'
Smokin'@SmokinFrazier·
@beesley_cathy The choices made by the government are why it's so hard to run businesses. They don't offer UC for charity, it's them trying to heal the damage they've caused and without it, hundreds of thousands would be unemployed overnight.
English
1
0
0
3
Cathy Beesley
Cathy Beesley@beesley_cathy·
Peter does not live on the minimum wage. He relies on Universal Credit to top up his workers’ wages to a survivable level so he is nicely off. We pay for people like Peter to run businesses while paying starvation wages.
Peter McCormack 🏴‍☠️🇬🇧🇮🇪@PeterMcCormack

A minimum wage of £15 would end my coffee shop, it would have to close, as would many other businesses. I’ll explain for the economically illiterate. Staff costs are currently half our costs, a £15 minimum wage is actually more than £15 an hour for the company, because you have to add: - 12.07% holiday - Sick pay - Maternity pay if and when required - National insurance - Pension contributions These costs would mean the shop loses money because remember, energy costs are up, rates are up, regulations are up. Now you can pass these costs onto the consumer - that would mean charging a lot more for coffee, people won’t pay it. The likes of Starbucks and Costa can, because they have economies of scale. The independent doesn’t. Now the little socialist will say well this is your fault, if you can’t run a business that can afford to pay its staff properly, but the little socialist has never run a business and does not understand the dynamics. Now I could pay some staff off and fill those hours myself or reduce us to one staff member during certain periods - but this proves the point that a minimum wage costs jobs. There was a time when these jobs were done by kids, perhaps on the weekend, paid a lower wage, no holiday and no silly employment rights. Perhaps they were even paid cash. The dynamic worked and small businesses like this could operate. It was also a great first job. Sadly now it isn’t worth employing entitlement youngsters at this level of pay. So alas, I don’t need the stress, the business would close, a number of jobs would be lost. Economics is about understanding these dynamics, no vibes. The cost of living is not solved through passing on inflation to the business, it is solved by ending high inflation and creating prosperity. This is what socialists don’t understand, they can’t create prosperity, they can only destroy it.

English
560
415
3.5K
152.1K