Scientia Verus

2.8K posts

Scientia Verus banner
Scientia Verus

Scientia Verus

@TrueScience6

Husband (29yrs), father of daughters, Catholic, electrical engineer. I detest propaganda disguised as science or truth. No DMs.

شامل ہوئے Eylül 2019
316 فالونگ328 فالوورز
Scientia Verus
Scientia Verus@TrueScience6·
@RyanMaue Thank you. This is a brilliant thread. It amazes me how successful they were at infiltrating nearly every respected scientific organization. It’s equally amazing how they’ve destroyed their scientific credibility (eg: Scientific American, The Royal Society)
English
0
0
1
4
Ryan Maue
Ryan Maue@RyanMaue·
"Yes — the same network of population control advocates (Paul Ehrlich, John Holdren, and their circle, amplified by the Club of Rome and figures like Margaret Mead) effectively launched the organized alarmist phase of modern climate change advocacy in the mid-1970s." Really?
English
5
39
189
63.5K
Scientia Verus
Scientia Verus@TrueScience6·
@MotherJones It’s called the Save Act and it’s supported by 80% of US citizens because it increases election integrity.
English
0
0
1
10
Scientia Verus
Scientia Verus@TrueScience6·
Who are you going to believe, the thousands of independent journalist running to the story or the Main Stream Media organizations manufacturing a story and telling you it’s important?
English
0
0
0
4
Scientia Verus
Scientia Verus@TrueScience6·
@sciam I think a better poll would be… Who do you trust trust the most with your children’s healthcare? 1) American Academy of Pediatrics 2) CDC 3) Neither You know what the results would be and it wouldn’t surprise anyone. Try it if you want the truth.
English
0
0
1
28
Scientific American
One in three Americans trust childhood vaccine guidance from the American Academy of Pediatrics more than the CDC’s recommendations, a new poll finds spklr.io/6010EHiV0
English
3
5
12
5.8K
PeterSweden
PeterSweden@PeterSweden7·
Question. What was it that made you realize the mainstream media wasn't telling you the truth? What was the turning point?
English
2.2K
190
1.7K
80.6K
iQwatson
iQwatson@iQwatson·
“Is your life that terrible that you need to sleep in the car?” Not my life, it’s my marriage. My life is the prisoner and YOU are the prison warden This is the PUREST reality of married men. Hi Njugush 👋
English
4
24
102
6.2K
Elisabeth Bik
Elisabeth Bik@MicrobiomDigest·
@DrJackKruse Are you accusing us of being criminals, Dr. Kruse? What is our crime?
English
4
2
56
15.5K
☣️ Pleb Kruse = BTC foundationalist in exile 🟩🔆
Holden Thorp has for years been a major amplifier of the abuse, harassment, smearing, and defamation campaigns, and scientific fraud of the PubPeer “PubSmear” Network Mob all at once. Savages know your enemies in centralized science. Holden Thorp gives sanctuary to criminals Elisabeth Bik, Lonni Besançon, Alexander Magazinov @Spottingthespot, Kevin Patrick Cheshire; @Thatsregrettab1, and David Sanders. Sanders thinks were are sleeping because he tagged Mircea Ivan @OxygenIvan. We know Thorp and Ivan protects the criminals. OUT THESE BASTARDS in your network. GIVE THEM ALL NO QUARTER. Make their lives miserable.
ScienceGuardians@SciGuardians

🚨 Holden Thorp, Editor-in-Chief of @ScienceMagazine, boasts about it being a 'non-profit journal.' Facts: Its parent org, @aaas, pulled in $129M revenue in 2024 (mostly publishing fees/subs/ads) and holds ~$127M in total assets. Non-profits can amass fortunes (reinvested, not to shareholders), but is this truly non-profit or tax-exempt empire-building? Much more exposed in this 4:27 minute clip. 🧵 Read the attached thread on the Holden Thorp Puzzle, which exposes his enabling of smearing campaigns against high-profile members of the academic community.

English
5
14
60
20.8K
Scientia Verus
Scientia Verus@TrueScience6·
@therobdale @ChrisMartzWX That’s is true because 1) It’s an echo chamber 2) It doesn’t have the volume 3) It doesn’t have diversity of thought I personally like BlueSky and I’ve had some reasonable debates there. But for the most part, it really is an echo chamber full of unchallenged clichés.
English
1
0
0
37
Mark Twain
Mark Twain@OurRepublic12·
@TrueScience6 @MotherJones Literally no. The federal government should not run elections. That's exactly how you create corruption and fraud.
English
1
0
0
9
Defiant L’s
Defiant L’s@DefiantLs·
Lawrence O'Donnell: "We have a president who is a joke."
English
129
5
46
23.2K
Mark Twain
Mark Twain@OurRepublic12·
@TrueScience6 @MotherJones 2. The system is run by Republicans, you dumb fuck. 3. Literally turning state information over to the feds used to infuriate Republicans. What happened to you?
English
1
0
0
14
Katie Daviscourt 📸
Katie Daviscourt 📸@KatieDaviscourt·
I love being in the middle of nowhere surrounded by no one. Peak bliss.
English
59
16
760
20.9K
Scientia Verus
Scientia Verus@TrueScience6·
@OurRepublic12 @MotherJones You’re such an angry little man. 1) It shouldn’t count every one. 2) I don’t trust any system run by democrats. 3) Yes, it’s a law that’s easy to break. See 2. Turn in your voter rolls and pass voter id. Then I’ll trust you.
English
1
0
0
17
Mark Twain
Mark Twain@OurRepublic12·
@TrueScience6 @MotherJones 1. The census counts everyone, you dumb fuck. 2. You don't believe the current system but somehow you would magically believe a different system run entirely by the federal government. How does that work? 3. ALREADY LAW that only US citizens can vote in federal elections.
English
1
0
0
7
Scientia Verus
Scientia Verus@TrueScience6·
Here's how it works. I don't believe in the astronomically low fraud statistic. The only way to strengthen election integrity and ensure people believe in election results is by ensuring that only U.S. citizens can register to vote in federal elections and prove it by selected forms of identification. Both Democrat and Republican voters strongly agree. In addition to the Presidential election, states like California count illegals in their census which has an electoral impact both in the presidential election and the House of Representatives. Illegals comprise about 6% of California's census population which add up to 3 electoral votes and Congressmen. So, when I said I don't care, I misspoke. I should have said I don't believe you. I don't believe your stats. If you want me to believe your stats, then join the 80% and demand that only US citizens can vote in Federal Elections and can be counted on census reports. Otherwise, I will firmly believe you are trying to steal elections and... and it is you that doesn't care.
English
1
0
0
7