Marshall

Silencing the Truth Through Rape With the antics of fake Sikh provocateurs and other Indian agents gaining international attention, it is time once again to try to remind people just how dangerous and psychopathic Hindu nationalists and their agents are. No person or group matters or is safe when it comes to this ideology, including Hindus and even other Hindu nationalists. This group MAY act like they are allies of another group, but they want all groups save their own eliminated or subservient. It is an ideology even worse than Nazism. sikhphilosophy.net/threads/silenc…

@BCCuda NDP will win again if anyone but Milobar leads the Conservatives. The social conservatives showed everyone they are incapable of governing even themselves almost immediately after the election, fracturing and then fracturing again. It has been absolutely embarrassing.

💥💥💥 Peter Milobar💥💥💥 Not a Conservative. He is a BC Liberal politician wearing a Conservative label. He did not build his career in the Conservative movement. He did not fight for Conservative principles. He did not stand with Conservatives when it mattered. As late as June 2024, he said he was “100% committed” to BC United/Liberal and staying for “values and integrity.” Then Kevin Falcon shut the party down, and within months Milobar rebranded himself as a Conservative. That is not conviction. That is convenience. Look at the record: On social policy, Milobar supported SOGI 123 and has openly said his position has not changed. That is not aligned with where many Conservatives stand on parental rights and education. On DRIPA and UNDRIP, he remained aligned with the BC Liberal framework and even acknowledged disagreements with John Rustad, while stating clearly his views were not changing. On the Freedom Convoy and the broader mandate movement, he stood with the establishment narrative, not with the people pushing back against government overreach. On vaccine mandates, he was not leading when healthcare workers were being fired and livelihoods were on the line. Only later did he shift position once the political pressure changed. So what does he actually represent? Not social conservatism Not fiscal conservatism Not grassroots conservatism Not national conservatism His record reflects establishment politics, managed messaging, and top-down policy alignment Which is 100% what the people denied and what Conservatives Hate. This is not a Conservative transformation, This is a political transfer and A party is more than a logo, It is a set of principles which Peter Milobar doesn’t posses. If the principles did not change, then neither did the politician. So the real question is: If Peter Milobar were to become leader, who is actually leading the Conservative Party? And more importantly whose values would that party represent? #KELLYOBRIENS 5pm #HOFSTEDES 8am #FRIDAY #ASKHIM

@DimitrisSoudas He definitely worked some slogans in there. This discourse wasn't an interview, as that isn't what Rogan does and Poilievre led the discussion just as often. And it wasn't an election stunt.

Probably the strongest interview Pierre Poilievre has delivered since becoming Conservative leader. No slogans. Just normal. Good for Canada. Good for Poilievre. Perhaps it comes 14 months too late. Well done Mr. Poilievre. A full video analysis to follow in a few hours.

@MarcMillerVM A lifetime of small energy

Don’t have mine. Don’t need one on a range under supervision. I was a small arms instructor in the army, though, way back when.

You guys don't have a clue though, because you are stuck in permanent election mode. Lots of people in this country understood who Poilievre was speaking to on this podcast. Media class in this country whose names don't rhyme with "classy" need to step down and make room for real journalists.

Steve Paikin on Pierre Poilievre's Joe Rogan appearance: "I'm not sure how that broadens the base. I suspect that just reinforces the whole 'bro culture' thing that he has been accused of."

@vancolour Small podcast syndrome up in here.

Pierre Poilievre had a good, albeit forgettable, chat with Joe Rogan. They hit classic JRE tropes (combat sports, lifestyle optimization) but avoided anything controversial or even timely (Trump, the war). It won’t change minds. It wasn’t bad or ‘based’. It just won’t matter.

@captaindomi @TheFigen_ Gross, Rebecca was his mom. Leah was sent to Jacob's tent first, Leah and Rachel were sisters so they looked alike. Leah was obviously a lot more fun in bed since she had 10 sons to Rachel's 2. Jacob was a happy dude.

@TheFigen_ Do traditions like this still exist? Well, it happened in the Bible. Jacob was supposed to marry Rebecca, whom he loved, but he ended up marrying Leah. I am imagining his reaction the next morning, knowing Laban has deceived him.

Their family tradition not to see the bride's face until the wedding day. Here's the groom's reaction when he sees her for the first time at the altar. His face says wow.

You could not do an unscripted live conversation for half the time @PierrePoilievre just did. You are our PM and I remain optimistic that you can deliver for Canadians this year (if you don't in year 2, you are a fraud) but I do not think you can even touch what the Leader of the Loyal Opposition just did.

We’re putting nearly $200M toward critical infrastructure upgrades across Toronto, including public transit — improving the TTC for faster, more reliable commutes.

Easy fix. For politically based wealth like Bernie's, 65% tax on earnings including book deals and other assets gained through political connections. For privately earned wealth like Musk's, legislate 8 $100,000/year jobs created for every $1,000,000 in wealth earned after the first $5 million.

SEN. SANDERS: “60% of our people living paycheck-to-paycheck, and one guy, Elon Musk, owns more wealth than the bottom 53% of American households.” “Think maybe that might be an issue that we should be talking about?"

Easy. For politically based wealth like Bernie's, 65% tax on earnings including book deals and other assets gained through political connections. For privately earned wealth like Musk's, 8 $100,000/year jobs created for every $1,000,000 in wealth earned after the first $5 million.

Lots of people around the world think President Trump needs help with the Strait of Hormuz, and that is why he is asking. Those people need to go back to preschool for a bit, and consider this story: randschools.com/kindergarten/k…

@FoodProfessor @WayneSpenc94524 Looks like The Prof needs to go back to preschool for this one: "Who will help me bake this bread?" asked The Little Red Hen.

@WayneSpenc94524 So why is he asking?

He doesn’t need help FFS. He is trying to get NATO Members to pay their share. And since they don’t want to he is going 5o walk away and let them Defend themselves. And with all the Elbows up, anti gun, LGBTQIA’s military leaders defending Canada I don’t like our chances

Very few people in the political and media classes in Canada are on the side of Canada and Canadians. Kapelos shows once again she is one of those few. The RCMP brass, unfortunately, are not. This has been evident for a decade, across demographics in this country.

@t7_linda He led the last third of the discussion, even.

I’m not even a Joe Rogan fan tbh and I loved this interview. Poilievre was an interesting and charming guest who didn’t get pulled into any traps. He represented 🇨🇦 well with weapons down, hand extended. I hope JD Vance tunes in and stops shit talking us

@sarobertsonca David Koresh level stuff from these Muppets.

Foreign Affairs Minister Anita Anand: "Everywhere I go as Foreign Minister, every country, every room, every Foreign Minister I speak with, the conversation begins with Prime Minister Carney's speech at Davos."

@prairiecentrist He went on the podcast to promote Canada, and that was clear throughout. He's not in permanent election mode like you lot are.

listened to Joe Rogan for the first and second times on the Okanagan run today. Canadian media and the political class (which includes hostile Conservatives such as @jkenney ) are likely beside themselves that @PierrePoilievre was able to do an undiluted, neutral interview. He advocated well for Canada, well for the entire government (including the PM), and had Rogan pretty excited particularly for the last 30% of the discussion. It was great.

@SatlujAthabasca It's not an election, he isn't doing this for votes. It's to reach people who may have Trump's ear (opinion).

Pierre misses the point. He lost because he is too American in his thinking and in his outlook. Going on JRE is only going to alienate the kind of voter who hates people like Rogan and sees Carney are “more Canadian”

@GoldRivers1 @DwightSinghS @PierrePoilievre @joerogan @liberal_party Yeah that would be in line with what I think. No one saw Smart Trudeau coming.

@TruthWorksLoops @DwightSinghS @PierrePoilievre @joerogan @liberal_party I can't help but think they were so far ahead the PR team didn't want to risk anything and they got absolutely blind sided.

Whatever @PierrePoilievre has to say, the world's most successful media personality @joerogan is interested enough in hearing it that he offered Canada's Conservative leader a second opportunity to appear on his show. That has the @liberal_party machine as well as Canadian media worried. Some research on the matter strongly suggests Rogan's show does not pay people to appear, and people do not pay to appear on it. Nor does the Liberal Party of Canada have any sway on Rogan whatsoever - in fact Rogan boycotts the country due to Liberal policies. This has produced the typical petty potshots at the show from outlets such as @CBC and Liberal political operatives such as @msSharanKaur , attempting to discredit the podcast and its listeners by citing vague (and scarce) "controversies" over the 16 years Rogan has been podcasting. At least CBC makes clear that those controversies have largely centred on the short lived antics of characters such as Neil Young, himself little more than a Liberal propaganda piece. ca.news.yahoo.com/pierre-poiliev…

Canadian media would have taken a few seconds of a 3 hour conversation out of context and weaponized them in an election. Rogan obviously respects the reasons because he invited Poilievre back on his show which he sure didn't have to . Liberal hacks are spinning this as election stuff, but I believe @TheHillTimes managing editor @CharelleEvelyn was correct in her assessment that this is more about reaching President Trump's base for Canada rather than reaching a Canadian base for an election.

Poilievre finally had the balls to go on Rogan. Feels like this should’ve happened before the election. What do you guys think? Too little, too late?

Conservative accounts are super happy to have their "gotcha" moment, they were only off by $499,998,300, and that's only if you count all four purchases - 3 of them ($150 and under) may not count at all.