Mike Mcginley

1.6K posts

Mike Mcginley banner
Mike Mcginley

Mike Mcginley

@blockcounsel

#Bitcoin, Beef, BJJ, and the occasional practice of law

Raleigh, NC شامل ہوئے Ocak 2017
1.2K فالونگ292 فالوورز
Mike Mcginley
Mike Mcginley@blockcounsel·
@1mantisco @glennbeck *whose. And every foreign war/conflict/military action that Glenn has sold to his gullible boomer viewers for the last 25 years. Which is to say all of them.
English
0
0
0
6
Glenn Beck
Glenn Beck@glennbeck·
If this doesn't prove we should ABOLISH THE FED, I don't know what does. They told us they were draining money out of the system (meaning YOU would feel economic tightening, but in theory, it was necessary to force the economy to sober up before it's too late). But in reality, they were letting their elite friends and biggest investors continue to get stupid drunk off easy money. They got richer while you suffered, all while the Fed (remember, that's the 5 biggest banks, not the government) said it was correcting the economy. You lose. They win.
English
51
535
1.8K
48.4K
TheWeirdPatriot
TheWeirdPatriot@CHearSpeakNEvil·
Kurds were aligned with US troops. When Turkey attacked the Kurds repeatedly, Trump gave a call to Erdogãn. It stopped. The Kurds needs friends in M.E.. A new improved friendly Iran would be a big plus for the Kurds. Trump did say the Kurds got the guns, lots of them. It called plausible deniablity of regime change. My thought was the Kurds would deliver the guns to the Iranian people just at the right time.
English
1
0
1
36
Glenn Beck
Glenn Beck@glennbeck·
American protest groups may be ILLEGALLY colluding with Iranian state media to spread Iranian propaganda, @DataRepublican tells me: "The national coordinator of the United National Antiwar Coalition received 83 direct calls from [the U.S. sanctioned Iranian outlet] PressTV over a 29 month period... that's a sustained relationship. These are not 'booking calls.' The call spikes CONSISTENTLY proceed protest surges by about a month. You see a spike in PressTV outreach. And then a month later, you see a spike in Iran and Palastine-related street protests. Absolutely [this would be a FARA violation]. The NCRI asses with high confidence that some organizers are acting as foreign agents on behalf of the Iranian regime without appropriate registration under FARA."
English
193
2.4K
6.3K
128.4K
TFTC
TFTC@TFTC21·
Ben McKenzie went on Jon Stewart and said "half of the North Korean nuclear weapons program has been funded via crypto" like he just cracked the case. The U.S. dollar has funded every war, cartel, and arms deal for the last 80 years.
English
71
37
928
37.6K
1mantisco
1mantisco@1mantisco·
@blockcounsel @glennbeck You know what would be even better? If you could remove your head from your ass. That would be great
English
1
0
0
35
Glenn Beck
Glenn Beck@glennbeck·
I asked Torch Insiders if temporary gas prices are acceptable in the fight against Iran. Their response SHOCKED me. This is NOT what I've seen on social media. You can join the conversation and vote in the poll at GlennBeck.com/Torch
Glenn Beck tweet media
English
108
61
255
22.4K
Jacob Winograd
Jacob Winograd@BiblicalAnarchy·
This clip demonstrates why people like @benshapiro & @marklevinshow won't debate @ComicDaveSmith or @scotthortonshow They wouldn't be able to keep up, and would have to similarly deflect & make up lies to cover up their ignorance & blind allegiance to Israel
Jacob Winograd@BiblicalAnarchy

"What I believe is we don't launch wars of aggression... I'm defending the Just War Theory of Christianity" - @ComicDaveSmith dropped this banger after giving this fool a history lesson

English
20
42
403
17.8K
SP1776
SP1776@SP17761·
@blockcounsel @glennbeck Can you even read? That’s not what I said. When push comes to shove I’m trusting my government before I trust theirs.
English
1
0
0
41
Glenn Beck
Glenn Beck@glennbeck·
Yesterday, I got community noted for saying that I don't remember Lebanon being part of the ceasefire deal. The note stated that “the ceasefire as announced by the Prime Minister of Pakistan does explicitly include Lebanon." So, my team looked into this. What we found was concerning. Yes, Pakistan did say the deal included Lebanon and Israel. But the U.S. and Iran never mentioned either country in their deal announcements, only that the ceasefire would be in Iran, between the U.S. and Iran. Trump also said "everyone knows that" Lebanon wasn't included. Only after that did Iran publicly side with Pakistan about Lebanon. Israel never said it agreed to the deal, only that it "supports President Trump's" version, WITH its own addition that Lebanon wasn't included. That's 3 different versions of the deal. Which version did the U.S. and Iran agree to? Only the negotiators know for sure. So, why is @CommunityNotes taking the word of Pakistan and Iran over America?
English
1.4K
2.2K
14.2K
592.4K
SP1776
SP1776@SP17761·
@glennbeck The same reason people are choosing to believe “evidence” supplied from Iran, Gaza, etc. Their excuse is they don’t trust our government. I’ll trust the US government before I trust Iran’s, Gaza’s, Pakistan’s, etc.
English
1
1
5
356
Patriot Fox🦊
Patriot Fox🦊@Maryfox81011826·
@glennbeck Been listening to Glenn Beck for decades! The Hall of Fame broadcaster is NEVER wrong! People who have nothing better to do than bash people need to get a life! 🙏🙏❤️🇺🇸🧡🇮🇱
Patriot Fox🦊 tweet media
English
1
1
4
709
Oren Cass
Oren Cass@oren_cass·
I mostly avoid commenting on what President Trump says from day to day, while pulling no punches in my assessments, whether positive or negative, of his policy. His Iran ultimatums feel different. Making such threats is a policy. If he were to follow through on them, the consequences would be immediate, irreversible, and catastrophic on a world-historical scale. So while some will inevitably insist he should be “taken seriously rather than literally,” or that he is executing a sophisticated “madman” strategy in a complex game of 5-D chess, or that he needs everyone’s steadfast support to maximize his leverage, now rather than later seems the time to say that the actions that he is proposing would be a disaster for our country, both strategically and morally, which makes the remarks themselves a terrible mistake. Simply put, what’s the point of all this? If these are empty threats that we all know he will not carry out, then they are ineffective threats (the Iranians are on X too!), merely making the president and our nation look foolish. If they are not empty threats, then the president is asserting the American position that such actions are acceptable in this situation and ones we are willing to take. We are not living in some quantum thought experiment where he simultaneously is and is not serious. We cannot expect the Iranians, but only the Iranians, will believe him. Whether the threats are empty or not, we should be willing to say: This is wrong. We should not establish a pattern of threatening escalation from a blockaded strait to elimination of a civilization. We should not launch strikes intended to devastate the lives of millions of people and take our nation to total war without indisputable justification, or before the American people have deliberated upon and assented to the path with full understanding of what total war might mean for them. Those principles are vital to our Republic, independent of whether the strategy could “work.” But it’s also worth emphasizing that the strategy is a dead end. This war is actively weakening American power, increasing the danger to American citizens, and frustrating the president’s important efforts at addressing our many domestic challenges. It has closed a strait that was previously open, strengthened the incentive for other nations to pursue nuclear weapons, and in this most recent rhetoric made more plausible their use. Our choices for continuing the war appear to be catastrophic escalation of the air war or extensive deployment of ground troops, neither of which were planned or had support at the outset. Stepping back from these threats and admitting such actions do not offer a path to resolving the conflict may be unpalatable, but it is by far the least unpalatable option available. Let us all hope cooler heads prevail.
English
361
855
4.9K
1.4M
Mike Mcginley
Mike Mcginley@blockcounsel·
@glennbeck Send your kids, Glenn! Lead the way in supporting another war!
English
0
0
0
15
Glenn Beck
Glenn Beck@glennbeck·
There's only one thing that could actually stop us from beating Iran: the fracturing of the American people. I understand not wanting war. However, we're in one right now. So, I'd prefer to win. Sadly, it seems like a lot of Americans would rather Iran win. And some even seem to agree with the religious zealots in Iran who wake up every day and pray for the destruction of the West. This is LUNACY.
English
1.9K
820
4K
360.8K
Jeff Wayne
Jeff Wayne@SpartanJeff7777·
@oren_cass 47 years from Iranians of lies, nuclear bomb desires, and death to America. That’s why we are there. It ends today.
English
67
0
78
8.7K
Dale Stark
Dale Stark@DaleStarkA10·
@RepBrandonGill Someone once said no matter who you vote for you get John McCain. Seems relevant
English
7
26
756
8.7K
Congressman Brandon Gill
Congressman Brandon Gill@RepBrandonGill·
The Dignity Act is mass amnesty and would constitute a terrible betrayal of our voters.
English
1.5K
9K
48.4K
2.1M
Shawn Ryan
Shawn Ryan@ShawnRyan762·
A few weeks ago, he said he was going to liberate the Iranian people from an evil regime. Now he has changed his plan to kill them all. The President of the United States in a nutshell...
Shawn Ryan tweet media
English
5.4K
9K
56.6K
1.8M
GTMAX
GTMAX@H_Max_C·
@thepaulfries @ShawnRyan762 Paul How many deaths has the regime in Iran been responsible for since 1979 ? It’s over a million. October 7th ??? Nah they just talk …. Let them Have Nuclear Weapons??? Come on Paul.
English
6
0
4
338
Abdullah Omar🇵🇸
Abdullah Omar🇵🇸@Abdullah_Om3r03·
I feel depressed and suicidal today - if you see this please say hi it makes massive difference.💔😭
English
732
295
3.5K
65.8K
Mike Mcginley
Mike Mcginley@blockcounsel·
@craneInc2025 Who said anything about "mass arrests"? How about just 1 deep state arrest in 12-24 months?
English
0
0
1
5
rhonda crane
rhonda crane@craneInc2025·
I am not naive to believe that mass arrests were going to happen, omg it's taken years to become so corrupt. Anyone believe things can magically turn in 12 to 24 months is crazy. The MAGA is just getting started it will take years to come to a constitutional Republic. Thats why we MAGA can't give up!!
Mike Mcginley@blockcounsel

@craneInc2025 @Timcast What movement? The deep state arrests movement? The no new wars movement?

English
1
0
0
46