Fabi

Hopefully everyone can have the opportunity to build with AI. I just fear that the gap between those who embrace AI and those who don’t keeps increasing. AI is definitely an amplifier for one’s work - I just want it to be accessible to everyone. That being said: building doesn’t seem to be a problem anymore. Having ideas and being responsible will be a much bigger challenge.

excited for the future

@StormslayerDev I can see where he’s coming from but literally saying „Use our tools or else you’ll end up on the streets“ sounds more like self-marketing and a threat. AI shouldn’t divide people even more.

This is exactly why they're expected to lose $14B Humans don't use AI, they use tools. If AI lacks all the characteristics that define a tool humans WON'T use it. AI used to be a tool and it wasn't always bad, think of things like background and subject selecting. They help them complete the task while giving the user complete control. Get rid of the text prompt. LLMs are not for the workplace! Language is flawed by nature and terrible groundwork for precision and control. Go back to presets, dials and controls we expect in our tools. Photoshop made many things in the creation process painless and easy the difference is every tool is engineered for a human to direct precisely. Technology didn't ruin creativity, the loss of control did! Happy bankruptcy!

@trikcode AI can help you code better, but I still don’t think it’s that incredible by itself. The C-compiler Opus built (led by Anthropic – probably not a skill issue) is probably the worst piece of code I have ever seen. Helpful yes, but still struggles at difficult tasks.

If you think AI coding is bad in 2026, it’s 100% a skill issue. This shit is incredible.

@rezoundous As long as you keep having ideas, everything’s good. Nowadays, having original ideas is harder than actually putting them into code. It’s an incredibly valuable skill if you know how to use it.

Before AI, I had 5 incomplete projects because I had too many ideas. ​After AI, I have 20...

@DataChaz Even though Gemini gets a lot of hate here, it’s probably the best tool for learning something. Maybe not the best for coding, but for general university purposes, it’s unbeatable. I personally love it.

Holy sh*t. Gemini can now produce fully interactive images on any topic. Such an insane resource for learning → highlight any region, and it gives you a full explanation 🤯

@MrEwanMorrison Possibly, sadly many people believe it. I’m enthusiastic about AI, but I feel most people live in a kind of hysteria because of it. But maybe that’s just the tech community on X 🧐

@fabi_dev All talk of AGI is marketing

Researchers tested AI on remote freelance projects - the failure rate was 97%. The projects were game development, product design, architecture, data analysis & video animation. The models tested were Grok 4, Sonnet 4.5, GPT-5, ChatGPT agent, Manus & Gemini 2.5 Pro Article👇

Big Tech is spending $650 billion on AI infrastructure in 2026 - a 60% increase, more than Israel’s GDP. Meanwhile: Sam Altman admits AI diffusion is ‘slower than expected’ and 95% of enterprise AI projects fail to deliver ROI. $650B bet vs reality on the ground.

@The_GreatBonnie I personally use Claude Code and Antigravity. However, it‘s been really fun to code manually aswell recently. Does anyone else kinda miss it?

Popular vibe coding tools are: - Cursor - GitHub Copilot - Claude Code - Codex As a developer, which one do you use?

@sama Sounds like an exciting model. I’m usually critical with AI companies but both Opus and GPT seem like great improvements. And that all within 30 minutes

I love building with this model; it feels like more of a step forward than the benchmarks suggest. Also you can choose "pragmatic" or "friendly" for its personality; people have strong preferences one way or the other!

@sama Even better coding and faster? Might be worth switching to ChatGPT/Codex now. I‘m impressed

GPT-5.3-Codex is here! *Best coding performance (57% SWE-Bench Pro, 76% TerminalBench 2.0, 64% OSWorld). *Mid-task steerability and live updates during tasks. *Faster! Less than half the tokens of 5.2-Codex for same tasks, and >25% faster per token! *Good computer use.

@OpenAI They heard about Opus 4.6 and couldn’t wait beating their model within 30 minutes, crazy competition going on

GPT-5.3-Codex is now available in Codex. You can just build things. openai.com/index/introduc…

@cursor_ai Has anyone tested Opus yet? Seems promising but can it compete with the Codex models?

Opus 4.6 is now available in Cursor! It's highly effective at long-running tasks and reviewing code.

@claudeai @AnthropicAI That is amazing. Really can’t wait to test it out. Was expecting Sonnet but Opus isn’t bad either. Hope it lives up to the hype

Introducing Claude Opus 4.6. Our smartest model got an upgrade. Opus 4.6 plans more carefully, sustains agentic tasks for longer, operates reliably in massive codebases, and catches its own mistakes. It’s also our first Opus-class model with 1M token context in beta.

@googleaidevs @stspanho @pt_pavlo AR is just such a fascinating technology, don’t think it’s paid enough attention to. Imagine the things AR could do with AI in education or certain work areas. Much more than just playing with LEGO’s.

Build AR applications that recognize physical objects and provide real-time spatial guidance. @stspanho and @pt_pavlo used Gemini 2.5 Pro’s multimodal vision and sound effect prompting capabilities to create an immersive experience with LEGO Smart Bricks and Snap Spectacles.

@rodydavis @antigravity I‘ll make sure to give it another try soon. Been too attached to VS Code but started liking Cursor recently. You think Antigravity is better than Cursor? 🤔

@fabi_dev @antigravity You should give it another shot! It has been awesome seeing what the community has built with it and new workflows discovered

Easily add a color mode switch with a couple prompts. 🎨 Utilizing Gemini 3 Flash in Antigravity: It replaced hex strings, removed inline styles, implemented CSS custom properties, and added persistent dark/light mode to the website.

@jdpcasey @intentaurixyz @sama I totally get that, as stated above. It's a valid approach but my personal preference is not to get ads using AI. I'm not an economist, just speaking out of personal preferences.

@fabi_dev @intentaurixyz @sama So what business model do you propose to run a free AI platform for hundreds of millions of daily users?

First, the good part of the Anthropic ads: they are funny, and I laughed. But I wonder why Anthropic would go for something so clearly dishonest. Our most important principle for ads says that we won’t do exactly this; we would obviously never run ads in the way Anthropic depicts them. We are not stupid and we know our users would reject that. I guess it’s on brand for Anthropic doublespeak to use a deceptive ad to critique theoretical deceptive ads that aren’t real, but a Super Bowl ad is not where I would expect it. More importantly, we believe everyone deserves to use AI and are committed to free access, because we believe access creates agency. More Texans use ChatGPT for free than total people use Claude in the US, so we have a differently-shaped problem than they do. (If you want to pay for ChatGPT Plus or Pro, we don't show you ads.) Anthropic serves an expensive product to rich people. We are glad they do that and we are doing that too, but we also feel strongly that we need to bring AI to billions of people who can’t pay for subscriptions. Maybe even more importantly: Anthropic wants to control what people do with AI—they block companies they don't like from using their coding product (including us), they want to write the rules themselves for what people can and can't use AI for, and now they also want to tell other companies what their business models can be. We are committed to broad, democratic decision making in addition to access. We are also committed to building the most resilient ecosystem for advanced AI. We care a great deal about safe, broadly beneficial AGI, and we know the only way to get there is to work with the world to prepare. One authoritarian company won't get us there on their own, to say nothing of the other obvious risks. It is a dark path. As for our Super Bowl ad: it’s about builders, and how anyone can now build anything. We are enjoying watching so many people switch to Codex. There have now been 500,000 app downloads since launch on Monday, and we think builders are really going to love what’s coming in the next few weeks. I believe Codex is going to win. We will continue to work hard to make even more intelligence available for lower and lower prices to our users. This time belongs to the builders, not the people who want to control them.

Hope it's not too bad, but here is my first article. Tell me what you think.

Just like Sam said in his post. Not everyone can afford to do so or afford multiple subscriptions at once. Let me repeat: I completely understand from an economic perspective but as a consumer that can’t afford $500/month in AI subscriptions I don’t want to be forced to be advertised either. If Anthropic is for the rich (Sam Altman), then so is OpenAI

@fabi_dev @sama You don’t pay for ChatGPT?