itsbdell 🔎

1.5K posts

itsbdell 🔎 banner
itsbdell 🔎

itsbdell 🔎

@itsbdell

@LowesLabs 🛠️| https://t.co/jaXFf8IFsR 🧭 @ConsenSysMesh, @TachyonAccel, @qz

nyc شامل ہوئے Ekim 2008
1.2K فالونگ1K فالوورز
itsbdell 🔎
itsbdell 🔎@itsbdell·
@david__booth @bran_don_gell @levie I like AgentOps as a variant of @jasonnov’s BizOps definition: “Just as Product focuses on iteratively solving user problems, BizOps focuses on iteratively solving business problems. We help the entire organization understand, optimize, and accelerate the business.” (w/ agents)
itsbdell 🔎 tweet media
English
1
0
2
105
David Booth
David Booth@david__booth·
ok help me out here team. i want to talk to people who are this role at their company..👇👇 @levie's tweet has the cleanest definition, but i'm still struggling what to call it. what do you put in the JD? - "internal FDE, whose job it is to wire up internal systems and get agents working with them effectively." - @tkkong says "leverage engineering" - @EricFriedman says "outcome engineers" - have also seen "agent operator", "director of agents" i like "ops engineer" ? maybe it doesn't need a title, it's just "head of operations" and/or "bizops but good at AI stuff" ? DM me pls i / founders tag your "person" who is thinking about this stuff, i wanna chat to you about something 👀
Aaron Levie@levie

Starting to hire and retrain for new agent engineering roles for *internal* functions to help get more powerful agents working well on critical business processes. I expect this type of role to be a very big deal over time at Box and other companies. It looks something like an internal FDE, whose job it is to wire up internal systems and get agents working with them effectively. The person will be extremely technical and capable of building secure, governed agents for internal workflows that connect to business systems (like Box, Salesforce, Workday, etc.), and codify workflows in skills. In some cases this person may understand the business process well enough to do it fully, but in most cases I expect them to work with the business directly in an embedded fashion. Ironically, that may introduce another new role on the business side that is more akin to agent product management for internal processes. The key is that you need technical + process people that can span multiple teams or functions in an organization. It’s not about brining automation to a job, but bringing automation to a process. This is going to be a very big trend in most companies going forward. Fun to watch the early innings of what this will look like.

English
28
2
46
17.1K
Parv
Parv@ParvSondhi·
NYC observations after spending last week there • people are actually outside touching grass (or cement 😅) • very few AI ads or billboards around • even cafes i went to - very few screens with claude code or cursor or some coding tool • people are way more open to socializing. everyone is willing to strike up a conversation (not about AI agents) • the energy is electric - everyone’s moving with purpose. • found a way to talk to folks without mentioning AI • way more artists, and non traditional creators. Met an actual physical product designer which was cool. it’s genuinely refreshing to remember there’s a whole world outside the feed been traveling the last few days and the SF tech bubble makes it easy to forget how alive real cities feel. sorry SF, you’re still home… but perspective is healthy 🤷‍♂️
Parv tweet mediaParv tweet mediaParv tweet mediaParv tweet media
English
315
122
3.8K
4.3M
Nathan Baschez
Nathan Baschez@nbaschez·
Do you spend a lot of time reviewing markdown docs written by AI? Wish it were a better experience? Say hi if you wanna try a new (free, open source) thing
English
341
1
353
55.1K
itsbdell 🔎 ری ٹویٹ کیا
Tom Critchlow
Tom Critchlow@tomcritchlow·
I needed a place to learn about AI search. It didn't exist. So I'm building it.
Tom Critchlow tweet media
English
2
4
24
1.9K
Behzod
Behzod@beh_zod·
“I plan to lean into the Yet Another moniker and expand it into a full alphabet.” — me, in my 2021 annual review. Finally had a moment to build yetanother.com Excited to get more tiles on the board this year.
Behzod tweet media
English
1
0
9
489
Brie Wolfson
Brie Wolfson@zebriez·
Do I know any Australian’s with a nice voice? I have a project for you!
English
7
0
6
1.4K
Nikunj Kothari
Nikunj Kothari@nikunj·
Building an experimental new side project and need some beta testers with a specific criteria.. Parents with young kids looking to ACTIVELY buy a house in the US. Free to try right now, but will be paid given the sheer token costs 😅
English
8
2
23
5.1K
Paul Millerd
Paul Millerd@p_millerd·
What recent non fiction books do you actually recommend in public a lot? Not one that someone sent you but that you bought, read, finished and loved. A few I hear about a lot: tiny experiments and wanting What else?
English
51
0
54
16K
itsbdell 🔎 ری ٹویٹ کیا
Behzod
Behzod@beh_zod·
Somehow it's already been 11 months at the triangle factory. This is a reflection on my role(s) and why care, not process, is the real operating system companies need. behzod.com/blog/11-months…
English
1
5
18
7.7K
itsbdell 🔎 ری ٹویٹ کیا
Jason Novack
Jason Novack@jasonnov·
I built a game (the first?) that runs entirely inside Claude Code. It's called BURNRATE — a logistics MMO played from your terminal through MCP tools. You control zones, manage supply chains, and compete on a shared map. The twist: the game gives you minimal tooling on purpose. The competitive edge comes from how well you collaborate with Claude to build your own tools, agents, and automation. Right now everyone is figuring out how to work effectively with AI, mostly on their own. I think we'd learn faster by doing it together in the open. BURNRATE is a shared environment where we can experiment, share tools, and measure one approach against another. It's early and things will break, but the core loop works. If you use Claude Code and want to try it, just comment and I'll DM you the link.
English
2
1
3
196
itsbdell 🔎 ری ٹویٹ کیا
Willie
Willie@bigwilliestyle·
Skills are the new software
English
4
1
17
7.3K
Harry
Harry@FPL_Harry·
Anyone got any big GW22 questions still need answering? Or any benching dilemmas?
English
175
1
181
65.5K
jihad
jihad@jaesmail·
You might've noticed that the Native logo looks a bit different now. We worked with the man the myth @noorcarriveaux, who did a fantastic job, and the process gave me the opportunity to get back to the heart of what we're doing. The name "Native" came from a McLuhan-esque quote, "native to our built environments." The media and technology that surrounds us influences our goals, our morals, and our quality of life. Tech isn't neutral. It shapes what we want and who we become. We started Native because we think Silicon Valley culture is broken. The scene is a machine that builds more machines, not a philosophy that asks what's actually worth building. So we write and publish and convene interesting people about the ideas that we think should shape the future. And we work with founders who align with our philosophy, bring them into our idea space, help them write and think seriously about what they do, and help them become legible to believers of their own. The business of technology is the single most consequential way to change the world. We need to shift the culture of tech toward craft, intention, and conviction, and toward founders who have a vision for what the world should look like, not just what's fundable. Finding the right people is important, so we've started assembling a team of collaborators: @haroonisdreamin, @gentlycarved, @rsuyoy, @FatmaYasier, and all of the teams we've worked with over the last year. If you're a founder or writer who resonates, we'd love to chat.
jihad tweet mediajihad tweet media
English
7
6
58
6.4K
itsbdell 🔎 ری ٹویٹ کیا
jihad
jihad@jaesmail·
First essay of the year: Chasing Greatness Without realizing it at the time, I spent most of last year thinking about what it means to be great. Technologists have hijacked the language of greatness. We need more founders to take the pursuit of greatness seriously.
Native@nativestudio_

x.com/i/article/2008…

English
1
17
168
24.2K
itsbdell 🔎
itsbdell 🔎@itsbdell·
@geoffreylitt I’ve been paraphrasing ‘God creates; I assemble’ with Assembled by AI — captures the vouching without the ambiguity
English
0
0
5
158
Geoffrey Litt
Geoffrey Litt@geoffreylitt·
a few things going on here: - crucial to accept responsibility and not say "it's the AI's fault" if the work is bad - feels weird to overclaim credit if very little effort/time was personally invested - tempting to anthropomorphize the AI, but that can also feel weird
English
24
1
417
26.8K
Geoffrey Litt
Geoffrey Litt@geoffreylitt·
We need a shorthand way of saying: "An AI did the work, but I vouch for the result" Saying "I did it" feels slightly sketchy, but saying "Claude did it" feels like avoiding responsibility
English
1.1K
257
7.8K
543.8K
Alex Lieberman
Alex Lieberman@businessbarista·
I want to start a community dedicated to Claude Code. It’s become the gateway drug to coding and experiencing the power of AI for tons of people. This will be a space for people to share killer use cases, agentic workflows, proven prompts, and connect with other CC obsessives. Comment “Claude” if you want to join.
English
7.1K
208
6.3K
620.8K