JesseOwensGhost

@ryanswalters73 @JoeLbsTweet I get that you're stuck on the word opinion, but in the case of SCOTUS, "opinion" is legalese for "determination." Try to square what you're saying with the concept of 3 CO-EQUAL branches and get back to me.

Ok dude, let’s educate you. Read the first line of the Constitution, Article 1, Section 1: “All legislative Powers herein granted shall be vested in a Congress of the United States, which shall consist of a Senate and House of Representatives.” Court opinions are just that, opinions. They are not law. All lawmaking power rests with Congress. Congress also has vast authority over the federal judiciary. Don’t insult us when it’s you who lack basic civics and constitutional history.

Apparently, according to all the legal and historical experts here on X, our Constitution, specifically the 14th Amendment, provides that any foreigner who is 9 months pregnant can come to America and have the baby, who then becomes a US citizen with full rights and privileges, just like any of us who have been here for centuries. A thimble full of brains will render such thinking as utter madness! That was never the intention of the 14th Amendment, no matter what delusions leftists conjure up! If you think that was the intended policy, you are worthy of no intellectual respect whatsoever!

@gregkellyusa Woof. You should have that post framed so that in 30 uears, you can look at it and remember what a spineless, morally bankrupt coward you were.

Everybody CALM DOWN! So they shot one of our Planes Down. RELAX. This happens in EVERY WAR. The situation is “under control”—-one guy has already been Rescued. FAKE NEWS is treating this like it’s 9/11 and Hurricane Katrina all wrapped up into One. CHILL!

@raznet61 @ryanswalters73 @JoeLbsTweet I'm sorry your school system failed you. Ignoring a law doesn't make it not the law. Jackson is a terrible example to use for almost anything, especially given the reason he said "let them enforce it." Separation of powers does not include the executive branch ignoring the SC.

@jesse_ghost @ryanswalters73 @JoeLbsTweet Republicans (“the North”) ignored the Dred Scott opinion. Democrats (“the South”) supported the SCOTUS opinion. The Civil War followed. The term is “SCOTUS Opinion”. Read up on Andrew Jackson for the difference between opinion and execution. Basic separation of powers.

@SenMikeLee Timothy McVeigh was also a birthright citizen, you thumb.

Two birthright citizens, born to illegal immigrant parents from China, tried to bomb an Air Force base on American soil. Whoever they were “subject to the jurisdiction thereof,” it wasn’t the United States of America.

@AlanDersh It is when we're the ones who caused it to close.

The Straits of Hormuz Should Not Be a U.S. Problem open.substack.com/pub/dersh/p/th…

@1TreeInAForest @BasedMikeLee Except that there is no confusion, legally speaking. It has meant what we're saying it means the whole time, clarified multiple times by multiple Courts over 160ish years. There is no confusion, just racism-laced xenophobia.

What did "aliens" mean back then? Also, the confusion seems to stem from the commas between foreigners, aliens and then children of diplomats. Some folks seem to think that the sentence implies that foreigners and aliens are a simply two more ways to describe diplomats of other nations. IE the first two an alternative description of the third. Let's apply this to a directive about which food is being refrigerated. If it said, "this directive shall not apply to potatoes, rice, bananas" I would take that to mean I shouldn't refrigerate those three distinct things. The way other folks read @BasedMikeLee's screen shot essentially suggests the directive about refrigerated food considers rice and potatoes to be a kind of bananas. While it's true aliens, foreigners and diplomats are all people same as potatoes, rice and bananas are all food the are still separate and distinct categories of people and food. Claiming all foreigners and aliens are diplomats, as those in favor of birthright citizenship seem to say, is truly bananas!!!

The Fourteenth Amendment doesn’t say what the far left wishes it said Didn’t mean that then Still doesn’t mean that today

@Steve_Beans @BasedMikeLee I appreciate you photoshopping the orange dick out of his mouth. That would have been simply crude.

@BasedMikeLee Mike ready for battle to defend anything Trump says or does.

@BasedMikeLee No, it really does, as multiple Supreme Court cases, not to mention practical history, demonstrate.

@KLFisright @JackPosobiec Oh, yeah, sure, yall are famous for thinking for yourselves and having great discernment. That's why you elected 6x bankrupt convicted felon President, because of your prolific discernment skills.

Thanks for the tip. But, as a Constitutional Conservative American, we tend to use our critical thinking, reasoning, and discernment skills and not blindly follow talking points and ‘to do’ lists sent from headquarters. I will, however, happily celebrate a “No Kings” 250th anniversary celebration on July 4th, 2026. You know, when it’s actually meaningful. Best,

Well well well Notice that the liberal justices suddenly refer to unborn babies as people with full rights when the subject changes from abortion to immigration Like magic

@raznet61 @ryanswalters73 @JoeLbsTweet It was bad law, but law, nonetheless. And, certainly, SCOTUS can offer horrible judgements. Presidential immunity, for another example. But the remedy for bad law is new law, not ignoring the bad law.

@jesse_ghost @ryanswalters73 @JoeLbsTweet So, you believe the Dred Scott SCOTUS decision that proclaimed that black people were property was correct and is law? SCOTUS can be wrong too. We have 3 branches, not two under SCOTUS.

@oloshion @ElizLanders @PressSec Hrm. Has she surpassed Corey Lewandowski for that title?

@ElizLanders @PressSec Utter cunt. The Shame of New Hampshire.

At a Turning Point USA event at GW in DC tonight, @PressSec talks about how she started as an intern in the first Trump admin but then “unfortunately” Biden was “installed” as the President in 2021.

@KeyserSozeThree @ElizLanders @PressSec Just had this weird flash of college frat boys fapping to Leavitt's face taped onto the cover of Atlas Shrugged.

@ElizLanders @PressSec Ah, the Little Miss Sunshine movie act reaches GW. Must be so entertaining for all the childish young adults.

@PeteHegseth Evidence for your trial at The Hague. Hrm. I wonder if Jack Smith will be the prosecutor...

Back to the Stone Age.

@PrometheusEra @Biggles9579819 @realBrandonGill Nice. Care to get back to the actual argument?

@jesse_ghost @Biggles9579819 @realBrandonGill My boy saluting

America belongs to Americans. It does not belong to the world.

@ArkansasAngie @andreagail_k @BrandonStraka "Noncitizens are voting." Neat. Show us the evidence. And I mean evidence of significant numbers, not some meaningless loner. Enough to actually sway an election.

@andreagail_k @BrandonStraka You must get your news from the Democratic propaganda machine. Noncitizens are voting. That's why the Democrats are going all in on stopping the SAVE America Act. You've been made a fool of by these lying liars.

JD VANCE: "ICE arrested an illegal immigrant from Mauritania who's voted in 7 federal elections since 2008!" "Even if you take the Democrats at their word, even if illegal aliens voting is very rare, then why don't we ban it anyway?"

@BrandonStraka You can, silly as it would be. You just can't do it in a way that impedes or disenfranchises valid voters.

@pitzington @GeraldoRivera Arrests typically require evidence to support them. Without it, you get grand juries returning no true bills on your indictments. No true bills are embarrassing as fuck for prosecutors, so they balk at trying to get indictments without evidence.

@GeraldoRivera This is the key chart. Will he fill in for the zeroes? Probably not.

Todd Blanche is the right person for the job.

@AEKouri @ClayTravis But it doesn't apply to the visiting parents, only to the baby, and then only if the parents wish to push the claim. The baby being born here makes the baby a citizen, not the parents.

@ClayTravis Anyone arguing for birthright citizenship does it on an emotional basis. There is absolutely zero logic to make a case that someone here illegally or visiting should be given the privilege of US citizenship.

An American citizen’s baby can’t become a Chinese citizen by being born on the soil of China. Can anyone explain why a Chinese citizen’s baby should be able to become an American citizen by being born on the soil here? It’s absolute insanity.

@SenRonJohnson Pssst... you're already schmucks.

Republicans will look like complete schmucks when Democrats nuke the filibuster and turn America into a one-party nation. We must face reality and act now — end it first to save America by securing our elections and ending birthright tourism if the Supreme Court does not.

@TomCottonAR "Russia, if you're listening..."

The New York Times just confirmed what we've long suspected: ActBlue knowingly let in fraudulent foreign donations to help Democrats win. Yet another example of the left's embrace of fraud. Everyone involved must face the full weight of the law.