oleosjo

53 posts

oleosjo banner
oleosjo

oleosjo

@jonathanmcdill

Bennington, VT شامل ہوئے Eylül 2008
33 فالونگ9 فالوورز
JoshIdeas
JoshIdeas@_joshideas·
It's the features, the SDKs, how you organize and word your system/user prompts, build MCP tools for specific use cases, creating a 'spine' that represents a workflow that can be created dynamically. Things like that. One of the most important things is how well you use that system prompt.
English
1
0
1
17
kozue
kozue@0xkozue·
Anyone else found that working with AI agents is more mentally tiring than just doing the work yourself?
English
12
0
14
438
oleosjo
oleosjo@jonathanmcdill·
@MattPenny99 That’s not true for me personally at all. The feel and design of the app is actually a key deciding factor in if I’ll use it. If it looks like slop I won’t enjoy it as much (or template-y back in the day) And I imagine there’s at least a percentage of people that feel the same.
English
0
0
0
107
Matt Penny
Matt Penny@MattPenny99·
Design does NOT matter in software If your SaaS looks like this, clearly AI built, it makes no difference People care if your product works, and solves a real world problem That’s it. Now design on the marketing site is another topic, there it matters. But spending time changing the design of the product rather than - marketing - speaking to customers - building desired features Is pure copium
Wes Bos@wesbos

the four horsemen of the apocalypse

English
33
0
43
41.9K
oleosjo
oleosjo@jonathanmcdill·
@jasonfried This is how you build your moat and fort. Maybe add in capture alligators?
English
0
0
0
52
Jason Fried
Jason Fried@jasonfried·
Before shipping, chop wood, carry water. After shipping, chop wood, carry water.
English
12
8
181
13.2K
oleosjo
oleosjo@jonathanmcdill·
@CasJam For me it worked much better when I could slowly build and think through each abstraction layer at a time as I built it. A big markdown file, some hope and dreams, and my lucky rabbit’s foot is the environment I have to define the problem in now. Skill issue, I know.
English
0
0
1
17
Brian Casel
Brian Casel@CasJam·
Stop asking "Can AI build this?" Start asking "Can I specify this?" AI took away the syntax barrier. Not the hard part: defining the problem, the constraints, and the milestones clearly enough for an agent to build it. That's the skill now.
English
5
0
7
359
JoshIdeas
JoshIdeas@_joshideas·
@0xkozue No. Once you understand their language, it's pretty easy
English
2
0
1
30
oleosjo
oleosjo@jonathanmcdill·
@zekramu Omg you still use JJ? There’s PP now
English
0
0
0
7
zek
zek@zekramu·
it blows my mind that people are still using git.
English
195
7
286
124.5K
oleosjo
oleosjo@jonathanmcdill·
@ThePrimeagen 10x developer naturally. AI 2xed that. It also negative 4xed on that. So I dunno where I’m at now.
English
0
0
1
43
ThePrimeagen
ThePrimeagen@ThePrimeagen·
I am so thoroughly convinced that anyone who thinks AI 100x's their output is a liar or a lunatic. You are telling me you can make 1 years worth of decisions in 3.65 days? Let alone describing those accurately and coaxing the result from the AI... (1.8 days european time)?
English
307
70
2.1K
72.5K
oleosjo
oleosjo@jonathanmcdill·
@hschmaiske The few people that have continued to invest in those “old school” skills AI has allegedly replaced will be at a marked advantage as time goes on compared to those who have invested only in “learning AI.” Could be wrong but I guess we’ll see who gets “left behind.”
English
0
0
0
24
henrique
henrique@hschmaiske·
People are stopping to think and letting AI do everything. They don't even read the AI output anymore. The bar is low... very low.
English
7
2
18
875
oleosjo
oleosjo@jonathanmcdill·
@teodorio 1. Train on entire internet 2. Think you have control over a prediction engine derived from said data 3. Cry when the truth sets in
English
0
0
1
300
teo
teo@teodorio·
After using Opus 4.8 extensively I assume there is some panic internally at Anthropic as it seems they are defaulting to cheap post-training tricks to get the models to "push" back. Which means that the biggest failure mode of wrong token paths out of which the models lack the meta rationality to pull themselves out is a huge and non trivial issue.
English
45
16
591
63.1K
oleosjo
oleosjo@jonathanmcdill·
@KostjaPalovic And now you’re not allowed to take your time with the details of a quality codebase you personally like because that’s “wasting time.” The LLMs can write code that’s the equivalent of that hollow prose with a bunch of em dashes and you’re now required to say “good enough.”
English
1
0
1
19
Kostja Palović
Kostja Palović@KostjaPalovic·
AI took away all the fun of coding and gave us the worst parts of it: code reviews and writing specs.
English
4
4
8
522
ily⚡️
ily⚡️@0xIlyy·
Please, stop running your agents in tmux. I just found out about Zellij and terminal multiplexing finally makes sense.
ily⚡️ tweet media
English
108
29
911
109.1K
oleosjo
oleosjo@jonathanmcdill·
@caps_raunak When given the chance, most people will just go ahead and shoot up the steroids to get ahead, with little thought about the nasty consequences coming for them later.
English
0
0
1
18
Raunak
Raunak@caps_raunak·
AI is killing the grind. You work hard for years to get good at building apps. Make mistakes, fix them, build taste. Now one prompt and it's done. No sweat, no learning. Everyone shares it like it's amazing. But we're making real skills cheap and fake. Stop smiling and think about it.
English
30
4
32
3.1K
oleosjo
oleosjo@jonathanmcdill·
@haider1 I can say “LLMs are so stupid,” and “LLMs are amazing,” very confident that both are true.
English
0
0
0
429
Haider.
Haider.@haider1·
person: "LLMs are so stupid" > me: which model are you using? > them: free GPT-5.5, 16k context, no tools > pastes no context, wants perfect code > refuses to try current models: "just hype" > tries a modern LLM once > "oh… ok, this works" every single time...
English
24
5
191
15.5K
Wes Winder
Wes Winder@weswinder·
i looked at 12 different x accounts that constantly trash vibe coding almost none of them have shipped a product with paying users interesting pattern
English
17
0
26
2.2K
oleosjo
oleosjo@jonathanmcdill·
@GaneshKompella I guess so. I was going off of this statement: "The gap between engineers is no longer who types faster." But I think in the end we agree. I just was stating that fast typing was never what made you a good engineer even in those ancient times before AI.
English
0
0
0
12
Ganesh Kompella
Ganesh Kompella@GaneshKompella·
The gap between engineers is no longer who types faster. It's who can hold a clean problem statement while Claude Code does the typing. Cursor and Claude Code don't reward fast hands. They reward sharp specs.
English
1
0
2
51
oleosjo
oleosjo@jonathanmcdill·
@pothuLabs Don't wake them up to this yet! I enjoy building things in a predictable "slow" way that improves, not erodes my skills. It's like this fun secret while everyone else is letting their brain rot, getting so "good" at playing the casino.
English
1
0
1
19
Pothu
Pothu@pothuLabs·
Is it just me or is vibe coding way less efficient than doing it the old fashioned way
English
9
1
5
668
oleosjo
oleosjo@jonathanmcdill·
@maxedapps It's like a savant toddler came in the room and started screaming and wrecking things but we have to put up with him because "he's got so much potential."
English
0
0
0
89
Maximilian
Maximilian@maxedapps·
Supply chain attacks, broken code everywhere, mass layoffs that are justified "because of AI", stupid / dangerous AI-powered customer support (hi meta!), AI gurus selling you their latest skills and "must use workflows" ... glorious times :)
English
18
23
177
6K
oleosjo
oleosjo@jonathanmcdill·
@MillionInt To figure out what is truely important one must do unimportant things
English
0
0
0
218
Jerry Tworek
Jerry Tworek@MillionInt·
Everything in life follows from repeatedly answering a simple question: "what are the most important things for me right now?"
English
15
12
302
15.8K