oleosjo
53 posts


@MattPenny99 That’s not true for me personally at all. The feel and design of the app is actually a key deciding factor in if I’ll use it. If it looks like slop I won’t enjoy it as much (or template-y back in the day) And I imagine there’s at least a percentage of people that feel the same.
English

Design does NOT matter in software
If your SaaS looks like this, clearly AI built, it makes no difference
People care if your product works, and solves a real world problem
That’s it.
Now design on the marketing site is another topic, there it matters.
But spending time changing the design of the product rather than
- marketing
- speaking to customers
- building desired features
Is pure copium
Wes Bos@wesbos
the four horsemen of the apocalypse
English

@jasonfried This is how you build your moat and fort. Maybe add in capture alligators?
English

@CasJam For me it worked much better when I could slowly build and think through each abstraction layer at a time as I built it. A big markdown file, some hope and dreams, and my lucky rabbit’s foot is the environment I have to define the problem in now. Skill issue, I know.
English

@ThePrimeagen 10x developer naturally. AI 2xed that. It also negative 4xed on that. So I dunno where I’m at now.
English

@hschmaiske The few people that have continued to invest in those “old school” skills AI has allegedly replaced will be at a marked advantage as time goes on compared to those who have invested only in “learning AI.” Could be wrong but I guess we’ll see who gets “left behind.”
English

After using Opus 4.8 extensively I assume there is some panic internally at Anthropic as it seems they are defaulting to cheap post-training tricks to get the models to "push" back.
Which means that the biggest failure mode of wrong token paths out of which the models lack the meta rationality to pull themselves out is a huge and non trivial issue.
English

@KostjaPalovic And now you’re not allowed to take your time with the details of a quality codebase you personally like because that’s “wasting time.” The LLMs can write code that’s the equivalent of that hollow prose with a bunch of em dashes and you’re now required to say “good enough.”
English

@caps_raunak When given the chance, most people will just go ahead and shoot up the steroids to get ahead, with little thought about the nasty consequences coming for them later.
English

@mattshumer_ @OpenAI Woah I bet you have something mind-blowing to show for it!!
English

Light work @OpenAI
Apparently, I’ve used 3x the tokens of OpenAI’s highest user in just the last 17 days

Madison Mills@MadisonMills22
NEWS: The token leader at OpenAI uses 100 billion tokens a month, CEO Sam Altman says, adding that this is not the token leader in the world "to my embarrassment."
English

@GaneshKompella I guess so. I was going off of this statement: "The gap between engineers is no longer who types faster." But I think in the end we agree. I just was stating that fast typing was never what made you a good engineer even in those ancient times before AI.
English

@jonathanmcdill You failed to understand what the post was about
English

@pothuLabs Don't wake them up to this yet! I enjoy building things in a predictable "slow" way that improves, not erodes my skills. It's like this fun secret while everyone else is letting their brain rot, getting so "good" at playing the casino.
English

@maxedapps It's like a savant toddler came in the room and started screaming and wrecking things but we have to put up with him because "he's got so much potential."
English

@MillionInt To figure out what is truely important one must do unimportant things
English















