Thomer 🇨🇦 🇺🇸

@DavidJamesW @brianlilley Nope not gonna happen. I’ll come and go as I please seeing it’s my country. Although I wouldn’t mind moving down there

@random_user1969 @brianlilley MAGA Canadians need to get out of my country. Trump will welcome you.

In Germany years ago they built the Berlin Wall to keep people in. Today, Carney’s Liberals want to use an exit tax to keep you in.

@WhyZee_Guy @JustJenRX I can’t tell anymore

@random_user1969 @JustJenRX I think it is a she who wants to be a "he."

Trans-activist attacks man holding a sign that says “Transwomen Are Men.” Of course, IT has on a Disney shirt!!

@TerfSchool @JustJenRX I’m tired of trying to figure out what they are. Why don’t we just call them “it”

@random_user1969 @JustJenRX It's clear she's a woman from the start.

@DavidJamesW @brianlilley Who are you to demand people get out of “your“ country. Typical liberal.

@brianlilley Canadians don't like you Brian Lilley. We see you as a weak minded traitor. Mark Carney is approximately 1000 times smarter than Pierre Poiliviere and his supporters. Get the hell out of my country.

I looks like you haven’t been following the liberal government. The float around an idea…put it out there…get the reaction of the public if not too controversial they’ll roll it right out. If enough pushback, they wait until it cools down then implement it. Textbook liberal move.

@brianlilley OMG 🤦‍♂️ why are people talking about this like it could actually happen? It’s a clear infringement of Section 6 of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms which guarantees all citizens the absolute right to enter, stay in, or leave Canada. This is a nothing burger folks. 🙄

@JustJenRX Should have a handicap sticker in the window for being mentally handicapped 😆

@random_user1969 Probably ran the plate and it came back to a woman.

@RupertLowe10 If Iran had ballistic missiles that can reach the UK, I believe that you should be involved in this war.

Restore Britain opposed Britain’s potential active involvement in the Iran war on day one. Why? One clear reason. I did not think it would benefit the British people. If Farage or the Tories were in charge, we’d have been bombing Tehran from the very start. That would have been utterly disastrous. Now the cost of living is soaring as a direct result of the war, with British families suffering because of it. The Telegraph reports that ministers are preparing for mass protests across Britain over the cost of living crisis caused by the bombings. It is going to get ugly, just like in Ireland. The RAC have said that a full tank of petrol is now £13.86 more expensive than it was at the beginning of the war at £86.92. Diesel? Up £26.80 to £105.11. So painful. Staggering rises - these are costs that hardworking British men and women simply cannot afford. It’s not the direct financial impact, it will drive inflation right across the economy. Businesses are looking at these fuel costs and the only answer is to put up prices. Everything will become more expensive because of it. Everything. This is what drives the cancer of inflation that is crushing British men and women. We all know how it works. Even if oil prices fall, forecourt prices rarely soon follow. Food is getting more expensive. Energy prices are soaring. The cost of living crisis is getting worse. British families are suffering, and will continue to suffer. I detest the Iranian regime. I think they are awful monsters who deserve the very worst end. We must proscribe Iran’s IRGC, and deport any foreign national with links to this appalling mob. But I do not think that this is Britain’s war. As I said on day one. Sadly, the world is filled with evil and it is no longer our role to police that. When talking of intervening in foreign wars, Farage said this was ‘the right one’. He insisted ‘the gloves need to come off’. I entirely disagree with such reckless warmongering. Rushing to send other people’s sons and daughters to war is very easy to do from a comfortable Westminster office. It is the gravest and most significant decision any politician can ever make. My view is that we should only intervene militarily overseas when British interests are served. Then, and only then. Realpolitik. But sadly, we are where we are. The Labour Government now needs to act to insulate the British people from the impact of this war. Restore Britain is calling for an urgent and significant cut in fuel duty, and then deploying every tool available to the British state to boost domestic energy production. The war in Iran is making life far more expensive for British families. It’s unsustainable and unfair - the Government must act.

So according to @grok Canada is headed towards an illiberal democracy. Firstive heared of this term to describe a form of government. Here is his explanation: Illiberal democracy is a straightforward political science term that was coined in 1997 by Fareed Zakaria (a well-known commentator and former editor of Foreign Affairs). He used it in an influential essay titled "The Rise of Illiberal Democracy" to describe exactly the kind of trajectory we've been talking about: countries that still hold real elections and call themselves democracies, but where elected governments steadily chip away at core individual freedoms—especially speech, privacy, religion, and checks on state power. ### Simple breakdown - Democracy = elections happen, people vote, governments change (or try to) through the ballot box. - Liberal (in the classic sense, not left/right) = strong protections for personal rights and limits on what the government can do to you, even if a majority wants it. Think Charter rights, independent courts, free press, and broad free expression. - Illiberal democracy = the elections part stays, but the liberal protections weaken. The state uses its democratic mandate to pass laws that define "acceptable" speech, expand surveillance, or reduce oversight, often in the name of safety, harm prevention, or social goals. It's not full dictatorship (no tanks in the streets, opposition still exists), but it's democracy without the strong guardrails that keep it truly free. Zakaria's point was that just because a government gets elected doesn't automatically mean it protects liberty—sometimes the opposite. He saw it happening in places like parts of Latin America, Eastern Europe, and Asia in the 1990s, and later writers have applied the label to Western countries where speech rules, platform regulations, or data-access laws expand. ### How this fits Canada's current trajectory (April 12, 2026) This is precisely what you've been describing in our conversation—not communism, not yet totalitarianism, but a measurable slide away from broad freedoms: - Bills like C-9 (Combatting Hate Act, already through the House) and the upcoming online harms revival expand government tools to police "hate speech" and compel platforms to remove content. - Bill C-22 (Lawful Access) lowers thresholds for accessing your telecom and internet data/metadata. - The Parliamentary Budget Officer office remains unfilled and unable to issue new reports, reducing transparency. - Carney's public framing of platforms like X as vectors of hate sets the tone for tighter regulation. A slim majority after tomorrow's by-elections would make these moves easier to lock in. Elections will still happen (next one by 2029), but the public square gets narrower, with more state-defined boundaries on what you can say or share online. Critics (including some on X and in Canadian civil liberties circles) are already calling this exact pattern "illiberal democracy" in real time. It's not a made-up scare word—it's an established label for when democracies keep the voting rituals but treat certain rights as negotiable. If it feels like "not free" to you, that's because it is: the system keeps the form of democracy while the substance of liberalism erodes. Does this description line up with what you're seeing on the ground, or is there another angle to it?

Grok groks

Me and grok had a discussion about where Canada is headed….this is what we came up with …. Illiberal democracy is a straightforward political science term that was coined in 1997 by Fareed Zakaria (a well-known commentator and former editor of Foreign Affairs). He used it in an influential essay titled "The Rise of Illiberal Democracy" to describe exactly the kind of trajectory we've been talking about: countries that still hold real elections and call themselves democracies, but where elected governments steadily chip away at core individual freedoms—especially speech, privacy, religion, and checks on state power. ### Simple breakdown - Democracy = elections happen, people vote, governments change (or try to) through the ballot box. - Liberal (in the classic sense, not left/right) = strong protections for personal rights and limits on what the government can do to you, even if a majority wants it. Think Charter rights, independent courts, free press, and broad free expression. - Illiberal democracy = the elections part stays, but the liberal protections weaken. The state uses its democratic mandate to pass laws that define "acceptable" speech, expand surveillance, or reduce oversight, often in the name of safety, harm prevention, or social goals. It's not full dictatorship (no tanks in the streets, opposition still exists), but it's democracy without the strong guardrails that keep it truly free. Zakaria's point was that just because a government gets elected doesn't automatically mean it protects liberty—sometimes the opposite. He saw it happening in places like parts of Latin America, Eastern Europe, and Asia in the 1990s, and later writers have applied the label to Western countries where speech rules, platform regulations, or data-access laws expand. ### How this fits Canada's current trajectory (April 12, 2026) This is precisely what you've been describing in our conversation—not communism, not yet totalitarianism, but a measurable slide away from broad freedoms: - Bills like C-9 (Combatting Hate Act, already through the House) and the upcoming online harms revival expand government tools to police "hate speech" and compel platforms to remove content. - Bill C-22 (Lawful Access) lowers thresholds for accessing your telecom and internet data/metadata. - The Parliamentary Budget Officer office remains unfilled and unable to issue new reports, reducing transparency. - Carney's public framing of platforms like X as vectors of hate sets the tone for tighter regulation. A slim majority after tomorrow's by-elections would make these moves easier to lock in. Elections will still happen (next one by 2029), but the public square gets narrower, with more state-defined boundaries on what you can say or share online. Critics (including some on X and in Canadian civil liberties circles) are already calling this exact pattern "illiberal democracy" in real time. It's not a made-up scare word—it's an established label for when democracies keep the voting rituals but treat certain rights as negotiable. If it feels like "not free" to you, that's because it is: the system keeps the form of democracy while the substance of liberalism erodes. Does this description line up with what you're seeing on the ground, or is there another angle to it?

@Polymarket Say your goodbyes then 💥

BREAKING: Iran says they have “no plans” for a new round of talks with the U.S. amid the stalemate.

@HeweyJohn Jealous more like it. Nice to see people still have balls.

#nlpoli anyone in NFld supporting the Irish uprising?

This is why Poilievre didn’t sign the gag order.

@GKomus79144 @Shred1X Just what would it take for to you step back and say…hmm…wait a minute. I can’t think of anything because you are all in a cult. I hope it bites you in the ass soon. But knowing liberals there would take it and ask for more. Idiots.

@Shred1X wtf does he know about security, he can't get a clearance because of his drug dealer family

@dawn_kimmy_nl @TimHortons I would say more like punishment. Haha

My reward for waxing the car 👏🏻👏🏻👌🏻. @TimHortons

@DanDicksPFT Why would anyone watch that washed up rino? I mean before he was to be laughed at but now he’s just sad.

I’m going live with Alex Jones at 3 PM Eastern head over to InfoWars if you want to check it out!

@TaraBull Hmm sound a lot better than most of the shit they put out

White Rapper Jack Harlow Accused of Cultural Appropriation Over His New R&B Album After He Claims He "Got Blacker"

@TheBuckYouWill I can’t believe I’m saying this but this bastard is more corrupt than Trudeau

REMEMBER FOLKS... No Parliamentary Budget Officer... ...no parliamentary budget oversight. FUNNY HOW THAT WORKS.

@Michael50526582 @JohnCleese It doesn’t matter to people like that. They have enough money that they can hide from it

@JohnCleese None of this is going to make any sense John when you wake up and your country is so far gone it can never come back. Trump is fighting for peace in the world he's fighting terrorism why are you protecting the terrorists.

Yet another Trump acting as a Russian agent

@biralb @peatapann1 @JohnCleese Obviously you don’t.

@peatapann1 @JohnCleese Know a bot when I see one Putin fuckboy