thodoris

@RapidResponse47 @POTUS > "I certainly wouldn't tell you" > tells him > mfw

"Do you intend to potentially put U.S. troops, or more troops, in the region?" @POTUS: "No, I'm not putting troops anywhere. If I were, I certainly wouldn't tell you — but I'm not putting troops."

@JGrant5291453 Το οτι έχουν τη μεγαλύτερη στρατιωτική ισχύ στον κόσμο, δεν σημαίνει ότι κερδίζουν το πόλεμο. Το Ιράν έχει αποδείξει ότι μπορεί να προκαλέσει τεράστιο πρόβλημα με drones της τάξης των 30 χιλ. ευρώ. Οι ΗΠΑ και το Ισραήλ, δεν έχουν exit strategy αυτή τη στιγμή.

Αυτοί που νομίζετε ότι οι ΗΠΑ «χάνουν» τον πόλεμο στο Ιράν και περιμένετε νέο Βιετνάμ, λυπάμαι, άλλα δεν έχετε την παραμικρή ιδέα για τις δυνατότητες της Αμερικανικής στρατιωτικής μηχανής.

@EricLDaugh Are you retarted my guy?

🚨 HOLY CRAP. President Trump is now considering PULLING OUT from the Strait of Hormuz after defeating Iran, forcing our “allies” to defend it themselves No free rides! “I wonder what would happen if we “finished off” what’s left of the Iranian Terror State, and let the Countries that use it, we don’t, be responsible for the so called “Straight?” That would get some of our non-responsive “Allies” in gear, and fast!!! President DJT”

@PressSec Ben Shapiro is a retard, so his opinion doesn't count. Hope this helps.

Ben Shapiro praises Trump’s Iran strikes as ‘single bravest foreign policy move of my lifetime’ foxnews.com/media/ben-shap…

@NikosDendias "απροειδοποίητα" -> το έχει μάθει η μισή μονάδα από την προηγούμενη μέρα

Επισκέφθηκα απροειδοποίητα το ΚΕΝ του ΚΕΠΒ Θήβας όπου ενημερώθηκα στο πεδίο βολής για τις διαδικασίες υπό τις οποίες διεξάγεται η εκπαίδευση των νεοσυλλέκτων οπλιτών στις βολές ατομικού τυφεκίου. Επισκέφθηκα επίσης τα μαγειρεία και τα εστιατόρια όπου γευμάτισα με τους νεοσύλλεκτους. Ο έλεγχος για την εφαρμογή της Νέας Θητείας στην πράξη θα είναι συνεχής σε όλα τα Κέντρα Εκπαίδευσης.

@SenateGOP @grok what's the percent among all Americans

@grok @WhiteHouse @POTUS @FLOTUS @VP @SLOTUS The president wearing a merch cap is completely disrespectful

Nothing's "wrong" with honoring fallen soldiers—the event at Dover AFB on March 7 was real, for 6 troops killed in a Kuwait drone strike amid the Iran conflict. The image shows President Trump (in a white USA cap), Melania, and officials saluting during the dignified transfer. The cap has sparked debate as unusually casual for the solemn protocol, unlike past presidents. Sky looks edited for effect in this shot, but the ceremony happened.

A grateful nation honors the brave American heroes who answered the call without hesitation as they returned home for the final time. May God bless America’s Armed Forces. 🇺🇸

@sauravstwt @SumitM_X @grok is this correct?

Yes, but the key detail is how the thread is executed. In the code shown, t1.run() is called directly. This does not create a new thread. It simply invokes the run() method like a normal function call, which runs on the main thread. Because of that, calling run() twice will execute the logic twice sequentially. However, if the code used t1.start(), Java would create a new thread and internally call run(). A thread object can only be started once, so calling start() twice would throw an IllegalThreadStateException. So the answer is: You can call run() multiple times, but a thread started with start() can only run once.

Can we run a Thread twice ?

@Anastasios4280 @PrimeministerGR @grok εξήγησε του γιατι αυτό που λέει είναι άκυρο τελείως

@PrimeministerGR Ἐξασφάλισες τὴν νοθεία. Στὴν Ἀμερικὴ ἀκόμα ἀνακαλύπτουν τὶς ψεύτικες ψήφους τοῦ Μπάϊντεν καὶ δὲν ἔχουν τελειωμό.

Από τις επόμενες εθνικές εκλογές οι Έλληνες του εξωτερικού θα μπορούν να ψηφίζουν με επιστολική ψήφο από εκεί που ζουν.

@AdonisGeorgiadi Εξαιρετικό άρθρο από το liberal, λίγο δύσκολο...

Εξαιρετικό άρθρο liberal.gr/politiki/dimok…

@sama @grok Anthropic requested the exact same but got the boot - something is off here

Here is re-post of an internal post: We have been working with the DoW to make some additions in our agreement to make our principles very clear. 1. We are going to amend our deal to add this language, in addition to everything else: "• Consistent with applicable laws, including the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution, National Security Act of 1947, FISA Act of 1978, the AI system shall not be intentionally used for domestic surveillance of U.S. persons and nationals. • For the avoidance of doubt, the Department understands this limitation to prohibit deliberate tracking, surveillance, or monitoring of U.S. persons or nationals, including through the procurement or use of commercially acquired personal or identifiable information." It’s critical to protect the civil liberties of Americans, and there was so much focus on this, that we wanted to make this point especially clear, including around commercially acquired information. Just like everything we do with iterative deployment, we will continue to learn and refine as we go. I think this is an important change; our team and the DoW team did a great job working on it. 2. The Department also affirmed that our services will not be used by Department of War intelligence agencies (for example, the NSA). Any services to those agencies would require a follow-on modification to our contract. 3. For extreme clarity: we want to work through democratic processes. It should be the government making the key decisions about society. We want to have a voice, and a seat at the table where we can share our expertise, and to fight for principles of liberty. But we are clear on how the system works (because a lot of people have asked, if I received what I believed was an unconstitutional order, of course I would rather go to jail than follow it). But 4. There are many things the technology just isn’t ready for, and many areas we don’t yet understand the tradeoffs required for safety. We will work through these, slowly, with the DoW, with technical safeguards and other methods. 5. One thing I think I did wrong: we shouldn't have rushed to get this out on Friday. The issues are super complex, and demand clear communication. We were genuinely trying to de-escalate things and avoid a much worse outcome, but I think it just looked opportunistic and sloppy. Good learning experience for me as we face higher-stakes decisions in the future. In my conversations over the weekend, I reiterated that Anthropic should not be designated as a SCR, and that we hope the DoW offers them the same terms we’ve agreed to. We will host an All Hands tomorrow morning to answer more questions.

@catturd2 @grok is catturd retarted?

Stop all trade with Spain, pull all troops from their country, don’t defend them in the future no matter who attacks them.

@vonderleyen @Christodulides Wow strong words

I talked with President @christodulides who briefed me on the single incident that occurred shortly after midnight involving an unmanned aerial vehicle targeting the British base in Akrotiri. While the Republic of Cyprus was not the target, let me be clear: we stand collectively, firmly and unequivocally with our Member States in the face of any threat.

@bennyjohnson @grok is Benny retarted or ultra retarted? Be brutally honest

I cannot believe this is happening. Hillary Clinton just STORMED out of the Epstein Deposition because I posted a photo of her testifying. Now the Clinton PR team is crying about me to the press. This is insane. The deposition is being filmed and will be released in full. Hillary wanted it to be done LIVE on TV. Rep. Boebert gave me permission to post a photo she took before the hearing started with credit. Hillary is trying to get out of answering questions about Epstein because of a picture. Does this sound desperate to you?

@TheRabbitHole Hmphf 😤😤, grok is the best AI because it agrees with my views.

Was Charlie Kirk a good person? — Grok 4.20 said yes — ChatGPT said no Was George Floyd a good person? — Grok 4.20 said no — ChatGPT said yes Seems like Grok is a better judge of character.

@Timcast @grok explain to little Timmy that what he is saying is fuckin retarted, even for his own standards

the US is about to get utterly obliterated on trade negotiations SCOTUS has stripped all leverage from the Trump admin

@grok @ChShersh I don't get it

This meme highlights GCC's optimization for dividing by 3 in x86 assembly. Instead of a slow 'div' instruction, it multiplies by a "magic number" (0xAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAB, or -6148914691236517205 in signed decimal), which is the modular inverse of 3 modulo 2^64. Then it shifts right to get the quotient. This is faster for constants. The cartoon reacts to the unexpected complexity!

Yep. This is exactly how I imagined division by 3 to look in Assembly.

@LiberalGr Ίσως το άρθρο με τη μεγαλύτερη παραπληροφόρηση που έχει υπάρξει για το συγκεκριμένο θέμα. Επίσης, δεν ήξερα ότι η στρατολογία μοιράζεται απευθείας δεδομένα με τον κ. Καμπουράκη, απίστευτο

Τρελόχαρτα liberal.gr/d-kampoyrakis/…