Laura V.

@JaymeKnyx Can’t wait!

Dear Mark Carney: This is your warning! You have committed acts of corruption and atrocities against the people of Canada and my good friends in the United Kingdom. You sold out energy security, destroyed livelihoods, wrecked economies, and pushed policies that crushed the working class while you collected your globalist paychecks and posed as the savior. You betrayed two nations for your own selfish power, your reckless ideology, and your personal connections. You left trails of damage that real families are still paying for in higher bills, lost jobs, and stolen futures. That is on you. Every reckless, irresponsible decision. Every backroom move. Every time you chose the elite agenda over the citizens who trusted you. I am not bluffing. I will make you famous for it. I will write the best song I have ever written in my life. It will be raw, brutal, packed with truth and unforgettable. It will name what you did. It will expose the corruption. It will drag every atrocity and every act of reckless betrayal into the light. This song will not fade when you resign in disgrace like your loser friend Keir Starmer. It will not disappear when the next scandal or the next politician tries to bury your record. It will keep ringing. It will live long after any memory of your failures are supposed to be forgotten. Because a truly great song does not die. It burrows into the culture. It gets sung in bars, blasted in cars, shared across borders, and passed to the next generation. Your name will be chained to it forever as the corrupt architect of suffering, the reckless traitor who thought he could get away with it. You will be remembered exactly as you deserve: not as the smooth banker or the climate prince, but as the weak and two-faced man the song destroyed. This is the only warning you get. The song is coming. And when it hits, there will be no place left to hide. Consider yourself served. @MarkJCarney

@gmforbes35 You will own nothing and be happy 😏

Fun fact: Mark Carney's much hyped "Build Canada Homes" isn't building anything people can buy. It's all rentals.

@CatWhite_3 I call bullshit

A tiny 15-week-old baby, surrounded by endless love, care, and sacrifices from day one. ❤️

@RayburnBev How’s that working out for you?

No, I voted for Carney to reduce our dependence on Trump. I voted for an economic expert AND I voted for a no nonsence PM who will fix some social issues, bail reform, kids off social media, tougher stance on crime. I voted to have an ADULT in charge

@erraticusfinch @IreneNewstead @ChadimirPoutine It’s polls, not poles. If you’re going to ride a high horse at least spell correctly

@IreneNewstead @LauraISO411 @ChadimirPoutine Just a friendly reminder, the real world and your echo chamber are not the same thing. Here is an aggregated analysis as of 30 seconds ago, combining multiple poles from a variety of different organizations.

Mark Carney is quote possibly the most corrupt and malevolent leader of a G7 country ever, and he deserves to leave office in the most humiliating and undignified way possibly.

A QUIET RAGE IS BUILDING -- SPEAK YOUR MIND! Silence is NO LONGER an option. Don't just 'Like' this post - REPOST it and speak up! WE NEED TO KEEP WAKING THOSE WHO ARE SLEEPING. .

@CGWeatherHub That explains a lot

If you're 1) Late 30s - mid 40s. 2) Married with children. 3) And not working for the government. This is the face you see when you wake up on Monday for work & realize that your retirement plan is now just to work until you drop dead. Happy Father's Day.

@Gunblaze1969 Something nice

Can you say something nice?

@Armed_Alberta @IDAHOgov For the people that say Canadians are nice read some of the comments. About a fellow Canadian. And then tell me again how nice we are

Just spoke with a lawyer. I’m moving my company to the United States and incorporating in a tax-free state. - thinking about Idaho, there’s still time to choose. But if I decide to go with Idaho: @IDAHOgov - you’re going to gain a reputable company and a hard working man who envies the US constitution and will employ even more US citizens. Congratulations to @liberal_party of Canada on successfully pushing another business south of the border. Less investment. Less growth. Fewer jobs. I refuse to suffer any longer under your regime. A lot of paperwork ahead, but it’ll be worth it. Tax free business opportunities await, in a country protected by the Constitution with free speech rights. Keep your elbows up! Enjoy your prison. 🖕 fuck Canada

Hey Liberal supporters, have a listen and the tell us how great Carney and Canada is. But at least we don’t have a pedo for a leader hey?😏

Ezra Levant: Thanks to floor crossers, Carney can now ram through his spy bill Using his newly acquired majority, Carney’s government has moved to dramatically curtail debate on Bill C-22, the so-called lawful access bill. The answer? It is a direct assault on parliamentary democracy and your freedoms. Last year, Mark Carney won the election with just 43 percent of the vote. That delivered him 169 seats out of 343 in the House of Commons, three short of the 172 needed for a majority. Canadians deliberately gave him a minority government. Sometimes voters do that on purpose, wanting to keep a politician on a shorter leash and force him to work with Parliament rather than dominate it. But Carney was not content with the verdict of the electorate. While the political establishment spent years warning that Donald Trump might refuse to accept election results, Carney set about changing his own. By persuading a string of opposition MPs to cross the floor, he secured the majority Canadians had declined to give him at the ballot box. The obvious question is why? Justin Trudeau governed for nearly a decade without a formal majority, relying on NDP support to pass budgets and survive confidence votes. There was little reason to believe Carney could not have done the same. Ezra’s answer is that Carney wanted something more than legislative support. He wanted the ability to shut down parliamentary scrutiny itself. That is now on full display. Using his newly acquired majority, Carney’s government has moved to dramatically curtail debate on Bill C-22, the so-called lawful access bill. The legislation would compel technology companies to retain user data for up to a year and make that information available to government authorities. Civil liberties advocates have raised serious concerns about privacy, government overreach and the expansion of state surveillance powers. The concerns are hardly theoretical. Canadians have already witnessed a government willing to freeze bank accounts and invoke extraordinary powers during the trucker protests. Mark Carney himself, while living in Europe at the time, wrote in The Globe and Mail that Ottawa should take a harder line against convoy participants and their supporters. It is therefore not surprising that critics view Bill C-22 as part of a broader push toward greater state control. What makes the situation particularly troubling is not only the substance of the legislation but the manner in which it is being advanced. The government has introduced a motion declaring that, notwithstanding any standing order or usual practice of the House, Bill C-22 will be pushed through Parliament on an accelerated timetable. In plain English, the normal rules are being set aside. Committee members will have just 30 minutes to complete clause-by-clause consideration of the bill. Any remaining amendments will be deemed moved and voted upon without further debate. The legislation will then move rapidly through report stage and third reading with strictly limited speaking time for opposition parties and virtually no opportunity for extended scrutiny. For a bill that constitutes one of the most significant expansions of government surveillance powers in Canadian history, Parliament is being afforded remarkably little time to examine the details. Professor Michael Geist, one of Canada’s leading experts on technology law and digital policy, has publicly criticized the government’s approach. Geist argues that hearings are being cut short, amendments are being rushed through without proper discussion, and the public is being denied the transparency normally expected during the legislative process. His warning is not about partisan politics but about the erosion of parliamentary accountability. This is why Carney needed those extra seats. The issue is not merely that opposition MPs crossed the floor. It is what those additional seats are now being used to accomplish. This is a double violation of democratic principles: first, altering the balance of Parliament after voters had already spoken; and second, using that altered balance to restrict Parliament’s ability to debate, amend and scrutinize legislation. The implications extend beyond a single bill. Across Canada, the United Kingdom, France and Australia, governments are increasingly embracing online surveillance measures, age-verification requirements and expanded regulatory control over digital spaces. These initiatives are almost always presented as necessary protections for children or public safety, yet they also require citizens to surrender more privacy and give governments more information about their online activities. It is a stark contrast to the vision of technological progress championed by figures such as Elon Musk, who promote innovation, space exploration, artificial intelligence and the expansion of human potential. One approach sees technology as a tool of freedom and advancement. The other increasingly treats it as something to be monitored, regulated and controlled. This is what an unchecked majority can look like under Mark Carney: Parliament reduced to a rubber stamp, debate curtailed, privacy placed at risk and major legislation rushed through with minimal scrutiny. Canadians deserve better. The democratic process only matters if it is respected when it becomes inconvenient. If Parliament is no longer permitted to properly examine legislation, question witnesses or challenge the government of the day, then the institution itself is diminished. That should concern every Canadian regardless of political affiliation.

@Tosca58861695 I believe this is an interview from a few years ago

This is Bullshit Danielle and you know it. You are an empty vessel filled with the globohomo bullshit of Ottawa. We have a rape gang on the loose in Edmonton. Its the usual suspects. You want to swarm us with more of them. You want to flood Alberta with hostile migrants. You want them to police themselves us. There are so many broken campaign declarations and you are sinking in public opinion. You are treacherous and manipulative. You’re Fired.

@KellyDeRidderMP It’s all part of the plan to wipe out the middle class. There will be either the rich or those who own nothing. Except we won’t be happy

When full-time workers live in trailers and sleep in highway carpool lots because they can't afford rent, something is deeply wrong. We used to have the world's strongest middle class. Today, working Canadians are facing homelessness while the cost of living continues to climb.

@Stockwell_Day Disagree. When you are a public figure in a public place you are fair game

I may not agree with all of her policies. But the Minister should be allowed to have a moment to herself. The restaurant owner should have punted this guy out.

@0TulsiGabbard2 Not a chance in hell

Would you support President 🇺🇦 Zelensky receiving the Nobel Peace Prize ? YES or NO?l

@eigenrobot Ok, I am going to hell. That made me laugh

what an idiot. stabbing people in the uk gets you jail time i understand he was upset but he could have avoided this by just raping them

@Neccccy Grifter

Describe Zelensky in one word?

@Kman0777 I thought that was basketball?

Who gives a fuck about niggerball? Get out of my country immediately.

@Neccccy Are you listening @MarkJCarney

You will never be able to walk down a street in the UK ever again Starmer You are a cunt, a racist, a narcissist, a bigot and we will hound you for the rest of your pitiful life

@mapleblooded 💯

When leaders resign it should trigger an election. These parasitic worms just pick a new one, convince the population it was the old one that was the problem, and regroup. It’s how we ended up with Mark Carney.