Brenda Anderson

History 🚨 Caitlin Clark became the fastest player in WNBA history to reach 1,000+ points, 250+ rebounds, and 250+ assists, accomplishing the feat in just 54 games — surpassing Diana Taurasi’s previous mark of 62 games. WNBA Tip-Off 2026 | @CarMax

Paige Bueckers has always been better better than Caitlin Clark

"Flopping all F**CKING day" Caitlin Clark is cold 😂

1K for CC 🔥 congrats to Caitlin Clark on 1,000 career points 📚

These signs are popping up all over Los Angeles Pratt for LA mayor

Who would you pick to build a franchise around? ❤️: Like for Paige Bueckers 🔄: RT for Caitlin Clark

“Sorry gas prices are sky high and you’ll never own a home — anyway check out these grainy UFO pics!” Cannot overstate how stupid these people think we are.

Release the video @MrsErikaKirk , @AndrewKolvet , @BlakeSNeff, @TPUSA x.com/i/trending/205…

Truth trends @RealCandaceO Help it along and restore sanity. @Nero @buckleycarlson @TuckerCarlson x.com/i/trending/205…

Candace Owens is spiraling.

They still haven't told us the truth about what happened in Miami in 2024

You're not paying $4.50 for gas because Iran was going to get a nuke. You're paying $4.50 because that's what Israel wanted. War with Iran. Israel First. America Last. Wake up.

@benshapiro @grok remove this twit from my timeline- I don’t follow him (never will) and add more @RealCandaceO content! Thank you!

On the show today: Tucker Carlson, Candace Owens, Nick Fuentes and the rest of the New Left remove the mask; Vivek Ramaswamy swamps his own New Left contender in the Ohio gubernatorial primary; and a California gubernatorial debate shows just how screwed the state may be. open.spotify.com/episode/50Fx6f…

MY DEEPEST PRAYER IS THAT EVERYONE FINDS THE LORD BEFORE THEIR TIME ON EARTH ENDS, BECAUSE NOTHING ELSE MATTERS AT ALL.

NEW EVIDENCE LOOMER BUSTED: As Loomer double down on her lie that George Farmer, Candace Owens husband has a DUI and a firearm charge producing what now appear to be COMPLETELY FABRICATED documents some new evidence has emerged! The documents below are all the 911 calls for August 10th that were dispatched to Rosa Park Blvd and none of them were DUIs. In fact, during the time period Loomer stated there were dui’s however none of them were on Rosa Park Blvd! If Laura Loomer created those documents, she has committed a felony multiple felonies! She took ownership of the documents when she plastered her watermark all over them! I don’t think there’s anything left to say other than the fact that Laura Loomer clearly was either fed some bad information or she created this entire psyop! Credit to: @Villgecrazylady @RealCandaceO @lauraloomer

I hate that there is no way that Erika Kirk wasn’t involved in betraying Charlie. I was really hoping I was wrong, but you don’t just put words in your dead husband’s mouth that are contrary to what he was saying right before he was assassinated. You just don’t.

Humans come in all shapes and sizes. Some are intelligent, some are stupid and some are genuinely malicious. People disagree about politics, religion, morality, and almost everything else, but there is one principle every sane person should understand: when someone is being attacked from every direction, especially by people they never attacked in the first place, you should at least stop and ask why? What is going on here? If I punch someone in the face and they punch me back, the responsibility starts with me because I initiated the conflict. That is simple cause and effect. But if random groups of people suddenly start attacking me when I never attacked them in the first place and their only justification is that I questioned an organization or its leadership because I believe they are not being fully honest then any rational person should immediately start asking questions. Why are these people so emotionally invested? Are they ideologically driven, financially motivated, coordinated behind the scenes, or simply acting in the interests of the same network of people? Otherwise, why would they aggressively attack someone who never attacked them personally? Especially in a country where personal conflict is avoided like the plague and passive-aggressiveness is in fashion. Why would they deliberately seek out personal conflict when they seemingly have no dog in the fight? That is basic logic. So why is Candace Owens being attacked by people she never attacked? Even someone with minimal common sense should be asking that question. And this is after she was fired, her friend was killed and somehow she’s the one attacked for what exactly? Having a show in which she asks questions most Americans would like to ask the leadership of this country? Is that what triggers these people? The answer is - YES! They are triggered by people who ask difficult questions. Why would a popular host like her, someone Americans genuinely enjoy listening to and support (a fact based on numbers), be attacked by a handful of weird individuals in a very coordinated manner? Popularity and public support are measured by numbers, and numbers usually reflect one important metric: honesty! Ben Shapiro learned that the hard way. So why is it that a host who is so obviously supported by the public still gets relentlessly attacked by certain people? Their excuse is always the same: “Erika Kirk was attacked, so now we’re attacking Candace.” Suddenly the same people who excuse corruption, hypocrisy, defend genocide in Gaza and institutional failure at every opportunity have discovered a moral conscience overnight. Now they present themselves as noble defenders of justice and protectors of Erika Kirk. Amazing! Candace Owens apparently performs miracles. She somehow transformed some of the worlds’ most cynical and self-interested people into passionate warriors for morality and for this widow Erika! People who would normally destroy others for the sake of self-preservation and have done so before, are suddenly deeply concerned about someone else’s well-being. Or maybe the explanation is far simpler: these people are connected, coordinated, and protecting the same interests behind the scenes, the same entrenched elites. That explanation makes far more sense doesn't it? Let’s be clear about something important: Candace Owens did not accuse anyone of murder. She asked questions and tried to connect the dots when nothing made sense. That is all. And I have to say she is much nicer than I am. If someone murder my best friend and then some group of people started attacking me for wanting to find out what happened to my friend - asking questions and connecting the dots would be the least of their worries. I'm not as nice as Candace. Candace Owens never accused Brian Harpole of killing Charlie Kirk, at least not to my knowledge, yet Brian Harpole is suing her for defamation. Defamation means making false statements that damage someone’s reputation. Brian Are you sure it was Candace who damaged your reputation? Or maybe it had something to do with your shortcomings when the person you were protecting was killed? Maybe that’s when people started seeing you as an incompetent ass? So where/what exactly was the false statement Candace made? Asking whether security failed at an event where the person being protected ended up dead is that the statement? That can not possibly be ground for defamation, it is a completely reasonable question because security failed Charlie is dead!!! What was Brian Harpole’s job? His job was to protect Charlie Kirk. Was Charlie Kirk protected that day? No. Charlie Kirk is dead. You f***g moron you and entire team miserably failed at your jobs that is why Charlie is dead. That is not an opinion. That is an undeniable fact the guy you were supposed to protect is dead! Or maybe we are missing something and you were not tasked with Charlie's protection at all? Maybe you were there to dance ballet before the event even started. I don’t know, am I missing something here? please educate us! If the person you were assigned to protect dies under your watch, then the security failed. PERIOD! That failure may not mean murder, but he is dead because of the failure! That is true in every country, every language, and every functioning reality! And this is where the lawsuit becomes absurd. A man whose protection team failed and got Charlie killed is now suing a podcaster because she questioned whether security at the event was handled properly. Think about how irrational that is. Brian, if you ever wanted to restore credibility or be taken seriously again professionally, as a body guard the correct action would have been very different. You should have gone on Shawn Ryan’s show and apologized to the American people and to Charlie’s family for the failures in security detail that day. That is what accountability looks like. Instead, you chose lawsuits and public attacks. And now, rather than being remembered as someone who took responsibility after a tragedy, you will be remembered as the bodyguard who failed at his job and then sued one of Charlie’s friends for questioning it. That is the legacy you are creating for yourself.

TRUMP: "When did I promise $2,000 tariff checks to Americans? I don't remember doing that." Right here, Mr. @POTUS ⬇️

Share the video @BlakeSNeff I’ve never seen such obvious liars continue to lie as if people are believing them! It’s embarrassing !