
Perps beta is now live on polymarket.com for select users. We’ll be rolling access out to more people over the next 4 weeks. Get ready.
Bizzi
5.5K posts

@Crypt0Bizzi
Telegram community: @cryptobzzi | Polymarket trader | AI lover | Landing: https://t.co/bOx7hGeEpN

Perps beta is now live on polymarket.com for select users. We’ll be rolling access out to more people over the next 4 weeks. Get ready.



@TheGreekTrader @Polymarket totally agree with you, thanks for the feedback and we are changing a bunch of stuff internally to make sure this doesn't happen again.

A DEVELOPER ONCE EXPLAINED A LANGUAGE FROM THE 1980s THAT ALREADY RAN MILLIONS OF TINY WORKERS IN PARALLEL UNDER ONE SUPERVISOR -- THE EXACT THING EVERYONE THINKS "300 AI AGENTS" JUST INVENTED Tim McNamara on what to steal from Erlang -- the language built for systems that can never go down, where thousands of independent processes run at once and a single supervisor watches every one of them. -> The moment it clicks, the whole "Swarm of agents" hype stops looking new. One coordinator that plans the work. A crowd of small workers that each do one thing and share nothing. A supervisor on top that kills and restarts whatever breaks. That's not a 2026 idea -- it's the actor model, and it's older than most engineers reading this. The trick was never raw parallelism. Anyone can spawn a thousand workers. It's the discipline around them: each one isolated, failures contained instead of cascading, and one layer with the authority to restart. "Let it crash" beats "Try to handle everything" because the supervisor already knows what to do. Running many things at once was never the skill -> orchestrating them so the whole thing doesn't collapse is. And now that people are pointing 300 AI agents at a single job and praying, the ones who win will be the teams who learned this pattern from a language that's been doing it for forty years. Everyone's racing to build the swarm. Almost no one is studying the one system that already solved how to keep a swarm from eating itself. Save it. It's the map for everything coming next ↓

A LINUX KERNEL DEVELOPER PROVED THE THING YOU PUSH CODE TO IS SECRETLY A DATABASE THAT CAN VERSION ALMOST ANYTHING AND THAT MOST DEVS HAVE ONLY EVER TOUCHED A TENTH OF IT 42 minutes from Josh Triplett -- a longtime Linux kernel and Debian developer -- showing that Git is a general-purpose, tamper-evident versioning engine that just happens to be famous for code. -> The moment it clicks, Git stops being "Where my code lives" and becomes what it really is underneath: a content-addressable store that can version almost anything -- your configs, your notes, your servers' state, entire datasets. People run whole wikis on it. They version their entire machine's configuration with it. They ship websites by pushing to it. They track data too big to email. None of it is a hack -- it's the same handful of objects you already use for code, pointed somewhere new. Treating Git as a code-only tool was never the ceiling -> it's a versioning engine for anything, and the people who see that automate what the rest of the team still does by hand. And as AI agents start spitting out not just code but configs, docs and data, the one system that can version and audit all of it at once is already sitting on your machine. You learned five commands to survive. This is the talk that shows you were standing on top of a database the whole time. It changes what you think the tool is even for. Bookmark & Watch it today ↓


And the second one was closed with more sweet profit (~106%) because bitcoin:native just dropped below $65k. These two days were pretty good (can’t say similar about crypto market). But we must be adaptable because we are Polymarket traders. Well, I'm off to bed.







BREAKING: Michael Saylor's Strategy unrealized loss on $BTC holdings has hit $11 BILLION - its highest ever. @saylor started buying BTC around $12K, and BTC is now at $62K, but still the company is down 17% on its #Bitcoin position. On Polymarket, odds of @MicroStrategy going bankrupt this year are starting to move.



Congrats everyone on the NO side Thanks for playing




$2,850 earned risk-free from the MSTR market. Honestly, I'm surprised by how many idiots were willing to burn their money after consensus had already been established. Some guy burned $100k just an hour before the market closed. Maybe he's just a wealthy fool, but the scale of it is still astonishing.

