Cook

@randmkiwi I only got two after like 80 hours, it's a scam!

This is the first nightmare I got in my game 😭

@ElseverwoerdS @liminalMarch @ScottFree__ @TheCartelDel @maximilian_ Personally I think it's more dangerous to obsess over an old creep and then argue that 40 year old men dating 17-year-olds is actually cool and good. Now fuck off back to your den of psychological instability, creepy cunt

@HardcoreCook37 @liminalMarch @ScottFree__ @TheCartelDel @maximilian_ Nah, I'm merely interested in setting people straight who fantasize about pedophiles, and who cannot see the difference between above-age and underage women, or even children. I find the latter distinction very important. While you like blurring it. That is dangerous in my view.

If you're confused by this. @maximilian_ said he was not really liking that a Street Fighter character was raised with his cousin as her older sibling in the storyline, only to marry and impregnate her when she got old enough. Then ten thousand oddballs said he's a western demon.

@ElseverwoerdS @liminalMarch @ScottFree__ @TheCartelDel @maximilian_ This is called projection and inversion.

@HardcoreCook37 @liminalMarch @ScottFree__ @TheCartelDel @maximilian_ Again, Woody Allen has NO 'history with underaged women'. So why maintain a dirty lie? For fun? Do you enjoy fantasizing about men having sexual relationships with underage women? Still fantasizing about pedophilia, and pedophiles? About eating dick? As I said: not a good look.

@ElseverwoerdS @liminalMarch @ScottFree__ @TheCartelDel @maximilian_ You seem really obsessed with wanting teenage girls to date creepy old men and I'm supposed to pretend like you aren't a fan of pedophiles? Okay dude.

'Rebuttals' like 'creep!' and 'weirdo!' are empty and rather cowardly attempts to evade accountability for the false claims you made. A mere reiteration of your damned lie about someone being a 'pedophile' won't magically make it come true. Society has established clear rules people should & can go by when it comes to dating. Of course, you can follow your own preferences. Maybe you hate same-sex relationships, or interracial relationships too - I don't care. If you want to be a bigot and hate age-gap relationships, then by all means, do so. But we're not all bigots who like to take away other people's literal freedoms. Like you'd want to take away 17 year old young women's right to date older guys.

@ElseverwoerdS @liminalMarch @ScottFree__ @TheCartelDel @maximilian_ I think remaining very close friends with a convicted pedophile when you have your own weird history with underaged women gives good reason to associate you with pedophilia. Go eat a dick you child rapist lover.

@HardcoreCook37 @liminalMarch @ScottFree__ @TheCartelDel @maximilian_ Maybe you believe Epstein had the 'Midas Touch'? Everyone he 'touched' or otherwise got close to automatically became a 'pedophile'? Blind Woody Haters are such fun.

@ElseverwoerdS @liminalMarch @ScottFree__ @TheCartelDel @maximilian_ Nice rebuttal "erm technically it's legal" Still a fucking creep you weirdo, men in their 40s shouldn't creep on high schoolers. And I don't care about Mia Farrow, I care about you defending pedophiles.

Great. So you have seen 'Manhattan'. Had you not just 'seen' it but also given it some thought, you would have KNOWN that 'Tracy' is ABOVE-AGE instead of underage. You would have also understood that 'Tracy' does not find 'Ike' 'creepy' at all, that their age-gap relationship is presented as INappropriate throughout the movie, from its very first lines, that they run into all kinds of problems due to the age gap, and that in the end, 'Tracy' leaves 'Ike' and goes her own way in life, leaving 'Ike' as a total loser. Scripsit Woody Allen. By the way, it was Allen's nemesis who volunteered as a character witness for Polanski when he was charged for child sexual abuse.

@ElseverwoerdS @liminalMarch @ScottFree__ @TheCartelDel @maximilian_ Yeah I've seen Manhattan dude, claiming he's not creepy about underaged girls doesn't work. Pretty sure he signed the Polanski petition too. But more importantly, I have a pretty serious and factual reason to associate Woody Allen with pedophilia and child abuse.

More fantasies from you. Woody Allen *has* no 'long history of weird behavior towards young women'. On the contrary, throughout his 90 years' lifetime he has only had long-term, committed relationships with ADULT and ABOVE-AGE women, all but two in HIS OWN AGE-GROUP. Of his two younger partners, Stacey Nelkin (66) is a friend for life, Soon-Yi Previn (55) the love of his life and mother of their two daughters, who adore their parents. Woody's wife of 30+ years and ALL his exes still love him, with the sole exception of a known cheater and deceiver (M.F.). You have exactly ZERO serious, factual reasons to associate Woody Allen with any kind of 'pedophilia' or other forms of child abuse.

@ElseverwoerdS @liminalMarch @ScottFree__ @TheCartelDel @maximilian_ What is it with pedo apologists and accusing their opponents of "fantasizing" about pedophilia? I am stating facts. Woody Allen was one of Epstein's best buddies, even after his first pedo conviction. Combine that with his long history of weird behavior towards young women...

@HardcoreCook37 @liminalMarch @ScottFree__ @TheCartelDel @maximilian_ Which is precisely one of those vicious lies that deserve to be spoken against. Why do you fantasize about people defending pedophiles? It is not a good look. Are you fantasizing about pedophilia at all? Hard to understand.

@ElseverwoerdS @liminalMarch @ScottFree__ @TheCartelDel @maximilian_ I think it's a matter of you defending pedophiles

@HardcoreCook37 @liminalMarch @ScottFree__ @TheCartelDel @maximilian_ Don't you think the truth deserves, or even needs to be defended in the face of all kinds of vicious lies? Maybe you think that is a matter of 'taste'?

@Spoopie4 @thvsarts @Woman4W In Arizona, rape is sexual assault. She was raped.

@thvsarts @Woman4W She said she was sexually assaulted not raped. azcentral.com/picture-galler…

He started a prison riot, then beat and raped a female corrections officer in the mayhem. He is no hero.

@ElseverwoerdS @liminalMarch @ScottFree__ @TheCartelDel @maximilian_ Wow you spend a lot of time defending one of Epstein's besties

@liminalMarch @ScottFree__ @TheCartelDel @maximilian_ Not a single Woody Allen. Please stop lying about Woody Allen. Thank you.

@scovaFD @marten_sorby @SirSicCrusader You're incapable of forming a coherent thought, it's incredible.

@HardcoreCook37 @marten_sorby @SirSicCrusader Why is it that the atheist can’t ever explain their nonsense? Instead, when they know they have no argument, they resort to name calling and lashing out? I’m the 5 year old and yet you have the potty mouth of an immature pubescent boy. Hmm… They’re the same thing btw

While people absolutely do talk about how satan is just as fake and dumb, what exactly is the need to criticise the one who's SUPPOSED to be evil, instead of the one who people claim isn't?

@DisaffectedPod @RecoverinZombie @albertcamslut

@RecoverinZombie @albertcamslut "Kat" has me blocked. I bet it's furious as I rubs the lotion in its skin.

My boy Shredder is getting very old. He's nearly 19, and after being a fat boy most of his life, he's getting bony now. Has early stage kidney failure, and some dementia. He's not entirely "gone in the mind," but he gets confused a lot, and wants to be near me or on me all the time. So he gets whatever he wants now. I bring him food wherever he is, on my bed, on the couch. He gets a heated blanket wherever he wants it. If he wants the food on my plate, then he gets to share it with me. As long as he eats that's what matters. I love him and it's sorrowful to know he won't be around much longer. I'm gonna love him up until then.

@scovaFD @marten_sorby @SirSicCrusader You sound like a fucking moron. Your rebuttal is to give me a sermon. They aren't the same thing, they sound similar because the English language is complicated and you have the same understanding of it as a god damn 5 year old. Pathetic.

@HardcoreCook37 @marten_sorby @SirSicCrusader They sound similar because they’re the exact same thing However, deep down in the heart of the atheist, God calls you and you do know His voice. You suppress His voice, and cling to the idea of wanting to hate Him, and then go and play semantic word games around His existence

@scovaFD @marten_sorby @SirSicCrusader It isn't, there's a massive difference between the two. Once again you repeat the error here. Believing there are no gods is not the same as not believing there are gods. It sounds similar but if you took grammar in the 2nd grade you'll understand the distinction.

@HardcoreCook37 @marten_sorby @SirSicCrusader A disbelief in God and saying no God exists is pretty much the exact same thing. Atheists believe there is absolutely no gods or God. Really weird game y’all are trying to pull

@scovaFD @marten_sorby @SirSicCrusader First it was "atheism is affirming that no gods exist" and now you're saying "atheism is a disbelief in gods" those are not the same thing. Lack of belief in gods and belief that there are no gods are separate things. Which one is it dude?

@HardcoreCook37 @marten_sorby @SirSicCrusader I’m not the one deciding, the definition of atheism is the one deciding and the definition of atheism is literally the disbelief of gods or God. Definitions matter for a reason. If you hold the stance that “you don’t know” then you’re agnostic not atheist

@TertiusIII @DBizzle4Prez @NathanNobis What's irrelevant? People who were raised secular, or you bringing up abuse. If it's the latter then I agree, that was irrelevant of you to bring up. Why don't you answer my initial question then?

@HardcoreCook37 @DBizzle4Prez @NathanNobis Irrelevant.

No, this is not a good question.

@TertiusIII @DBizzle4Prez @NathanNobis It's kinda what you implied. I asked you how you account for people who were raised secular and your response is that a lot of them were physically abused. Now why did you say that if not to imply something about secular households?

@HardcoreCook37 @DBizzle4Prez @NathanNobis You’re a lying fraud dude. Get lost. That’s not at all what I said.

@TertiusIII @DBizzle4Prez @NathanNobis So all atheists who weren't raised religious were victims of abuse? That's what you're going with?

@HardcoreCook37 @DBizzle4Prez @NathanNobis Not all of them were former Christians. Some were the children of unbelievers who physically abused them or worse.

@scovaFD @marten_sorby @SirSicCrusader Also learn to read, there's a difference between "set of beliefs" and "set belief"

@scovaFD @marten_sorby @SirSicCrusader Not exactly. That's the most common philosophical definition, but since language is descriptive, the "lack of belief" position is probably the most common definition of atheism in the modern age. Both are valid, you don't get to decide for someone which one applies to them.