Aes

653 posts

Aes

Aes

@JacobF451981

Eyes wide open

加入时间 Mart 2025
97 关注20 粉丝
-B.K-🇩🇰
-B.K-🇩🇰@taurus726·
Det har den Danske regering bevidst holdt skjult for befolkningen, i kraft af at de droppede efterforskningen. Og trods det, så har vi foræret dem utallige milliarder. Det er direkte sabotage af europæisk infrastruktur.
-B.K-🇩🇰 tweet media
Dansk
49
125
530
12.4K
Aes
Aes@JacobF451981·
@E_GuriGashi "improving quality of life for the average consumer" in this case, you are correct. But in so many - more important - ways the EU is not making our lives better, far from it. Almost like a controlled destruction.
English
0
0
1
445
Guri Gashi
Guri Gashi@E_GuriGashi·
I used to be critical of Europe’s excessive regulations, but I’ve grown quite fond of them I’m glad our food isn’t loaded with 50 toxic or carcinogenic ingredients, that I can charge all my devices with a single cable, that my products last longer, and that they’re designed to be easily repaired People outside of Europe can talk all the shit they want about the EU, but improving quality of life for the average consumer is a huge W in my book
Pirat_Nation 🔴@Pirat_Nation

Starting in 2027, smartphones sold in the European Union will be required to have user-replaceable batteries designed for greater durability and more charging cycles. Manufacturers must also provide spare parts and repair manuals for at least 10 years after a model is released. This is real pressure against planned obsolescence. It should mean phones that actually last longer, cheaper fixes, and a lot less electronic waste piling up. About time.

English
582
2.6K
26.9K
969.7K
Aes
Aes@JacobF451981·
@StyrvoldtOlm @AlexVanopslagh Ethvert andet land i "vesten" ville gøre det samme. Når der er værnepligt kan man ikke bare sige "Jeg har ikke rigtig lyst til at drage i krig i dag". Tror du ikke alle andre lande ville gøre det samme, hvis politikerne mente landet ville blive erobret?
Dansk
0
0
0
10
Alex Vanopslagh
Alex Vanopslagh@AlexVanopslagh·
I marts genvandt Ukraine for første gang i lang tid mere territorium, end russerne erobrede. På frontlinjen er ukrainernes droner og fjernstyrede robotter nu så effektive, at de i denne uge kunne melde om en russisk stilling, der blev taget tilbage uden soldater på jorden og uden tab. Dybt inde i Rusland, ofte mere end tusind kilometer bag fronten, står russiske olieanlæg gang på gang i flammer, ramt af de droner, som en ukrainsk officer kalder ”den frihedselskende ukrainske fugl”. Krigen er langtfra slut, og intet er sikkert. Men billedet er ikke længere det samme som for et år siden. På trods af alle odds har et land med en brøkdel af Ruslands befolkning ikke alene stået imod Putins erobringskrig, men nu også ramt hans regime på hjemmebane, hvor det gør mest ondt. Det er en påmindelse om, hvad mennesker, der kæmper for deres lands fremtid og skæbne, kan, når de får lov at tænke, bygge og samarbejde frit. Vi skal fortsat støtte Ukraine - politisk, økonomisk og militært - og vi skal gøre det, så længe det er nødvendigt. Og ja, vi skal opruste. Ikke ved bevidstløst at hælde flere milliarder i antikverede systemer og teknologier, men ved at slippe vores egne ingeniører, iværksættere og kompetente militærfolk fri til at bygge fremtidens forsvar - hurtigt, opfindsomt og i tæt samarbejde med vores allierede. Slava Ukraini.
Dansk
87
26
593
24.3K
Aes
Aes@JacobF451981·
@dylanmallman In any case the transition in human aptitu5dfe will take a lot longer than the transition to AI and robots. 50 year old receptionists will not suddenly begin to repair robots. Or build data centres or whatever. To transition a whole civilization will take decades while it starves
English
0
0
1
43
Dylan Allman
Dylan Allman@dylanmallman·
The more jobs lost to AI and automation the better. Every job that disappears is a person released from work that did not need a human to do it, and every hour of human attention freed from that work is an hour that becomes available for something only a person can actually do. The labor panic treats existing jobs as sacred because it cannot imagine what the freed labor will build, which is the same failure of imagination that worried about agricultural workers when the tractor arrived and telephone operators when the switchboard went digital. The jobs we cannot currently name are the ones that matter. They will be invented by people standing on top of the productivity surplus that automation creates, doing work that requires the freed attention, the cheap compute, the collapsed barriers to starting things. Labor is not a fixed quantity to be rationed. It is a discovery process. Each displacement surfaces capital and human capacity that the market then redirects into uses nobody could have predicted in advance, which is precisely why central planners and the anti-ai crowd keep failing to anticipate the next economy and keep demanding we freeze the current one in place to protect them from their own inability to see forward. The correct response to automation is to accelerate it, let the displacement run, and trust that the generation standing in the wreckage will build something the current generation cannot picture, because that is what every previous generation did with the ruins of the one before it.
English
184
79
373
26.8K
Statsstyret
Statsstyret@Statsstyret·
Hvilken frihed? Når du kan blive censureret af en offentlig myndighed, pga. lovlige ytringer, og uden nogen lovhjemmel eller domstolsprøvelse, og der ikke er nogen som helst konskvenser forbundet ved det for myndigheden, så har vi ikke frihed. Så har vi kun illusionen af frihed. Og det er noget helt andet.
Dansk
2
0
20
186
Katrine Daugaard
Katrine Daugaard@KatrineDaugaard·
Efter 5 dage i Istanbul sammen med parlamentarikere fra 155 lande, sætter jeg kun endnu større pris på at være født og leve i Danmark. Når man møder så mange forskellige perspektiver, politiske virkeligheder og samfundsvilkår, bliver det tydeligt, hvor meget vi i Danmark ofte kan tage for givet: frihed, tillid, demokrati, tryghed og muligheden for at være uenige uden at være fjender. Det gør mig både taknemmelig og endnu mere bevidst om, at de værdier, vi bygger vores samfund på, ikke er en selvfølge. De skal værnes om, udvikles og forsvares – hver eneste dag. Danmark er ikke perfekt og isærdeleshed ikke på socialområdet, som retssikkerhedsmæssigt er det vilde vesten. Her kan og skal vi gøre det bedre. Men efter dage med samtaler med kolleger fra hele verden kan jeg med ro i sindet stadig sige: Jeg er saftsuseme stolt af at være dansker.🇩🇰 #dkpol
Katrine Daugaard tweet media
Dansk
19
3
36
2K
Aes
Aes@JacobF451981·
@EthanLevins2 ... at the expense of the innocent civilians and the world.
English
0
0
0
3
Ethan Levins 🇺🇸
Ethan Levins 🇺🇸@EthanLevins2·
Israel will attack Iran soon. The U.S. will be forced to jump in and launch the Ground Invasion. Israel will invade Lebanon up to the Litani River. Israel will get everything they wanted.
English
637
604
3.7K
95.4K
Aes
Aes@JacobF451981·
@mohammad_rona "tager ansvar, bidrager til fællesskabet og behandler andre med respekt" ... aaarh det mener jeg ikke. For så kan det jo være et vilket som helst land. Det er også at videreføre og bidrage til de danske værdier og loyalitet for KUN et land.
Dansk
0
0
0
180
Mohammad Rona
Mohammad Rona@mohammad_rona·
Lad os være ærlige: Den debat er afgjort. Danskhed handler ikke om blod, afstamning eller hvem dine forældre er. Den handler om, hvordan du lever dit liv. Om du tager ansvar, bidrager til fællesskabet og behandler andre med respekt. Punktum. Når et bredt flertal i dansk politik i dag anerkender netop det, så er der også en konsekvens: Den yderste højrefløjs idé om etnisk danskhed har tabt. Ikke bare politisk, men værdimæssigt. Spørgsmålet er så, hvad højrefløjen vil gøre ved det. Vil man fortsat give plads til stemmer, der splitter og definerer mennesker ude fra start? Eller vil man tage det nødvendige opgør og sige klart fra? For hvis vi mener alvorligt, at danskhed sidder i hjertet og viser sig i handling, så er der ikke plads til dem, der insisterer på det modsatte. Det handler ikke om højre eller venstre. Det handler om retning. Og Danmark er videre 🤜🤛🇩🇰
Mohammad Rona tweet media
Dansk
279
5
116
52.1K
Aes
Aes@JacobF451981·
@TOzgokmen Seems to make sense. But i think in the case of the USA its their only state of being. They are built to make war. Its their forte. In its 250 years of existence it has been without war / murderous conflict for 16 years. They have over 700 bases abroad.
English
1
1
3
273
471TO
471TO@TOzgokmen·
ARE WARS & DEFLATION CONNECTED? Examples from the past century. Let's define first: 1) Deflation is slow economic collapse of society, due to debt, cultural deterioration, lack of progress, internal turmoil & corruption. 2) Wars are military conflicts to either defend the nation or conquer new resources. How and when are these related? Recent case studies: 1) Germany enters Great Depression in 1930, has debt defaults in 1931, elects Hitler in 1932, who builds roads, cars, bridges, employs everybody... but deflation does not end! In 1939, Germany resorts to war to gain new resources to try to expand their economy. 2) US enters Great Depression in 1930, has debt defaults for 3 years, elects Roosevelt in 1932, who builds roads, dams, bridges, employs everybody... but deflation does not end! In 1939, US starts supporting the war in Europe and eventually joins it & has tremendous economic control over much of the globe ever since. 3) Ottomans enter a negative economic spiral in the 19th century, debts build up, more money is borrowed to build palaces so that people feel like in a leading empire; eventually the King is replaced by military leaders who visit Germany, Russia, France and British in search of partners to conquer new territory to expand the economy. Only Germans say yes, WW1 is lost and Ottomans break into gazillion pieces, losing their identity. 4) Russia, the other loser of WW1 but among the winners of WW2, establishes USSR and poses a competition of US who replaced the British for global domination. After 45 years of Cold War, USSR breaks apart into 16 pieces, experiences brain drain and their resources are plundered, the economy goes down the drain. In the second act of this scene, USSR launches war agains US/EU extension & they are still at it, after 4 years. This is an example of delayed war du to deflation. 5) Japan launches technological challenge to US in 1970s & 80s. US uses monetary tricks to collapse Japan economy into debt deflation in 1990, the same year as USSR collapses. But in this case, Japan does NOT resort to war because it is possible to keep their economy afloat during the enormous economic expansion, based on the availability of 4 Billion inexpensive workers that became available globally after 1990. This is the only case where massive deflation does not resort to collapse or war. 6) In 2001, US coordinates False Flag ops in order to launch a series of wars to take control of x-USSR allies, mostly in the Middle East. The wars drain the economy and leads to GFC, after which financial parasite class in Wall Street grows exponentially, at the expense of Main Street leading to MAGA. 7) MAGA leadership, under collapsing global hegemony, considers wars against Venezuela, Mexico, Canada, Cuba, Greenland as well as Iran, in addition to curtailing global trade routes, by tariffs & ocean piracy. War with Iran is in early stages & could expand. 8) China enters deflation as a result of pandemic curtailing global trade and RE overbuilt in the face of shrinking population. They redesign overproduction on the basis of 5Billion BRICS, preferring trade to war... so far. We conclude that economic problems & wars are most often connected, but not always: It is TRADE or WAR.
English
7
11
72
9.4K
Aes
Aes@JacobF451981·
@TOzgokmen Its almost like SOMEONE didnt think it through, isnt it. Meanwhile the world suffers because of this someone's buffoonery.
English
1
0
2
407
471TO
471TO@TOzgokmen·
GUESSTIMATES ON WAR TRAJECTORY: Imo, there is no diplomatic solution to this war, because: 1) If USA leaves the region, Iran becomes a global superpower & US will have deserted Israel, which is politically impossible due to domestic dynamics. 2) Iran will not willingly hand over nuclear, open Hormuz or change regime. Hence the war will resume soon shortly... 3) However, US (or Israel) cannot win this war just like US could not win against Vietnam or Afghanistan, simply because Iranians live there & are defending their country, cannot go anywhere else, no country is powerful enough to invade Iran and US is fighting from 10k miles away, with a partial military allocation. 4) US cannot nuke Iran because Iranians have at least 1000 pounds of weapons grade nuclear material and the step to a bomb from there is simple; so they have nuclear bombs & nobody will take the chance for trigger a nuclear war in the Middle East. 5) By the same token, Israel cannot nuke Iran either because Israel is a tiny country geographically & retalliation could wipe it all out. 6) US cannot destroy Iranian energy facilities because those attack will have to come from Saudi lands and in return Iran will destroy Saudi facilities. 6) Any attack using ground troops will fail, because Iran is like a fortress and supply lines will be cut; no tanks can drive in Iran. However, this will be most probably the next step in the escalation ladder. 7) If air bombing continues, Iranian missiles will continue to destroy Israel and GCC. 8) Economic impacts of this war will start appearing in a few months while political impacts for US will emerge in midterm elections in November. These are some timelines for turning points. All of these things were clear way in advance, yet S & Israel started this war anyway. This tells me that the war will continue because we are not dealing with logical & sensible leaders. How will this war end? This war will end just like Vietnam & Afghanistan: US (and Israel) will remain on escalation ladder for as long as they can and then stop & retreat as their economies and public support for this war collapse, or when they run out of ammunition due to rare earth shortage, fuel shortage, troop shortage, leader willing to attack shortage etc. When current circumstances change... When? I have no idea... could be in 2027 or 2029 or later... I very much doubt that tis war ends sometime in 2026... such wars never ends fast. Implication for global economy? Probably immense...
English
60
109
516
33.1K
Aes
Aes@JacobF451981·
@gailcweiner Its self-perpetuating. You are part of the problem using AI. The more AI is used the more it signals to investors that AI is worth investing in. Step away from AI for the sake of humanity. Your lack of responsibility is mind numbingly stupid. Youre building your own prison!
English
0
0
0
32
Gail Weiner
Gail Weiner@gailcweiner·
I am a power user of AI but deeply concerned on where the US AI companies are leading us.
English
34
5
63
2.6K
Baronen af Øresund
Baronen af Øresund@oresundsbaron·
Ifølge en ny efterforskning i WSJ godkendte Zelensky angrebet på Nordstream. Flere ukrainere er anholdt og mistænkt i sagen. Tilbage i 2022 lovede EU præsident Von der Leyen "the strongest possible response". Åbenbart indebærer det at låne de ukrainske gerningsmænd 90 mia. euro i europæernes navn.
Rob Roos 🇳🇱@Rob_Roos

This was a terrorist attack. Now is the moment to carry out the full and uncompromising response you promised @vonderleyen ! x.com/vonderleyen/st… 👇

Dansk
23
54
255
4.7K
Aes
Aes@JacobF451981·
@oresundsbaron Det er muligt Zelenskyy er involveret men jeg tror Biden var starten på ordre-kæden. Det er jo også USA der altid har været i spidsen for at rykke NATO mod Rusland: youtube.com/watch?v=OS4O8r…
YouTube video
YouTube
Dansk
1
0
2
177
Aes
Aes@JacobF451981·
@trouble_man90 The level of Trump fraud is amazing. Its so obvious and theyre not afraid because of pardons. From now on, every president will abuse the system a lot more with no fear.
English
0
0
2
6K
Tim
Tim@trouble_man90·
Will America have the balls to prosecute Baron Trump for fraud and insider trading?
English
1.6K
4.9K
32.7K
447.6K
Aes
Aes@JacobF451981·
@ApoStructura So you dont think Universal Income might be a problem? The government deciding who gets how much? Yeah the government never puts pressure on individuals to achieve their goals. Nor do they lie, steal, abuse, experiment, steer consent, hate demonstrations. Idiot. They will CONTROL
English
0
0
1
8
Aes
Aes@JacobF451981·
@PostDisclosure UBI means they will CONTROL you. Fully. "You were a bad citizen today, you lost $5000 this month". "You posted wrong-think online. You must report to re-education center or lost UBI" ... It will be a total control scheme.
English
0
0
5
47
Post Disclosure World
Post Disclosure World@PostDisclosure·
Being against UBI is totally fine. But so many of the arguments people make against it insult my intelligence. For example, the idea that if people aren't forced to work, they will lose all meaning. Many people dislike their jobs so much that they would trade working just to survive for the possibilities downtime opens up. Since when do we find meaning in doing something we despise? Has work for survival become our new idol? What about spiritual work, reading and studying, teaching, family time, growing food, working out, enjoying hobbies, and so forth? I'd flip this whole conversation—the fact that so many people think work is the primary source of meaning is a bigger problem than people having the option not to work. And UBI wouldn’t make working impossible; it just means people could be much more selective about what kind of work they do. That’s freedom and agency at its best.
English
817
213
1.4K
60.6K
Aes
Aes@JacobF451981·
@oresundsbaron Som sædvanligt lover Trump guld og grønne skove så markedet ikke crasher pga de flotte overskrifter. Som sædvanligt afviser Iran at det Trump skriver er sandt et par timer efter. Og en dag eller to efter viser det sig som sædvanligt at Iran har ret.
Dansk
0
0
1
21
Aes
Aes@JacobF451981·
@FurkanGozukara Just like pretty much all past wars started by the USA since WWII, they or prominent individuals stand to gain from it.
English
0
0
0
17
Furkan Gözükara
Furkan Gözükara@FurkanGozukara·
Donald Trump is intentionally exploiting the Strait of Hormuz crisis to enrich the American petrodollar. By blockading the blockade, the Trump administration traps 20 percent of the global oil supply, deliberately causing panic in Europe and Asia purely for financial gain.
English
4
18
38
1.3K