🇺🇾 Emilio
551 posts

🇺🇾 Emilio
@akade_dev
I'm a developer transitioning to design engineer.


opencode 1.3.0 will no longer autoload the claude max plugin we did our best to convince anthropic to support developer choice but they sent lawyers it's your right to access services however you wish but it is also their right to block whoever they want we can't maintain an official plugin so it's been removed from github and marked deprecated on npm appreciate our partners at openai, github and gitlab who are going the other direction and supporting developer freedom



was messing with the OpenAI base URL in Cursor and caught this accounts/anysphere/models/kimi-k2p5-rl-0317-s515-fast so composer 2 is just Kimi K2.5 with RL at least rename the model ID


Anthropic's own study proves Vibe-Coding and AI coding assistants harm skill building. "AI use impairs conceptual understanding, code reading, and debugging abilities, without delivering significant efficiency gains on average" Developers learning 1 new Python library scored 17% lower on tests when using AI. Delegating code generation to AI stops you from actually understanding the software. Using AI did not make the programmers statistically faster at completing tasks. Participants wasted time writing prompts instead of actually coding. Scores crashed below 40% when developers let AI write everything. Developers who only asked AI for simple concepts scored above 65%. Managers should not pressure engineers to use AI for endless productivity. Forcing top speed means workers lose the ability to debug systems later. ---- Paper Link – arxiv. org/abs/2601.20245 Paper Title: "How AI Impacts Skill Formation"


Complexity visualiser








Code Review optimizes for depth and may be more expensive than other solutions, like our open source GitHub Action. Reviews generally average $15–25, billed on token usage, and they scale based on PR complexity.


wow Anthropic just published a crazy report on AI replacing your job and er... you might want to look at this: - #1 most at-risk jobs are computer programmers, financial analysts (rip excel bros) and customer service - most at-risk workers are female, white, older and higher paid. - BUT high-risk jobs *aren't* firing employees... they've STOPPED HIRING. biggest victims: college graduates (4X more likely to be fucked) - entry-level hiring has dropped 14% since chatgpt launched (for highest risk jobs) - SAFEST jobs are... bartenders, dishwashers and lifeguards - any manual labour that AI can't automate (yet) this accounts for 30% of the job market. - this was the scariest part: AI models are capable of automating most work TODAY but are prevented because of law and slow company adoption. so its not even a fucking skill issue its an ADOPTION issue. - now its important to understand that the study is based on real world data but also 'theoretical' intelligence. so take it with a pinch of salt. some jobs (manual labor) didn't even meet min. data reqs i applaud anthropic on being so damn transparent - they're literally the company behind claude who will be responsible for these impacts studies like this will help us figure it the hell out. LOT of change coming this year.



Couldn't help it! Had to give GPT 5.4 (High) + /fast mode a try. → Added height terrains to the level → Animation tweens for the jumps Used xHigh to solve a gnarly bug with the controls successfully 💪 This Final Fantasy Tactics-inspired game was completely vibe coded!


thinking about the conservation of focus again








