Peer Richelsen

52.9K posts

Peer Richelsen banner
Peer Richelsen

Peer Richelsen

@peer_rich

i make time @calcom https://t.co/svpVpBOIvu

Katılım Aralık 2012
4.1K Takip Edilen37.7K Takipçiler
Peer Richelsen retweetledi
Axel Großklaus
Well, I'm one of those parents. Could you now please start "putting back the power into the hands of parents" like you're promising here and allow me to raise my child without dystopian government interference?
Paul Walsh@Paul__Walsh

Ursula von der Leyen has confirmed that everyone in the EU will need to use the EU's app for identity authentication before being able to access or post on social media websites. 🇪🇺 As an expert in online child safety, I am here to expose the misinformation and misdirection in von der Leyen's statements. Today von der Leyen said: "This is not about whether children can access social media, it is about whether social media can access our children". 💡The first part is true. This isn't about children. It's about surveillance and combating political dissent. A state that can't control its own citizens is more dangerous than a state rife with criminals. The second part is a PR soundbite that politicians are using like a campaign slogan straight out of 1984. 🇪🇺"The question is no longer if children face risks online, but what can we do to give children a safer start online". 💡No. You can't give children a "safer start" online any more than you can offline. In the offline world, the government doesn't enforce curfews or ban children from entering liquor stores, bars or restaurants. That's a parent's responsibility. The digital world should be no different. 🇪🇺"The age verification app is one of the tools to get it done". 💡This is a contradiction because she also said "It won't be foolproof". 🇪🇺"It's easy to use, it is privacy preserving and it is open source". 💡The app was compromised as soon as it was released. "Privacy-preserving" age verification is an oxymoron. You can't verify a person's age without verifying their identity. Where or how that age is shared afterwards is irrelevant. 🇪🇺"This is basically about putting back the power into the hands of parents". 💡More from 1984. The EU is doing the opposite. Parents are having their authority stripped by politicians who think they know better. Many parents are capable and unaffected by peer pressure, and they know how to use parental controls to block any app classified as 13+. Some teens are safe, their parents trust them, and the state has no business overruling that trust. 🇪🇺"We don't give our children keys to the car before they have their licence" 💡Comparing an app to a car is a false equivalence used to justify mass surveillance. Governments don't decide when a young person is ready for car keys, guardians do. 💡Forcing every adult and child into a biometric checkpoint just to use an app or website is not licensing drivers. It's the state seizing everyone's keys, locking the garage, and forcing every driver to ask a private company for permission to take a drive. 💡 This is a gross, unethical overreach that strips authority from parents while imposing state sanctioned identity verification on every adult who doesn't even have a child. 💡Additionally, people who pass a test, obtain a licence and drive a car aren't forced to use an app to constantly authenticate their suitability to drive. 🇪🇺"We do not let them buy alcohol until they are legally allowed" 💡False equivalence. We don't force every person to show ID at a shopping mall entrance just because a few people might buy alcohol with a meal at a restaurant. Some parents are okay with their 12 year-old going to the mall with friends while others aren't. Either way, it's their choice. Whatever irresponsible decisions some parents might make, every adult in the country shouldn't be forced to pay the price. 🇪🇺"It won't be foolproof" 💡This is all the proof we need to show that the EU and every government know that banning social media for teens won't protect them. When pressed by journalists about VPNs being used to circumvent a ban, politicians always state the ban isn't a silver bullet and will take time. The Mayor of London, Sadiq Khan went as far as to say "we know it's not the solution". 💡Either age verification works, or it doesn't. As a technical expert in this space, I can tell you there are no additional steps to take and no progress to be made. Either the approach does what it is supposed to do, or it's not fit for purpose. If they claim a bulletproof solution is coming, it can only mean one thing. They intend to ban or restrict VPNs to people who verify their identity. 🇪🇺"It will take time to invite the cultural change that is already taking shape in our society, just as it took time to outlaw drink driving, just as it took time to use seatbelts in the cars. Great change never happens overnight, but when it comes to our safety it is always worth it". 💡Comparing a social media ban and age verification to seatbelts is a completely broken analogy. Seatbelts are a safety feature that protects children while allowing them to travel in a car. A ban doesn't give kids a seatbelt. It kicks them out of the car entirely. 💡Instead of supporting parents who want to guide their own children through the digital world, this heavy-handed law strips away parental authority by banning the apps and websites that many parents are perfectly fine with and actively monitor. 💡Furthermore, enforcing these bans requires biometric age verification, which means forcing millions of adult citizens to scan their IDs, faces or credit cards just to browse the internet. That isn't a common-sense traffic law. 💡It's a digital checkpoint on every street. True safety means teaching kids how to navigate the digital world safely with real guardrails and parental guidance, not burning down digital spaces for everyone under the guise of protection. 🇪🇺☠️ The EU wants to ban teens from social media so every person is forced to verify their identity before they can read, share or post anything online. In their words, this is to protect children from dangerous content. 🇪🇺☠️ The EU wants to enforce "Chat Control" so every app has to monitor everything people say privately inside it, including apps with end-to-end encryption. In their words, this is to protect children from dangerous criminals. 💡Where this ends 🇪🇺 "If you want a picture of the future, imagine a boot stamping on a human face - forever". George Orwell, 1984.

English
0
1
3
319
Peer Richelsen
Peer Richelsen@peer_rich·
@Mqsley and no governments stops me from signing into any website which from what it looks like EUID “could” if abused
English
0
0
0
87
Peer Richelsen
Peer Richelsen@peer_rich·
@Mqsley no not at all there is a lot of police shenanigans for people insulting politicians which is questionable (bad) but i can say “Merz is a horrible chancellor and should resign” without repercussions
English
1
0
0
126
Peer Richelsen
Peer Richelsen@peer_rich·
turns out you can just grow things
Peer Richelsen tweet media
English
3
0
39
1.6K
Peer Richelsen
Peer Richelsen@peer_rich·
the real cost of a meeting isnt the hour on the calendar its everything that doesnt happen because of it a one hour meeting with six people isnt one hour its six hours of collective focus pulled from six different contexts and context switching is expensive in ways that dont show up in any time tracking tool we try to default to written communication at cal.com not because meetings are bad but because most meetings are solving a problem that a well written message could have solved faster and without interrupting everyone at once the meetings worth having are the ones where real-time reaction matters a hard conversation, a decision that needs everyone in the room everything else is better as a doc, a loom, etc
English
5
1
21
2.2K
Peer Richelsen
Peer Richelsen@peer_rich·
(dont translate this to english lmao)
English
1
0
3
627
Peer Richelsen
Peer Richelsen@peer_rich·
my god german is a wild language
English
3
0
1
918
Peer Richelsen
Peer Richelsen@peer_rich·
@skeptrune are yall under SOC2 compliance? how do you manage merging without human approval
English
5
0
25
1.7K
Nick Khami
Nick Khami@skeptrune·
i personally think code review is dead. the team does not agree. directionally found this surprising.
Nick Khami tweet media
English
300
3
1.2K
463.2K
Peer Richelsen
Peer Richelsen@peer_rich·
@JesseSchoberg its like cal.com but without the m so when you make a booking, the “m” wont show up “30 minute meeting” would be “30 inute eeting”
English
2
0
49
3.6K
Peer Richelsen
Peer Richelsen@peer_rich·
@satoruhakase i was running a marketplace to buy and sell magic: the gathering cards that we had to shutdown in 2020 @peeroke/shutting-down-mage-market-2fc7006946b4" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">medium.com/@peeroke/shutt…
English
1
0
5
1.1K
Errol
Errol@satoruhakase·
@peer_rich what changed,what were you doing before that?
English
1
0
0
603
Peer Richelsen
Peer Richelsen@peer_rich·
@tomhaerter i need to speak to someone in charge of domains in Albania min. 3 characters but so did .co and twitter got t.co somehow
English
1
0
21
4.1K
Peer Richelsen
Peer Richelsen@peer_rich·
extremely important to monitor your 3 agents properly
Peer Richelsen tweet media
English
15
1
283
10.6K
Peer Richelsen
Peer Richelsen@peer_rich·
@TweetsOfSumit if they can manage to keep nazis out its a promising direction but i think it wont get any mainstream adoption im not even sure its a party you can vote for? looks like a think tank
English
1
0
2
166
Sumit Kumar
Sumit Kumar@TweetsOfSumit·
@peer_rich I just discovered teamfreiheit. Still reading into it but looks promising.
English
1
1
11
1.1K
Peer Richelsen
Peer Richelsen@peer_rich·
i wish the pirate party would make a comeback in Germany as an alternative to the Afd, centrist, privacy and freedom first with liquid democracy and tech-first
English
9
0
35
3.5K