Peer Richelsen

pretty crazy there are parents out there naming their children after AI Claude Clairaut whats next? ChatGPT Cooper

ok wtf

Europe Backs ‘EU Inc’ — But will it go all the way? The European Commission has thrown its weight behind the idea of a cross-EU company structure, dubbed “EU Inc”, aimed at making it easier to build and scale startups across the bloc. But while the political signal is clear, the execution so far falls short of what founders and investors had hoped for. @Pathfounder’s Mike Butcher caught up with @andreasklinger, founder of Protoype Capital, an @euinc_petition co-organiser, to discuss the latest developments.

we need 1 not 27 new corporations

My opinion on the European Commission's proposal for an "EU Inc": We are getting the icing, without the cake. We asked for structural reform, for a genuine 28th regime. Draghi asked for a 28th regime. Letta asked for a 28th regime. The Council asked for a 28th regime. We got 27 new national forms instead. Each in their local ecosystem, local courts, and only partial harmonization, with *some* genuinely appreciated goodies. But I fear these goodies won't be consequential. Because this was always about building something that is better than Delaware. If we can't manage that Europe's best and brightest will continue founding outside of Europe, will move elsewhere, take capital from elsewhere and create jobs and growth elsewhere. Europe deserves better than this. And we frankly cannot allow unambition and political complexity to hold us back from building the Europe we need. If the EU and all 27 member states cannot deliver a true EU–INC, then we might need to build a coalition of genuinely ambitious European countries that are actually serious about fixing Europe. Why should a damn EU Court - that apparently is "too hard" to implement - keep us back from reaching global competitiveness and technological sovereignity in Europe? It shouldn't. European founders, investors and everyone who cares about Europe need to step up now and lobby their national governments and MEPs for a real EU–INC. Nobody else will do it for us. Clearly. Watch Lambertus Robben of @EU_Made_Simple analyse the "EU Inc" proposal by the Commission below. This is spot on. We can do better. For Europe. 🇪🇺🫡

bootstrap vs VC — colorized, 2026

velocity is architecture we shipped ios and android apps and multi browser extensions in under 3 weeks all without forking into 5 codebases it took one codebase shared logic and shared components thats how startups need to ship

wanna work with us at cal.com? 👀 we are hiring a remote scale engineer and an account executive global team, async, no bullshit come build something big with us: cal.com/jobs

@iammoizfarooq oh goddd yess i hope its accurate all previous attempts were at least 20% off

stripe has no MRR endpoint. baremetrics charges $129/mo to calculate it for you. I built a free open source CLI that does it in 3 seconds: npx stripe-pulse mrr → $392.00 MRR, churn, LTV, NRR, 20 commands. free forever. github.com/progrmoiz/stri…

> be Zuckerberg. > rename Facebook to Meta in 2021. > declare the future is the metaverse. > in 2022–2023, Spend $31B+ on Reality Labs. > Legless avatars, empty rooms, still no users. > Stock crashes 70%. > Keep going anyway. > Total spend crosses $80B+. > in 2023, AI takes over. > quietly stop saying “metaverse.” > launch Llama. > rebrand as “AI-first.” > pull the plug. Rename your company for a product, then abandon the product. Greatest pivot in tech history or the most expensive mistake ever made.

@thekitze @dorutu_ bmi mogging too

@dorutu_ @peer_rich tallmogging him

CarCast with @thekitze

@snorripall @thekitze

@thekitze "140, rookie numbers" lol, typical deutsche autobahn speak

we had a lot of fun recording this with peer (very) rich give it a listen x.com/i/status/20342…

@thekitze so much of 3d printing is just satisfying the husband while printing and the wife after

oh god..

Meta has announced it is shutting down its VR metaverse on 15th of June. All 5 users are reportedly devastated. 😏

🇪🇺 EU Inc explained: Europe has 27 countries. But also 27 different ways to start a company. That means: • Different incorporation rules • Different shareholder laws • Different employee stock options • Different reporting & compliance Result? European startups struggle to scale inside Europe. So founders do something crazy: They expand to the US first. 👉 EU Inc is the fix. EU Inc (also called the 28th regime) would be: • One company structure • Valid across all EU countries • Recognized by investors everywhere With EU Inc, a founder could: ✅ Incorporate once ✅ Hire across borders easily ✅ Offer stock options EU-wide ✅ Raise capital faster ✅ Scale without re-incorporating Think: 🇺🇸 Delaware C-Corp But designed for Europe’s 450M people. @euinc

theres a difference between  move fast and break things and move fast and own things breaking things is inevitable owning means reverting quickly and explaining your reasoning  if you ship fast you will ship regressions  the question is not did something break but rather how did we respond did you revert immediately or wait for a quarterly review did you tell users what happened or quietly pretend nothing did owning looks like rollback as soon as you see real damage clear changelogs and honest post mortems direct replies to the loudest critics its not about being perfect but about being accountable in public the worst move is to gaslight your users if they say this is worse and your response is youre using it wrong youre done people forgive bugs but they dont forgive being treated like they imagined them move fast and own things is the only sustainable version of spend ship aggressively but be even more aggressive about fixing reverting and communicating speed without responsibility is a disservice to your paying users

not all heroes wear capes.. @andreasklinger 🙇‍♂️

The EU has unveiled a red-tape-cutting plan dubbed “EU Inc.” to boost the emergence of companies that could compete on the world stage with US and Chinese rivals bloomberg.com/news/articles/…