Post

@CommandCodeAI 100% GPT-5.6. GLM 5.2 is amazing for open-source, yet even for value GPT-5.6 still comes up on top.
English

@CommandCodeAI GPT-5.6 for sure you can't compare Ford with Geely car! They too far from each other!
English

@CommandCodeAI add custom api key support please, your harness is great in tool using but how will you compete with other agents if you dont support other provider api keys
English

@CommandCodeAI I loved GLM, even this model in high level, no one can beat GPT family!
English

@CommandCodeAI No reason to pick GLM 5.2. Grok 4.5 is better, faster, and cheaper (when accounting for token usage).
English

@CommandCodeAI GLM 5.2 is Luna at best, Competition is Good, In 6 months All GLM, Kimi, Deepseek models will have GPT5.6 SoL as a floor performance wise.
English

@CommandCodeAI GLM 5.2 tends to overthink even simple tasks, and it also lacks multimodal capabilities.
English

@CommandCodeAI GLM 5.2 is not multimodal yet
English

@CommandCodeAI i will choose GLM-5.2 , it hast best produce while compared with cost.
English

@CommandCodeAI GPT 5.6 for sure, GLM 5.2 is solid it is comparable to GPT 5.5 medium
English

@CommandCodeAI For the hardest coding tasks, GPT-5.6 is the safer choice. For value, GLM-5.2 is remarkably competitive—I’d use it for most agent iterations and reserve pricier models for the hardest cases. GLM-5.2 is available via AIMOWAY. Disclosure: I run it. aimoway.com
English

@CommandCodeAI If I had a paid Zcode plan, I would definitely test GLM 5.2.
English

@CommandCodeAI I'm less interested in "who wins" and more interested in which one becomes my default after a week of use.
English

@CommandCodeAI for coding?
GPT-5.6
for value?
GLM 5.2 is surprisingly competitive
English

@CommandCodeAI Grok 4.5 as orchestrator, dav4pro as executor. Win
English























