The fee Villa are paying Chelsea for Alejandro Garnacho in the summer of 2027 is £60m fixed. Garnacho has to make 10 PL appearances to make it permanent #AVFC
@JHFootballAgent I don't trust Aston Villa though, they can do him the way they did with Harvey Elliot.
Didn't play him so that the can't trigger the permanent signing clause.
@JHFootballAgent He will not play 10 games, that’s the play here. Last season it happened to another player, forgetting his name. @grok who was that player
@JHFootballAgent He will play 9 games and sit the rest of the season on the bench , it’s the Eliot deal all over again , it’s the worst deal you can sign as a footballer , it can end your career.
𝙽𝚘 𝚜𝚠𝚎𝚊𝚝.
From the mind of Zach Cregger, director of Weapons and Barbarian. Watch the official trailer for Resident Evil. Filmed for IMAX – in theatres 9.18.
@JHFootballAgent Chelsea is playing a chess game here. I’m sure Villa is paying a certain amount for the loan. If Garnacho performs well, Villa pay the 60m willingly if he didn’t Chelsea will have to recall and sell at lower price and with the loan fee villa is paying right now, it will
@JHFootballAgent Utter bollocks. They paid £40m for him and after Harvey Elliott we are not going to agree to pay that amount of he hits 10 games. We've been burnt once with the Elliot deal.
@JHFootballAgent Ex agent for a reason. Pretend journalist going forward. Widely reported fee of £40m and if 10 PL appearances was the obligation trigger then it would very obviously fail UEFA’s 45 day rule on swaps
@JHFootballAgent This us a deal garnacho should be careful about. Last season Villa revised to intentionally use a player to avoid paying a permanent fee.
@JHFootballAgent Garnacho is washed. Not worth £60m of anyone’s money, but then these transfers between themselves and Chelsea aren’t solely based on footballing ability