Call that the why-axis

@LongFormMath Maybe I'll do a session in 7th grde math next year on deceptive graphics.

@LongFormMath Those Latvian women sure do weigh a lot. Don't mess around with them!

@LongFormMath This is almost certainly intentional, and very funny

@LongFormMath @DEFAKATOR_Off "Si tu penses pas à vérifier l'origine, tu risques de pas faire longtemps bonne mine"

@LongFormMath The scale of intimidation

@LongFormMath This chart can be made in 3D. Here's a start. twitter.com/TeXgallery/sta…

@LongFormMath Graphs are really scary if scaled at accuracy, I was just flabbergasted looking at India on X axis, (like how short 😂)

@LongFormMath mostly dwarf women in india? must be due to some evolutionary pressure. doesnt make sense. how do they even give birth?

@LongFormMath You have do not any work except measuring height of girls from different countries . Go to toilet and take measurements of your toilet seat 😂😂😂

@LongFormMath „Why did we omit the zero?“-axis.

@LongFormMath That axis doesn't suit the bar shapes; it would've had to start at zero inches to look more realistic. Would've also like the bars to have equal widths for easy comparison. And my handler says she dislikes pink. Do the two shortest countries happen to be less well-fed?

@LongFormMath numerical diff. is of 5 inches or less than 1/2 feet but the graphical representation of diff between indian women's avg. height is like 1/5 of the avg. latvian women ht. not a lot of diff. if you consider the diff. in prosperity & the female pop. latvia >1 mil and india>600 mil.

@LongFormMath Not using the metric system is bad enough