Post

Ounka
Ounka@OunkaOnX·
Tucker: "Was Iran about to get a nuke?" Kent: "No. They've had a religious ruling against it since 2004. We had no intelligence that it was being disobeyed." So the entire war-the thousands dead, the billions spent, the American soldiers buried-was based on nothing. No nukes. No threat. Just a lie sold to justify a war that was always for Israel
English
1K
7.8K
28.8K
1.4M
Michaela Fachar
Michaela Fachar@MichaelaFachar·
@OunkaOnX That’s a lie. JCPOA and the inspections were corrupt. There was plenty of Iran intel on this.
English
22
2
19
11.5K
Jon Stephen Zwayer
Jon Stephen Zwayer@Heartcom888·
@OunkaOnX Oh, how Tucker likes to jump on the antisemitic, anti-American bandwagon before he looks. There goes your credibility down the drain along with Candace Owens, Meghan Kelly's, MTG, and all the anti-American Democrats, Muslims, and Hollywood "Stars".
Jon Stephen Zwayer tweet media
English
2
1
0
242
🦁 Maccabi Lev-Ari מכבי לב ארי
@OunkaOnX Perhaps he can try to explain then for what logical reason they had 60% enriched Uranium. His own words show they were a threat. Perhaps it’s because he’s under FBI investigation for leaking classified info ?
🦁 Maccabi Lev-Ari מכבי לב ארי tweet media🦁 Maccabi Lev-Ari מכבי לב ארי tweet media
English
2
13
209
4.2K
Christian Farlake
Christian Farlake@CFar2022·
@OunkaOnX @grok: fact-check that Iran was enriching nuclear material beyond levels needed for civilian purposes
English
1
0
0
2.4K
bansville
bansville@bansville·
@OunkaOnX Joe Kent says Iran wasn’t close to a nuke and had a religious ban against them yet this was still used to justify war. Thousands dead, billions spent, all based on a threat that may never have existed. How do we let this happen?
English
23
0
5
2K
American Proud
American Proud@Homeland_1776·
@OunkaOnX If anyone believes @TuckerCarlson or @joekent16jan19 you’re delusional. Kent either lied to the nation, or the President to get us into this war, watch his videos, & read his tweets. Lastly, if this fucking bitch was leaking intel the @FBI should drag him through the streets.
English
0
1
1
28
joseph
joseph@Joseph181525·
@OunkaOnX Yeah no threats to the USA at all
joseph tweet mediajoseph tweet mediajoseph tweet mediajoseph tweet media
English
10
4
80
8.8K
Vet Dad
Vet Dad@VetDad25·
@OunkaOnX To be fair, someone who accepts that idea from Iran at face value should not be in our national intelligence or counterterror enterprise
English
3
3
83
1.9K
Larrry C
Larrry C@LarrryC1·
@OunkaOnX Did Tucker ask Kent why the Iranians didn't allow unimpeded inspections by the IAEA? They could have cleared the worry, but chose to bury the facilities deep under a mountain. Draw your own conclusions...
English
2
0
1
487
Distinguished Gentleman 🤵‍♂️
@OunkaOnX Iran enriched uranium up to 60%. There is no need for civilian use of uranium over 4%. You can’t trust Iranian leader’s words. Trust their actions.
English
6
15
306
8.3K
LindaKaye
LindaKaye@cowgirl0866·
1. The man telling you this provided no actual evidence. 2. The man telling you this said the opposite just a year ago 3. The man telling you this was not privy to the intelligence regarding the current action against Iran. 4. The man telling you this had been caught leaking information, given a warning not to do it again or he would face investigation. He did do it again and was facing investigation, which is why he resigned.
English
5
9
57
2.3K
Steven Cox
Steven Cox@Boomerexistence·
Religious ruling?!? Kent forgot to mention, Tawriya (also spelled tawriyah or tawriya; Arabic: تورية) is an Islamic jurisprudential concept that refers to deliberate ambiguity or equivocation in speech. It involves saying something that is technically true according to the literal or intended meaning in the speaker’s mind, but which the listener is likely to misunderstand or interpret in a different (often more straightforward or opposite) way. The word derives from the Arabic root meaning “to conceal” or “to hide,” and in religious terminology, it describes using words with multiple possible meanings—where the speaker intends a less obvious or “hidden” sense, while the apparent or common meaning misleads the listener without the speaker uttering a direct falsehood.
English
1
0
1
185
Matthew Underwood
Matthew Underwood@MATTUNDERW00D·
@OunkaOnX When @joekent16jan19 said, “we had no intelligence…”, he likely broke the law. Speaking like that is highly regulated by official processes and his ability to directly address classified information is a matter of legality.
English
1
0
3
1.9K
REXX
REXX@rotaercz·
@OunkaOnX There was talks about FBI planning a false flag attack on American soil and blaming it on Iran to garner support for boots on the ground. Joe Kent resigned. Coincidence?
English
7
6
141
6.7K
Alex
Alex@Kasxol·
@OunkaOnX Why would they openly admit enriching to 60%? @grok
English
1
0
2
5.3K
🔱Bodybag Guy🔱
@OunkaOnX Oh I mean if the terrorists say they don’t want a nuke, I guess they’re being honest.
English
5
3
218
2.1K
TheReformRepublican
TheReformRepublican@TheReformRepub1·
@OunkaOnX If nukes were ruled out in 2004, why did Iran negotiate with the U.S., China, France, U.K., and others in 2015 to slow down development of nukes?
English
1
10
124
2.2K
John Kirk
John Kirk@JohnKir08660882·
I asked Grok. Grok says: Iran's government (via its negotiators) directly told US representatives that they possessed enough material (specifically, 460 kilograms of 60% enriched uranium) to produce 11 nuclear bombs—occurred during nuclear talks between the two countries in early 2026. I suggest Tucker & Kent explain why they don't believe, or don't know, about the claims of Iran's government.
English
2
0
1
159
Lee Pen
Lee Pen@Bible_Scientist·
@OunkaOnX Iran informed in the last diplomatic discussion that they had enough material for 11 missiles. Do you think they would have even hesitated to bomb us or Israel?
English
1
0
1
126
gbjohns53
gbjohns53@gbjohns53·
Tucker Carlson, to me, has no credibility. Somewhere along the line, he has gone anti-semitic and total isolationist regardless of the consequences. With Joe Kent, information seems to indicate that his current wife has taken control of his life. And now, when the FBI investigation being made public - which was started almost a month ago - it seems that our buddy Kent was the leaker.
English
0
0
0
45
🙏🇺🇲~*Guarding the Grid *~🇺🇲🙏~ USA
@OunkaOnX Is that why the IAEA determined that they had 460kg of 60% enriched uranium which serves no other purpose then be used to further enrich to get to weapons grade? Energy maxes out at 20% Most don't go above 10. Iran was building nukes!
English
0
0
1
51
Zachary Bynx
Zachary Bynx@iliSonixili·
@OunkaOnX Him resigning then immediately ending up on Tucker's podcast is a psyop. All of this is a giant psyop for and against all sides to create the ultimate cloud of confusion. It's funny to me because 99% of the people invested in all of this online are unknowingly participating in it
English
2
1
6
3.6K
Bill
Bill@kindofmaybe·
@OunkaOnX I'm going to give Joe Kent grace to grow. He's very young but has gone from Democratic, to Libertarian, to Republican in a 6 year span. He just seems to like attention to be honest.
English
2
0
2
350
Demosthenes
Demosthenes@paradox6666666·
@OunkaOnX That was Iran mistake. The only way to secure yourself against american aggression is to have nukes.
English
1
6
137
4.1K
Paylaş