Strangest language feature stackoverflow.com/questions/1995…

In JavaScript: '5' + 3 gives '53' Whereas '5' - 3 gives 2

¯\_(ツ)_/¯

༼ つ ◕_◕ ༽つ

@ThePracticalDev Kids, this is why you use ===.

@ThePracticalDev destroyallsoftware.com/talks/wat

@ThePracticalDev pbs.twimg.com/media/B9B7qbVI…

@ThePracticalDev I love the last one :D

@ThePracticalDev AAAHHHHHH!!!!

@ThePracticalDev I have an idea! Let's choose this as the only workable cross-plaftorm programming language for the WHOLE INTERNET!

@ThePracticalDev The biggest question: Is this consistent on all implementations? :D

@ThePracticalDev Thanks for giving me a better example than aaencode (utf-8.jp/public/aaencod…) to explain why JavaScript is the worst.

@ThePracticalDev ...and that's why you should almost always go for ===

@ThePracticalDev @migrrrr me niego

@ThePracticalDev @JasonTrenouth struth! (Or as autocorrect would have it, “struts!”)

@ThePracticalDev (0.001*10) == 0.01 // false ;-)

@ThePracticalDev tableless.com.br/conversao-de-t…

@ThePracticalDev Try the Return True to Win game. alf.nu/ReturnTrue

@ThePracticalDev Everything I remember these quirks I say #eff #javascript

I confirmed the last one is authentic. Bloody hell. @ThePracticalDev @JackTheRipla

@ThePracticalDev @themaxx I would have thrown in the === operator

@ThePracticalDev reminds me of this hilarious talk: destroyallsoftware.com/talks/wat

@ThePracticalDev The most confusing for me is [] == ![] //true

@ThePracticalDev @phessler post-truth?

@ThePracticalDev its a little thing called #coercion, replace all == with === and it all makes sense #JavaScript

@ThePracticalDev @pvblivs The double = and peeps still find it funny? Type conversion or not. That's all.

@ThePracticalDev @RoBiNh0oD #FFSBlecchhh

@ThePracticalDev I didn't think I knew Javascript, but this makes perfect sense to me.

@ThePracticalDev Basically the answer to this is "JavaScript" no matter what.

@ThePracticalDev Aren’t most (or all) of those technically undefined? They could differ from one interpreter to the next, right?

@ThePracticalDev seem's legit.