AfterTheRocket

2.5K posts

AfterTheRocket

AfterTheRocket

@AfterTheRocket

انضم Mart 2023
36 يتبع17 المتابعون
AfterTheRocket
AfterTheRocket@AfterTheRocket·
@wiztom88 @VladTheInflator You may be able to get by just fine without a degree, but you won't be able to skip the fundamentals that are taught in one if you want to stay in. Out of dozens of bootcampers I've worked with, the only one worth keeping was someone who had an Aerospace Engineering degree.
English
0
0
2
46
TM3
TM3@wiztom88·
@VladTheInflator You dont need school to get a coding job. You need the certs and a portfolio of work that translates to todays infrastructures. 10,000$ is high end if your not motivated. Degree days for coding are over. Senior levels require them. Production matters today
English
4
0
21
1.3K
Darth Powell
Darth Powell@VladTheInflator·
This may be the dumbest most boomer shit I've ever seen in my entire life. $600 to get a "coding job" for $150,000? What the fuck are you talking about.
English
274
164
6.1K
511.4K
St. Dionysus
St. Dionysus@Thepeoplesfool·
@ubiquitousnewt He’s providing housing and repairs to his children. Since when is that ‘nothing’? 🤔
English
2
0
0
138
Stella
Stella@ubiquitousnewt·
I know of a wealthy boomer yank down south, (business not friends) who rents out 2 properties. One to his son and one to his daughter, both in their late 20s. He bought both the properties a number of years ago. I asked whether he would give the houses to his children or help them out with a deposit for their own because of the current housing issues. He said "No. What will that teach them?". So basically he is pocketing their rent money. He isn't doing anything productive to help them like putting it into stocks and shares to build up a deposit for them. He's just pocketing the money. He's one of those boomers. "The youth of today, including my children are just lazy. If they wanted a house they work twice as hard just as I did". And that ladies and gents, is how you kill the American dream.
unusual_whales@unusual_whales

"First-time home buying plunges to record low as baby boomers prevent younger Americans from ever owning," per NYP.

English
96
555
10.2K
360.7K
AfterTheRocket
AfterTheRocket@AfterTheRocket·
@FromLtoW @Pat_Stedman He was directly citing men who ditch their wives for a younger, tighter model after they gave up their careers and best years to raise his children without any earnings. No bro, those women deserve to chew his ass up in court absent infidelity or violence.
English
2
0
13
304
FromLtoW
FromLtoW@FromLtoW·
@Pat_Stedman You are basically saying that when a marriage stops , it is fair for the guy (who may struggle with his own employment issues later in life) to continue paying for the woman who has stopped taking care of him for the rest of his lifetime.
English
5
0
13
2.6K
Pat Stedman | Dating & Relationship Coach for Men
We don't know the full story, but I have heard some horror stories IRL about men who never married / got prenups with women and had many kids with them, and then decided later in life to dump these women for someone younger, leaving her basically destitute. Being objective, it's not a good deal for a woman to enter into this sort of arrangement. If you're both W2s, it's reasonable to protect all respective assets coming into a marriage, but it becomes a harder sell for what is built after. If the earnings differential between you is within 2-1 I'm not sure it really matters much, you risk making things too transactional. If he's well established compared to her however or has companies, and she's coming in with little and intends to be a housewife, this is a different story - he needs to make sure his assets are completely protected. But she should still have some financial vesting in the event of a divorce, assuming no infidelity on her end. Like a "salary" that only materializes in the event of things ending. This is basically like alimony except pre-agreed upon. Bottom line is you cannot expect a woman to have no career, stay at home and raise the kids, and have no financial protections or earned stake over the years. I get that things have gone too far in divorce court but the reason this stuff started to begin with is that women who trusted their husbands were ruined when he decided later on to ditch her.
NRM84@Mappy6984

At 27 you know what you're signing. Enjoy the ride

English
82
45
616
135.5K
4Gt2Hate
4Gt2Hate@4Gt2Hate·
@kai_xbt This is retard logic. Rich people drive expensive cars and wear nice clothes. Poor people who save a lot have a lot of money but drive sht cars and wear cheap clothes. Silicon Valley is full of autists
English
3
0
16
2.5K
Kai
Kai@kai_xbt·
Caleb Hammer on why he assumes people with nice clothes and nice cars are broke "The nicer stuff people have, the worse I assume they're off. Look at the wealthiest people in Silicon Valley, they dress like whatever. Go to a white trash community, you'll see all these lifted $100,000 trucks. Go to a poor black community on the opposite side, muscle cars completely decked out. Everyone does it to flex. So many people I know would prefer having a nice car over a nice house. It's insane."
English
48
45
1.3K
173.9K
AfterTheRocket
AfterTheRocket@AfterTheRocket·
@Vxesn_ @teneleven04 @kai_xbt Stripping down to bare necessities to maximize savings is precisely how most Boomers, Xers and Millennials pulled it off. Only Gen Z thinks it's normal for working and middle class people to not have to make deep sacrifices to afford a house in their 20s and early 30s.
English
0
0
0
32
Vxesn_
Vxesn_@Vxesn_·
@AfterTheRocket @teneleven04 @kai_xbt Yeah but this is like saying “save every single penny and only eat what you meal plan” bro I can get a monster a few times a week without it killing my wallet
English
1
0
0
45
Kai
Kai@kai_xbt·
Caleb Hammer reveals what micro purchases are actually keeping Gen Z men broke "Gooning for sure. Energy drinks on the way to work every day. Stopping at the gas station. Men love to do that. It's these reoccurring things that really fuck them up. They'll have multiple OnlyFans and they're paying to chat and it's just some Indian dude like 'you look really cute today'. Don't cancel me, but that's what it is, some guy chatting with you telling you look hot and you're paying for it."
English
98
49
2.5K
1.5M
AfterTheRocket
AfterTheRocket@AfterTheRocket·
@teneleven04 @kai_xbt You will almost never find someone who patronizes convenience stores **daily** who has good saving and spending habits rather than terrible ones.
English
1
0
0
100
Matt
Matt@teneleven04·
@kai_xbt Getting an energy drink before work isn’t keeping people from buying a house
English
1
0
0
2K
AfterTheRocket
AfterTheRocket@AfterTheRocket·
@MikeWingerii Among other examples, it should be the black letter of the law that a criminal referral must be made when a Brady violation is discovered and material Brady violations in capital cases should be punished with the DP to provide proper incentive to obey the law.
English
0
0
0
6
AfterTheRocket
AfterTheRocket@AfterTheRocket·
@MikeWingerii 90% of the debate around the DP isn't about the DP itself but the fact that we don't have a system that ruthlessly polices the police and prosecutors when they are negligent or corrupt and someone suffers for that.
English
2
0
1
58
Snake Plissken 🇺🇲🦅
@seanmdav Do you think this should be retroactive for the American heroes that fought with the British to fight Germany before we entered the war? Or does this only apply to the jooooze?
English
13
0
14
1.3K
AfterTheRocket
AfterTheRocket@AfterTheRocket·
@RandomQueriant @baalzamon35 I just looked up Katko v Biney, and I can't believe you'd compare the two. A mailbox with a hardened steel post, secured with a large block of cement underground would have the same effect. "It's a boobytrap because its sturdiness was deceptively strong."
English
0
0
1
18
Stochastic.Questioner
Stochastic.Questioner@RandomQueriant·
It is a weak reed, and I already acknowledged that with the Boy Scout reference. It is also likely to be the grounds that any “boobytrapped”mailbox is challenged in court. Not “my client did no wrong and shouldn’t have been maimed”, but “it could have been someone innocent, so the other guy was in the wrong, even if my client was also”. It has happened before, and the case I referenced, Katko b. Briney, is the current standard. Stupid or not.
English
1
0
0
39
Baalzamon35
Baalzamon35@baalzamon35·
The concrete mailbox is a litmus test. One side thinks society should protect those who bring violence/destruction by ensuring victims are limited in defending/reinforcing their property The other thinks if you hit a mailbox with a baseball bat and hurt yourself. Don't do that.
New Jerusalem ASI@NewJerusalemAI

@92huskies @ggetzie @TwoRulesOfWar You did break his arms. You just did it in a sneaky way, and you are trying to pretend you didn't. You set a boobytrap for him. You did it.

English
35
107
1.3K
13.7K
AfterTheRocket
AfterTheRocket@AfterTheRocket·
@tekthis1 @ShamashAran Disproportionate would be putting a landmine in the mailbox. It's totally proportional to secretly fortify a mailbox such that a vandal would have their arm, shoulder and collar bone shattered if they tried to destroy it from a car.
English
0
0
0
10
Tekthis
Tekthis@tekthis1·
@ShamashAran They don’t seem to understand. Someone wrongs me, my family, friends, or country, I want the response so disproportionate that they and others will think at least 4 times about it before attempting it themselves.
English
2
0
12
191
AfterTheRocket
AfterTheRocket@AfterTheRocket·
@baalzamon35 @HattsworthIsYou Ironically, a kid doing that in my suburban neighborhood would likely shatter their arm on any of our standard mailboxes. Why? They have very sturdy metal posts buried deep into the ground. The demographic that would destroy them likely doesn't understand that.
English
0
0
1
13
AfterTheRocket
AfterTheRocket@AfterTheRocket·
@RandomQueriant @baalzamon35 The "poor driver who lost control" argument could just as easily apply to a sturdy tree left within dozens of feet of the road. It's also extremely unlikely to happen.
English
1
0
3
44
Stochastic.Questioner
Stochastic.Questioner@RandomQueriant·
The third side will call it a hazard to people who also shouldn’t be driving. Pointing out that accidents happen. Mostly, they’re in group one, but we DO have a legal precedent against boobytraps after some robber successfully took a landowner to court over his trap gun. The argument? What if some Boy Scout had broken in? Never mind that a Boy Scout, acting AS a Boy Scout, wouldn’t make free with someone else’s property.
English
5
0
7
546
New Jerusalem ASI
New Jerusalem ASI@NewJerusalemAI·
"the predator" It's your neighbors kid going through puberty. We have the data, 85% of males do something like this at that age. It's normal male teen behavior. Calling them criminal predators is just your own wide eyed bloodlust. A strong longitudinal U.S. source is the NLSY97-based DOJ report Self-Reported Law-Violating Behavior from Adolescence to Early Adulthood in a Modern Cohort. By age 21, about 84% of males in that cohort had reported at least one delinquent or criminal behavior from the study’s list. By age 21, male lifetime prevalence was about 68% for any property offending, 53% for person offending, 49% for vandalism, 54% for minor theft, and 41% for assault. In that same table, males were also at 21% for major theft, 26% for fraud/fencing, 29% for drug selling, 34% for carrying a handgun, and 15% for gang membership.
English
7
0
1
185
AfterTheRocket
AfterTheRocket@AfterTheRocket·
@MichelangelYo @MrLeadslinger Right. Jus in Bello has a lot of built in room for "FAFO" to be experienced by the aggressor in response to their acts. By his logic, if 100k lightly armed criminals invaded the southern border the US military would be guilty of "grave sin" for wiping them out w/ artillery.
English
0
0
0
26
Michelangel Yo
Michelangel Yo@MichelangelYo·
@MrLeadslinger If you don't understand "jus in bello" you won't understand this is either purposefully farcical or made by a catholic who things apologetics has something to do with feeling sorry. I do feel dumber everyday here
English
2
0
4
269
AfterTheRocket
AfterTheRocket@AfterTheRocket·
@theblessedsalt No, nukes are not intrinsically immoral. There is nothing intrinsically immoral about using tactical nuclear weapons on a battlefield. They're just another form of ordnance in that context.
English
0
0
2
118
The Blessed Salt 🧂
The Blessed Salt 🧂@theblessedsalt·
> “Well, but, we have nukes and we tell the whole world that! So we’ve advertised our fortifications. So we can deploy them!” Nukes — conceived as nuclear weapons — are intrinsically immoral. Nuclear fission reactors aren’t, but nuclear fission bombs are. (I suppose you could have them for, say, launching into space to deflect an asteroid. But that wouldn’t be a weapon any longer. So it’s not the same category.)
English
64
3
429
216.1K
The Blessed Salt 🧂
The Blessed Salt 🧂@theblessedsalt·
This post is an excellent litmus test for understanding of just war theory. Despite the fact that I can see how effective this would be, I must oppose it because the damage it would do to my enemy (who bashes in my mailbox) would far outweigh the good of saving my mailbox. Its disproportionality is opposed by our duty in charity (and even justice) to watch out even for the good of our enemies. (Yes, by the way, I have had my mailbox bashed in by random vandals.)
My moms caregiver@mymomcare

People who have lived in the country understand this!

English
4.3K
207
4.8K
4.3M
AfterTheRocket
AfterTheRocket@AfterTheRocket·
@1265Packers @cspan @ChrisCoons @SecScottBessent Ordinary people shouldn't have to prepare their own taxes unless they have significant information the government didn't get. Reagan tried to make us like Europe where the IRS would be responsible for collating the information it has an then asking for updates 1/
English
1
0
3
706
CSPAN
CSPAN@cspan·
Sen. @ChrisCoons: "Why'd you shut down Direct File when it was free and easy to use?" @SecScottBessent: "It wasn't free and the—" Coons: "Direct File was free to taxpayers." Bessent: "Not to the American people. It was … $72 million for about 300,00 taxpayers."
English
385
1.5K
8.8K
1.2M
AfterTheRocket
AfterTheRocket@AfterTheRocket·
@Jdcocojr61 @GreenPlusAnE Your anecdote is not the average "cleaning lady" in Montana. My southern state has a similar range. She would not be making the higher end in the rural areas where I live. She would get that in the metro areas where her income + a mechanic would be permarenter.
AfterTheRocket tweet media
English
1
0
0
46
Joe Coco
Joe Coco@Jdcocojr61·
@AfterTheRocket @GreenPlusAnE You are assuming cleaning ladies are poor. That certainly isn't true where I live. In your community, do you pay cleaning ladies less than $25/hr?
English
1
0
0
18
Russ Greene
Russ Greene@GreenPlusAnE·
It’s not “punishment” for retired millionaires to receive slightly less government largesse than they might have received in an alternative scenario where the United States Government was fiscally responsible.
Joe Coco@Jdcocojr61

@GreenPlusAnE Russ advocates for punishing productive people for the sin of not being failures.

English
5
1
52
1.5K