Gene Sticco

1.1K posts

Gene Sticco banner
Gene Sticco

Gene Sticco

@InfinityDisclsd

USAF Veteran. Intel Contractor. Big Oil Whistleblower. Opera Impresario. UFO Reverse Engineering From Soviet Design to US Denial with @DirtyWaterDiva

Boston, MA انضم Şubat 2024
399 يتبع1.8K المتابعون
تغريدة مثبتة
Gene Sticco
Gene Sticco@InfinityDisclsd·
Access the complete Soviet UFO Reverse Engineering Scan Archive (originals in Russian with English summaries provided) at cernohajev.omeka.net/items/browse?c… with additional research connecting the science to US programs at EngineeringInfinityBook.com (including page by page translations). Stories about documents aren’t helpful. What matters is access to the materials themselves, where independent analysis can occur. We’re prioritizing disclosure over storytelling to get materials in-the-hands of researchers and investigators.
Gene Sticco tweet mediaGene Sticco tweet mediaGene Sticco tweet media
English
1
75
278
15.1K
Tom King
Tom King@redmech928·
@InfinityDisclsd @ufokimball I've said filing a UFO report to MUFON is useless. Nobody will read it behind their paywall. You're better off writing your report on the wall of a Buceess bathroom. More people will read it than MUFON in a single day!
English
1
0
2
17
Kimball
Kimball@ufokimball·
First time. Honestly it kind of freaked me out
Kimball tweet media
English
1
0
6
179
Gene Sticco
Gene Sticco@InfinityDisclsd·
@AeroTech_Space @UAPGERB Once he's burned through defense company employees there's an Air Force Colonel who was the former NNSA Associate Administrator for Defense Nuclear Security who went to work for Target when he retired; and if you've ever seen the roof of some Target stores? Just sayin' . . .
English
2
0
5
141
The Paranormal Chris
The Paranormal Chris@AeroTech_Space·
Somebody tell @UAPGERB that just because you can google search people who used to work for aerospace companies doesn’t mean they’re currently part of or used be part of some made-up “UFO crash retrieval program”. And I guess we’ve moved on from Lockheed-Martin? Were the alien craft and bodies not there? Why is it Northrop Grumman? What happens if they’re not there, you going to target employees of another company on the list? Also, James Clapper clearly doesn’t sound like a man in charge of overseeing said programs in this interview. Matter of fact, he doesn’t even believe in UFOs but remains open minded. If you’re the head of space alien craft and body recovery team, you would sound far more confident than he does in this interview.
Gerb@UAPGERB

Another Senior UFO Legacy Program figure currently or recently serving an executive role at Northrop Grumman - Michael Dempsey, @northropgrumman Vice President of Government Affairs and Strategy & Development for Space, Cyber, and Intelligence Prior to Northrop, Dempsey served briefly as Acting Director of National Intelligence (DNI) in 2017 following a tenure as Deputy Director of National Intelligence for Intelligence Integration in the Obama Administration from 2014-2017 under James Clapper. It is my understanding that Dempsey, allegedly, engaged in overseeing UFO crash retrieval and exploitation efforts housed under the National Security Council alongside James Clapper and his Principal Deputy Director of National Intelligence (PDDNI) Stephanie O'Sullivan. During this time, Dempsey served as Obama's primary intelligence briefer.... If anyone partially read Obama into legacy activities during or post his presidency OR neglected to read Obama into such activities, this would have been Dempsey. Like any good senior legacy gatekeeper, Dempsey, of course, served for many years within the CIA. These CIA positions included: Deputy Associate Director for Military Affairs, Deputy CIA Representative to the Joint Chiefs of Staff, and Deputy Director of the Weapons Intelligence, Nonproliferation, Arms Control Center (WINPAC). @ChrisUKSharp of the @LiberationTimes has some excellent work discussing how WINPAC, now known as the Weapons and Counterproliferation Mission Center (WCPMC), "produces coordinated assessments for senior policymakers on foreign advanced weapons systems and technologies across the space, air, land, sea and undersea domains, including UAP." I highly recommend reading Sharp's work to also learn how James Clapper's brief retirement from service during 1998-2001 ties into WINPAC: liberationtimes.com/home/us-air-fo… It is my understanding that recently, allegedly, Dempsey oversaw a senior role in the administration of Northrop Grumman's NHI recovery and exploitation activities under his VP of Government Affairs role. For reference, @LockheedMartin VP of Government affairs from 2006-2021 was one Mary K. Sturtevant. During the early 2010's failed Kona Blue transfer of recovered UFO materials from Lockheed Martin Space Systems Company to the AAWSAP program, Sturtevant liaised between Lockheed VP Dr. Jim Ryder and CIA DS&T Deputy Director Glenn Gaffney, who was crucial to killing the proposed transfer. Perspective on the importance of "VP of Government Affairs" role within our primes Learn more about Dempsey: web.archive.org/web/2017020316… en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mike_Demp… climate.columbia.edu/events/careers… forbes.com/sites/michaelp…

English
7
4
23
2.7K
Gene Sticco
Gene Sticco@InfinityDisclsd·
@realOhBeDave @AshtonForbes Drawings, physics, thoughts about consciousness and human civilization development. There’s hours of fun in there for everyone 😁
English
0
0
1
30
Gene Sticco
Gene Sticco@InfinityDisclsd·
James Lacatski, the Defense Intelligence Agency scientist who designed and ran the Pentagon's $22 million UAP physics program in 2008, published a new book this week confirming that the Soviet document at the core of that program was missing its 12 technical attachments, and that all attempts to locate them had failed. Those attachments covered propulsion physics, field mechanics, and consciousness-navigation - the exact domains his program spent four years and 38 commissioned academic papers (DIRDS) trying to reconstruct. My father-in-law, a Soviet aerospace engineer, produced 12 numbered technical works between 1980 and 2000. He sent them to us before he dies in 2019. We archived and published them publicly in November 2024. His papers resolve, domain by domain, every problem Lacatski's program could not and we’ve had the answer, have been trying to deliver it, unexamined by the people and institutions that spent decades and hundreds of millions of dollars looking for exactly this, for the last 6 years. That is the consequence. That is why it matters.
English
23
84
574
35.4K
Gene Sticco
Gene Sticco@InfinityDisclsd·
@neoconbill Appreciate it that’s exactly what we put it out for.
English
0
0
1
70
Gene Sticco أُعيد تغريده
Total Disclosure Podcast
Total Disclosure Podcast@DisclosurePod·
Weaponized Curiosity| Navigating the UFO Community (Ft. GENE STICCO) 6PM EST. @InfinityDisclsd Sits in the Hot seat on this weeks TDP- From UFO researcher Hierarchy, to Gatekeeping, We break down everything hes learned since entering the field. youtu.be/7FTu6FI1F_M?si… via @YouTube
YouTube video
YouTube
English
0
5
8
1.5K
Gene Sticco
Gene Sticco@InfinityDisclsd·
I’ve often said if there is a national security component to protecting the work that’s been done. It’s despair the embarrassment of how little work the government put in to the importance of consciousness. By my assessment from early on, they viewed it to some sort of mysticism and counted on being able to muscle their way through it technologically. I think they’ve come to the realization that that is not going to happen and have pivoted, but it’s put them decades behind. When I closely look at my father-in-law’s work, it becomes more clear that operating these craft begins with consciousness. That’s why we’ve had them for decades and I’ve never been able to figure out how to operate them and I’ve only been able to create derivatives.
English
2
0
1
67
NEZ
NEZ@NEZ_Crypto·
@InfinityDisclsd Most of these theoretical physics people never address the elephant in the room - consciousness
English
1
0
1
69
Gene Sticco
Gene Sticco@InfinityDisclsd·
Never mind that he’s near incoherent in connecting thoughts - I got out about 30 instances of how @JeremyCorbell jeopardizes sources and whistleblowers (That’s of course, assuming that Corbell is actually an independent journalist and not a govt media mouthpiece pushing an authorized narrative) here are the top 10: 1. The ODNI source who read back SCIF contents to him. Smallest possible access pool. Most legally exposed individual. Burned completely. 2. No notes. Ever. No contemporaneous record means no shield law protection if subpoenaed. Every source he has ever had is legally naked. A structural failure that voids the entire journalist protection framework. 3. CIA directing the ODNI DIG stated as confirmed fact. That level of certainty requires a source inside the tasking chain. He just told every CI officer exactly what access level to look for. 4. Brown's controlled delivery methodology explained in full operational detail. That technique is now permanently retired. Every future operation Brown or his network runs is compromised before it starts. 5. Pentagon comms source burned via meeting specificity. Time, participants, topic, and the fact they had his personal FaceTime number. That is a one or two person identification matrix. 6. Signal channel confirmed with document transmission details. Platform, direction, and content type. Any adversarial exploitation of that channel now has a confirmed baseline. 7. Brown's complete counter-surveillance protocol documented publicly. No phone, no Uber, no advance signal. Every future interdiction effort knows exactly what to expect and adjusts accordingly. 8. Personnel security assessment of Brown leaked by ODNI source. Clearance status of a named individual is strictly compartmented. The population with access and a reason to call Corbell is extremely small. That source is almost certainly already flagged internally. 9. Repeatedly pushing Brown past his State Department clearance boundary on camera. Every instance is documented. If Brown ever faces legal jeopardy for this interview, Corbell's pressure is on the record and provides zero legal cover for either of them. 10. Break-in details confirmed publicly. Potential criminal prosecution evidence broadcast to the perpetrators in real time, with enough specificity to confirm which operations succeeded and which were documented. And he consistently does all this. So he’s not an investigative journalist he’s obviously not skilled in any form of intelligence work. So what exactly is he?
English
0
1
6
293
Gene Sticco
Gene Sticco@InfinityDisclsd·
If @EricBurlison @realannapaulina and others on @GOPoversight weren’t getting advice from the people who scream disclosure but need it NOT to happen for the media jobs; if they looked at the HUGE Oversight gaps around AAWSAP, including Lacatski, Puthoff and Knapp’s financial entanglements ( question if he disclosed those before his Sept 2025 testimony) we’d have substantive hearings, proper oversight and dare say be further down the road than field-trips and story time.
English
1
0
2
27
Gene Sticco
Gene Sticco@InfinityDisclsd·
Follow-up to my post yesterday that's been circulating about Lacatski and the 12 missing attachments. This is the full story behind that gap - and how the UAP "media," our "investigative journalists" Congress likes to lean on for advice, brushed aside what can be the most consequential piece of physical/technical/scientific evidence in UAP/UFO disclosure to come forward in at-least the last 6 years in favor of recycling unfalsifiable stories, analyzing blurry pics and fawning over unstable videos as "evidence." Today's Dispatch: open.substack.com/pub/asirpjourn…
Gene Sticco tweet media
English
5
11
56
1.6K
Gene Sticco
Gene Sticco@InfinityDisclsd·
@SimeonHein @rosscoulthart @quantumheat I haven’t connected but will reach out. The analysis I referenced hasn’t been produced as any external publication. It’s still sitting in an analytical channel as most of what we focus on is the relationship to US government and state-sponsored programs right now.
English
0
1
1
28
Disclosure Party
Disclosure Party@disclosureorg·
Why does the @CIA face no consequences for repeated cover-ups?
English
7
3
15
1.1K
Gene Sticco
Gene Sticco@InfinityDisclsd·
The works don't provide any insight into the biologics of the "pilots" but it describes is a system where consciousness is the navigation mechanism "built into" the craft's engineering architecture. What he calls the tripartite consciousness framework couples to the Information-Energy Field. That field interface is how the craft is directed. Think destination. Field executes. Distance contracts. Now apply that to what witnesses describe. If the craft's propulsion system operates through a consciousness-field interface, then the craft is not alive in a biological sense. It is responsive. The field system is always active. The question of who or what is providing the consciousness input is separate from the question of how the navigation mechanism works. What the testimony record describes as craft that appear to anticipate, respond, and behave with apparent intent, is entirely consistent with a field-responsive system that does not require a biological operator physically present inside it. The consciousness input could be local, remote, or pre-encoded into the field architecture itself. The manuscripts establish the mechanism. The testimony describes the behavior. Mapping one onto the other is the analytical work that still needs doing.
English
1
0
7
332
BIGGLY BILL BRASKY ACC/⚔️🪽
Incredible. You mention "consciousness-navigation." It's been explained that the beings inside the craft are more like avatars or pre programmed biological drones. That the craft appears to be alive while it's contents are not. If the "biologics" are not conscious or sentient then who or what is using their consciousness to pilot the craft? Can you shed any light on this?
English
1
0
3
432
Gene Sticco
Gene Sticco@InfinityDisclsd·
The connection you are drawing is one we have documented in prior a prior analysis! Klimov's work is consistent with nuclear-level processes in the same physical regime Cernohajev's reactor specifications describe. His isotopic anomaly data is the closest thing to independent empirical corroboration of that physics class that exists in the published literature. Parkhomov's replication work and the MFMP open data methodology are the kind of independent verification framework this material needs. The specifications in the manuscripts are specific enough to be tested. The field threshold, the reaction parameters, the containment geometry is derivable and checkable.
English
1
0
1
70
Simeon Hein
Simeon Hein@SimeonHein·
Thanks Gene for sharing these invaluable Soviet-era UFO reverse engineering and Thread-3 documents. They seem highly consistent with the LENR/Coherent Energy Transformation research conducted by Bob Greenyer and the MFMP researchers at @quantumheat and other Russian researchers like A. Parkhomov and A. Klimov.
English
1
1
5
156
Gene Sticco
Gene Sticco@InfinityDisclsd·
His Gravitational-Charge Dualism framework does not bend spacetime from outside, it modifies the local gravitational-charge field conditions so that the distance between two points effectively contracts. The craft's not crossing long distances. The distance becomes less. The energy requirement then drops from civilization-scale to reactor-scale and changes the local medium the fabric sits in. Davis identified the problem that GR has no navigation laws and the energy requirements are prohibitive. Cernohajev's framework routes around both objections by working through a different mechanism entirely. Full technical derivation at cernohajev.omeka.net
English
1
0
6
318
Meg Carreau
Meg Carreau@megcarreau·
The public-facing “ecosystem” is the sanitized spillover. Same core team (Lacatski, Kelleher, Bigelow network, Knapp, Vallée, etc.) kept the ball rolling via books (his three-volume series), the Skinwalker Ranch reality TV show (a living lab for the paranormal/hitchhiker effects), podcasts, and think-tank-style research. This serves dual purposes: controlled acclimation of the public and a way to keep studying the “hybrid” tech + consciousness phenomena without formal government fingerprints. Some community mapping even traces it into private contractors, TV production, and data warehouses still being used today. One of his newer revelations reportedly ties into something called “Project Consciousness”—expanding the scope to psi, mimicry, and the mind-tech interface—which sounds like the paranormal half of Kona Blue living on in private/academic-adjacent work. Why this structure? National security + bureaucracy. Full public SAPs get killed by cost, leaks, or politics (as happened twice—AAWSAP defunding, then Kona Blue rejection). Private/contractor black programs are harder to “kill” because they’re compartmentalized, profit-driven, and already hold the hardware. Lacatski has said the U.S. is “absolutely” in a race with China/Russia for this tech; you don’t race by shutting everything down. AARO’s repeated claims of “nothing here” look like disinformation cover for the ongoing black work—exactly what Lacatski has criticized.
English
2
0
1
50
Meg Carreau
Meg Carreau@megcarreau·
Officially, per declassified DHS and AARO documents (released 2024), Kona Blue was a proposed Prospective Special Access Program (PSAP) pitched to the Department of Homeland Security around 2011–2012 as a successor to AAWSAP. Its goals were ambitious: restart UAP investigations (including paranormal/high-strangeness elements like “human consciousness anomalies”), acquire/analyze “material of unique origin and engineering” (i.e., recovered advanced aerospace vehicles or AAVs), interview witnesses for potential new recoveries, study health/physiological effects on humans (including fatalities), and even handle “unusual and unique biological specimens.” It was framed around exploiting disruptive technologies from non-human sources without ever naming “UFOs” or “aliens.” DHS Under Secretary Tara O’Toole initially greenlit preparatory work, but Deputy Secretary Jane Holl Lute formally rejected and terminated it on February 10, 2012—citing massive security costs, lack of merit, and no actual recovered craft or bodies to work with. AARO explicitly states: “no extraterrestrial craft or bodies were ever collected—this material was only assumed to exist by KONA BLUE advocates.” The program never stood up, no funding flowed, and nothing transferred. So it went private most likely…(?)
English
3
0
5
1.6K
Gene Sticco
Gene Sticco@InfinityDisclsd·
@AZColt Thanks, I'll have a long‑form breakdown of the 12 missing papers and Lacatski’s admission coming tomorrow
English
1
0
1
14
Chad Remsen
Chad Remsen@AZColt·
@InfinityDisclsd Awesome! I’m not a physicist or scientist so I don’t really understand much of it. But it’s nice to know they exist. Hopefully they will get into the right hands.
English
1
0
1
14