🧊⛏️

21.3K posts

🧊⛏️ banner
🧊⛏️

🧊⛏️

@icebrketh

broken ice block from Minecraft

DC: liltallboi انضم Temmuz 2013
761 يتبع1.1K المتابعون
Yaori
Yaori@Pashoke1·
good morning and Happy Easter 🐰🥚 whatever you celebrate - eggs, bunnies or just extra sleep hope your bags get some nice surprises too 🚀
English
2
0
4
21
Slav
Slav@Skilovi4okGb·
Happy Easter! 🐣 Which one are you choosing? The @KASTxyz Gold Card 💳 or the Gold Egg 🥚? Let us know in the comments! 👇
Slav tweet media
English
4
0
17
47
koporkey
koporkey@Koporkey·
@icebrketh then why does the head of product of pro crypto platform hate crypto so much
English
1
0
1
7
𝗙𝗮𝘀𝘁𝗟𝗶𝗳𝗲
Translate from french with Grok because I'm too lazy to do it myself and I'm working IRL for a more ridiculous salary than Zora's airdrop. But I wanted to share again because it's a super interesting article on Polymarket's manipulation. ⮕ Quick to read. You will understand better why some people have extraordinary PnL's. ----- Why are manipulations on Polymarket so common and go unpunished? For the past few days, the market “Iran military action against Oman by March 31?” has still not been resolved because the consensus isn’t clear: 57% YES/P2, 33% NO/P1, and 10% 50/50/P3. The market stood at 12 votes for Yes and 7 for No in the Experienced group (Screen 1). The only reason it wasn’t already settled is that one user, “dontg,” disputed it with a $750 bond. But why did he spend $750 just to block the Yes outcome?! Because “dontgambledontilt” (aka “dontg”) had originally bet on Yes. The price then crashed from an average entry of 49.9 down to an average exit of 16.2, resulting in a $750 loss (Screen 2). He sold at a loss even though he knew he was right on the market, and basically thought: “Why not manipulate the price and get my money back?” So he posted a $750 bond to prevent the market from being validated/resolved by the UMA oracle (oracle.uma.xyz/?project=Polym…). He then bought No. Shortly after, “JessicaOnlyChild” voted No and added an “Additional context” note that dismissed the 8 Yes-supporting links previously posted by @CarOnPolymarket on Discord (discord.com/channels/71859…). Result: the market pumped to 100% No. The moment she voted No, seven other verifiers also voted No within minutes (Screen 3) — the same thing happened on Discord (discord.com/channels/71859…). Who is “JessicaOnlyChild” and why should her votes no longer count? She has already manipulated multiple markets, including one less than a week ago (x.com/TheGreekTrader…). And this isn’t new — she manipulates markets with her friends (x.com/GenaTheCroco/s…). It’s also worth noting that @aenews, a voting member responsible for resolving markets, had bet on Yes while actively manipulating outcomes to win. He was kicked out today for running pump-and-dump schemes, just like his friend @frigodor, who was doing the same thing with Jessica (Screen 4 shows aenews in green buying Yes, while “dontgambledontilt/dontg” in black is buying No and disputing to tank the price, etc.). I like Polymarket, but it’s not normal that people can manipulate markets with total impunity and that the consensus is not truly decentralized. @zachxbt @Dark_Emi_ @Atlantislq @PolymarketHelp @HugoMartingale @mustafap0ly @notyrjo RT and like so the maximum number of people can see how pump-and-dump schemes are being run on Polymarket via UMA.
𝗙𝗮𝘀𝘁𝗟𝗶𝗳𝗲 tweet media
DogePlayMid@Dogeplaymid

Pourquoi les manipulations sur Polymarket sont elles si courantes et impunies ? Depuis quelques jours, le bet "Iran military action against Oman by March 31 ?" n’est pas encore clos car le consensus n’est pas formel: 57 % de OUI/P2, 33 % de NON/P1 et 10 % de 50/50/P3 Le bet était à 12 votes sur Oui et 7 sur Non dans Experienced (Screen 1). La seule raison pour laquelle il n’était pas déjà résolu, c’est le fait qu’une personne "dontg" a contesté avec 750$ Mais pourquoi a t il dépensé 750 $ pour bloquer le vote Oui ?! Car à la base, "dontgambledontilt" aka "dontg" avait parié sur le Oui, mais le prix a chuté de 49,9 prix moyen d’achat à 16,2 prix moyen de vente, causant une perte de 750 $ (Screen 2) Il a vendu en perte tout en sachant qu’il avait raison sur le bet et s’est dit : pourquoi ne pas manipuler le prix et récupérer mes pertes ? Il a mis 750 $ de garantie pour que le bet ne puisse pas être validé/contesté le consensus: oracle.uma.xyz/?project=Polym… Il a ensuite acheté du Non. Puis « JessicaOnlyChild » a voté Non, suivi de la note « Additional context » qui a annulé les 8 liens en rapport avec le vote OUI postés par @CarOnPolymarket sur Discord: discord.com/channels/71859… Résultat : le bet a pumpé sur le Non à 100 %. Lorsqu’elle a voté Non, 7 autres vérificateurs ont voté Non dans les minutes qui ont suivi (Screen 3) + sur Discord: discord.com/channels/71859… Qui est "JessicaOnlyChild" et pourquoi ses votes ne devraient ils plus compter ? Elle a déjà manipulé à plusieurs reprises des bets, comme il y a moins d’une semaine: x.com/TheGreekTrader… Mais ce n’est pas nouveau : elle manipule les bets avec ses amis: x.com/GenaTheCroco/s… Et il faut savoir que @aenews, membres de vote pour résoudre les Bet, avait parié sur le Oui en sachant qu’il manipulait les bets pour gagner mais il s’est fait virer aujourd’hui car il faisait du pump and dump, comme son ami @frigodor qui en faisait avec Jessica (Screen 4, aenews en vert qui avait acheté et en noir "dontgambledontilt/dontg") qui achète du Non et conteste pour faire chuter le prix, etc.) J’apprécie Polymarket, mais ce n’est pas normal de pouvoir manipuler les bets en toute impunité et que le consensus ne soit pas réellement décentralisé @zachxbt @Dark_Emi_ @Atlantislq @PolymarketHelp @HugoMartingale @mustafap0ly @notyrjo RT et Like pour que le maximum de personnes puisse voir comment Polymarket font du pump and dump via l'UMA Merci DPM

English
6
1
24
675
🧊⛏️
🧊⛏️@icebrketh·
The current credit system in the US: - Depends on FICO - Uses middlemen - Has low transparency - Weak automated It's the biggest credit market in the whole world, and it is not perfect; it has flaws, but they can be fixed Rialo can upgrade the system and change things
🧊⛏️ tweet media
Rialo@RialoHQ

The $1.7T+ US unsecured consumer credit market is starting to move beyond credit scores alone. For decades, lenders mostly relied on systems like FICO to decide who should get a loan, how much they should get, and at what rate. That is changing: newer lending systems, including those used by @SoFi and @CashApp, use signals ranging from education and employment history to cash flow and platform-specific behavior to make those decisions. The next step is to upgrade the lending stack and move key components onchain. Rialo makes this possible by connecting onchain credit systems to real-world data, providing infrastructure to automate servicing workflows onchain, and enabling seamless tokenization of real-world assets, including private credit and consumer loans. That opens up three opportunities: - Richer credit assessment: Lenders can use alternative signals to determine creditworthiness by tapping into real-world data through Rialo. - Efficient servicing: Lenders can run loan management and repayment workflows on Rialo’s transparent, programmable blockchain rails, reducing overhead and improving transparency. - Loan packaging: Lenders can tokenize loans and bundle them into risk-weighted vintages, or loan pools organized by risk profile, with clearer visibility into risk and performance. The opportunity for lenders is not just to make better loans. It is to use infrastructure that enables them to assess, service, and package loans in a single integrated system. Get Real about credit. Get Rialo.

English
8
0
12
178
Nick Research
Nick Research@Nick_Researcher·
➥ A full-stack liquidity system forming with - stablecoins as base money - RWAs as yield layer - Perps/DEXs as trading layer - then AI/DePIN as resource markets AI, RWAs, and even perps all depend on DePIN layer eventually
Nick Research@Nick_Researcher

➥ Everyone is staring at AI coins and perps right now I get it, I’m here grinding them too, they’ve been the only things actually moving in a choppy market But if you zoom out, something more important is happening that liquidity in crypto is being rebuilt from the ground up and most people are still trading the surface, not the pipes 1/ What’s actually working in 2026 so far? I break the market into where real flows are going, aside with just narratives: - AI → attention + speculative + early revenue = $TAO, $VIRTUAL, $RENDER - Perps → trader liquidity + fees = $HYPE - RWAs → real yield + institutional capital = $ONDO, $SKY - Stablecoins → settlement layer = @tempo, $XPL, $ENA Different narratives, same underlying question of where does liquidity sit, and who controls it? Because based on my real experience, the best performer is a liquidity model Take @HyperliquidX as an example: ppl think it’s winning because of perps, I think it’s winning because it solved something deeper: - onchain orderbook that actually feels like a CEX with deep liquidity without relying on fragmented LPs - sticky pro traders & generates real fees - the hardest liquidity to win That said, $HYPE is how liquidity infra done right Same with @opentensor, but from a different angle that it turned compute into a market Liquidity is now intelligence + resources, and all Subnets = specialized liquidity pools for AI Different vertical, same pattern with whoever structures liquidity best → captures the entire category 2/ Why RWAs feel boring but matter more than people think? I’ve been paying more attention to @OndoFinance lately, because it sits where real money is entering crypto this cycle - Tokenized Treasuries & Private credit onchain - Yield that institutions actually recognize So as far as I witness, Crypto is no longer just trading liquidity, but starting to absorb global liquidity And RWAs are the bridge Ethereum holding the majority of RWA TVL isn’t random It’s where compliance is easier to layer, liquidity is deepest and institutions are most comfortable $ONDO is basically playing what if BlackRock flows came onchain… where would they go first? That’s why I see it as underrated imho The real game = Liquidity layers stacking on top of each other, only few looking at this angle cuz this is kinda boring What’s interesting is how these narratives are starting to connect: → Perps are expanding into RWA markets with the support of commodities, rates, etc. → AI needs compute such as GPU, CPU → priced + traded like assets → Stablecoins are becoming the default settlement rail → RWAs bring in external yield → anchors the system of all above sectors into one single liquidity layer This is a full-stack liquidity system forming with - stablecoins as base money - RWAs as yield layer - Perps/DEXs as trading layer - then AI/DePIN as resource markets My underrated bet is $ONDO as the top pick, but also the DePIN as liquidity infra DePIN = turning real-world resources into liquid, tradable markets so now I see GPUs as AI liquidity, Storage as data liquidity, Wireless as connectivity liquidity and Sensors/energy as real-world data liquidity And here’s the part that trigger my fomo nerve as AI, RWAs, and even perps all depend on this DePIN layer eventually → AI needs compute (DePIN) → RWAs need data/oracles (DePIN) → Perps need low-latency infra (DePIN) I think it’s the invisible backbone nodody realizes yet So I’m looking back at the market as a whole right now and see: - $HYPE already moved, liquidity capture is obvious here - $TAO already moved, AI hype + revenue will push it further - RWAs and DePIN still feel under-owned and haven’t move an inch yet This is where I’m positioned mentally for the cycle Not chasing the loudest charts but tracking where liquidity is getting harder to move once it arrives

English
12
3
28
588
🧊⛏️
🧊⛏️@icebrketh·
If you are this type of user who can't imagine a DC server without the poker, this post is for you 🃏 Every Thursday, @FlutonIO hosts the Poker. And besides the great time, you can win the Apex Role and a Voucher Code Now, only 200+ people have this role - become the one
🧊⛏️ tweet media
English
9
0
18
147
Yura
Yura@stetyura·
𝐍𝐄𝐑𝐎 𝐂𝐡𝐚𝐢𝐧 shows that digital assets can be honest, transparent, and accessible to everyone. It is not just technology - it is a path where even teenagers can learn, experiment, and grow together with the modern economy. @Nerochain_io
Yura tweet media
Yura@stetyura

The true power of digital assets isnt just in the technology, but in making the economy understandable and accessible for everyone. When even teenagers can buy, sell, exchange tokens, and work with real-world assets, the world becomes more transparent, fair, and open to new opportunities. Its a chance to learn, experiment, and grow together with the modern economy of the future. @Nerochain_io

English
6
0
23
140
🧊⛏️
🧊⛏️@icebrketh·
@stetyura Not everything, but definitely can boost the system
English
0
0
0
7
Yura
Yura@stetyura·
@icebrketh Automation can improve everything
English
1
0
1
8
CryptoNotes
CryptoNotes@_CryptoNotes_·
Good morning X Today I opened my capsule in @Angland_x Best fishing game in @base I think it’s best game for fishing lovers Joined the game and try Support ID : E8YMYHW88JRDJMD7 #AnglandGodPull
Angland@Angland_x

[🎣Angland "God-Pull" Challenge💊] Share your "God-Pull" moment! We want to see those legendary effects the moment your capsule cracks open! ✨💥

Post your capsule opening clips with #AnglandGodPull. ⠀ 🎁 REWARDS 🏆 $50 each for 5 LUCKY WINNERS (Any God-Pull clip!) 💎 $100 for 1 LUCKY WINNER who pulls the [Shrimp 🦐 + Automatic reel⚙️]  (💡Shrimp: Catch Squid! / Automatic reel: Low HP Consumption) 🦑💪 ⠀ HOW TO JOIN THE CAMPAIGN 1️⃣ Follow @Angland_x 2️⃣ Repost this post 🔄 3️⃣ Post your opening clip with your Support ID & #AnglandGodPull ⠀ ⚠️ NOTE: We will verify all logs via Support ID. Fake videos will be disqualified. ⏰:Deadline: April 9th, 0:00 UTC ⠀ Let’s fill the TL with your god-pull! 🎰 P2E - #PatienceToExcite #Angland 🎣

English
7
0
8
200
Nick Rotenberg
Nick Rotenberg@NickRotenberg·
📢 The Story of Optimum and MIT Role in RLNC When we talk about Web3, most people think of dApps, smart contracts, or NFTs. Few consider that data transfer speed and reliable storage are real limitations for blockchains. This is where @get_optimum comes in. It doesn’t just improve blockchains, it solves a fundamental problem: how data moves quickly and safely between nodes while maintaining network integrity. At its core is Random Linear Network Coding (RLNC), developed at MIT. RLNC splits data into pieces, mixes them, and sends them so any node can reconstruct the information even if some packets are lost, like a puzzle missing a few pieces. Optimum adapted RLNC for real blockchains with a memory layer that speeds up and simplifies data transfer. Ethereum, Solana, and other networks gain fast, reliable, scalable infrastructure without changing their core logic. Why it matters: -> Speed: critical for DeFi and trading -> Reliability: data reaches nodes even in unstable networks -> Scalability: blockchains grow beyond execution-layer limits Optimum shows that infrastructure is the new alpha of Web3, and MIT research provides a solid foundation for it. @blockchainjeff
Nick Rotenberg tweet media
English
32
0
50
476
valentino
valentino@walle_k·
@icebrketh that’s exactly what we’re waiting for gRialo bro
English
1
0
1
8