🧊⛏️
21.3K posts



why does Nikita hate X crypto users?


Pourquoi les manipulations sur Polymarket sont elles si courantes et impunies ? Depuis quelques jours, le bet "Iran military action against Oman by March 31 ?" n’est pas encore clos car le consensus n’est pas formel: 57 % de OUI/P2, 33 % de NON/P1 et 10 % de 50/50/P3 Le bet était à 12 votes sur Oui et 7 sur Non dans Experienced (Screen 1). La seule raison pour laquelle il n’était pas déjà résolu, c’est le fait qu’une personne "dontg" a contesté avec 750$ Mais pourquoi a t il dépensé 750 $ pour bloquer le vote Oui ?! Car à la base, "dontgambledontilt" aka "dontg" avait parié sur le Oui, mais le prix a chuté de 49,9 prix moyen d’achat à 16,2 prix moyen de vente, causant une perte de 750 $ (Screen 2) Il a vendu en perte tout en sachant qu’il avait raison sur le bet et s’est dit : pourquoi ne pas manipuler le prix et récupérer mes pertes ? Il a mis 750 $ de garantie pour que le bet ne puisse pas être validé/contesté le consensus: oracle.uma.xyz/?project=Polym… Il a ensuite acheté du Non. Puis « JessicaOnlyChild » a voté Non, suivi de la note « Additional context » qui a annulé les 8 liens en rapport avec le vote OUI postés par @CarOnPolymarket sur Discord: discord.com/channels/71859… Résultat : le bet a pumpé sur le Non à 100 %. Lorsqu’elle a voté Non, 7 autres vérificateurs ont voté Non dans les minutes qui ont suivi (Screen 3) + sur Discord: discord.com/channels/71859… Qui est "JessicaOnlyChild" et pourquoi ses votes ne devraient ils plus compter ? Elle a déjà manipulé à plusieurs reprises des bets, comme il y a moins d’une semaine: x.com/TheGreekTrader… Mais ce n’est pas nouveau : elle manipule les bets avec ses amis: x.com/GenaTheCroco/s… Et il faut savoir que @aenews, membres de vote pour résoudre les Bet, avait parié sur le Oui en sachant qu’il manipulait les bets pour gagner mais il s’est fait virer aujourd’hui car il faisait du pump and dump, comme son ami @frigodor qui en faisait avec Jessica (Screen 4, aenews en vert qui avait acheté et en noir "dontgambledontilt/dontg") qui achète du Non et conteste pour faire chuter le prix, etc.) J’apprécie Polymarket, mais ce n’est pas normal de pouvoir manipuler les bets en toute impunité et que le consensus ne soit pas réellement décentralisé @zachxbt @Dark_Emi_ @Atlantislq @PolymarketHelp @HugoMartingale @mustafap0ly @notyrjo RT et Like pour que le maximum de personnes puisse voir comment Polymarket font du pump and dump via l'UMA Merci DPM



The $1.7T+ US unsecured consumer credit market is starting to move beyond credit scores alone. For decades, lenders mostly relied on systems like FICO to decide who should get a loan, how much they should get, and at what rate. That is changing: newer lending systems, including those used by @SoFi and @CashApp, use signals ranging from education and employment history to cash flow and platform-specific behavior to make those decisions. The next step is to upgrade the lending stack and move key components onchain. Rialo makes this possible by connecting onchain credit systems to real-world data, providing infrastructure to automate servicing workflows onchain, and enabling seamless tokenization of real-world assets, including private credit and consumer loans. That opens up three opportunities: - Richer credit assessment: Lenders can use alternative signals to determine creditworthiness by tapping into real-world data through Rialo. - Efficient servicing: Lenders can run loan management and repayment workflows on Rialo’s transparent, programmable blockchain rails, reducing overhead and improving transparency. - Loan packaging: Lenders can tokenize loans and bundle them into risk-weighted vintages, or loan pools organized by risk profile, with clearer visibility into risk and performance. The opportunity for lenders is not just to make better loans. It is to use infrastructure that enables them to assess, service, and package loans in a single integrated system. Get Real about credit. Get Rialo.





The first time I went viral in 2021 was cause I threw an absolute fit in someone's DMs cause they wouldnt accept my $45,000 offer for an NFT and they posted the screenshot Today that NFT is worth < $10 with zero volume on the entire collection for over a month

I'll probably get attacked for saying this, but every team in crypto should use this as an opportunity to slow down and focus on security. If possible, dedicate an entire team to it. I know how hard it is. There's an enormous amount of pressure to grow at all costs. Your runway will pressure you. Your investors will pressure you. Your token holders will pressure you. But you can't grow if you're hacked. Take time to stop what you're doing, stop stressing about growth, and audit your whole stack. Custody. Risk. Dependencies. Access control. Everything. The world will still be here when you get back. Focus on the safety of your users' funds above all else. In the long term, this is the most important requirement to grow.

➥ Everyone is staring at AI coins and perps right now I get it, I’m here grinding them too, they’ve been the only things actually moving in a choppy market But if you zoom out, something more important is happening that liquidity in crypto is being rebuilt from the ground up and most people are still trading the surface, not the pipes 1/ What’s actually working in 2026 so far? I break the market into where real flows are going, aside with just narratives: - AI → attention + speculative + early revenue = $TAO, $VIRTUAL, $RENDER - Perps → trader liquidity + fees = $HYPE - RWAs → real yield + institutional capital = $ONDO, $SKY - Stablecoins → settlement layer = @tempo, $XPL, $ENA Different narratives, same underlying question of where does liquidity sit, and who controls it? Because based on my real experience, the best performer is a liquidity model Take @HyperliquidX as an example: ppl think it’s winning because of perps, I think it’s winning because it solved something deeper: - onchain orderbook that actually feels like a CEX with deep liquidity without relying on fragmented LPs - sticky pro traders & generates real fees - the hardest liquidity to win That said, $HYPE is how liquidity infra done right Same with @opentensor, but from a different angle that it turned compute into a market Liquidity is now intelligence + resources, and all Subnets = specialized liquidity pools for AI Different vertical, same pattern with whoever structures liquidity best → captures the entire category 2/ Why RWAs feel boring but matter more than people think? I’ve been paying more attention to @OndoFinance lately, because it sits where real money is entering crypto this cycle - Tokenized Treasuries & Private credit onchain - Yield that institutions actually recognize So as far as I witness, Crypto is no longer just trading liquidity, but starting to absorb global liquidity And RWAs are the bridge Ethereum holding the majority of RWA TVL isn’t random It’s where compliance is easier to layer, liquidity is deepest and institutions are most comfortable $ONDO is basically playing what if BlackRock flows came onchain… where would they go first? That’s why I see it as underrated imho The real game = Liquidity layers stacking on top of each other, only few looking at this angle cuz this is kinda boring What’s interesting is how these narratives are starting to connect: → Perps are expanding into RWA markets with the support of commodities, rates, etc. → AI needs compute such as GPU, CPU → priced + traded like assets → Stablecoins are becoming the default settlement rail → RWAs bring in external yield → anchors the system of all above sectors into one single liquidity layer This is a full-stack liquidity system forming with - stablecoins as base money - RWAs as yield layer - Perps/DEXs as trading layer - then AI/DePIN as resource markets My underrated bet is $ONDO as the top pick, but also the DePIN as liquidity infra DePIN = turning real-world resources into liquid, tradable markets so now I see GPUs as AI liquidity, Storage as data liquidity, Wireless as connectivity liquidity and Sensors/energy as real-world data liquidity And here’s the part that trigger my fomo nerve as AI, RWAs, and even perps all depend on this DePIN layer eventually → AI needs compute (DePIN) → RWAs need data/oracles (DePIN) → Perps need low-latency infra (DePIN) I think it’s the invisible backbone nodody realizes yet So I’m looking back at the market as a whole right now and see: - $HYPE already moved, liquidity capture is obvious here - $TAO already moved, AI hype + revenue will push it further - RWAs and DePIN still feel under-owned and haven’t move an inch yet This is where I’m positioned mentally for the cycle Not chasing the loudest charts but tracking where liquidity is getting harder to move once it arrives


The true power of digital assets isnt just in the technology, but in making the economy understandable and accessible for everyone. When even teenagers can buy, sell, exchange tokens, and work with real-world assets, the world becomes more transparent, fair, and open to new opportunities. Its a chance to learn, experiment, and grow together with the modern economy of the future. @Nerochain_io

[🎣Angland "God-Pull" Challenge💊] Share your "God-Pull" moment! We want to see those legendary effects the moment your capsule cracks open! ✨💥 Post your capsule opening clips with #AnglandGodPull. ⠀ 🎁 REWARDS 🏆 $50 each for 5 LUCKY WINNERS (Any God-Pull clip!) 💎 $100 for 1 LUCKY WINNER who pulls the [Shrimp 🦐 + Automatic reel⚙️] (💡Shrimp: Catch Squid! / Automatic reel: Low HP Consumption) 🦑💪 ⠀ HOW TO JOIN THE CAMPAIGN 1️⃣ Follow @Angland_x 2️⃣ Repost this post 🔄 3️⃣ Post your opening clip with your Support ID & #AnglandGodPull ⠀ ⚠️ NOTE: We will verify all logs via Support ID. Fake videos will be disqualified. ⏰:Deadline: April 9th, 0:00 UTC ⠀ Let’s fill the TL with your god-pull! 🎰 P2E - #PatienceToExcite #Angland 🎣









