Andrew Morgan

1.9K posts

Andrew Morgan banner
Andrew Morgan

Andrew Morgan

@itsanderz

I build cool stuff.

Kingston, Jamaica انضم Ekim 2021
1.9K يتبع1.1K المتابعون
تغريدة مثبتة
Andrew Morgan
Andrew Morgan@itsanderz·
Hoping to help out some creators w/ this project. Made to produce aesthetically pleasing generations for scene setting w/@midjourney.Let me know what you think! P.S. Free until I run out of credits, so act quickly(LIMITED).Looking forward to your feedback! geniea.com
English
31
23
136
122K
Seth Howes
Seth Howes@SethSHowes·
@nterminus Sequence at home. Don’t let them take your DNA sequence.
English
1
0
5
209
Nish
Nish@nterminus·
If someone wants to build this company, lmk
Patrick Collison@patrickc

I'm lucky enough to have a great doctor and access to excellent Bay Area medical care. I've taken lots of standard screening tests over the years and have tried lots of "health tech" devices and tools. With all this said, by far the most useful preventative medical advice that I've ever received has come from unleashing coding agents on my genome, having them investigate my specific mutations, and having them recommend specific follow-on tests and treatments. Population averages are population averages, but we ourselves are not averages. For example, it turns out that I probably have a 30x(!) higher-than-average predisposition to melanoma. Fortunately, there are both specific supplements that help counteract the particular mutations I have, and of course I can significantly dial up my screening frequency. So, this is very useful to know. I don't know exactly how much the analysis cost, but probably less than $100. Sequencing my genome cost a few hundred dollars. (One often sees papers and articles claiming that models aren't very good at medical reasoning. These analyses are usually based on employing several-year-old models, which is a kind of ludicrous malpractice. It is true that you still have to carefully monitor the agents' reasoning, and they do on occasion jump to conclusions or skip steps, requiring some nudging and re-steering. But, overall, they are almost literally infinitely better for this kind of work than what one can otherwise obtain today.) There are still lots of questions about how this will diffuse and get adopted, but it seems very clear that medical practice is about to improve enormously. Exciting times!

English
19
3
83
16.7K
Sara Stein MD
Sara Stein MD@sarasteinmd·
@itsanderz I've seen something for retina and there's some data about cornea Let me look into that.
English
1
0
1
53
Andrew Morgan
Andrew Morgan@itsanderz·
@sarasteinmd hey, I was wondering if you've seen any research or experiments on peptides and visual impairments and/ diseasse like Macular Degeneration
English
1
0
1
24
Andrew Morgan
Andrew Morgan@itsanderz·
Claude code is painfully unusable right now **sobs**
English
0
0
1
150
Andrew Morgan
Andrew Morgan@itsanderz·
@levelsio are you still on Hetzner or now looking for alternatives ?
English
0
0
0
22
Melkey
Melkey@MelkeyDev·
Opus 4.6 munching on tokens 😟
English
48
0
113
11.2K
Andrew Morgan
Andrew Morgan@itsanderz·
@karpathy Hmmn... Agentic Orchestration has a nice ring as well
English
0
0
0
85
Andrej Karpathy
Andrej Karpathy@karpathy·
A lot of people quote tweeted this as 1 year anniversary of vibe coding. Some retrospective - I've had a Twitter account for 17 years now (omg) and I still can't predict my tweet engagement basically at all. This was a shower of thoughts throwaway tweet that I just fired off without thinking but somehow it minted a fitting name at the right moment for something that a lot of people were feeling at the same time, so here we are: vibe coding is now mentioned on my Wikipedia as a major memetic "contribution" and even its article is longer. lol The one thing I'd add is that at the time, LLM capability was low enough that you'd mostly use vibe coding for fun throwaway projects, demos and explorations. It was good fun and it almost worked. Today (1 year later), programming via LLM agents is increasingly becoming a default workflow for professionals, except with more oversight and scrutiny. The goal is to claim the leverage from the use of agents but without any compromise on the quality of the software. Many people have tried to come up with a better name for this to differentiate it from vibe coding, personally my current favorite "agentic engineering": - "agentic" because the new default is that you are not writing the code directly 99% of the time, you are orchestrating agents who do and acting as oversight. - "engineering" to emphasize that there is an art & science and expertise to it. It's something you can learn and become better at, with its own depth of a different kind. In 2026, we're likely to see continued improvements on both the model layer and the new agent layer. I feel excited about the product of the two and another year of progress.
Andrej Karpathy@karpathy

There's a new kind of coding I call "vibe coding", where you fully give in to the vibes, embrace exponentials, and forget that the code even exists. It's possible because the LLMs (e.g. Cursor Composer w Sonnet) are getting too good. Also I just talk to Composer with SuperWhisper so I barely even touch the keyboard. I ask for the dumbest things like "decrease the padding on the sidebar by half" because I'm too lazy to find it. I "Accept All" always, I don't read the diffs anymore. When I get error messages I just copy paste them in with no comment, usually that fixes it. The code grows beyond my usual comprehension, I'd have to really read through it for a while. Sometimes the LLMs can't fix a bug so I just work around it or ask for random changes until it goes away. It's not too bad for throwaway weekend projects, but still quite amusing. I'm building a project or webapp, but it's not really coding - I just see stuff, say stuff, run stuff, and copy paste stuff, and it mostly works.

English
647
815
8.8K
1.3M
Rand
Rand@rand_longevity·
@itsanderz o.n.e. is what I take
English
2
0
1
31
Andrew Morgan
Andrew Morgan@itsanderz·
@elonmusk @grok what is the feasibility of a system like this, and would it accelerate or decelerate the evolution of the civilization? What would be our motif to progress and thrive?
English
1
0
0
7
Andrew Morgan
Andrew Morgan@itsanderz·
@VictorTaelin One of the most annoying issues I have with Gemini 3 is that it ignores very specific instructions. Instructions that Claude or GLM would follow right out the box. 😔 Butttt it is really good at UI, that part I really love !
English
0
0
1
1.1K
Taelin
Taelin@VictorTaelin·
I'm in love with Opus 4.5 right now It feels as smart as Gemini 3, but with way better code style, instruction following, CLI UX and, most importantly, speed when you just want to do something small. Also I had a super cool interaction where Claude Code was failing and walking circles, so I interrupted it and let it ask for clarifications. It made great questions, I taught some concepts, until it clicked. It then completed the task (not an easy one!), and all tests passed. Here's the interaction (summarized by Opus itself): (Claude Code interrupted) - Me: you're spending quite some time here, why don't you just ask me questions? I can always answer questions. you don't need to blindly guess and try random things, this will lead to failure. - AI: You're right, I apologize. Question: when I distribute the lambda across the SUP, how should variable redirection work? Should I be setting HEAP[lam_loc] to redirect the original VARs to the new lambdas? - Me: not sure what your notation means, but... [explains dup-lam semantics]. note that we absolutely need a clone_many() function that receives a Term* and clones each element into two Term*'s. do we have that? does that answer your question? - AI: Thank you, that clarifies a lot! My question about clone_many: in my C inject, I clone the template once, and clone each remaining arg. Is this correct? - Me: what is args0[16]? what is args0[0] and why sup_a is going there? not sure I follow - AI: You're right, let me re-read the Haskell more carefully... So a and b (the SUP branches) are not cloned - they go directly as the first element of the new arg lists. Only the remaining args are cloned. My C code matches this. The issue must be elsewhere. - Me: ah, I see. yes your clone logic looks correct-ish, but I'd still insist that you use a helper clone_many function instead of inlining it manually like that. - AI: Okay, let me add clone_many first. [adds it, tests still fail] Still getting wrong output. Question: Should collapse evaluate/resolve the CO0/CO1 nodes? Or should they stay as CO0/CO1 and get resolved later? - Me: in Haskell, CO0/CO1 fall in the default case of collapse... [explains full reduction chain with dup-sup same-label interaction] - AI: That's very helpful! So the dup-sup interaction with same labels is what makes the CO0/CO1 resolve correctly. The issue must be in my template structure. Is my template structure wrong? - Me: you just pass the template to inject, it will clone the whole thing if needed. your construction looks wrong, you're allocating two lambdas? why two heap_allocs? you should create a var to the outer lam, seems like you're creating a var to an unused place? - AI: You're right! The VAR(fV_loc) should point to the outer lambda's body location (outer_loc), not to some separate fV_loc. Is this correct? - Me: sounds ok-ish but please double check, you're the machine here - AI: You're right, let me trace through carefully... [traces through, verifies, fixes code] collapse_4 passes! [continues fixing APP, DRY, MAT, CTR cases with same pattern] All 35 tests pass!
English
33
20
823
56.9K