NC

7.4K posts

NC banner
NC

NC

@rowdy_phantom

If not here, I'm outside (most likely with the dragonling) or hanging upside down. Writerly stuff moved.

in Vancouver (for now) انضم Şubat 2009
1.1K يتبع724 المتابعون
Orc89
Orc89@SamA111202·
@jk_rowling @ConservativeDeb I've read every single one of your books, including the strike novels. Love them all. I'm a 36 yr old trans man and I'm incredibly distraught about all this. We don't have to agree, but misgendering does more damage than perhaps you realise.
English
245
1
13
13.5K
J.K. Rowling
J.K. Rowling@jk_rowling·
Yes, period huts are back. Because girls just aren’t embarrassed and awkward enough about menstruation. But what happens when the trans-identified boy feels excluded from the period hut? What if he feels less of a girl? Perhaps it would be easier just to tell girls to stay home.
Sonia Sodha@soniasodha

‘Unisex toilets outside the main toilet area for menstruating girls.’ In a British school in 2026. This is where ‘be kind’ policies have got us.

English
513
4.3K
29.3K
1M
NC
NC@rowdy_phantom·
@NotWorking77 @ewarren They all should be prosecuted, D or R. That’s why nothing changes because all sides are up to their ears in greed and corruption. Drain the swamp of the Pelosis AND the Trumps.
English
0
0
0
7
not-working
not-working@NotWorking77·
@ewarren So basically the same thing Nancy Pelosi has done for decades. Invests in Visa's IPO, holds up credit card legislation.
English
1
0
4
70
Elizabeth Warren
Elizabeth Warren@ewarren·
Trump Jr. invests in a company. A Trump White House staffer reportedly calls the Pentagon. The Pentagon rushes a $620M loan through in weeks. The company's value jumps tenfold. Congress must investigate NOW.
Elizabeth Warren tweet media
English
216
919
1.8K
33.3K
NC
NC@rowdy_phantom·
@jasonjamesbnn With the amount of garbage left behind on an average day, I don’t even want to think how trashed night partiers would leave.
English
0
0
0
21
Jason James
Jason James@jasonjamesbnn·
This is why I'm spending less time on X and less time paying attention to politics in general. I spent a lot of my life on this beach. I know how isolated it is, how dangerous it is after dark, and why the beach closes at sunset. These influencers and commentary accounts make money from the engagement they receive on these posts, so once a narrative is drawn around innocuous issues such as this one, they all run with it to scoop up ad share dollars. They're purposely manipulating reality for their own monetary benefit. The vast majority of their followers want to believe the narrative so they perpetuate it despite it being propaganda. The anti-propaganda people are just as propagandized as those in the mainstream—just from the other side and willingly, which is even more terrifying. It makes me wonder how often this is happening with other, bigger issues. And when I think about it enough, I come to realize all of it is just one big orchestrated manipulation of reality.
Concerned Citizen@BGatesIsaPyscho

🚨🇨🇦 Meanwhile in Canada RCMP Officers tell members of the public that they have to leave the beach at precisely 21:06 Why? Because that’s the official time the sunsets and Canadians apparently now have a curfew on beaches. Total State Control.

English
97
18
164
27.9K
NC
NC@rowdy_phantom·
@JadenPMcNeil Don’t forget Joshia Johnson and Brandon Best. Or the corrupt American Fork police. They can all room together.
English
0
0
8
489
NC
NC@rowdy_phantom·
@Hitchslap1 Another case of men knowing what *they* prefer and trying to project it onto women.
English
0
0
0
12
NC
NC@rowdy_phantom·
@sunQ_osrs @jk_rowling You do know AI is not actually “intelligent”. It’s an internet consensus machine, mostly based on reddit and Wikipedia, both of which are subject to trends. You might have recognized it as drivel once you got to “resonant frequency of the feminine”.
English
0
0
1
40
sunQ
sunQ@sunQ_osrs·
@jk_rowling So ya'll just changing the definitions now? looks like AI disagrees with you 😂
sunQ tweet media
English
54
2
39
11.6K
J.K. Rowling
J.K. Rowling@jk_rowling·
Being biologically female means having a body that is observably organised to produce large gametes (eggs), as opposed to a body organised to produce small gametes (sperm). A woman is female whether her eggs have been fertilised or not. A man can never be female.
J.K. Rowling tweet media
English
2.5K
12.5K
93K
2.1M
NC أُعيد تغريده
The Persian Jewess
The Persian Jewess@persianjewess·
Iranian hairstylist Ami Moghadam received death threats for posting videos of women receiving haircuts on Instagram. So she decided to troll the Islamic Regime and their oppressive mandatory hijab laws in the most epic, hilarious way possible. 😂
English
1.3K
24K
171.7K
5.2M
NC
NC@rowdy_phantom·
@SamanthaBartosz @LongTallDani @StellarFox16 No problem with hidden cameras in the stall? That’s one of the safeguarding issues these days with unisex bathrooms/changing stalls.
English
1
0
2
80
Jeanmarie Bartosz
Jeanmarie Bartosz@SamanthaBartosz·
@LongTallDani @StellarFox16 I like the notion of using unisex bathrooms that already are being used in New York City where I live. There are private stalls with full doors with locks. There are common sinks. And lots of men and women present to notice and to take action should there be trouble.
English
4
0
0
78
Stellar_Fox
Stellar_Fox@StellarFox16·
The psychological abuse part of the trans rights movement, in my view, is this pattern: Women say: “Male people have harmed us, we need boundaries.” Then they are told: “Your boundary is hateful.” Women say: “We need words for our sexed reality.” Then they are told: “Your words are exclusionary.” Women say: “We need privacy from male bodies.” Then they are told: “Your discomfort is bigotry.” That is a coercive loop. It takes women’s protective instincts and reframes them as moral defects. It turns self-defense into sin. Lovely little ideological trap. Making women into demons the second men don’t like our boundaries is psychological abuse and DARVO.
English
88
982
3.3K
43.8K
thundertick
thundertick@thundertick·
@TerriWhiti @Heccles94 Oh give it a rest. When was the last time you even saw a trans woman, never mind in a women's toilet or changing room? Or competed against one in a sport? And women *never* had to fight for women's toilets/changing rooms. Look it up. Stop pretending to be a fucking feminist.
English
4
0
0
56
Harry Eccles
Harry Eccles@Heccles94·
Hating Trans people does nothing to make women’s lives better. It just makes you a bigot.
English
1.2K
248
1.6K
161K
NC
NC@rowdy_phantom·
@ScienceFocusonX @drdina1 The melitten doesn’t “barely touch” healthy cells. It can very much harm healthy cells and create toxicity. Melitten just destroys the specific cancer cells at a lower dose.
English
0
0
1
26
ScienceFocus
ScienceFocus@ScienceFocusonX·
A tiny bee just did what chemotherapy couldn't. Scientists in Australia discovered that honeybee venom can wipe out 100% of aggressive breast cancer cells in under 60 minutes. And the healthy cells around them? Barely touched. The breakthrough came from Dr. Ciara Duffy and her team at the Harry Perkins Institute of Medical Research, working alongside the University of Western Australia. They tested venom drawn from 312 honeybees and bumblebees across Australia, Ireland, and England. The target: triple-negative breast cancer and HER2-enriched breast cancer. Two of the deadliest, most stubborn forms of the disease. The weapon: melittin. The same tiny peptide that makes a bee sting burn. At one specific dose, melittin tore through cancer cell membranes completely within an hour. Within just 20 minutes, it shut down the chemical signals cancer cells need to grow and multiply. Bumblebee venom, which lacks melittin, did nothing. Zero effect, even at high concentrations. Scientists then recreated melittin synthetically in the lab and got almost identical results, meaning no bees need to be harmed to develop the therapy. Published in the peer-reviewed journal npj Precision Oncology, the findings are still early-stage. Human trials haven't happened yet. But one thing is clear. Nature has been hiding answers in plain sight all along, sometimes inside the smallest creatures on Earth. Source: Harry Perkins Institute of Medical Research / npj Precision Oncology (Dr. Ciara Duffy et al.)
ScienceFocus tweet media
English
1.6K
19.3K
49.7K
2.6M
NC
NC@rowdy_phantom·
@Dame_Nemo @Peter96355998 @babybeginner This is my thought as well. When the show depicts the violence as a “good thing” because “she deserved it” then it’s not harmless.
English
1
0
1
6
NC
NC@rowdy_phantom·
@xoRachelPitzel @ihtesham2005 @RedLeaderRobby This is exactly why a few shrewd instructors “allowed” a half-page handwritten cheat sheet. I realizsd this when I was taking the test and almost never referred to my painstakingly crafted page.
English
2
0
5
271
Rachel Pitzel
Rachel Pitzel@xoRachelPitzel·
In law school from 2003-2006, I switched to handwriting my class notes only. I was the ONLY person handwriting notes. I realized I wasn’t retaining info from typing that I normally do having to summarize and hand write notes. I did the same for my bar review, made flash cards and printed my study guides and wrote notes on the page. It truly does make a difference imho
English
56
107
2.4K
135.9K
Ihtesham Ali
Ihtesham Ali@ihtesham2005·
A Norwegian neuroscientist spent 20 years proving that the act of writing by hand changes the human brain in ways typing physically cannot, and almost nobody outside her field has read the paper. Her name is Audrey van der Meer. She runs a brain research lab in Trondheim, and the paper that closed the argument was published in 2024 in a journal called Frontiers in Psychology. The finding is brutal enough that it should have changed every classroom on Earth. The experiment was simple. She recruited 36 university students and put each one in a cap with 256 sensors pressed against their scalp to record brain activity. Words flashed on a screen one at a time. Sometimes the students wrote the word by hand on a touchscreen using a digital pen, and sometimes they typed the same word on a keyboard. Every neural response was recorded for the full five seconds the word stayed on screen. Then her team looked at the part of the data most researchers had ignored for years, which is how different parts of the brain were communicating with each other during the task. When the students wrote by hand, the brain lit up everywhere at once. The regions responsible for memory, sensory integration, and the encoding of new information were all firing together in a coordinated pattern that spread across the entire cortex. The whole network was awake and connected. When the same students typed the same word, that pattern collapsed almost completely. Most of the brain went quiet, and the connections between regions that had been alive seconds earlier were nowhere to be found on the EEG. Same word, same brain, same person, and two completely different neurological events. The reason turned out to be something nobody had really paid attention to before her work. Writing by hand is not one motion but a sequence of thousands of tiny micro-movements coordinated with your eyes in real time, where each letter is a different shape that requires the brain to solve a slightly different spatial problem. Your fingers, wrist, vision, and the parts of your brain that track position in space are all working together to produce one letter, then the next, then the next. Typing throws all of that away. Every key on a keyboard requires the exact same finger motion regardless of which letter you are pressing, which means the brain has almost nothing to integrate and almost no problem to solve. Van der Meer said it plainly in her interviews. Pressing the same key with the same finger over and over does not stimulate the brain in any meaningful way, and she pointed out something that should scare every parent who handed their kid an iPad. Children who learn to read and write on tablets often cannot tell letters like b and d apart, because they have never physically felt with their bodies what it takes to actually produce those letters on a page. A decade before her, two researchers at Princeton ran the same fight using a completely different method and ended up at the same answer. Pam Mueller and Daniel Oppenheimer tested 327 students across three experiments, where half took notes on laptops with the internet disabled and half took notes by hand, before testing everyone on what they actually understood from the lectures they had watched. The handwriting group won by a wide margin on every question that required real understanding rather than surface recall. The reason was hiding in the transcripts of what the two groups had actually written down. The laptop students typed almost word for word, capturing more total content but processing almost none of it as they went, while the handwriting students physically could not write fast enough to transcribe a lecture in real time, which forced them to listen carefully, decide what actually mattered, and put it in their own words on the page. That single act of choosing what to keep was the learning itself, and the keyboard had quietly skipped the choosing and skipped the learning along with it. Two studies. Two countries. Same answer. Handwriting makes the brain work. Typing lets it coast. Every note you have ever typed instead of written went into your brain through a thinner pipe. Every meeting, every book highlight, every idea you captured on your phone instead of on paper was processed at half depth. You did not forget those things because your memory is bad. You forgot them because typing never woke the part of the brain that would have made them stick. The fix is the thing your grandmother already knew. Pick up a pen. Write the thing down. The slower road is the faster one.
Ihtesham Ali tweet media
English
2.5K
44.7K
120.9K
10.3M
NC
NC@rowdy_phantom·
What’s your preferred pen? I like onyx roller balls.
Ihtesham Ali@ihtesham2005

A Norwegian neuroscientist spent 20 years proving that the act of writing by hand changes the human brain in ways typing physically cannot, and almost nobody outside her field has read the paper. Her name is Audrey van der Meer. She runs a brain research lab in Trondheim, and the paper that closed the argument was published in 2024 in a journal called Frontiers in Psychology. The finding is brutal enough that it should have changed every classroom on Earth. The experiment was simple. She recruited 36 university students and put each one in a cap with 256 sensors pressed against their scalp to record brain activity. Words flashed on a screen one at a time. Sometimes the students wrote the word by hand on a touchscreen using a digital pen, and sometimes they typed the same word on a keyboard. Every neural response was recorded for the full five seconds the word stayed on screen. Then her team looked at the part of the data most researchers had ignored for years, which is how different parts of the brain were communicating with each other during the task. When the students wrote by hand, the brain lit up everywhere at once. The regions responsible for memory, sensory integration, and the encoding of new information were all firing together in a coordinated pattern that spread across the entire cortex. The whole network was awake and connected. When the same students typed the same word, that pattern collapsed almost completely. Most of the brain went quiet, and the connections between regions that had been alive seconds earlier were nowhere to be found on the EEG. Same word, same brain, same person, and two completely different neurological events. The reason turned out to be something nobody had really paid attention to before her work. Writing by hand is not one motion but a sequence of thousands of tiny micro-movements coordinated with your eyes in real time, where each letter is a different shape that requires the brain to solve a slightly different spatial problem. Your fingers, wrist, vision, and the parts of your brain that track position in space are all working together to produce one letter, then the next, then the next. Typing throws all of that away. Every key on a keyboard requires the exact same finger motion regardless of which letter you are pressing, which means the brain has almost nothing to integrate and almost no problem to solve. Van der Meer said it plainly in her interviews. Pressing the same key with the same finger over and over does not stimulate the brain in any meaningful way, and she pointed out something that should scare every parent who handed their kid an iPad. Children who learn to read and write on tablets often cannot tell letters like b and d apart, because they have never physically felt with their bodies what it takes to actually produce those letters on a page. A decade before her, two researchers at Princeton ran the same fight using a completely different method and ended up at the same answer. Pam Mueller and Daniel Oppenheimer tested 327 students across three experiments, where half took notes on laptops with the internet disabled and half took notes by hand, before testing everyone on what they actually understood from the lectures they had watched. The handwriting group won by a wide margin on every question that required real understanding rather than surface recall. The reason was hiding in the transcripts of what the two groups had actually written down. The laptop students typed almost word for word, capturing more total content but processing almost none of it as they went, while the handwriting students physically could not write fast enough to transcribe a lecture in real time, which forced them to listen carefully, decide what actually mattered, and put it in their own words on the page. That single act of choosing what to keep was the learning itself, and the keyboard had quietly skipped the choosing and skipped the learning along with it. Two studies. Two countries. Same answer. Handwriting makes the brain work. Typing lets it coast. Every note you have ever typed instead of written went into your brain through a thinner pipe. Every meeting, every book highlight, every idea you captured on your phone instead of on paper was processed at half depth. You did not forget those things because your memory is bad. You forgot them because typing never woke the part of the brain that would have made them stick. The fix is the thing your grandmother already knew. Pick up a pen. Write the thing down. The slower road is the faster one.

English
0
0
0
37
The Ricky Gervais Clips
The Ricky Gervais Clips@gervaisclips·
"If you enjoy seeing an animal terrified or in pain, you are a cunt." - Ricky Gervais
The Ricky Gervais Clips tweet media
English
180
1.4K
10.7K
153.8K
NC
NC@rowdy_phantom·
@_8675309_Jenny @gervaisclips What about those paying someone else to abuse/kill them so they can eat them on the daily?
English
0
0
0
11
NC
NC@rowdy_phantom·
@CollinRugg Doesn' ring true when Ervin's already on record being censured for inappropriate conduct around students.
English
0
0
0
41
Collin Rugg
Collin Rugg@CollinRugg·
NEW: The Tennessee school board member who told a female high schooler she was "hot" has been censured. Board member Keith Ervin was heard telling the girl, “God, you’re hot,” at a public board meeting. Ervin claims that his use of the word "hot" actually meant that the girl was "on a roll." "Last week at the board meeting I wanted to congratulate a student who did a great job sharing thoughts with all that was in the room," he said. "When I mentioned she was hot, I meant she was on a roll, it was nothing to do with her appearance." The censure means that Ervin's behavior has been formally condemned, but it doesn't remove him from office.
Collin Rugg@CollinRugg

NEW: A Tennessee school board member is standing by his comments after telling a high schooler, "God, you’re hot," during a meeting. No one was seen challenging Washington County official Keith Ervin after he made the comment and put his arm around the girl. "God you’re hot, you know that? Where do you go to school at?" he said. Ervin is standing by his remarks after receiving backlash from the community, says he was impressed by her "smart questions." "I mean, I was impressed and the other board members was impressed because of the question she asked," he said to a local news outlet. "And, you know, I’m old school. I’m an old farm boy. And I didn’t mean nothing by anything. I just was proud of her." Ervin claims there is a lot of "context missing" from the viral videos. Thousands of people have since signed a petition demanding his removal.

English
183
81
589
520.9K