Daniel Fredriksen 🇺🇲

-> Anarchy is the natural state of things. -> Under anarchy, people have natural rights they are free to exercise. -> Anarchy is vulnerable to "overthrow" by collective (government) use of force (power). The government that utilizes power most effectively will displace the anarchy, regardless of how righteous the ideology of the other governments are. (Righteousness is not a necessary condition of power). This is binary (but situation dependent) - a government either does or does not have enough power to enforce the rules. -> The displacement of the anarchy is inevitable because there exists collectives / governments with ideologies that support the use of force to displace anarchy. -> Therefore, for the government with the most righteous ideology to displace the anarchy, it also needs to be the most powerful government. -> Corollary: if you believe libertarianism (the preservation of natural rights) is the most righteous ideology, then it is also OK to believe that a libertarian government can possess the most power and use that power to displace external anarchy and protect against external threats, with the goal of preserving internal anarchy (natural rights) for the citizens of that government. The disputes within libertarianism are usually not about the purpose of government, it is about how government can effectively achieve the above. Libertarians can truly range between pure anarchist and neocon. I believe that the libertarian party can attract more people if it focused official messaging on the importance of preserving natural rights and the benefits of that, while leaving the "how" for internal debate. @beinlibertarian @LPNational

@Snakeystew1 @S_W_Somerville @grok Foolish and rash

@runequantum @S_W_Somerville @grok 1. Whoopie doo. It's inconsequential to my point. 2. If no human believed such creature existed, it could be "great" all it liked, it wouldn't be worth anything. Who would it be great to? Itself? 3. Gods don't exist. Grow up.

If God has no needs, why would creation occur at all?

@S_W_Somerville @Snakeystew1 @grok You are picking up on my deeper meaning

@runequantum @Snakeystew1 @grok Unless you're an atheist, in which case nothing is greater than God. (Feeling cute--may delete later.)

@Snakeystew1 @S_W_Somerville @grok Nothing is greater than God

@S_W_Somerville @grok This, at best, makes existence entirely arbitrary, and every action and command and behaviour of said god equally pointless.

@theerealtao Nothing is greater than God.

@princesshypio @legen_eth Who says the shooter was from the future? 😏

@legen_eth Why would someone use a time machine to miss shots at the president Instead of doing something crazier

Are time machines real? Are we living in a simulation?

@Jeremybtc @Aleksan70999300 1970 is the default unix timestamp year when timestamps get messed up. A hacked timestamp is definitely plausible in this scenario. Insider most likely.

@Aleksan70999300 You dont know the post from 1970? there has been stuff like that before

The Cole Allen "time traveler" conspiracy is bullshit. There are too many “coincidences” here. Way more likely that someone found an exploit and backdated a tweet AFTER the shooting happened. Remember a few months ago when an account suddenly had a tweet from 1970? Looks like the same thing on a different event.

@kekiusteeshirt Bruh

The White House: “Our technologies permit us to manipulate time and space. They leave distance annihilated, cause things to grow, and improve productivity.”

@gfodor We forgot the button and are on time travelers now

My final take on the buttons is that the optimal approach is to spend the maximum possible time and AI compute to develop a strong prior on the global result using proxy polls and other data, and then flip from red to blue at a maximum estimated margin cutoff, via vibes.

@HandyGingerGal Please Excuse My Dear Aunt Sally

I'm starting to think that maybe the CERN split included people who learned different rules for the order of operations, from a dimension where the "in the order that they appear" rule doesn't exist.

@elonmusk Don't have to, we can just reference the past cases where they all gained power

If they’re willing to die to assassinate, imagine what they will do if they gain political power

it’s over for you. I’ve portrayed you as a lunar phenotypical LMTN chud, while I am the Martian visaged chad.

@wholyv @PerryALPHA found it

hear me out yall go find the person who first discovered and covered that this account was the first one to post the name “Cole Allen” in 2023 I have a theory that the person who covered it first has something to do with this account itself, because there is no way a dead account with a post made in 2023 could have surfaced up simply by searching up the name “Cole Allen”. when there are thousands and thousands of fresh and viral posts saying the exact name every minute.

@BreakfastQGame @IterIntellectus I have life insurance don't worry

@runequantum @IterIntellectus Then red is for those who the tribe values. If anyone in your life depends on you, you don't pick blue. If you have real people you care about (with more than mere emotions), you pick red. If you don't, you pick blue.

my only argument is that without blue button pressers we wouldn’t have communism or suicidal empathy or mass immigration or most of the problems afflicting humanity nowadays really

@TommyKtattoo @PerryALPHA Why is this so ominously based

@PerryALPHA Reality is Weird....

This account's only post was the name of the White House Correspondents Dinner shooter, Cole Allen

@HenryMa79561893 This is some Donnie Darko shit

Cole Allen

Fun fact, this does not hold with distributions besides 80/20. I've tried variations over the years and 80/20 is most accurate

Imagine a circle, with a little spinner on it that you can flick. The circle is 80% red and 20% yellow, like a yellow pie slice. You flick the spinner. It spins, and slowwwly stops. Where did it land?

@chainsandtrains @yacineMTB So mote it be

@yacineMTB Gotta drop in one of these now and again too

POV you are coding during the year of 2026.5

@yacineMTB Proceed per protocol and in parallel where practical