Bobby Henson

23.1K posts

Bobby Henson banner
Bobby Henson

Bobby Henson

@BobbyForMAGA

Jesus is King. Husband. Father. MAGA Trash. Clemson son. Go Tigers!

Beigetreten Temmuz 2020
3K Folgt903 Follower
Bobby Henson
Bobby Henson@BobbyForMAGA·
@thisisfoster That's beautiful. Thank you for sharing this. My son has had similar struggles, and I tend to rush right in with answers based on apologetics. It sometimes does help, but time together helps not only build his faith, but our relationship overall.
English
0
0
4
258
Michael Foster
Michael Foster@thisisfoster·
About seven years ago, we were going through a massive life reboot. We had left South Carolina to return home to Cincinnati and were living in a two-bedroom apartment with six kids. We made it work because there was an attic that doubled as one big room for the three older boys. The apartment was above my father-in-law’s old dental practice, and he let us stay there rent-free. We only had to pay utilities. It was an incredible opportunity to pay off debt and save money. At the time, I worked in business development and was allowed to work unlimited overtime. So I did. I worked as much as I could. I honestly don’t know how many hours a week I was putting in, but it was a lot. At the same time, my podcast was really taking off, and I was starting to get invited to speak at conferences. Since I was remote, I could do my job from the road. I would clock out, go speak, then clock back in afterward. It allowed me to maximize the opportunity to build out that ministry while also paying down debt and putting money away for the future. One day I was at a conference in the Catskills. An evening session had just wrapped up, and I walked out into a big field under a sky full of stars when my wife texted me, “We need to talk.” I called her and asked what was going on. She had my son with her, who was probably nine or ten at the time. She told me they had been talking about whether or not God was real, and during the conversation he more or less claimed to be an atheist. So standing there looking up at the stars, I started explaining different arguments about fine-tuning and the nature of the universe. I asked him what he thought about it. I remember him repeatedly saying, “I don’t know what you want me to say.” And I kept telling him, “Just answer honestly.” As I circled around a few apologetic arguments and kept getting basically no real response, it suddenly hit me: this is a ten-year-old boy who has spent his whole life in a Christian home, with parents who love him, and in solid churches. This was not fundamentally an intellectual problem. He was not wrestling with the historicity of the resurrection or the complexity of cosmology. There was something much more basic underneath it all. A big part of it was that we were packed into a tiny apartment, and his dad was gone constantly. I started realizing the issue was not primarily intellectual. It was relational and social. If my earthly father doesn’t have time for me, if my earthly father feels distant, then maybe my heavenly Father, who already feels distant because He can’t be seen, probably doesn’t care much for me either. Of course, my son had never consciously worked through it in those exact categories. But children often feel things long before they can explain them. So I backed off the apologetics. I just told him, “Hey, I love you. When I get back, we’ll talk more. Don’t worry about it.” After I returned from that conference, I started taking him with me to my co-working place several days a week. I let him drink however much soda he wanted, sit in on my calls, hang around while I worked, and just talk with me about life. Nothing dramatic. I just started spending more hours with him. And over time, all that stuff faded away. In fact, over time, he became one of the more vigorous defenders of the Christian faith among our kids. There is no program that can help struggling children like godly, present parents. I almost wish there were, because a program would feel more manageable. It would require less faith. But God designed the family to be one of the primary means through which children are shaped into a stable and godly way of life. We only get so many hours. We have to spend them wisely. If you give your heart to your children and walk with God humbly, not perfectly, but humbly, God often uses that to draw your children’s hearts to Himself.
Michael Foster tweet media
English
25
87
769
22.3K
Bobby Henson
Bobby Henson@BobbyForMAGA·
@JakeSherman They don't do jack shit as it is. They can't even pass the Save America Act, which 85% of Americans want. The Senate GOP is absolutely worthless. The only remedy is to vote them out and send someone like Paxton to replace the losers.
English
1
5
17
587
Ashley Schendel
Ashley Schendel@ashleyschendel·
Very rarely will you need to buy your husband a new wallet, but when that day comes, it is somehow a major household decision and you cannot screw it up. Men will carry the same wallet for 20 years with the corners falling apart and still say it’s fine. So this is not the moment for creativity. Slim, durable, leather if he’s a leather guy, metal if he already likes that kind of thing. Do not surprise a man with a weird wallet.
English
833
254
4.6K
712.5K
Bobby Henson
Bobby Henson@BobbyForMAGA·
@lambeth981 @shawnpaterson Beautifully said. I don't even really know what "final justification" is. I just thought there was one justification. Theology can be confusing!
English
0
0
0
22
Matt Kennedy
Matt Kennedy@lambeth981·
"We are accounted righteous before God, only for the merit of our Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ by Faith, and not for our own works or deservings: Wherefore, that we are justified by Faith only is a most wholesome Doctrine, and very full of comfort..." Article 11 of the 39 Articles
English
1
0
2
54
Paterson
Paterson@shawnpaterson·
Mark Jones on John Piper.
Paterson tweet mediaPaterson tweet media
English
16
14
176
21.3K
Matt Kennedy
Matt Kennedy@lambeth981·
@shawnpaterson I don't understand this critique. I think Piper is wrong about final justification, at least in his articulation of it. That doesn't mean I have to call him an abominable heretic because he's not. I don't think too many people are doing that.
English
3
0
3
1K
Bobby Henson
Bobby Henson@BobbyForMAGA·
@TexasPreacher We must live in different worlds. Most preaching I hear is so quick to get to application that I never have time to understand what the text is about.
English
1
0
0
151
Ryan Denton
Ryan Denton@TexasPreacher·
Most Reformed today preaching is just lecturing, not preaching. I blame it on the idolatry of the redemptive historical method. Untethered from experimental application, it leaves both saint & sinner untouched. It doesn't apply, doesn't press the conscience, doesn't woo, doesn't cut & heal, doesn’t search the heart. It's just data dumping. It's a seminary lecture in a pulpit. It comes across as either a lengthy theological paper better suited for a PhD dissertation, or vague and mushy platitudes. The result is dead orthodoxy, puffed up heads, & antinomian tendencies. That's why experimental preaching is needed more than ever in our day of cold, cozy, formal religiosity. And before you think this is a shot at everyone else, I'm talking about my own pulpit ministry as well. Lord, help us to preach a felt Christ!
English
60
46
484
50.5K
Bobby Henson
Bobby Henson@BobbyForMAGA·
@jjstyx I’m glad I’m not the only one who can’t tell a difference. I guess my fashion tastes are unrefined, but my bank account thanks me.
English
0
0
1
7
Joey - Master of Wit and Sarcasm
So everyone is criticizing Pete Hegseth's wife. I guess she wore a 42 dollar dress to the gala this weekend. First of all she looked great in it, I would not be able to tell if it was a $42 dress or $2,000 dollars. It's nice to see people that understand the value of a dollar.
English
431
631
10.7K
71K
Peachy Keenan
Peachy Keenan@KeenanPeachy·
Tennessee Florida South Carolina This is where LA people are talking about fleeing to
English
996
69
1.1K
275.1K
Bobby Henson retweetet
Michelle Maxwell ™
Michelle Maxwell ™@MichelleMaxwell·
The people that took the wine have no class or decorum. They also are void of any decency. The fact that this was a priority for them vs. concern for what had happened or who might be injured or worse. Probably explains why the press is the way it is.
Peter Girnus 🦅@gothburz

I am a senior coordinating producer for the White House Correspondents' Association Dinner. I have worked eleven of these. I was backstage at the Washington Hilton when the shots were fired. The first thing I heard was not the gunfire. It was glass. A champagne flute hit the floor of the International Ballroom at approximately 9:47 PM. Then a second. Then the sound that I have since been told was a 12-gauge shotgun, which from inside the ballroom sounded like a heavy door slamming in a parking garage. Then the Secret Service moved. They moved the President, the Vice President, the First Lady through the east corridor in under ninety seconds, which is protocol, which is practiced, which is the one part of the evening that worked exactly as it was designed. Everything else was improvised. I know this because I ordered the wine. 94 tables. Two bottles per table. 188 bottles of a Willamette Valley pinot noir that the Association selected in February after a tasting committee spent three meetings debating between Oregon and Burgundy. Oregon won. The budget was $14,200. I signed the invoice. I can tell you the vintage. I can tell you the distributor. I can tell you the per-bottle cost because I negotiated it down from $89 to $76. What I cannot tell you is how 147 of those bottles left the building during an active shooter evacuation. I can tell you what I saw. A correspondent from a network I will not name picked up two bottles on her way to the east exit. Full bottles. One in each hand. She was wearing heels and she did not spill. A man in a tuxedo tucked one inside his jacket the way you'd shoplift a paperback at an airport bookstore. A woman picked up a bottle, looked at the label, put it back, and took a different one. She checked the vintage. During an evacuation. That's editorial judgment under pressure. The theme of the dinner was "A Free Press for a Free People." The banners were still hanging when the evacuation began. I know because I hung them. Twenty-three banners, navy blue, gold serif lettering, $11,400 for the set. They were still hanging when 2,600 guests were directed to the exits by Secret Service agents, one of whom had just taken a shotgun round in his ballistic vest and walked to the ambulance on his own feet. The agent's vest costs approximately $800. The wine that left the building was worth $11,172 at Association cost. At restaurant markup, roughly $29,000. The guests saved more in wine than the vest that saved the agent. That's priority. The video went viral by 10:15 PM. Not the video of the evacuation. Not the Secret Service response. The wine. Three guests in formalwear grabbing bottles off white tablecloths while being told to move toward the exits, while a man with a shotgun stood in the same motor entrance where John Hinckley shot Ronald Reagan 45 years ago. A woman near the service entrance was crying. She said "I just wanna go home." She was not holding wine. She was holding her phone. She was the only person I saw that night who looked afraid rather than inconvenienced. That's the distinction. The rest of the ballroom did not look afraid. They looked interrupted. An active shooter at the WHCD is a logistical problem. The dinner was disrupted. The timeline was off. The after-party at the French Ambassador's residence would need to be rescheduled. These are contingency matters. Contingency matters have solutions. Fear is for people who attend events without security details. I have produced eleven of these dinners. I have managed seating charts that require diplomatic-grade negotiations. I have handled comedians, cabinet secretaries, network anchors, and the editor of a major newspaper who once threatened to leave because his table was behind a column. I have never, in eleven years, seen a guest leave a $76 bottle on the table during an evacuation. I have also never seen a guest check the label first. Both observations are consistent. The bottle is worth taking. The evacuation is worth surviving. The instinct is to do both simultaneously. 188 bottles placed. 41 recovered. 147 unaccounted for. One agent shot. Zero guests injured. Zero bottles broken. A free press for a free people. The press is free. The wine was $76 a bottle. They took it anyway.

English
58
230
668
13.1K
Bobby Henson
Bobby Henson@BobbyForMAGA·
@gothburz Thank you for telling the truth about these disgusting cretins. We have our own Panem, and even books struggle to describe their moral decadence.
English
0
0
0
26
Peter Girnus 🦅
Peter Girnus 🦅@gothburz·
I am a senior coordinating producer for the White House Correspondents' Association Dinner. I have worked eleven of these. I was backstage at the Washington Hilton when the shots were fired. The first thing I heard was not the gunfire. It was glass. A champagne flute hit the floor of the International Ballroom at approximately 9:47 PM. Then a second. Then the sound that I have since been told was a 12-gauge shotgun, which from inside the ballroom sounded like a heavy door slamming in a parking garage. Then the Secret Service moved. They moved the President, the Vice President, the First Lady through the east corridor in under ninety seconds, which is protocol, which is practiced, which is the one part of the evening that worked exactly as it was designed. Everything else was improvised. I know this because I ordered the wine. 94 tables. Two bottles per table. 188 bottles of a Willamette Valley pinot noir that the Association selected in February after a tasting committee spent three meetings debating between Oregon and Burgundy. Oregon won. The budget was $14,200. I signed the invoice. I can tell you the vintage. I can tell you the distributor. I can tell you the per-bottle cost because I negotiated it down from $89 to $76. What I cannot tell you is how 147 of those bottles left the building during an active shooter evacuation. I can tell you what I saw. A correspondent from a network I will not name picked up two bottles on her way to the east exit. Full bottles. One in each hand. She was wearing heels and she did not spill. A man in a tuxedo tucked one inside his jacket the way you'd shoplift a paperback at an airport bookstore. A woman picked up a bottle, looked at the label, put it back, and took a different one. She checked the vintage. During an evacuation. That's editorial judgment under pressure. The theme of the dinner was "A Free Press for a Free People." The banners were still hanging when the evacuation began. I know because I hung them. Twenty-three banners, navy blue, gold serif lettering, $11,400 for the set. They were still hanging when 2,600 guests were directed to the exits by Secret Service agents, one of whom had just taken a shotgun round in his ballistic vest and walked to the ambulance on his own feet. The agent's vest costs approximately $800. The wine that left the building was worth $11,172 at Association cost. At restaurant markup, roughly $29,000. The guests saved more in wine than the vest that saved the agent. That's priority. The video went viral by 10:15 PM. Not the video of the evacuation. Not the Secret Service response. The wine. Three guests in formalwear grabbing bottles off white tablecloths while being told to move toward the exits, while a man with a shotgun stood in the same motor entrance where John Hinckley shot Ronald Reagan 45 years ago. A woman near the service entrance was crying. She said "I just wanna go home." She was not holding wine. She was holding her phone. She was the only person I saw that night who looked afraid rather than inconvenienced. That's the distinction. The rest of the ballroom did not look afraid. They looked interrupted. An active shooter at the WHCD is a logistical problem. The dinner was disrupted. The timeline was off. The after-party at the French Ambassador's residence would need to be rescheduled. These are contingency matters. Contingency matters have solutions. Fear is for people who attend events without security details. I have produced eleven of these dinners. I have managed seating charts that require diplomatic-grade negotiations. I have handled comedians, cabinet secretaries, network anchors, and the editor of a major newspaper who once threatened to leave because his table was behind a column. I have never, in eleven years, seen a guest leave a $76 bottle on the table during an evacuation. I have also never seen a guest check the label first. Both observations are consistent. The bottle is worth taking. The evacuation is worth surviving. The instinct is to do both simultaneously. 188 bottles placed. 41 recovered. 147 unaccounted for. One agent shot. Zero guests injured. Zero bottles broken. A free press for a free people. The press is free. The wine was $76 a bottle. They took it anyway.
English
4.2K
16.1K
48.2K
4.4M
Bobby Henson
Bobby Henson@BobbyForMAGA·
@johnmilbank3 You are one sick, evil bastard. You have lost all credibility with me.
English
0
0
0
6
Bobby Henson
Bobby Henson@BobbyForMAGA·
@aedanusburke This is a beautiful church filled with beautiful people! Of course, I am biased since I attend here. The best thing is that it's still faithful to Scripture.
English
0
0
4
102
Aedanus Burke
Aedanus Burke@aedanusburke·
St Helena’s Anglican Church in Beaufort South Carolina is a substantially modified structure built in 1724 and extended to its current size in the 19th century. The parish was founded in 1712, many notable South Carolinians are buried in the churchyard.
Aedanus Burke tweet mediaAedanus Burke tweet mediaAedanus Burke tweet mediaAedanus Burke tweet media
English
5
28
169
8.8K
Bobby Henson
Bobby Henson@BobbyForMAGA·
@neoavatara Here we go with the "both sides" bullshit. Political violence is coming from the left. Period. Our President has been targeted three times. That's never happened before. Stop pretending otherwise.
English
147
1
60
8.2K
Pradheep J. Shanker, M.D.
Pradheep J. Shanker, M.D.@neoavatara·
Trump does a lot of things I hate. But you know what he doesn't do? Promote political violence against his enemies. The same can't be said about the worst wackadoodles on the Far extremes right now.
English
2.5K
214
2.5K
1.2M
Bobby Henson
Bobby Henson@BobbyForMAGA·
@julie_kelly2 @EWess92 We are at best 50/50 with GOP judges. It's time to start nominating politicians like DeSantis or Cruz. We can't afford any more ACBs.
English
0
0
1
70
Eric W.
Eric W.@EWess92·
Judge Hermandorfer is an excellent exemplar of what a future Justice could look like. Other judges include: Judges Ho, Oldham, Stras, Menashi, and Thapar from Trump I; Judge Bove from Trump II; SG Sauer; Staff Sec. Scharf. And more! Embarrassment of riches
Jennifer Bukowsky@esqonfire

Future SCOTUS Justice? President Trump's WH Counsel David Warrington just named 39-year-old Whitney Hermandorfer as an example of a judge they've put on the bench who may someday sit on the Supreme Court.

English
17
13
161
32.5K
Chris
Chris@chriswithans·
This is a good point. Florida needs to redistrict to more properly represent the people of the state. This isn't about any sort of partisan advantage, like with California or Virginia. This is merely to Rightmander the state towards more proper representation. And yes, I suppose they will end up with a map that is 26R-2D. But I mean that's how the state is. The state is full of conservatives who want to vote for Republicans. To draw anything less would be the actual gerrymander.
Mark Meadows@MarkMeadows

It’s time to redistrict Florida. Over TWO MILLION Americans have moved to the Sunshine State since 2020, and the old congressional maps no longer reflect the state. Gov. DeSantis supports this effort and has convened a special session. Now Speaker Perez and the legislature need to get it over the finish line!

English
11
18
142
4.7K
Christian Heiens 🏛
Christian Heiens 🏛@ChristianHeiens·
We've never had a referendum in Virginia like this in late April, so take these projections with a grain of salt. It's extremely difficult to use early voting modeling to predict this outcome with a high degree of precision because partisanship won't have a 100% correlation with the outcome. We know there will be some Dems voting NO. We know some swing voters who voted for Spanberger will vote NO. We also know that turnout across the board won't be a perfect replication of either 2025 or 2024. Those are all variables that have to be considered, and that's the bull case for the referendum failing. The bear case is that Dems could replicate their special election overperformance and pull off a win that's larger than expected. For example, almost everyone predicted Spanberger would win by about 7-12 points last year, but very few foresaw her winning by more than 15 points. There's always a chance something like this happens again and YES wins by something like 8-12 instead of the 5-7 margin that the numbers *appear* to be pointing to. If you had to build a probability slope, you'd probably put the most likely outcome around 5-7 for YES, with one standard deviation in either direction stretching from a 3-point win for NO to something like a +10-point win for YES. The only reason I think the range is so large is that there are just too many unique variables at play in this special referendum, which makes it hard to model. TLDR: Just vote NO tomorrow and stop listening to me ramble about statistical probabilities.
English
9
9
282
15.4K
Christian Heiens 🏛
Christian Heiens 🏛@ChristianHeiens·
Final early vote electorate for the Virginia gerrymandering referendum: 🔴GOP: 36.01% 🔵Dems: 63.89% For comparison, I went back and looked at the final figures for the 2025 gubernatorial election (and the model has a better idea of what that looks like in retrospect), and it produced an outcome of: 🔴GOP: 33.58% 🔵Dems: 66.41% So that's a 5-point shift to the Right compared to last year's early vote margin. And when you consider that there will inevitably be some Dems who vote "NO", plus the likelihood that those swing voters (who broke quite literally about 80-20 for Spanberger last year) are much more evenly split this time around, I can see this referendum passing by about 5-7 points compared to Spanberger's 15-point victory in November. That's my expectation. If we see some sort of Presidential-level turnout in Red counties tomorrow, that's how "NO" wins, but barring that, this referendum probably has about an 80% chance of passing. It really all just depends on rural turnout tomorrow. If you have not yet voted, the only way this thing fails is if you and your friends and family show up and vote "NO".
Christian Heiens 🏛@ChristianHeiens

With just five days to go until the Virginia gerrymandering referendum, I've just run the same early vote model that I used in 2021, 2024, and 2025. The results give me an early vote electorate of: 🔴GOP: 35.99% 🔵Dems: 64.01% That's pretty much the ballgame right there. I'm sure "No" will do significantly better than Sears did last November, but national Republicans really just abandoned this fight before it even began. My gut tells me that the GOP is going to fall just short of what it really needed to get on both the persuasion and turnout fronts. I'm expecting "Yes" to win by about 3-7 points. The Supreme Court of Virginia should throw this entire case out because Democrats violated the state constitution and state law in order to even get this referendum on the ballot in the first place (to say nothing of the explicitly partisan language itself), but considering the court is filled with cowards, I'm not holding my breath that they'll do the right thing.

English
115
305
2.2K
381K
Kostas Moros
Kostas Moros@MorosKostas·
Probably about right. Much closer than November, but Virginia is a blue state now. Surging rural vote isn't enough when the drones in NoVa are hellbent on subjugating the rest of the state. You basically need surging rurals AND depressed urban vote to get a narrow Youngkin-style win. Hope we get a pleasant surprise.
Sun Belt Politics@SunBeltPolitics

Okay, for the third and final time (and now in ugly colors), here is my Virginia Redistricting prediction: Yes +5.2 Honestly the polls seem to be in line with it here. Electorate + persuasion seems to outrun Miyares but not enough to win. Think Stafford/VAB go either way.

English
17
17
243
18.5K
Quantus Insights
Quantus Insights@QuantusInsights·
Using the projected margins shown here, it seems the likely topline is at least D+9 statewide. Democratic-friendlier end of the range: -Democrats ~669,296 -Republicans ~494,374 That is about a D +174,922 lead, or roughly D +15.0 points. A simple midpoint of the projected range gives: -Democrats ~635,411 -Republicans ~528,259 That gives a probable D+9.2 points advantage.
Quantus Insights tweet media
English
17
9
27
57.5K
Bobby Henson
Bobby Henson@BobbyForMAGA·
@DrunkRepub I agree with you there. I think it comes down to how much they embrace the MAGA agenda on immigration, trade, re-shoring manufacturing, and fighting the deep state. Or do they take the GOP back to the Romney country club days? Time will tell.
English
1
0
1
31
The Drunk Republican
The Drunk Republican@DrunkRepub·
The bad news about 2028 is that Trump isn’t running. The good news about 2028 is that Trump isn’t running (and a lot of normies who despise the left but COULD NEVER VOTE FOR THAT GUY might easily vote for Vance or Rubio).
English
140
51
1.2K
25.2K