CSG

@F1re_q @darwintojesus Lol the fact you do not understand the fact logic is an analytical truth or a systemic axiom is really interesting. If logic is objective what is it routed in? If it is god, is God an agent and could he change his mind?

@Common_Sense_G @darwintojesus If logic is not binding like then I reject your argument, there's no reason for anybody to believe what you say is true. You've just conceded. You can't even say im wrong because wrong requires an objective logical standard. So there is no reason to trust reasoning or observation

Impressive. Very nice. Now apply this to morality and human rights.

@AaronBastani To be fair most people do not care where the engery gets to them from, they care how much it costs. Gas, oil and nuclear are in general cheaper for the consumer at the point of buying. If governments put infrastructure in place to make it cheaper the "right" we support it.

Yep. The right’s obsession with renewable energy as ‘woke’ is only going to look more stupid with time. Electrification is perfectly sensible from perspective of energy security. Cars, train, buses.

@_fbhm @NotEvolution1 Thats why theres testing of the evidence and we use it literally to test our genetic heritage via ancestry. If you believe that happens and is true this is just more detailed version of that. It isnt an affirmation of the worldview it's conformation via testing and evidence

@Common_Sense_G @NotEvolution1 Tldr just because you say “muh genetic similarity n da fossils look da same” doesn’t actually mean anything because “if my worldview was true, we’d expect to see the world thusly; we see the world thusly; therefore my worldview is true” is totally baseless

Evolution is a belief, like religion.

@_fbhm @NotEvolution1 You could but then you're god was the catalyst for evolution and not that evolution happens. That's fine.

@Common_Sense_G @NotEvolution1 Another problem is that you fail to account for any other worldview that would also expect to see such genetic similarities, therefore I can just as easily say “we would expect to see all that under creationism because that’s how theall-powerful God created it to be”3/

@_fbhm @NotEvolution1 What doe this even mean, it's gibberish?

@Common_Sense_G @NotEvolution1 Problem is the standard of genetic similarity is never actually substantiated, allowing for conflation such as “genetic similarity exists between subspecies or within one species, therefore it’s possible for a species to change into a different species after enough generations”2/

@_fbhm @NotEvolution1 No closeness ancestry and decent. We see this relatedness via genetics and ancestral linage. This is evidence via observations and testing that evolution, of decent of modification of alino frequencies via groups and species. This is correct 👌

@Common_Sense_G @NotEvolution1 Your worldview is thus: A) If evolution is true, we should expect to see genetic closeness between species B) We see genetic closeness between species C) Therefore evolution is true Circular loop with zero substantiation 1/

@NotEvolution1 I'm open minded. So let me test your evidence so I can believe in the all might and all loving God.

@NotEvolution1 If we are all descended from that 8 ppl then we all interbred and in your view incest is fine. Why do christians never think their views through properly?

Humans did not come from a human/chimp hybrid that gave birth to humans and chimps

@_fbhm @NotEvolution1 Lol you have 2 theories. 1 is that diversity on animals and living things are descendants and related to eachother because of ancestry. So we test the genetics and look at closeness of them. Test physical history and fossils to test the hypothesis. Yours is god said so.

@Common_Sense_G @NotEvolution1 “It’s not my job to educate you” ass lmao How would you even test evolution? “In the control group we have zero random mutations over millions of years, as opposed to another group WITH random mutations!” What a hollow and unscientific worldview

@IXVegas @pureMetatron I engaged leftist much more than religious people. I argued against socialists much more than religion.

@Common_Sense_G @pureMetatron I remember everyone getting banned if they dissagree with your bad opinions. All that told me is that you fucked up your algorithm by engaging with religious Americans.

X is so much better. Twitter before Elon was awful.

@PatrinaC @RDonaldson91 Why?

@Common_Sense_G @RDonaldson91 Sometimes, it's the racism that can lead to how we enforce borders...

When I lock my doors at night, it’s not because I hate the people outside… It’s because I love the people inside. That’s how borders should be viewed. Protection isn’t hatred. Security isn’t “racist”, and putting your own people first should never be controversial. But somehow… we’ve been conditioned to think it is. Society has been tricked into believing that common sense is something to be ashamed of. It isn’t, it’s survival.

@_fbhm @NotEvolution1 If you're asking then you've not investigated this properly.

@Common_Sense_G @NotEvolution1 What testable outcomes?

@F1re_q @darwintojesus You can sure, millions do it everyday. But if you want to be logical then you need to work within that system of logic to do so. Same as math. Thats called an analytical truth. Its inductivly and aductivly shown to be the best description of what's happening.

@Common_Sense_G @darwintojesus If logic is just a constructed concept, then it’s not binding and I can reject it. So which is it? Because you can’t use objective logic to argue that moral ought's dont exist. on 2nd note, can you prove uniformity of nature without assuming it? since u said its descriptive.

@F1re_q @darwintojesus As constructed concepts or descriptions of reality for the last one which is a different category, but sure.

@Common_Sense_G @darwintojesus So you don't believe in rationality either right? like law of non contradiction, reliability of knowledge, uniformity of nature etc.

@F1re_q @darwintojesus Not as independent things from humans no. If they are please show them and where they might be?

@Common_Sense_G @darwintojesus So there's no moral ought's.

@realJosiahBurke @EnochBurke If you lot where able to tell the truth it would be nice. Guess the teacher that got arrested for trasspassing and harassing kids after he was sacked is somehow a hero lol

My brother teacher @EnochBurke is spending tonight in a tiny prison cell in Ireland after refusing to use “they/them” pronouns for a child. This is now over 600 days behind bars. Judges now want to ban his family from attending court. BUT THE TRUTH WILL NEVER BE SILENCED.

@ianmiles Yes it has nothing yo do with changes in laws and what the crime is defined as right? Its just mass immigration of Muslims right?

The UK is now the rape capital of Europe, far surpassing Sweden. Grooming gangs are its greatest strength and don’t you dare speak a word of this unless you want to find yourself in prison.

@IXVegas @pureMetatron Really lol. I remember talking to lots of people that had many different views. Now its mostly just religious americans

@Common_Sense_G @pureMetatron It was just one side that's allowed to talk pre-elon, and nobody had a normal perspective.

@DollyD1974 @liz_churchill10 Oh dear lol.

@Common_Sense_G @liz_churchill10 Haha, that's why they call me Dolly.. However, maybe if you gave a fact, it would help me understand.. Have you thought of contacting the Sussex squad - think you'd get on well..

Rupert Lowe annihilates a BBC Foot Soldier… BBC: “Patients will feel more comfortable speaking in their native language” Lowe: “I don’t care” BBC: “Fine” Lowe: “I have no interest in that. They live in England…they should speak English”

@JUAN_K51 @pureMetatron What's far left for you here?

@Common_Sense_G @pureMetatron Not sure how you managed that, I see far-left extremist propaganda all the time. Could be that you muted a lot of people.