
LuckyFK
1.2K posts









Why is it always "seize the means of production" and never "create the means of production"?



> seja a Mixtape > um pequeno estúdio australiano > formado por ex-roqueiros > construir um jogo inteiro > em volta de uma música do DEVO > escrever a playlist primeiro > e a história depois > fazer personagens baterem palmas > exatamente no ritmo da música > criar um minigame > onde você controla duas línguas > durante um primeiro beijo > transformar uma corrida de carrinho de supermercado >em helicópteros > televisão ao vivo > e caos absoluto justificar tudo com: “pelo menos é assim que eu lembro” > recusar streamer mode > porque a música É a alma do jogo > fazer a maioria dos streamers > nem conseguir transmitir direito > ainda assim > virar o jogo mais bem avaliado de 2026 no OpenCritic > duração: 3 horas > preço: $20 > apenas um final Enquanto estúdios AAA gastam centenas de milhões… um grupo quebrado de Melbourne com bom gosto musical acabou de vencer o jogo do ano. Talvez criatividade ainda importe. Mesmo em uma indústria obcecada por orçamento.






@TheWizardTower Games inherently stimulate independent though and problem solving. But for a rigid ideology it's unacceptable. So the only game possible in that ideology is something that is already pre-programmed? Party approved. You turn it on and consume it. No deviation.


Explaining why I, personally, hate Mixtape in just under 3 minutes of totally uninterrupted "gameplay" (Spoilers):









Italy’s university system’s main objective was to create the new generation of academics. Producing professionals for the job market was the least of their concerns. The system was extremely selective; it wasn’t unheard of for a professor to fail all students in his module. It was far more commonplace, and absolutely expected, to pass only a handful of students. Italian lawmakers decided the country would be better served by adopting the Anglo-Saxon system, where the first five years (3+2) are dedicated to the job market (with module failure rates lower than 20%) and additional years to select the new generation of academics. They heavily reformed the system in the ‘80s and ‘90s but failed to inform the professorial class. When I attended university, 50% to 80% of professors stuck to the old ways, routinely failing 95% of the students in their module like there was no tomorrow. When I passed, I was often among the 3-4 students who passed out of 200. When I finally graduated, the session was organized for just 5 of us. Over the decades this has slowly changed, but even today, almost half a century after the Italian elites decided to reform the university system, it is not unusual to hear anecdotes of professors still anchored to the old ways: failing all students except a selected few – in this case, one. P.S.: I hope we don’t jinx them! 🫣 They have passed the written phase of the exam, not the oral yet! 🥹











