Jarrett Hasson

60 posts

Jarrett Hasson

Jarrett Hasson

@Jakebison123

Beigetreten Şubat 2024
1 Folgt1 Follower
Mohamed A. El-Erian
Mohamed A. El-Erian@elerianm·
Among the G7 nations, the IMF’s revised outlook for the UK economy is likely to attract attention due to: • A Sharp Downgrade in Growth: The 2026 GDP forecast has been slashed to just 0.8%, risking "stall speed." • Persistent Inflation: The hope that inflation would return to 2% target has all but vanished, replaced by a more stubborn price environment. • Rising Joblessness: Unemployment is projected to climb to 5.6%. • Policy Constraints: The government and central bank have limited policy flexibility, undermining their ability to respond to external headwinds. #economy #uk
English
20
31
152
28.9K
Tina Yazdani
Tina Yazdani@TinaYazdani·
I am no longer employed by CityNews. I am proud of my journalism at CityNews and I stand by my reporting. I will have more to say on this later but for now please stay tuned and thank you for those who have supported me.
English
791
2.1K
11.7K
1M
Kerry Sun
Kerry Sun@SunKerry·
Podcast discussion for Macdonald-Laurier Institute's Judicial Foundations Project between @CopelanPeter and @yuanyi_z, @xavierfm3, and @FCote_Avocat on the notwithstanding clause case (English Montreal School Board / Hak) pending at the Supreme Court of Canada. Link in thread:
Peter Copeland@CopelanPeter

A major constitutional showdown is now before the Supreme Court of Canada, and at its core is a simple question of who decides. Constitutional interpretation is not a straightforward exercise. Rights are stated at a high level of generality, as they must be, and don’t contain detailed instructions for their application. They must be interpreted and operationalized in the real world, and balanced in relation to other rights and other public policy objectives. Courts are not uniquely equipped to perform this task, nor were they ever meant to monopolize it. In our parliamentary democracy, legislatures have an essential role to play in that process, and that is what section 33 is for - a necessary condition of patriation and part of the constitutional design where coordinate interpretation can occur in a back and forth between courts and legislatures. The federal government has intervened in these cases to argue contrary to the clear textual basis of the Constitution that repeated invocation of the clause “irreparably impairs” a rights. Though the clause clearly prohibits the policing of its use beyond correctness of application, they argue courts should in fact be able to assess whether legislatures have used it too much. Ottawa has also argued that courts should be able to issue declarations that laws are unconstitutional even where section 33 prevents them from being struck down. A constitutional press release, if you will. Formally toothless, but plainly political in purpose and effect. And given the Court’s decision in Power, which contemplates retroactive damages for laws later found to be unconstitutional, this sort of declaratory power could become a backdoor route to financial liability as well. Given all the innovations the courts have been prone to, one would not put this past them.

English
1
8
11
3.6K
Jeremy Christiansen
Jeremy Christiansen@TradVat2·
Some of my favorite dissenting opinions: 1- Snyder v. Phelps (Alito, J.) 2 - US v. Stevens (Alito, J.) 3 - US v. Alvarez (Alito, J.) 4 - Texas v. Johnson (Stevens, J.)
English
17
18
149
34.9K
GB News
GB News@GBNEWS·
‘The debate in this country is accelerating.’ Professor Steven Greer, author of ‘Islamophobia and Free Speech’, discusses his research into the Government’s incoming Islamophobia ban and whether it will curb Free Speech in Britain. 📺 Freeview 236, Sky 512, Virgin 604
English
20
40
167
13.7K
Jamie Sarkonak
Jamie Sarkonak@sarkonakj·
Human rights went from "firing pregnant women is bad" to "you can't disagree with us on gender ideology" in a couple of short decades. Once intended for good, these tribunals have become a threat to free expression. My feature: nationalpost.com/opinion/the-tr…
English
19
236
845
15.1K
Shuv Majumdar
Shuv Majumdar@shuvmajumdar·
Mark Carney’s subversion of the democratic will of our people, the real frustration Canadians are feeling, and not a single nation-building project built. My interview with @VassyKapelos on @CTVQP:
English
149
297
1.3K
31.1K
Tom Cotton
Tom Cotton@SenTomCotton·
Communist China and its accomplices continue to smuggle advanced AI chips to undermine the US and threaten our national security. My bipartisan Chips Security Act would ensure our chips don’t illegally fall into the hands of our adversaries. bloomberg.com/news/articles/…
English
167
146
445
22.5K