Curmudgeonly Misanthrope

3.6K posts

Curmudgeonly Misanthrope

Curmudgeonly Misanthrope

@JeffCoPops

Entrepreneur, science fan, constitutional attorney, dad, husband and do-it-myselfer. INPO.

Flyover country Beigetreten Mayıs 2012
140 Folgt104 Follower
Angehefteter Tweet
Curmudgeonly Misanthrope
Curmudgeonly Misanthrope@JeffCoPops·
@libsoftiktok @SFUSD_Supe Fed DoE actually provides very little funding for local schools. If you want to get local school power structures' attention, eliminate property taxes and replace revenue $ for $ with an "education tax" shown on every sales receipt in the jurisdiction. Show the people the scam!
English
0
0
9
1K
Curmudgeonly Misanthrope
@derrickvanorden @johnkonrad @SecWar Dude reminds me of "litigators" as compared to trial lawyers. The latter train for the fight and stand ready to win it. They love it. Litigators are all bluster and maneuver and seem startled and panicked when it comes to an actual courtroom dance.
English
0
0
1
44
Derrick Van Orden
Derrick Van Orden@derrickvanorden·
This Major General has never seen a war he did not want to lose. @SecWar fights to win. This Major General fights to whine. GWOT vets stand with Pete.
InfantryDort@infantrydort

This will be the last thing I post today because I have better things to do. What confuses me about these generals is their visceral reaction to what most of human history would consider classic strength of purpose. Brute force if you will. Should every leader be like that? Of course not. But what's telling about these generals is their complete and utter revulsion at any other leadership style than their own. They are intolerant. And most know they're intolerant. The ones that look past it are those who've conformed to their way of thinking. What befuddles me is their absolute denial of the fact that millions of people respond well to the type of leadership they revile in Hegseth. They can't explain it because it doesn't fit nicely in their "MOPS/MOES" worldview. It is intangible. I'm just tired of these weak takes. I'm tired of these generals who go out of their way to appear "measured". They are the living embodiment of the 'proportional response'. They are self styled masters of limited war. That's why they scoff at terms like "unconditional surrender". Because they have never and will never be equipped to prosecute the type of war necessary to achieve it. No. They just refer to those of us furious after GWOT, growing up in the shadow of their inadequacy, as "potential war criminals" because we finally get to shoot back. Look, I'm not trying to be as mean as these bitter generals. I'm not. But I'm just so sick and tired of being lectured at about what war means from people who couldn't be bothered to win one. They couldn't win then. They can't win now. And they will try to take down anyone they can at some final shot at relevance. Because maybe if they can get that one last verbal jab in, they'll finally get that little victory that eluded them on the field of battle. This cohort of officer must be removed from the service almost entirely. Notice I said "almost". Because even I see the value in the occasional corporate GOFO. But if this department is to change for the long term, it must shed most of this archetype going forward. They should be the exception, not the rule. I will not be convinced otherwise.

English
20
22
172
17.9K
John Ʌ Konrad V
John Ʌ Konrad V@johnkonrad·
“Beyond what any sober mind could have envisioned” First of all I don’t drink. Second I envisioned way worse on week one. Third, my envisionment was more conservative than shipping analyst @calvinfroedge Maybe if you turned off the news and listened to actual shipping experts this wouldn’t be such a shock to you.
Eric Nuttall@ericnuttall

I've so far avoided dramatics because I would be accused of bias. To be clear: this is the worst energy crisis of our lifetimes, well beyond what any sober mind could have envisioned, with no end in sight. The level of complacency to me is astounding.

English
9
7
92
6.6K
Curmudgeonly Misanthrope
@WorkforLife3 @SkinnyFilter HR also universally facilitates whiners, makes truly productive people hesitant to complain about crappy management, and makes it far, far more difficult to terminate people who should be terminated, even in an "at will" environment. If you have an HR department, that's the job.
English
0
0
0
4
Jerry Curlan
Jerry Curlan@WorkforLife3·
The use of "undoubtably" was purposeful and ironic, I guess. HR is a reflection of regulations, the company, plus the person in the role and his status. To respond to your "drag on productivity." HR may advertise for, vet, and hire workers. Without HR, there'd be no hiring. Or, line managers would take on those tasks. Outsourcing those tasks allows production people to do what they do best.
English
2
0
1
19
Jerry Curlan
Jerry Curlan@WorkforLife3·
Has anyone done a story on why certain airports 35%+ TSA agents not showing up for work, while others have less than 10% absent? And, how a 20% difference workforce makes the security line wait time 10x? Nashville (and others) airport security lines: 20 minutes or less. Houston, Atlanta, New York, New Orleans - 3 to 4 hour security lines. Is it a difference in union power? Cultural? No need to tell me they're not getting paid; that is not a difference b/t airports. Whoever runs the "good" performing airports should get a raise. Maybe give HR a raise, too.
Jerry Curlan tweet media
English
8
2
17
3.2K
Curmudgeonly Misanthrope
@WorkforLife3 @SkinnyFilter I wonder if your statement is meant to be ironic, because you just trafficked an absolute against absolutism. If so, bravo! Here's another absolute, beyond dispute: the minimum wage is always zero. That said, I'm interested in a counter-exemplar HR department if you have one.
English
1
0
0
14
Curmudgeonly Misanthrope
Curmudgeonly Misanthrope@JeffCoPops·
@johnkonrad Man, that's a tough one! My own highly *conservative* 4.0 daughter (34 ACT, dual sport varsity starter) did not! Thank God! I don't envy the decision you're going to have to make.
English
0
0
0
20
John Ʌ Konrad V
John Ʌ Konrad V@johnkonrad·
My liberal 4.0 daughter just got into her dream school. 7% acceptance rate. Absolutely unreal. Insanely proud of her. Now do I rob a bank, push a cheaper school, put her in student loan debt, or dust off the old captain’s hardhat and head back to sea? Decisions. Decisions.
English
949
86
2.8K
684.8K
Curmudgeonly Misanthrope
@Heminator In Buckley's famous formulation, I, too, would rather be governed by the first 100 people in the phonebook then by the "best minds" Washington can find.
English
0
0
2
66
Mary Talley Bowden MD
Mary Talley Bowden MD@MaryBowdenMD·
The cap on resident hours was implemented in 2003, the year after I finished. Google it. Conrad Fischer is a liar.
English
22
89
500
19.8K
Ed Whelan
Ed Whelan@EdWhelanEPPC·
Sotomayor asks a 3-minute question, cuts off response after 10 words, talks for another 30 seconds, cuts off response after 5 words, and again and again.
English
146
308
4K
138.6K
Curmudgeonly Misanthrope
@MaryBowdenMD @CDCgov Liar. It's due to be published in June right on schedule with the same (albeit questionable) 3 yr delay to compile and sort that there always is. You discredit yourself and our movement with this engagement farming BS. Please stop.
English
0
0
2
65
Curmudgeonly Misanthrope
@MattWalshBlog And what's more, the 80% failure rate, while embarrassing and dispositive in proving TSA incompetent, is almost entirely irrelevant bc the real threat to actual security isn't passengers, it's airport staff who have access to luggage areas, and airplane services providers. 💣😱
English
0
0
0
29
Matt Walsh
Matt Walsh@MattWalshBlog·
The current chaos at airports is just another argument for privatizing airport security. TSA agents are horrible at their jobs. The DHS admitted back in 2017 that, when tested, TSA misses up to EIGHTY PERCENT of weapons and contraband smuggled through screening. And now we have to wait in line for three hours because funding for an incompetent agency with an 80 percent failure rate is being held hostage. The whole thing is insane. Get the government out of airport security. They suck at it. And it's just another bargaining chip these sociopaths can use for their own political agendas.
English
454
1.2K
11.3K
327.4K
Curmudgeonly Misanthrope
@TroyWright @MaryBowdenMD Totally agree. It's shameful that it took 3 YEARS even 10 yrs ago. But failure to fast track isn't refusal to publish. That CDC "hasn't published cancer data since 2022" is just a lie. They published 2022 data last June, right on schedule, and Mary is grossly distorting that fact
English
0
0
1
20
Christopher Hale
Christopher Hale@ChristopherHale·
No Christian can defend this godless man.
Christopher Hale tweet media
English
4.1K
2.3K
16.7K
702.8K
Daniel Ninio
Daniel Ninio@DrDaniel832·
@JeffCoPops @delbigtree Someone has caught @stkirsch 's obsession with open access data. There are dozens of published trials involving hundreds of thousands of patients and billions of doses with post marketing surveillance world wide. Only conspiratorial nutters think we're suppressing data
English
1
0
0
10
Del Bigtree
Del Bigtree@delbigtree·
I was honored to speak in Amsterdam with 15 of the most courageous scientists, doctors, and truth-tellers on this planet, all in one room. People who have lost careers, been arrested, been silenced, been ridiculed, and who showed up anyway. The audience was asked one question: How many of you know someone in your circle who has been injured, disabled, or died from the COVID-19 vaccine? Almost every hand in the room went up. Almost every. Single. Hand. That is your tipping point. The hands of real people who have buried someone, who are watching someone they love deteriorate, who know in their bones what was done to them and to the people they love. We are so far past the tipping point it isn't even a debate anymore. This fight has cost everyone in that room something. Some of us lost everything. But don't be discouraged - we are winning. This is what the winning team looks like. Not loud, not flashy, not backed by billions of dollars or government agencies, but people who decided the truth was worth whatever it cost them. They needed our compliance. They never got it. Rise up. Talk to each other. Celebrate how far we've come. We are just getting started. 🙏 bit.ly/ICANSupport
English
47
1.1K
2.6K
69.1K
Curmudgeonly Misanthrope
Curmudgeonly Misanthrope@JeffCoPops·
@TruthDespiteMSM @HansMahncke @ITGuy1959 True in the criminal sense, but Judge Webber found him in contempt for "intentionally false" testimony. Then once SupCt Ark ruled that the office of prof'l conduct must act, he was tried for revocation of his license and admitted his "knowingly misleading and evasive" statement
English
0
0
4
111
Curmudgeonly Misanthrope
Curmudgeonly Misanthrope@JeffCoPops·
@TruthDespiteMSM @HansMahncke @ITGuy1959 There is one: William J Clinton. He should have been disbarred for lying under oath in his deposition presided over by the judge in the case. Instead he was merely suspended for 5 years, against ABA guidelines that countermand any suspension longer than 3 years. Two tiers indeed.
English
1
1
25
842
MalinformationSuperSpreader ⚖
MalinformationSuperSpreader ⚖@TruthDespiteMSM·
As a licensed attorney, I was so appalled by the treatment received by Clinesmith that I conducted a nationwide search for another example of an attorney with a felony conviction for lying to a federal court that was not subsequently disbarred. I was unable to find one. Clinesmith is a poster child for how the establishment protects its own and an indisputable example of our two-tiered justice system
English
19
334
994
16.8K
Curmudgeonly Misanthrope
Curmudgeonly Misanthrope@JeffCoPops·
@FmrRepMTG You are an absolutely disgusting narcissist. This soldier does in an accident in Africa years ago you self promoting fool.
English
0
0
1
7
Former Congresswoman Marjorie Taylor Greene🇺🇸
Heartbreaking 💔 THIS is what we thought MAGA was going to end. We believed Trump would end it because he told us he would. This is Trump’s new MAGA and I want nothing to do with it. Pray for our troops🙏because Trump is sacrificing them for Israel.
English
12.7K
15.2K
65.7K
3.8M
Kostas Moros
Kostas Moros@MorosKostas·
Something I've learned in the Second Amendment space: "Law office history" often means "actual history, but liberal scholars disagree with it and hide behind credentialism to deny it." In 2A, what we saw for years was people claiming Scalia "invented" an individual right in Heller, based on nonsense the NRA made up in the 1970s. Insert cite to Warren Burger. So I went and looked at as many pre-1900 sources as I could find on what people thought the 2A meant. I found dozens and dozens of them, nearly all confirming they saw the Second Amendment as an individual right. And not only that, but it was obvious to them, stated matter-of-factly. It's in my pinned thread if you want to see for yourself. (I later found out Dave Kopel did the same 30 years ago and did a paper on it). What was derided as "law office history" was correct. It is the supposed liberal "scholars" that made up nonsense. Birthright citizenship is indeed more debatable than the individual right of the Second Amendment. But it IS debatable, as Wurman and Swearer and others have shown.
Anthony Michael Kreis, FRHistS@AnthonyMKreis

I have done multiple threads engaging with Prof. Wurman’s article and brief. They have been substantive and lengthy. Law office history done to influence the public and judges is bad. And I will not yield public space to erroneous claims and let them take hold while I work hard.

English
23
96
671
27K