Anonymous.tcp

4.8K posts

Anonymous.tcp

Anonymous.tcp

@KD2K18

N & S + Cyber Security Consultant

Bharat Beigetreten Mayıs 2020
212 Folgt25 Follower
Angehefteter Tweet
Anonymous.tcp
Anonymous.tcp@KD2K18·
@rwac48 @mehartweets Yeah the same liberal keep their mouth shut when Hindu got lynched. And the same liberal keep running their agenda behind CAA protest. Shame on these kind of liberals.
English
9
2
67
0
Anonymous.tcp
Anonymous.tcp@KD2K18·
@Anele With one bullet on shoulder Luther was on his feet in few days. Ingrid didn’t wake up till the end. WTF
English
1
0
7
465
Deepinder Goyal
Deepinder Goyal@deepigoyal·
Last one on this topic, and I have been holding this in myself for a while. For centuries, class divides kept the labor of the poor invisible to the rich. Factory workers toiled behind walls, farmers in distant fields, domestic help in backrooms. The wealthy consumed the fruits of that labor without ever seeing the faces or the fatigue behind it. No direct encounter, no personal guilt. The gig economy shattered that invisibility, at unprecedented scale. Suddenly, the poor aren't hidden away. They're at your doorstep: the delivery partner handing over your ₹1000+ biryani, late-night groceries, or quick-commerce essentials. You see them in the rain, heat, traffic, often on borrowed bikes, working 8–10 hours for earnings that give them sustenance. You see their exhaustion, their polite smile masking frustration with life in general. This is the first time in history at this scale that the working class and consuming class interact face-to-face, transaction after transaction. And that discomfort with our own selves is why we are uncomfortable about the gig economy. We want these people to look our part, so that the guilt we feel while taking orders from them feels less. We aren't just debating economics. We are confronting guilt. That ₹800 order might equal their entire day's earnings after fuel, bike rent, and app cuts. We tip awkwardly, or avoid eye contact, because the inequality is no longer abstract. It's personal. Pre-gig era, the rich could enjoy luxury without moral discomfort. Labor was out of sight. Now, every doorbell ring is a reminder of systemic inequality. That's why debates explode. It's not just policy. It's emotional reckoning. Some defend the system (“they choose it”), others demand change (“this isn't progress, its exploitation”). And here’s the uncomfortable twist: the unsaid ask of clumsy ‘solutions’ isn’t dignity. It is about returning to invisibility. Ban gig work and you don’t solve inequality. You remove livelihoods. These jobs don’t magically reappear as formal, protected employment the next day. They disappear, or they get pushed back into the informal economy where there are even fewer protections and even less accountability. Over-regulate it until the model breaks, and you achieve the same outcome through paperwork instead of slogans: the work evaporates, prices rise, demand collapses, and the people we claim to protect are the first to lose income. And then what happens? The rich get their old comfort back. Convenience returns without faces. Guilt dissolves. We go back to clean abstractions and moral posturing from a distance. The poor don’t become safer, they become invisible again: back in cash economies, back in backrooms, back in shadows where regulation rarely reaches and dignity isn’t even debated. The gig economy just exposed the reality of inequality to the people who previously had the luxury of not seeing it. The doorbell is not the problem. The question is what we do after opening the door. Visibility is the price of progress. We can either use this discomfort to build something better (which we keep doing continuously as delivery partners are our backbone), or we can ban and over-regulate our way back into ignorance. One of those choices improves lives. The other simply helps the consuming class feel virtuous in the dark.
English
2K
5.2K
25.3K
3.7M
Anonymous.tcp
Anonymous.tcp@KD2K18·
@ViCustomerCare Pls help me to generate the eSIM for my number as I am on international roaming ..
English
1
0
0
54
Anonymous.tcp
Anonymous.tcp@KD2K18·
@Airtel_Presence Pls help me to generate the eSIM for my number as I am on international roaming ..
English
1
0
0
46
Airtel Cares
Airtel Cares@Airtel_Presence·
@KD2K18 We don't want our customers to experience any concerns related to our services. Kindly DM us your registered contact number and DSL ID, so that we can look into it immediately. Thanks, Monika twitter.com/messages/compo…
English
2
0
0
20
Bharati Chaturvedi
Bharati Chaturvedi@Bharati09·
Dear women of Delhi I took an @Uber_India from Vasant Vihar to sarvodaya enclave to the doc. The pin stopped near Essex farms, driver agreed to drop me minus pin. But began getting irritated and yelling and suddenly turned while i asked him to go straight for a u turn. Asked him to stop and he refused. I opened the cab door to make him stop. He turned around, grabbed my arm and twisted it. Called 100 but no response. Called uber safety and was asked to call 100. Also Sanjana said will involve entire team to assess action. Outrageous. @DelhiPolice how do women contact you when in need? PS- Driver didn’t take payment. @gupta_rekha @Uber_Support
English
225
645
3.2K
456.8K
Chief
Chief@TheChiefMK·
Hello @grok! In 72 hours, pick two of my followers from the comments (with no likes) to win these iPhones. Good luck to all my followers participating! ❤️🥳
Chief tweet media
English
16K
954
22K
3.1M
Ashwini Shrivastava
Ashwini Shrivastava@AshwiniSahaya·
In India, police officers should first be trained on how to behave & communicate with common people. This incident took place in Katihar dist of Bihar, where a sibling pair had gone to a café for dinner. This officer should be terminated immediately to set an example. @bihar_police
English
509
2.5K
9.2K
888.5K
Earth
Earth@earthcurated·
What comes to mind when you think of England?
Earth tweet media
English
349
74
562
225.3K