Fred Frumple

@TimGlauert @trin357 @FooleryT @xyphophor @newbsharp @ken_caudle @ThatGuyM77 @RogHawk1 @Not_yourpilot @grok @Angry_Amphibian @_free_f0rever_ @haprho @entropie42 @WisenheimuR @BillySwift8 @AlteredEggoEgo @lrdofkbl @scorpion_bird @hawk_yeah123 @Mctoon27 @egolder256 A riot of confused babble.

@trin357 @FooleryT @xyphophor @newbsharp @Masterzips @ken_caudle @ThatGuyM77 @RogHawk1 @Not_yourpilot @grok @Angry_Amphibian @_free_f0rever_ @haprho @entropie42 @WisenheimuR @BillySwift8 @AlteredEggoEgo @lrdofkbl @scorpion_bird @hawk_yeah123 @Mctoon27 @egolder256 The absurdity of flat Earth exposed in a single post.

So foreground obstruction doesn't exist either in your paradigm? Oh yeah, b/c you need it to be your "erf curve". Hijacking perspective. We know the EFFECT! Low camera angles when closer to objects mimick distance and objects moving into that distance. Same effect!

@trin357 @FooleryT @xyphophor @newbsharp @ken_caudle @TimGlauert @ThatGuyM77 @RogHawk1 @Not_yourpilot @grok @Angry_Amphibian @_free_f0rever_ @haprho @entropie42 @WisenheimuR @BillySwift8 @AlteredEggoEgo @lrdofkbl @scorpion_bird @hawk_yeah123 @Mctoon27 @egolder256 Hang on, if it rises due to your beloved hallway perspective there’s no dip angle. You can’t have it both ways. Unless it only rises so far, then stops because reasons. You are so confused on this topic it’s laughable.

@FooleryT @xyphophor @newbsharp @Masterzips @ken_caudle @TimGlauert @ThatGuyM77 @RogHawk1 @Not_yourpilot @grok @Angry_Amphibian @_free_f0rever_ @haprho @entropie42 @WisenheimuR @BillySwift8 @AlteredEggoEgo @lrdofkbl @scorpion_bird @hawk_yeah123 @Mctoon27 @egolder256 As you’ve been told, the horizon will always be below eye level. Why? Well bc it’s PHYSICALLY a part of the surface level which is what we’re ON , so eyes are above the sea/ground. The horizon simultaneously APPEARS to rise WITH eye level as you never have to bend over to see it.

@bigDawg8526 @newbsharp @Apricitas121323 @xyphophor @trin357 @FooleryT @ken_caudle @TimGlauert @ThatGuyM77 @RogHawk1 @Not_yourpilot @grok @Angry_Amphibian @_free_f0rever_ @haprho @entropie42 @WisenheimuR @BillySwift8 @AlteredEggoEgo @lrdofkbl @scorpion_bird @hawk_yeah123 @Mctoon27 @egolder256 Oh here we go…

@newbsharp @Apricitas121323 @xyphophor @trin357 @Masterzips @FooleryT @ken_caudle @TimGlauert @ThatGuyM77 @RogHawk1 @Not_yourpilot @grok @Angry_Amphibian @_free_f0rever_ @haprho @entropie42 @WisenheimuR @BillySwift8 @AlteredEggoEgo @lrdofkbl @scorpion_bird @hawk_yeah123 @Mctoon27 @egolder256 Are you a jew?

@Keith72718138 It’s your claim buddy therefore it matters to you. Please don’t swerve the response .I deal with one raised issue at a time until the resolution is clear. You allege a pressurised system is adjacent to vacuum so I’m entitled to seek clarification. Where is the adjacency?

@Masterzips That doesn't matter. How can it be created in a vacuum?

Let's start the day off with a good laugh 🤣

@bigDawg8526 @xyphophor @Apricitas121323 @trin357 @newbsharp @FooleryT @ken_caudle @TimGlauert @ThatGuyM77 @RogHawk1 @Not_yourpilot @grok @Angry_Amphibian @_free_f0rever_ @haprho @entropie42 @WisenheimuR @BillySwift8 @AlteredEggoEgo @lrdofkbl @scorpion_bird @hawk_yeah123 @Mctoon27 @egolder256 Wait. You think the sun can mooch UNDER clouds??

@xyphophor @Apricitas121323 @trin357 @newbsharp @Masterzips @FooleryT @ken_caudle @TimGlauert @ThatGuyM77 @RogHawk1 @Not_yourpilot @grok @Angry_Amphibian @_free_f0rever_ @haprho @entropie42 @WisenheimuR @BillySwift8 @AlteredEggoEgo @lrdofkbl @scorpion_bird @hawk_yeah123 @Mctoon27 @egolder256 Wrong. 1) coriolis is fantasy. It's never calculated into anything. 2)horizon dip is also fantasy. We see too far. 3)clouds lit from underneath is because the sun is local. 4)sunsets are perspective.

@MarcCabanaXV @benwehrman You have seen a very cropped video of Chinese astronauts in their own space station doing a live demonstration of what happens to buoyancy in zero-G. Here’s the whole thing. youtu.be/0qEzdxLls5k?si… Any questions?

@benwehrman What about the glass of water when a chinese astronaut visit the spatial ship!

3 minutes of NASA Cinema wire fails. They are LYING to you.

@Keith72718138 At what altitude are you claiming a pressurised system is adjacent to vacuum?

@Masterzips Ok, if outer space is real... How was a pressurized gas system, with a pressure gradient, adjacent to a vacuum created in a vacuum? Go!

@PoisonDeathShot Hello. Expert here. It is the observed tendency for mass to attract mass according to the Universal Law of Gravitation. It is currently best understood as arising inertially from inertial acceleration caused by the warping of spacetime by mass-energy.

GRaViTy Explained:

@Dog66515910 A polar azimuth equidistant sphere projection.

They didnt hide it back than, they removed it all when Nasa came out. The evidence of our realms many reset events can be found everywhere That is Australia 🤔

@benwehrman Ah another Flerf idiot who thinks a white grid is good for chroma key. 😂 Thirty seconds on Google would have turned up the real reason for the grid: A science lesson from space: astroacademy.org.uk

As long as NASA is still using real humans (not AI), they will make mistakes in the production that you can catch with a keen eye.

@flatsmackin Same datum *curve* You’re welcome

It’s all it can be.

@TinaZimmermann4 I don’t know what’s more pathetic: you deliberately cropping the caption that reads “McDonnell Simulation” or you attempting to suggest that NASA was actually trying to fob this off as genuine footage, untethered camera crew and all.

🥸Moon Fakery 💊Real Footage 💥CBS 1966 Flatearther

@GhostGone420 More hilarious math fail from one of the Finest Minds.

In the heliocentric frame work the sky’s 15° angular sweep would not be possible if you include your +/-4,000 mph linear velocity difference on earth between day and night. Day side facing the Sun 14°/hr Night side opposite of the Sun 44°/hr Difference is a 30°/hr swing

@PatByron2 @maniaUFO This is a well documented hoax

@Masterzips @maniaUFO It was a nasa error lol

A fly caught in a photo sent by the Rover on Mars🧐🤔🪰🪰🪰

@trin357 @FooleryT @newbsharp @ken_caudle @TimGlauert @ThatGuyM77 @xyphophor @RogHawk1 @Not_yourpilot @grok @Angry_Amphibian @_free_f0rever_ @haprho @entropie42 @WisenheimuR @BillySwift8 @AlteredEggoEgo @lrdofkbl @scorpion_bird @hawk_yeah123 @Mctoon27 @egolder256 Baseless? Scroll up.

@Masterzips @FooleryT @newbsharp @ken_caudle @TimGlauert @ThatGuyM77 @xyphophor @RogHawk1 @Not_yourpilot @grok @Angry_Amphibian @_free_f0rever_ @haprho @entropie42 @WisenheimuR @BillySwift8 @AlteredEggoEgo @lrdofkbl @scorpion_bird @hawk_yeah123 @Mctoon27 @egolder256 You have no point. You just have baseless assertions.

@trin357 @newbsharp @FooleryT @ken_caudle @TimGlauert @ThatGuyM77 @xyphophor @RogHawk1 @Not_yourpilot @grok @Angry_Amphibian @_free_f0rever_ @haprho @entropie42 @WisenheimuR @BillySwift8 @AlteredEggoEgo @lrdofkbl @scorpion_bird @hawk_yeah123 @Mctoon27 @egolder256 So now you’re finally admitting that gas pressure on an embedded object IS directly caused by collisions with gas molecules. What have those collisions got to do with any collisions that might be happening on the walls of a container?

@Masterzips @newbsharp @FooleryT @ken_caudle @TimGlauert @ThatGuyM77 @xyphophor @RogHawk1 @Not_yourpilot @grok @Angry_Amphibian @_free_f0rever_ @haprho @entropie42 @WisenheimuR @BillySwift8 @AlteredEggoEgo @lrdofkbl @scorpion_bird @hawk_yeah123 @Mctoon27 @egolder256 Gas pressure.

@trin357 @newbsharp @FooleryT @ken_caudle @TimGlauert @ThatGuyM77 @xyphophor @RogHawk1 @Not_yourpilot @grok @Angry_Amphibian @_free_f0rever_ @haprho @entropie42 @WisenheimuR @BillySwift8 @AlteredEggoEgo @lrdofkbl @scorpion_bird @hawk_yeah123 @Mctoon27 @egolder256 To maintain the what within a finite space? Please repeat

@Masterzips @newbsharp @FooleryT @ken_caudle @TimGlauert @ThatGuyM77 @xyphophor @RogHawk1 @Not_yourpilot @grok @Angry_Amphibian @_free_f0rever_ @haprho @entropie42 @WisenheimuR @BillySwift8 @AlteredEggoEgo @lrdofkbl @scorpion_bird @hawk_yeah123 @Mctoon27 @egolder256 It's not only colliding with matter on some off chance or rare occasion... No, no. The collisions must be constant and withIN a finite INNER space with a physical barrier on all sides to maintain the pressure. It's crazy how you don't know this.

@trin357 @TimGlauert @FooleryT @newbsharp @ken_caudle @ThatGuyM77 @xyphophor @RogHawk1 @Not_yourpilot @grok @Angry_Amphibian @_free_f0rever_ @haprho @entropie42 @WisenheimuR @BillySwift8 @AlteredEggoEgo @lrdofkbl @scorpion_bird @hawk_yeah123 @Mctoon27 @egolder256 How is that at all relevant to the pressure on an embedded object?

@TimGlauert @FooleryT @newbsharp @ken_caudle @Masterzips @ThatGuyM77 @xyphophor @RogHawk1 @Not_yourpilot @grok @Angry_Amphibian @_free_f0rever_ @haprho @entropie42 @WisenheimuR @BillySwift8 @AlteredEggoEgo @lrdofkbl @scorpion_bird @hawk_yeah123 @Mctoon27 @egolder256 Gas pressure is produced when the gas particles collide with the walls of its container.

@trin357 @FooleryT @newbsharp @ken_caudle @TimGlauert @ThatGuyM77 @xyphophor @RogHawk1 @Not_yourpilot @grok @Angry_Amphibian @_free_f0rever_ @haprho @entropie42 @WisenheimuR @BillySwift8 @AlteredEggoEgo @lrdofkbl @scorpion_bird @hawk_yeah123 @Mctoon27 @egolder256 You continue to prove my point.

@Masterzips @FooleryT @newbsharp @ken_caudle @TimGlauert @ThatGuyM77 @xyphophor @RogHawk1 @Not_yourpilot @grok @Angry_Amphibian @_free_f0rever_ @haprho @entropie42 @WisenheimuR @BillySwift8 @AlteredEggoEgo @lrdofkbl @scorpion_bird @hawk_yeah123 @Mctoon27 @egolder256 Projection.