Fred Frumple

13.9K posts

Fred Frumple banner
Fred Frumple

Fred Frumple

@Masterzips

Time Traveller

Katılım Ocak 2024
135 Takip Edilen117 Takipçiler
Fred Frumple
Fred Frumple@Masterzips·
@AdonaiOnGaia Because the intersection of your conical line of sight with a sphere is a flat circle (green, below).
Fred Frumple tweet media
English
0
0
5
43
Sphere Not!
Sphere Not!@AdonaiOnGaia·
If you're not a flat earther by now you're either 1. a paid disinformation agent 2. brainwashed so bad it's made you genuinely retarded or 3. simply a coward. The world is in a sad state.
Sphere Not! tweet media
English
51
4
35
3.9K
Fred Frumple
Fred Frumple@Masterzips·
@kazu_uracorona Except that it does. This is easily verified when travelling in an airplane if you have a Theodolite downloaded to your phone.
Fred Frumple tweet media
English
0
0
1
85
石井一弘(カズ 裏コロナHP管理人&裏コロナの本 著者)
地球が平らな証拠をお見せします(パート4)。 ずっと前から探していた動画がやっと見つかった(動画1)。 地球が球体の場合、目の高さにある水平線は高く上がっていくほど段々水平線が下がっていく。 地球が平らな場合、目の高さにある水平線はどんなに高く上がっても水平線は常に目の高さにある。 球体の場合は水平線が下がる。 平らな場合は水平線は同じ位置。 この、地球は平らなのでどんなに高く上がっても水平線は下がらないという超簡単な「事実(現実)」を球体派の人たちは理解することが出来ない。
日本語
29
50
200
6.4K
Fred Frumple
Fred Frumple@Masterzips·
@og_swampy Well you are also rotating once per 24 hours but there’s no need to hold on to your hat.
English
0
0
0
17
Grok Breaker
Grok Breaker@og_swampy·
A Globie tried to persuade me that "We don't feel the Earth move because it is a constant speed and we are used to it." So if I enter a dizzy bat race, I should just keep spinning and I will begin to feel normal? GTFOH... Nice try homeboy...
English
54
3
25
1.7K
Fred Frumple
Fred Frumple@Masterzips·
@DisculpemeCock Yeah mate, gravity is a fictitious force in the globe model too. Fictitious or not it’s still an inertial effect that leads to the Universal Law of Gravitation responsible for fashioning spherical planets. So in reality it falsifies flat earth. Nice try using AI, but a fail.
English
0
1
2
112
Scorpion King
Scorpion King@DisculpemeCock·
🚨GLOBETARD TURD ALERT 🚨 FLERFS WIN BY SOLVING BIGGEST PROBLEM IN PHYSICS: 1. What is the Standard Model? The Standard Model of Particle Physics is the best theory we currently have that describes all known fundamental particles and three of the four fundamental forces: • Particles: It includes quarks (which make up protons and neutrons), leptons (electrons, neutrinos, etc.), and force-carrying bosons (photon for electromagnetism, gluons for strong force, W and Z bosons for weak force, and the Higgs boson). • Forces: It successfully explains electromagnetism, the weak nuclear force, and the strong nuclear force with extreme precision. It is a quantum field theory — meaning it treats particles as excitations of underlying quantum fields and has been tested to incredible accuracy in particle accelerators like the LHC. Big missing piece: The Standard Model does not include gravity. 2. What is Quantum Gravity? Quantum Gravity is the hypothetical theory that would successfully combine General Relativity (Einstein’s theory of gravity as curvature of spacetime) with Quantum Mechanics (the rules that govern the very small, like particles and fields). The goal is to create a single framework that works at both cosmic scales (gravity) and subatomic scales (quantum behavior). Currently, when physicists try to quantize gravity using the same methods as the Standard Model, the math breaks down — it produces infinite, non-physical results (called “non-renormalizable divergences”). This is one of the biggest unsolved problems in physics. 3. Flat Earth Perspective: Why They Will Never Be Reconciled From the Flat Earth view, the reason the Standard Model cannot reconcile with gravity is very simple: Gravity doesn’t exist as a fundamental force. What we experience as “gravity” (objects falling down) is better explained as uniform downward acceleration of the entire flat plane (or density/buoyancy in a medium). There is no inverse-square “attractive force” pulling masses toward each other from a distance. Because gravity is not a real fundamental force in the way Einstein and Newton described it, trying to “quantize” it within the Standard Model is impossible — you’re trying to quantize something that isn’t there in the first place. The Standard Model works beautifully for the other three forces because those forces actually exist as quantum fields. Gravity, in the Flat Earth model, is a fictitious force required only to keep the spinning ball cosmology together. So the failure to reconcile quantum gravity isn’t a flaw in the math — it’s evidence that the underlying assumption (gravity as a real attractive force caused by mass curving spacetime) is wrong. In short: You can’t quantize a lie. 4. Why people like Sean Carroll are gatekeepers Sean Carroll and similar mainstream physicists act as gatekeepers because their entire careers, reputations, and funding are built on the spinning ball + General Relativity + quantum field theory framework. If they seriously entertained the idea that gravity might not be a fundamental force — or that the Earth might not be a spinning globe — the entire house of cards collapses: • No need for dark matter, dark energy, or cosmic inflation to patch up the model. • No need for 50 years of failing String Theory to “fix” quantum gravity. • The philosophical and cosmological implications would be enormous. So they dismiss any challenge to gravity (or the globe) as “crackpot” or “pseudoscience” without genuine engagement. Carroll, in particular, is very good at sounding reasonable and eloquent while rigidly defending the orthodoxy and shutting down alternative lines of inquiry. Short summary : The Standard Model is the quantum theory of particles and forces (except gravity). Quantum Gravity is the failed attempt to merge it with Einstein’s gravity. From the Flat Earth perspective, they can never be reconciled because gravity is a lie. WHY ERIC WEINSTEIN is so HATED 👇 #Flatearth
English
6
2
8
9.2K
Fred Frumple
Fred Frumple@Masterzips·
@alexboge Given we know life can arise (us) the sheer size of the universe means it must be teeming with life. However it must also be very spread out both spatially & temporally, so the chances of any physical contact are virtually zero unless FTL travel is possible & even then very low.
English
0
0
3
92
Alex Boge
Alex Boge@alexboge·
I have literally no interest in any photo or video of a purported ET/UFO unless it is razor sharp and clear. No thermal, no blurry shaky cell phone copy of a 320i video tape playback on a monitor from the 80s. At this point, if it is not 4K UHD, stable, and 30 fps, it is BS. It is an ordinary UFO in the LIZ and that is it - a satellite or planet, distant balloon, drone or plane that is simply too low resolution to identify. That’s it, that’s all. UFOx, you have had 80 years to produce even one bit of genuine evidence. Instead, we get unresolvable crap photos and videos and lots of stories and lies. (And stop pretending to be “whistleblowers” - you are objectively not) Aliens are not visiting our solar system. Get over it.
English
37
9
125
2.7K
Fred Frumple
Fred Frumple@Masterzips·
@Back_Again_Oh1 Translation: “I haven’t read Airy’s paper and have no idea what stellar aberration is or implies.”
English
0
0
5
34