Roger Hawkins

13.3K posts

Roger Hawkins

Roger Hawkins

@RogHawk1

Katılım Eylül 2014
124 Takip Edilen176 Takipçiler
🧬Maxpein🧬
🧬Maxpein🧬@maximumpain333·
The U.S. Navy Just Admitted Flat Earth On Live Camera. ✨🙌🏽💫
English
48
624
1.8K
59.1K
Harry Worp
Harry Worp@HarryWorp·
Harry Worp@HarryWorp

@KrutzDonna @JimmyNoJabba @RogHawk1 @NotebookSlys @CalmLogical @surfpurzel @Jfree75 @4dots899721 @Nerzog999 @digital_bow012 @Skink101 @RComparin55076 @sly_sparkane @DoljaninJo80605 @StupidSCOTUS @CreatorJonwPuck @ImNux @CatManitarMike @sashuwa77246 @iLeedy1987 @ResonanceEnter1 @YourFerntasy @Evil_MerlinX @guitardude42 @karleastlondon1 @Rudeboymessiah @AlwaysWrightDM @MaxQHellcat @space_audits @xyphophor @8getoveritman8 @SchallR64430 @SueSuemaria1 @lavalmxhr @haprho @First_Won_ALT @bobfrogg77 @BadrHarry72 @DutchPatriot72 @LHorne95691178 @Notaspud_ @mattysp911 @egolder256 @OhDearWhat666 @mrjaybeevee @Back_Again_Oh1 @Burki677 @hawk_yeah123 @KidGuacamole @dirspielbergo Sailors and pilots have long relied on celestial navigation for determining their position. There is a geometric basis for celestial navigation on a globe Earth yet there is no geometric basis for a flat Earth.

English
1
0
2
30
Modal Method
Modal Method@plinkyplon88054·
@AdonaiOnGaia So, no curve, no globe, no space, no black holes, no light speed, no ISS, just the firmament and God. Simple.
English
5
0
0
977
Sphere Not!
Sphere Not!@AdonaiOnGaia·
No curve = no globe. The debate has been over for a long time. Y'all just refuse to accept reality.
English
85
118
425
118.7K
Scorpion King
Scorpion King@DisculpemeCock·
Nice try, but this doesn’t falsify Flat Earth at all. Look at your own picture carefully. You’re at 35,820 feet, and your fancy flight display shows the pitch ladder / artificial horizon sitting roughly level with the real horizon outside the window (or very close to it). The aircraft is flying straight and level according to its instruments. On a globe, at that altitude the horizon is supposed to dip ~3.3 to 3.7 degrees below true horizontal (eye level). That’s a very noticeable drop — more than 6 times the width of the full Moon. Yet in real high-altitude flights and balloon footage, the horizon consistently rises to eye level and stays there, even as you gain altitude. Pilots don’t have to keep pushing the nose down to “follow the curve.” The plane flies straight and level with the horizon staying flat and at eye level, exactly as it would on an infinite flat plane. What you’re actually seeing in these cockpit shots is: • The aircraft’s artificial horizon (the yellow box/pitch ladder) is referenced to the plane itself. • Atmospheric perspective, wide-angle lens distortion in cameras, and the massive distance to the horizon make any tiny “dip” extremely hard to detect reliably with the naked eye or phone. • Many actual measurements from pilots and passengers using proper leveling tools show far less dip than the globe math predicts once refraction and other factors are considered. If the Earth were really curving away at that rate, the horizon would visibly sink lower and lower the higher you climb — revealing more and more of the “ball.” It doesn’t. It stays flat and rises with the observer. This is one of the most repeated observations from people who actually go high up: the horizon always rises to eye level. Your “measurable dip” claim sounds good in a calculator, but it doesn’t match what thousands of people actually see out the window on commercial flights. Your move GLOBETARD 🫡 who's next? #Flatearth
Disc Order Space Toaster@jacuzzi_toaster

@DisculpemeCock @YeDivvy @d2fl @grok You failed at 1. The dip angle to the horizon is measurable. It increases with altitude. It falsifies the idea that the earth is flat.

English
27
0
3
2.5K
Thoughtcrime
Thoughtcrime@Th0ughtcrime2·
@Nerzog999 @alexboge Hmm 🤔… I wonder where the billions of dollars that NASA gets every year in tax money goes? 🤔🤔 😂😂😂😂😂
English
1
0
0
13
Alex Boge
Alex Boge@alexboge·
What a morning view !
English
18
3
61
1.2K
Roger Hawkins
Roger Hawkins@RogHawk1·
@benwehrman Yes, I listened to the original radio program when it first aired. It refers to the Blue Marble 2.0 composite photo illustration project of the early 2000s, not the original Blue Marble photograph from 1972, or any other actual photography of the Earth.
English
0
0
0
23
₿en Wehrman
₿en Wehrman@benwehrman·
The Biggest Lie Of All - Allegedly Dave MUST-WATCH FOR FLAT EARTH SKEPTICS 👇
English
21
189
579
28.5K
truthache
truthache@truthache68·
Flat Earth Dave breaks down the Artemis II launch: “The speed and sound don’t add up.” 🚀🤔 Is this rocket really hitting those insane velocities with the audio/visuals we see? Or is something off with the whole production? Dave’s calling it out… Real engineering or Hollywood physics? Watch this clip with his breakdown and decide for yourself.
English
67
42
234
12.5K