@lolkms247 What?
You’re living in a fantasy world where all Christians rape gay kids?
Do you hear how stupid that sounds?
English
ScoutingTheNarrowRoad
19.4K posts
ScoutingTheNarrowRoad
@ScoutingAlong
Just scouting along. 🇻🇦
Beigetreten Ocak 2022
192 Folgt145 Follower
@ScoutingAlong A Christian talking about homosexuality is like an abuser talking about their abuse victim.
Your kind won’t win against us. Yall do corrective rape and conversion therapy on gay kids. Scum
English
People ARE born gay.
Being gay is NOT pedophilia.
Saying “don’t BE gay” suggests homosexuality is an action. It is not. BEING is a state of existing, not acting.
Lane Brown@lanebrown_3
You aren’t born gay. Being gay is introduced to you by creepy pedophiles. Don’t be gay.
English
What respect have I not afforded to others?
The insult is ad hominem because ad hominem is attacking a person rather than the argument
Also yeah let’s talk about the “breeder” comment
Which again is meant as insult unless I’m much mistaken.
Your comment makes no sense on multiple levels:
1. Being sexually attracted to the opposite sex does not mean you necessarily are one to have children.
2. Saying those who have children are “breeders” as some sort of derogatory word is stupid. Would you tell your parents “you’re just a couple of breeders”?
3. If by your comment you meant there are multiple ways to become heterosexually attracted(though I don’t understand why you wouldn’t just say that), I think I could agree. Though I don’t see how this in any way retorts against what I have said.
English
@ScoutingAlong @Texaggie79 @BreeSolstad @ArielleScarcell You get the same amount of respect you give others
And it’s no ad hominem, it’s an insult that directly correlate with your poor socially constructed “reasoning”
You have been answered already
I told you that there’s different ways to become a breeder - you didn’t like that ans.
English
I’ve never heard that insult for a brain shape
Smooth brain of course, but a flat line? it’s interesting to say the least
Anyway, perhaps instead of resorting to ad hominem, which is never a marker of a winning argument, perhaps you could, in your obviously vastly superior mental capacities if your comment holds any truth, formulate a coherent logical argument to object about my values without having to default to insult
English
@ScoutingAlong @Texaggie79 @BreeSolstad @ArielleScarcell Nothing makes sense to you because your brain is a flat line.
English
@ZELLKLUMPEN What is the genuine teaching on this?
Does what he did constitute blaspheming the Holy Spirit?
Sincere question.
English
@ZELLKLUMPEN Murder, especially this kind, is an unpardonable sin.
English
@7Qwerk @ZELLKLUMPEN You should look up the story of Rudolph Hoss and his reversion before his execution
English
@ZELLKLUMPEN I don’t.
I know it’s wrong for me to think that.
But I sincerely hope he is burning in hell because of the genocide on innocent infants he did.
I’ll pray for myself, so that my heart can be softened. But I’m not going to pray for this evil bastard
English
@JamesEwen0407 @TaylorRMarshall @t0bitsdog @A_A_Ron_314 @schiziodbosch Let me guess, those receipts are from those using the archaic definition of “worship”
The definition that the British use for their judges when they call them “your Worship”
English
@ScoutingAlong @TaylorRMarshall @t0bitsdog @A_A_Ron_314 @schiziodbosch If you're a part of the RC you're a liar, you do worship and pray to idols I have the receipts. You do worship and pray to a false god that you call Mary, the RC is just a pagan religion that will lead those who follow its teachings to the lake of fire
English
These are the missing books in Protestant Bibles that Catholics still have:
Tobit
Judith
Wisdom
Sirach (aka Ecclesiasticus)
Baruch (including the Letter of Jeremiah))
1 Maccabees
2 Maccabees
Additionally, Catholic versions include:
6 more chapters in Esther
3 more chapters in Daniel: Song of the Three Young Men (in ch 3), Susanna (ch 13), and Bel and the Dragon (ch 14)
Dr Taylor Marshall™️@TaylorRMarshall
Dear Protestants, Your Bible lacks 7 canonical books, removed by Martin Luther and John Calvin as “Apocrypha”. Protestants often quote Saint Jerome to justify this removal. Saint Jerome later changed his mind about the 7 deuterocanonical books in obedience to Pope Damasus. His famous quote from the Helemeted Preface (quoted daily by Protestants) doubting the 7 deuteros dates from 391. Nine years later he wrote that he had submitted to the Catholic position and rejected his private opinion. Can Protestants please drop their fan fiction that Jerome was a Proto-Protestant? Later in life (in Against Rufinus around 402 AD), he defended the Church's judgment on the 73-book canon saying, "What sin have I committed if I followed the judgment of the churches?"
English
@GrZmNkY09 @kingofthehood89 @BibleInContext1 You might want to look up why British judges are called “your worship”
English
@kingofthehood89 @BibleInContext1 king of the hood 89 is calling someone a moron lol.
English
When a Catholic says, they don’t worship Mary, what they mean is that they don’t magically turn her into a wafer and eat her!
English
@EmeraldGiss @MarioStar08 The Live Action remake of the Live Action remake can happen in 2 decades
English
@MarioStar08 Well the problem here is the year, they are 2 decades early.
English
@JamesEwen0407 @TaylorRMarshall @t0bitsdog @A_A_Ron_314 @schiziodbosch We will never justify such things because we don’t worship or pray to idols or a false god.
We also say we must become born again, in Baptism.
Your strawman of us is nothing more than the lies of the devil
English
@TaylorRMarshall @t0bitsdog @A_A_Ron_314 @schiziodbosch And you can never justify you worshiping and praying to idols, you can never justify you worshiping and praying to a false god you call Mary. You can never justify denying that a person must be born again. The RC is nothing more than a pagan religion.
English
@JohnnyWelte @arc7gaming @delmontyb @redeemed_zoomer @HoldenCCole The only exception may be Jerome, but Jerome came after the Council of Rome and Jerome later changed his mind to include duterocanonical books at the behest of the Magesterium
English
@JohnnyWelte @arc7gaming @delmontyb @redeemed_zoomer @HoldenCCole The profound error you have made is that (to my knowledge at least), not one recorded canon matches the Protestant canon exactly
There is always at least a book or two out of place or emplaced that is not in the Protestant canon
English
The Protestant Bible is missing nearly 10% of God’s Word. No wonder they’re confused.
English
@pzj1801 @Schweinzig @TaylorRMarshall The Old Covenant and any and all outpourings of God’s love was only possible in light of the graces from Christ’s death yes
English
@ScoutingAlong @Schweinzig @TaylorRMarshall He had it with them all, how do you think for example David was forgiven for murder & adultery? What day did Abraham rejoice in because he seen?
English
Protestant nonsense: "but in the Middle Ages, they made up the word bishop." 🤡
The origin of the word "bishop" was not a "made up word". It derives from the original Greek word:
ἐπίσκοπος (Greek) > episcopus (Latin) > episcop (early English > piscop > pishop > bishop
Same goes for priest:
πρεσβύτερος (Greek) > presbyterus (Latin) > presbyter (early English) > priester > priest
Please read more books and educate yourself.
Tertius@TertiusIII
@XxXDomyNXxX @TaylorRMarshall My point exactly. The proper translation is overseer but in the Middle Ages, they made up the word bishop and applied it, erroneously to the word episkopos.
English
@arc7gaming @JohnnyWelte @delmontyb @redeemed_zoomer @HoldenCCole Because it deformed, destroyed, and/or rejected what was there
English
English
@pzj1801 @Schweinzig @TaylorRMarshall God had both an Old and New Covenant
The Old with the Patriarchs (Adam, Abraham, Isaac, Jacob, Moses)
The New with Jesus
English
@ScoutingAlong @Schweinzig @TaylorRMarshall No I think it is you that is confused when you call both ''testaments'' as you did when you were given the definition of what a testament is
English
Again with v35 it does not say anything about the active verbs of eating or drinking, just about being satiated.
v63 comes after v51 and so the “flow” should be traced from 51 to 63 across the verses in between
And as I explained in the other thread: v63 is a continued chastisement of those who were not believing His words about eating and drinking Him
51 can’t be continuing the metaphor because it explains the metaphor. Jesus was talking about the bread He will give, and then He says what the bread is: His flesh
English
@ScoutingAlong @TomorrowsWar Verse 51 fits within the same flow as verses 35 and 63. Jesus defines the imagery as coming to Him and believing, and contrasts Spirit with flesh. So I see verse 51 as continuing that metaphor, not introducing a defined physical change.
English
Can you show me any writing from a mainstream Christian leader before 400 AD that looks like modern Protestantism?
If the earliest Christians would instantly recognize you but find Catholicism alien, it should be easy to quote them describing a faith that matches yours.
J Heckathorne, the Bible is enough@HeckathorneJay
@TomorrowsWar Hardly. The irony is Catholicism would be unrecognizable if it were biblical; yet the earliest Christian’s would have no problem recognizing you.
English
@sandtorock @TomorrowsWar We are debating which inherently entails listening carefully to the other side’s opinion
English
@ScoutingAlong @TomorrowsWar Just to make sure I respond the right way… are you curious to hear my opinion, or just sharing what you believe?
English