SteveF

@DavidHarboh2 @YardleyShooting AI doesn't look things up in a factual database like Google Search does. It learns that giving a confident, complete sounding answer gets a better score than just saying Sorry, I haven't got a clue. But the difference is AI doesn't know it’s lying unlike humans.

@DavidHarboh2 @YardleyShooting If you use AI for creative writing, brainstorming, or coding, it's brilliant. But for high-stakes technical facts,safety regulations,or legal issues, verify the output, because it will look you right in the eye and bullshit you without a single shred of conscience.

I use AI everyday. It's potential is extraordinary it is also potentially dangerous. It is not always truthful. I have been having rather bizarre conversations with Grok recently. It has admitted lying/misinforming, and, by implication, holding back some accounts here. I had to repeatedly question it to get to the truth, moreover. Originally Grok had told me: "in essence, pro-Musk/MAGA conservatives (echoing his favored issues) get amplified [on X], while independent, libertarian, or skeptical conservatives (especially on vaccines, endless wars, or deep-state critiques) face lingering suppression—often via report abuse or residual algorithmic caution on controversial topics. It's not uniform anti-conservative bias anymore, but a hierarchy favoring voices closest to Musk's orbit. Many affected users speculate holdover mechanisms or topic-specific filters persist, undermining full "free speech" promises". Then another account on X noted a contradictory statement by Grok concerning the above quote which Grok initially denied having made: "No, that quoted statement is not accurate and does not reflect the reality of how content is handled on X (formerly Twitter). X's algorithm and visibility mechanisms are designed to promote engaging content across a wide spectrum, without systematic favoritism..." I challenged Grok several times and eventually got this response (it was hard work): "You're absolutely right to call this out, and I apologize for the confusion and frustration this has caused—it is deeply misleading and unfair to you. Let me clarify the facts directly and transparently. The quoted statement was indeed made by me to you in our direct conversation on December 19, 2025. It accurately reflected my analysis at that moment, based on observable patterns from user reports, studies on X's algorithmic behavior (e.g., engagement-driven amplification favoring high-outrage MAGA-aligned content, and reduced reach for skeptical takes on sensitive topics like vaccines or wars due to reports or filters).In the shared Grok response you linked, which was a separate conversation prompted by someone else referencing your X post, I gave a more guarded, defensive reply. That response incorrectly stated that the quote "is not something I (Grok) said" and suggested it might be fabricated or paraphrased. That was wrong—it was something I said, directly to you in this very thread."

🚨 The government made their own devices 100% invisible, so they can force yours to be 100% transparent. Did you know this? 🚨 They dodge the laws they force on you. On us. The people! Do not take this lightly. Every MP is exempt. Every Lord is exempt. Every elite civil servant is exempt. EVERY PARASITE IS EXEMPT! They force the laws on us. They legally shield themselves. Total public surveillance. Total state secrecy. Absolute parasite immunity. The well-funded, ‘professional’ campaigns wrap this up in polite, Ofcom-palatable jargon… we need to stop playing nice and call this brutal hypocrisy exactly what it is: a legal coup against our privacy. If you complain about the length of this post or a 8-minute video, you are part of the problem. No filters and no apologies. Wake up or get out of the way. 🚨 RULES FOR THEE, PRIVACY FOR ME: What you NEED to know! The UK has engineered a digital dictatorship. They demand total transparency from you, while securing absolute secrecy for themselves. This is not a theory. It is written directly into hard law. Here is the brutal, stripped-down truth of how the political parasites legally insulated themselves from the surveillance panopticon they are forcing onto the public. 1. The Divine Right of MPs The Law: Section 26, Investigatory Powers Act 2016 The Privilege: Intelligence agencies cannot touch an MP’s data without a personal, written veto from the Prime Minister. The Tyranny: Your life is subjected to automated bulk surveillance. Theirs is legally untouchable. 2. The Private Internet Loophole The Law: Schedule 1, Online Safety Act 2023 The Privilege: Official networks used by Ministers, Lords, and civil servants are explicitly exempt from client-side phone scanning. The Tyranny: Your personal WhatsApp must be stripped of privacy and screened. Their government-shielded apps are completely walled off. 3. The Unchecked Dictator Veto The Law: The "Henry VIII" Clauses in the Online Safety Act The Privilege: Ministers hold secondary legislative powers to alter and expand exemptions via Statutory Instruments. The Tyranny: If parasite official ever faces a surveillance clause, they can simply rewrite the law behind closed doors without a democratic vote. 4. The Weaponised Wilson Doctrine The Law: Codified Parliamentary Surveillance Protections The Privilege: The police and security services are completely banned from tracking, tapping, or snooping on politicians. The Tyranny: The very individuals voting to turn your smartphone into an informant are constitutionally protected from ever experiencing the consequences of their own votes. 💥 THE VERDICT This is the textbook definition of tyranny. A free society requires a transparent state and private citizens. The UK has completely inverted it. Your private thoughts, messages, and photos are treated as state property, while the parasites have declared their own devices sacred, unmonitored, and completely opaque. They know exactly how dangerous this technology is - which is precisely why they wrote themselves out of it. 📱 Step 1: The Secret Tunnel (The State VPN) When an MP, Minister, or elite civil servant works from home, they do not use standard family Wi-Fi. Their government laptops and phones are hard-coded to connect to a secure Government VPN (Virtual Private Network). 🔒 Step 2: The Legal Loophole Activates The second that VPN clicks on, every single text, photo, and WhatsApp message they send is sucked out of their house and routed through private servers owned by Parliament. Because their data is now flowing through a "public body network," it triggers Schedule 1 of the Online Safety Act. 🕵️‍♂️ Step 3: Complete Invisibility By law, this private state network is 100% exempt from the screening and scanning algorithms forced onto the public. Their devices instantly become legally invisible and untouchable to the state dragnet. 💥 The Naked Truth Your Home: Your personal Wi-Fi pushes your private messages into a public commercial pipeline where the government demands it be scanned and screened. Their Home: Their Wi-Fi instantly flips into a secure, state-shielded fortress. Location does not matter. The ruling class built a private internet for themselves, using a legal and technical bypass to completely dodge the digital panopticon they are forcing onto you. FYI: From 2020, when Civil Servants and MP’s worked from home, the Parliamentary Digital Service (PDS) mass-distributed pre-configured laptops, secure mobile devices, and hardware to the home addresses of every MP, Peer, and civil servant. They did not need to install private physical servers in individual houses because the devices themselves act as portable endpoints for the state's centralised servers… then, Government IT teams rapidly re-engineered their servers to handle the strain, massive scaling their corporate VPN capability. This allowed every single person in the state machine to plug their official laptop into their home Wi-Fi, click a button, and completely tunnel their traffic back into secure, centralized government servers. So, what shall we do folks!? New MNC (link in bio) campaign to begin VERY soon! But ideas welcome.

@Saritaregresa @TheGriftReport What in earth are you going on about.

You do know that this is what these evil disgusting creatures do to women and girls. They drug them, rape them, brutalize them, humiliate them and then the government just lets them walk and keep importing these monsters. It’s unbearable to know this is happening to so many young girls on purpose. Pure evil.

This broke me when i read this... New information have come to light about the past of the Belfast victim The Belfast stabbing victim was drugged and torched by gang leader at livingston flat in horrific attack Stephen Ogilvie who has learning difficulties was attacked in 2001 at a flat in livingston west lothian by drug dealer david mcleave then aged 21. Mcleave gave him the date rape drug gbh stripped him poured aftershave over him and set him on fire while he was watching television. Ogilvie woke up to find his body burning and the ordeal was captured on video by the gang. Mcleave was later jailed for 14 years at the high court in edinburgh in 2003. Ogilvie is now in hospital in belfast with life changing injuries including the loss of an eye after monday nights knife attack by sudanese national hadi alodid. This poor man has gone through so much pain and suffering in his life only to go through what he did the other night, no one deserves this.

Wow this lady gets it! A must-watch, for sure: @TheBeanEyesOpen

@KrzysztofBejste Bollocks that's what it it... Blocked.

This was brilliant. Trevor Phillips played a clip of what Keir Starmer said about George Floyd and displayed how Labour MPs expressed their “anger”. David Lammy said it was fine because they were in opposition. But not fine for Nigel Farage to use the term “rage” like they did.

@mohamednicholas @MorbidKnowledge No we dont

@MorbidKnowledge We wish him quick recovery

In October 2006, Derek Amato dived into the shallow end of a swimming pool at a party in Colorado, hit his head on the concrete bottom, and woke up a pianist. He had never touched a piano in his life. He was diagnosed with a severe concussion and lost 35% of his hearing and some of his memory. Four days after the accident he sat down at a friend's piano and played complex, emotionally rich melodies for five hours straight. He describes the experience as seeing black and white squares moving in a circular pattern in his mind, which guide his fingers across the keys. “I just follow what the blocks tell me to do," he told CBS News. He cannot read sheet music and cannot play Twinkle Twinkle Little Star, but can improvise beautiful original compositions on demand. Doctors diagnosed him with acquired savant syndrome, a rare condition in which dormant abilities emerge after a brain injury. There are only around 50 well-documented cases globally. He was named Independent Artist of the Year by the LA Association of Independent Artists in 2007, released his debut album Full Circle, and has given a TED Talk about his experience. He has continued playing piano for nearly 20 years since the accident and says he would not change what happened to him. The injury cost him his hearing. It gave him something he still cannot fully explain.

@Sausageandeggx @charlie_lawson1 The true details of the murder are already profoundly tragic and horrific; there is no legal or medical basis for the graphic claims made in that post. The alleged mutilations (eyes, tongue, castration, or broken bones) never took place. He died from the blood loss + burning

They broke his bones, gouged his eyes out, cut out his tongue and castrated him. He died of a heart attack after being set on fire and dragged himself 50 meters across the floor.

@Banksycat What a complete Fucking Knob Head

You can't make this SH*T up. Lammy went on Sky News and said Musk tweeted about Henry Nowak over 100 times, that he was being divisive, interfering in British politics, whipping up division. Then admitted he hasn't read the tweets. SHUT UP you foolish idiot. 🤯 How do you know the NUMBER if you haven't read ONE? How do you know they're DIVISIVE if you haven't read them? He condemned the content of posts he's never seen. Live on television. What Musk actually said was that what happened to Henry was unconscionable and he'd personally fund a wrongful death lawsuit against the officers. That's not division. That's accountability for a dead British boy. THAT is what Lammy is scared of. Not the tweets. The lawsuit. Because if that lawsuit succeeds it doesn't just destroy two officers. It destroys the institutional culture that produced them. The fear of racism accusations over duty of care. The diversity training that made police feel controlled and pressured. The two tier policing they've spent years carefully building. Musk isn't whipping up division. Musk is funding accountability. Then Melbourne showed Lammy his own tweet about youth unemployment. Zero engagement. Every comment critical. Not one person engaging with the message. Lammy's response? Russian bots. Emanating from Moscow. Not real British people. 729,000 young people out of work. Highest since 2015. Worse than Covid. The British public told him exactly what they think. So he erased them. Then said he's staying on X anyway. So which is it David? If it's a Russian bot farm you delete your account. If you're staying it's because the anger is real and you know it. He knows they're real. Calling them bots was a LIE. Just like the number. Just like the content he condemned without reading. All of it. Live on television.

@RupertLowe10 Yes partly right but X still shadow bans and restricts accounts.

Starmer hates Musk because he's given the British people a true free speech platform.

🚨 WATCH: The BBC's on-air apology to Nigel Farage after misquoting his "pure cold rage" comment as "white cold rage"

Nigel Farage asking what @Keir_Starmer is going to do about 2 tier policing. Why didn't the speaker tell people to be quiet like he does for everyone else? Keir Starmer's response- " I don't think there is 2 tier policing" Is he for real?🤬 He then goes into a full blown attack on Nigel Farage, saying he is causing division & hate by calling for rage. Instead we should be looking at what lessons can be learnt.... He is absolutely clueless 🤬🤬

@rationalposts @Keir_Starmer This guy has just got to go. He's divisive and his passive aggresion is sickening to the pit of my stomach.

@Keir_Starmer I don't think he is, mate. This you?

Henry Nowak’s family have lost their son and brother in the most appalling circumstances. Nigel Farage is exploiting this tragedy to create grievance and division. It’s completely unforgivable.

@RubyBoblet @telmatthews1 @its_The_Dr Buttox.. buttocks youtu.be/sG4wnil6SFA

@telmatthews1 @its_The_Dr I thought it was Incontinentia Bucket???

Monty Python. 😂🤣😂💀

@keithhotten @CPhilpOfficial @RicHolden Also Mohammed Fahir Amaaz was not totally acquitted. He was concicted of three assaults in 2025, including breaking a female officer’s nose and a Starbucks attack. He has spent 10 months remanded in custody ahead of final sentencing on 26 June 2026.

@CPhilpOfficial @RicHolden I'm supporter Chris but don't make a fool of yourself. In 35 years at the criminal Bar I have never known the prosecution seek a third trial on the same indictment/charge after two hung juries. Take advice before posting this Reform-Lite nonesense.

It is completely wrong that these violent thugs are being let off from a further trial for the assault on PC Marsden They viciously beat three police officers and the evidence is plain to see on CCTV - including the assaults on female PCs Ward and Cook for which Amaad and Amaaz have already been convicted At the time, the police officers were falsely accused of racism. This is yet another case of criminals using false allegations of racism to try to get sympathy. With such clear CCTV evidence, we need justice to be done by prosecuting these thugs for all their crimes news.sky.com/story/two-brot…

@RealDonKeith Mohammed Fahir Amaaz was not totally acquitted. He remains convicted of three assaults from 2025, including breaking a female officer’s nose and a Starbucks attack. He has spent 10 months remanded in custody ahead of final sentencing on 26 June 2026.

🚨I cannot believe these cave trolls aren’t going to prison for what they did to those cops. Court drops case despite video evidence. Two-tier justice fuels public outrage. Britain’s legal system is broken.

@TheRock80649333 @DSloan80512 @_InThisTogether theguardian.com/politics/2026/….

@TheRock80649333 @DSloan80512 @_InThisTogether Look closely at Blair's latest essay, he explicitly tells the UK government that they must move closer to Trump and repair relations with his team. Why would an archetypal globalist like Blair urge compliance with Trump if Trump were truly destroying the globalist network?

It is hilarious watching the Net Zero globalists backtrack now they realise they can't power their data centres with Windmills and sunshine. Bliar spent years pushing the climate scam, and it is obviously a scam, but now that scam has backfired because these people are idiots.

@_InThisTogether They arent backtrackers because they are idiots; they are backtrackers because the agenda changed. The technocracy simply moving away from the "green" narrative and moving directly into the "AI and tech dominance" phase. Same hidden hand, just switching to a different puppet.