Shoʿayb

9.2K posts

Shoʿayb

Shoʿayb

@ZombieScroller

Spiritually tired.

Beigetreten Temmuz 2022
682 Folgt175 Follower
Shoʿayb
Shoʿayb@ZombieScroller·
@abdul_now Is the Quran created? If the response is “No” = Athari “Yes” = Mutazilite “Depends”/“Which Quran” = Ashari
English
0
0
1
12
Shoʿayb
Shoʿayb@ZombieScroller·
@AhmedTayy Must be good looking chicken and rice? Shawaya rice?
English
0
0
0
257
Ahmed Al-Tayy
Ahmed Al-Tayy@AhmedTayy·
Need to get this off my chest. Yesterday we sat in the haram for suhoor, we had rice and chicken, some guy walked up without asking, sat down, started eating our food, ate all the chicken and then walked off. Had he asked we would have said yes, but I'm still mad about it.
English
78
16
1.5K
160.5K
Shoʿayb
Shoʿayb@ZombieScroller·
@Vidyut For that he should first acknowledge and apologize for being a BJP mouth piece for all these years. Else this grifter will continue to be seen as a cheaper opportunistic whore.
English
0
0
0
11
Amit Behere
Amit Behere@_amitbehere·
The first giveaway was the location :) The world thinks you are dead, you are PM of Israhell, and you shoot a video showing your fingers in a coffee shop. Duniya ko ch***a samajh rakha hain kya ...??? Btw, while am 1000% sure video is AI, it doesn't mean Bibi can't be alive. Zionists are the most evil, devious psychopaths the world has ever seen. Who knows how they think?
वरुण 🇮🇳@varungrover

100% AI. The sip-gulp throat muscles movement is missing, in addition to multiple other loopholes pointed out by people. The strange, dreamy lighting is the first giveaway though.

English
35
56
681
60.5K
Jackson Hinkle 🇺🇸
Jackson Hinkle 🇺🇸@jacksonhinklle·
🤣🇮🇱 Hi @netanyahu, very cool disappearing ring! If only you could use AI to make Iranian missiles disappear too…
English
2.9K
23K
128.4K
6M
Ibn ‘Abdullāh al-Hāshimī
Recently I misunderstood a video by Shaykh @YasirAlHanafi. I publicly retract my statement and apologize for my words. One of my teachers approached me on behalf of the Shaykh and clarified his position. I had taken it as discussing the Shīʿah position, whereas it was actually addressing the Muʿtazilī concept of “deposited power.” I recommend watching the full video for proper context before drawing conclusions. The post I made about the Ash’ari position is still up for those who can’t watch the full video and want a short overview.
English
20
14
176
61K
MuftiCheesecake
MuftiCheesecake@CheesecakeMufti·
Daniel debates a CHRISTIAN on the morality of BLASTING 💥 a home intruder 👀 "...theres probably things I've done that deserve mercy and kindness 🙏🕊️.." Daniel: "but he's about to kill your family‼️"
English
2
14
92
5.2K
Shoʿayb
Shoʿayb@ZombieScroller·
@abdul_now Eg: “Someone may be deeply hostile to the Iranian regime given its brutal record, while still refusing to treat America and Israel as a righteous side” This just means that person decided Iran as the bigger/primary enemy while conceding American/Israel are no angel @abdul_now
English
0
0
0
57
Shoʿayb
Shoʿayb@ZombieScroller·
@abdul_now It becomes a back & white dichotomy when you weigh which side is more evil (America/Israel or Iranian regime). Once you do that, then a realistic favorable outcome according to you becomes clear — by choosing a lesser poison and deciding which side you want to primarily oppose.
English
1
0
1
206
Abdul Rahman (TAP)
Abdul Rahman (TAP)@abdul_now·
A lot of the discussion around the Iran-Israel-US conflict feels pretty shallow. It’s like certain people are trying to reduce a very complicated reality into a neat black-and-white dichotomy, as if there’s only one serious or acceptable way to respond to it. Once you put aside the obvious extremes (like wanting either side to come out of this with even greater regional power or acting as though this conflict somehow wipes away everything else they have done and turns them into noble saviors), there’s clearly more than one reasonable position a person can take. That doesn’t mean every one of those positions is equally sound, only that they’re perfectly understandable and morally legitimate responses to the whole thing. Someone can be strongly opposed to an American and Israeli victory that strengthens their influence in the region, while at the same time also being strongly opposed to any outcome that strengthens Iran’s own regional power. Someone may want an Iranian victory that sets America and Israel back without that leading to broader Iranian domination in the region. Someone may be deeply hostile to the Iranian regime given its brutal record, while still refusing to treat America and Israel as the righteous side. Someone may refuse to support either side at all. Someone may simply think that when all of the parties involved have such nasty track records, and when the possible outcomes themselves carry real dangers, the most honest position is not to rally behind any camp. There’s nothing surprising about that. Some of these positions may look strategically mistaken when analyzed at a more technical level, but that does not make them “morally absurd” in any obvious sense, and it shouldn’t be hard to understand why many people would hold them.
English
10
8
45
3.3K
رعد
رعد@RaadTheShepherd·
May Allah ﷻ destroy Israel and Iran, and all of their supporters.
Català
70
57
423
13.1K
Shoʿayb
Shoʿayb@ZombieScroller·
@AqidaDefence @RaadTheShepherd Yeah Akhi. I am jealous and my heart burns that same love and hospitality for Israeli dogs and munafiqs wasn't shown to our fellow Sudanese brothers and sisters. But again that's a hallmark of munafqeen
English
1
0
1
39
Shoʿayb
Shoʿayb@ZombieScroller·
@SamQari At least the Chinese version got most things right. Can the say about the original one
English
0
0
0
607
Seeker
Seeker@SamQari·
Professor Jiang is essentially the Chinese Imran Hossein lol
English
51
109
1.3K
35.3K