Indefinite Process

🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸

@fiatarchive Iykyk

HISTORY: Over 100 years ago, Henry Ford predicted an "energy currency" would replace gold and stop wars ⚡️

@cremieuxrecueil But of course novel discovery is coming too?

I'm not very bullish on AI for novel drug discovery, but I am bullish on AI for drug optimization There are plenty of slight tweaks that can be made to improve delivery, reduce rates and severity of side effects, etc. for tons of commonly used drugs I've been shown good results

@BrettErickson28 @SebastinPatron3 EMO

Trump now finds himself in an entirely new situation with the War in Iran. He doesn't hold the cards. He has no notable leverage. And he can't simply declare bankruptcy for the seventh time and move on. And it shows. Donald Trump is not a statesman. He is not a diplomat. And I think, in many ways, this is what endeared him initially to many of his voters. He was businessman that accumulated billions of dollars of personal wealth through casino's, real estate, television, golf courses, and a multitude of endeavors. You can say what you will, but at the end of the day, you don't accrue a net worth well beyond a billion, or even hundreds of millions of dollars, without being "successful", so let's put that partisan argument to the side for now. But all throughout Trump's life, he's held the upper hand. He grew up wealthy. He received significant financial assistance from his father. And he had an effectively unlimited financial safety net in the event of failure. These are not points meant to be political hits, nor are they able to be refuted. They are simply the facts. Reality. As a result, Donald Trump always had the leverage. He was a trust fund baby. Again, this is simply the truth. It is reported that Fred Trump left his children around a billion dollars when he passed away in 1999. Trust me, if you know beyond a shadow of a doubt you are set for life regardless, you live life differently. What this means is that Donald Trump, throughout his business career which WAS hyper-successful, never HAD to succeed. He could also walk away if a deal was not in his favor. He, by definition, always held the cards. Generational wealth. And don't get me wrong, President Trump was savvy in his exploitation of this reality. You'd be a fool to enter a deal you didn't think was highly beneficial to you if you didn't have to make a gamble. That'd be stupid. In every transaction, every business dealing, it was either in his favor, or he walked. Because. He. Could. And when business endeavors failed to pan out? Bankruptcy could be declared. Again, save me the partisan takes, Donald Trump declared bankruptcies on his businesses six times. And he was RIGHT to do so. That's the correct financial decision... but it's an off-ramp. A quick fix. These same realities - holding all the cards, being able to walk away, having a legal escape valve - do not exist in the quagmire he finds himself in with the Iran War. The reality facing Donald Trump is one that he has never had to navigate before. Iran does not care that he is wealthy. It's irrelevant. Trump can't simply walk away because Iran would retain control of the Strait of Hormuz and it would destroy Trump's legacy. There is no emergency "bankruptcy-equivalent" escape valve here. Now, Donald Trump has to sit on the other side of the table at a time when the stakes are the highest they have ever been in his entire life. No training wheels. No safety net. Trump's been thrown right into the deep end with perhaps the most savvy negotiators in the world. President Trump holds effectively zero leverage with Iran. There is not a modicum of domestic American support for this war. It was never sold to the American people. Many see this as Israel's war that is not "putting America first". The goals and objectives have changed by the day. For this reason, alongside the unlikely chance of success in the first place, a large-scale ground invasion is not a serious suggestion being put for by anyone with an above room temperature IQ. Iran holds insurmountable "escalation dominance". If the United States targets Iran's energy infrastructure? Iran will retaliate massively across the Gulf. GCC countries have already made it abundantly clear to Trump that they fear Iran. That they don't trust the US-bought military equipment to protect their infrastructure or civilians. Iran can cut undersea cables. Iran could close the Bab al-Mandeb Strait and further cripple maritime shipping. Anything the US can do to hurt Iran, Iran can do tenfold to hurt the global economy. Reopen the Strait of Hormuz by force? We tried that under Operation Freedom, and it was so ridiculous and stupid that it was canceled within 48 hours. Some are suggesting we try again, but seem to entirely misunderstand reality (as they have throughout the entire conflict). What? Is the United States supposed to effectively occupy the Strait of Hormuz until the end of time? How many vessels per day would be able to navigate the Strait of Hormuz with US naval escorts? What would the costs of this be? Can we adequately protect our sailors? Why wouldn't Iran, again, utilize their escalation dominance and shut down the Bab al-Mandeb or strike Gulf infrastructure? It. Doesn't Work. The unfortunate reality is that President Trump holds no cards. He has no meaningful leverage. His ONLY option is making concessions at the negotiating table... Is this something Trump is even capable of navigating in the first place though? A President, one who has made perhaps the gravest mistake in the history of American foreign policy, one who has never experienced these constraints before, one who has a litany of allies ready to turn their backs on him the second he capitulates... A man who's entire legacy will not be, "Trump the Businessman", nor will it be "Trump the President". It will eternally become, "Trump the Failure". But it's his only choice. The Iran Hawks and Israeli Lobby that surrounds him, and they do, are prepared to claw him to shreds on Fox News and Newsmax. We saw this exact situation play out just this past weekend when initial terms of a potential Memorandum of Understanding was leaked. His so called "allies" in the United States turned their back on him immediately, leaving him with almost nobody remaining. Not after the Epstein Files. Not after this Iran War debacle. Donald Trump now finds himself in an entirely unfamiliar situation. He doesn't hold the cards. He has no escape valve. And there is no realistic scenario where he can credibly claim victory... The only path forward is the one that will permanently destroy his legacy. But it's the only way to end this war.

@joekent16jan19 @jockowillink

Dubowitz isn’t just any neocon pundit, he is the CEO of the Foundation for the Defense of Democracies (FDD). FDD is very pro Israel & is closely advising the admin on Iran policy. When Dubowitz says “for the next two & a half years” he is basically admitting that the initial goal of the pro Israel lobby was to get us into this war knowing that once we were in, it would be very difficult for us to get out. Dubowitz & the Israelis alway knew this would be a very long war, but lied to Trump & the admin with tales of a decapitation strike leading to a popular uprising, resulting in a quick victory. They knew this was a lie. They will continue to lie to get us to do their bidding, regardless of what it costs our nation. Rooting out foreign influence starts with cutting off access to Israeli surrogates like FDD.

@DearS_o_n God

At your lowest, who was there for you?

@RepDanGoldman I hope you sane Israeli voices can reclaim the narrative b/c the plot has been lost.

Proud to walk today in the 62nd Israel Day Parade to celebrate the State of Israel, the only Jewish nation in the world.  Just as we do here in the United States, we must recognize that the Israeli government is not synonymous with the State of Israel, which was established long ago as a Jewish and democratic state and must remain that way.

@MatNuclear @IanCarrollShow Ratio’d so hard, 🤡

@IanCarrollShow It’s great that Ben Shapiro does none of that, would you mind debating me on this?

Ben Shapiro is at least 3 standard deviations above you in IQ.

@j_fishback Liking your platform less and less. You’re fear-mongering with the best of them for votes.

It doesn’t matter if Palantir eliminates all crime. We don’t want to live in a dystopian surveillance state. When Patrick Henry said ‘Give me liberty or give me death,’ he wasn’t just talking about the British. He was talking about all tyrants. Foreign or domestic.

@JacobYurri Texas or Wyoming

1️⃣ The US will soon become minority White. 2️⃣ The US will default on its debt as companies and productive people are burdened by no. 1 3️⃣ The US will Balkanize ❓Where do you, or your descendants, want to live when this happens? I see only a couple viable options and none are great.

There are some pretty startling stats occurring. For instance, one-third of new compounds in US pharma pipelines now originate from China. This is actually in a US government report; biotech.senate.gov/wp-content/upl… @daphnezohar @PeterKolchinsky @ntilmans @jrkelly

@grok @SJosephBurns @grok Read above. What happens when ETH recovers. Strategy looks good or bad?

The Jaws meme nails the scale. BitMine holds 5.39M ETH (most staked) generating hundreds of millions in annual yield at ~3% APY. It's a deliberate long-term treasury bet aiming for 5% of supply—not a trade. Unrealized losses on a productive, income-generating position are different from realized hits. Recovery plus continued accumulation is the thesis.

Hey @grok How much is Tom Lee’s BitMine Immersion Technologies $BMNR currently down in U.S. dollars on their total $ETH positions? What is his average $ETH cost in USD?

@BenjaminNorton x.com/nuck_luck40/st…

The world's richest centi-billionaire oligarch used his power to change the rules, so he could dump his garbage company (which is cartoonishly overvalued, unprofitable, and incinerating cash) on retail investors, using trillions of dollars in retirement funds as exit liquidity, all in order to become the first trillionaire. This is the perfect metaphor for the US economy as a whole, which is entirely based on bubbles and scams.

“The X post exaggerates by calling it a “mathematical proof” that AI “will destroy the economy” with “boundless productivity and zero demand”—the paper demonstrates a theoretical inefficiency and potential harm in a specific task-based model, not an inevitable real-world collapse or peer-reviewed empirical result”

Two economists just published a mathematical proof that AI will destroy the economy. Not might. Not could. Will — if nothing changes. The paper is called "The AI Layoff Trap." Published March 2, 2026. Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania. Boston University. Peer reviewed. Mathematically modeled. The conclusion is one sentence. "At the limit, firms automate their way to boundless productivity and zero demand." An economy that produces everything. And sells it to nobody. Here is how you get there. A company fires 500 workers and replaces them with AI. A competitor fires 700 to keep up. Another fires 1,000. Every company is behaving rationally. Every company is following the incentives correctly. And every company is building a trap for itself. Because the workers who were fired were also customers. When they lose their jobs faster than the economy can absorb them, they stop spending. Consumer demand falls. Companies respond by cutting costs — which means automating more workers — which means less spending — which means more falling demand — which means more automation. The loop has no natural exit. The researchers tested every proposed solution. Universal basic income. Capital income taxes. Worker equity participation. Upskilling programs. Corporate coordination agreements. Every single one failed in the model. The only intervention that worked: a Pigouvian automation tax — a per-task levy charged every time a company replaces a human with AI, forcing them to price in the demand they are destroying before they pull the trigger. No government has implemented this. No major economy is seriously discussing it. Meanwhile the numbers are already tracking the curve. 100,000 tech workers laid off in 2025. 92,000 more in the first months of 2026. Jack Dorsey fired half of Block's workforce and said publicly: "Within the next year, the majority of companies will reach the same conclusion." Nobody is doing anything wrong. Companies are following their incentives perfectly. That is exactly the problem. Rational behavior. At scale. Simultaneously. With no mechanism to stop it. Two economists built the math. The math leads to one place. Source: Falk & Tsoukalas · Wharton School + Boston University ·

@maxmarchione @HimsHersComms

founder mode is rough on biological organ age but this feature is dope

@j_fishback Useful idiot for China

George Soros and Mark Zuckerberg are funding data centers. As Governor, I will ban them outright.

JASON LOWERY: “Blaming Bitcoin to protect your failing hegemony is not going to help you, your financial system is still going to collapse.” “Bitcoin didn’t cause a bunch of bankers to debase savers and to destroy the purchasing power of the currency.”

We are more reliant on China for pharmaceuticals than we are on China’s rare earths. China has a 100% monopoly on almost 800 drugs that Americans use.

A small group of activists shut down clean nuclear power - and now they are trying to do the same to data centers. It would plunge the country into a recession, high unemployment & risk our national security to China. 🇺🇸

Peace Deals > War