Andy Rucker

661 posts

Andy Rucker banner
Andy Rucker

Andy Rucker

@rucker_andy

Hoosier IP Officer (Recovering Submariner). For fun, also a Podcaster, Video and Naval Minis Gamer - Have model ships, will game! (https://t.co/vI6PUnW1s5)

VA Beigetreten Eylül 2015
305 Folgt75 Follower
BigJKU316
BigJKU316@BigJKU316·
@cdrsalamander This is somewhat valid but the question is what capability do you give up to get it? People hate thinking like that. Bits it’s true of all peacetime military forces. The composition of the USN going into both world wars was not correct due to limits in funding.
English
1
0
3
92
cdrsalamander
cdrsalamander@cdrsalamander·
There has been a small but vocal group of people who have been ringing the bell about the neglect of base defense and SHORAD for decades. Those we promoted and appointed to train, man, and equip our armed forces decided to risk the threat. Q.E.D. This is not a surprise. This is a result of intentional neglect.
streiff@streiffredstate

Drone Attack That Destroyed U.S. Aircraft and Wounded Servicemembers Calls Preparedness Into Question redstate.com/streiff/2026/0…

English
11
29
213
8.7K
Andy Rucker
Andy Rucker@rucker_andy·
@galaxyclassproj I also wonder how much of the use of Aztec patterns boils down to a desire to show off a modeler’s technical skill in terms of being able to mask & paint or decal the pattern?
English
0
0
2
48
Galaxy Class Project
Galaxy Class Project@galaxyclassproj·
If you think of the average distance of eye or camera from model, in real terms it would be 1000s of meters. Scale matters! Aztec would all but disappear: try it on a train, plane, ship today. They look smooth. You have to get real close to see the panelling.
Galaxy Class Project tweet media
Galaxy Class Project@galaxyclassproj

IMHO: I still think the so called ‘Aztec’ hull plating used by many modellers, physical or digital, is over done. Seems an increasingly failure to understand relationship between distance & scale. The distances from a model or camera to a model means it should be subtle..

English
3
2
53
3.3K
Andy Rucker
Andy Rucker@rucker_andy·
@galaxyclassproj I think that Aztec patterns can definitely be over done, and I’m generally not a fan of the technique on models/miniatures much smaller than about 18-24” long (scale will depend on the subject). I think it’s important to consider not just the scale but physical size as well.
English
0
0
1
52
Andy Rucker
Andy Rucker@rucker_andy·
@galaxyclassproj That’s what is really a bummer about the Epnterprise Construction Project and Stage 9 getting shut down; they gave a really good feel for what the Galaxy was “actually” like, free from the limitations of TV production.
English
1
0
2
64
Galaxy Class Project
Galaxy Class Project@galaxyclassproj·
Phenomenal to think most of the sets we see in TNG do not actually match the internal space or external hull profile of the ship. It makes you think just how different a Galaxy Class is than we saw. Yes, sets give an idea, but serving on one would be quite different to on screen.
TrekShorts@TrekShorts

Classic Star Trek visuals, now in a cinematic aspect ratio! It's a relatively small thing in the grand scheme but seeing these sets as if it was a motion picture, brings them to life in a whole new. From TOS, TNG, VOY and DS9 each show is given that love and it is very cool!

English
4
3
19
2.4K
Andy Rucker
Andy Rucker@rucker_andy·
@HuntClancy Matches my experience reading him, first in high school and then at USNA in my Plebe literature class.
English
0
0
0
42
Andy Rucker
Andy Rucker@rucker_andy·
@navybirddog As an 05 grad that was born in Indianapolis, I would unironically wear this.
English
0
0
6
644
Michael DiMercurio
Michael DiMercurio@MikeyDiMercurio·
For those who haven't yet heard about that person whose name shall not be mentioned. Or who read my bio - People always ask me, "Mikey, why do you hate that motherless whore Tom Clancy so much?" and I always answer, I'm glad you asked that question. You see, when we were both at Penguin Putnam and had the same editor, a conversation with Editor Boy Douggy went like this – Douggy: I got called in to see Michael-UHH (the editor-in-chief, a very icy woman who didn't like me). You'll never guess who we talked about. Me: Let me guess. Douggy: Yup. You. Specifically how Tom Clancy wants us to terminate your contract. Me: Terminate my fookin contract? Why would that motherless whore Tom Clancy want my contract terminated? Douggy (snickering): He says you're, quote, stealing his readers, unquote. Me: Oh, for fuck's sake. Like he owns the readers? Douggy: Well, he owns everything else. But look at the bright side. You're a very big blip on Tom Clancy's radar. And he hates when your book covers announce in block letters that Publishers Weekly quote, "A MASTER RIVALING TOM CLANCY!" Me: That motherless whore. A few years later, someone brought to my attention that the motherless whore Tom Clancy stole my title - THREAT VECTOR. He published a book WITH THE EXACT SAME TITLE. Furious, I call up Douggy. Me: Douggy, what the fuck? A novel named THREAT VECTOR by that motherless whore Tom Clancy? You told me I couldn't use the title VORTEX because Larry Bond already used it. If I can't recycle a title, how come that motherless whore Tom Clancy can? Douggy (laughing): Because he's Tom Clancy. Me (mumbling): That motherless whore. Years later, I'm opening the fridge and my daughter walked into the kitchen just as I'm muttering out loud, "that motherless whore." She just starts laughing. "You're thinking about Tom Clancy again, aren't you?"
Michael DiMercurio tweet media
English
59
22
415
34.2K
Andy Rucker
Andy Rucker@rucker_andy·
@cdrsalamander Clancy was a piece of work. I met him once at my USNA company’s dining in (one of my company mates was dating one of his daughters). He spent part of his talk bragging about how his second wife thought he had great taste in jewlry…while his daughter from wife 1 was in the room!
English
0
0
1
34
cdrsalamander
cdrsalamander@cdrsalamander·
I haven't liked a post on X this much in a long time.
Michael DiMercurio@MikeyDiMercurio

For those who haven't yet heard about that person whose name shall not be mentioned. Or who read my bio - People always ask me, "Mikey, why do you hate that motherless whore Tom Clancy so much?" and I always answer, I'm glad you asked that question. You see, when we were both at Penguin Putnam and had the same editor, a conversation with Editor Boy Douggy went like this – Douggy: I got called in to see Michael-UHH (the editor-in-chief, a very icy woman who didn't like me). You'll never guess who we talked about. Me: Let me guess. Douggy: Yup. You. Specifically how Tom Clancy wants us to terminate your contract. Me: Terminate my fookin contract? Why would that motherless whore Tom Clancy want my contract terminated? Douggy (snickering): He says you're, quote, stealing his readers, unquote. Me: Oh, for fuck's sake. Like he owns the readers? Douggy: Well, he owns everything else. But look at the bright side. You're a very big blip on Tom Clancy's radar. And he hates when your book covers announce in block letters that Publishers Weekly quote, "A MASTER RIVALING TOM CLANCY!" Me: That motherless whore. A few years later, someone brought to my attention that the motherless whore Tom Clancy stole my title - THREAT VECTOR. He published a book WITH THE EXACT SAME TITLE. Furious, I call up Douggy. Me: Douggy, what the fuck? A novel named THREAT VECTOR by that motherless whore Tom Clancy? You told me I couldn't use the title VORTEX because Larry Bond already used it. If I can't recycle a title, how come that motherless whore Tom Clancy can? Douggy (laughing): Because he's Tom Clancy. Me (mumbling): That motherless whore. Years later, I'm opening the fridge and my daughter walked into the kitchen just as I'm muttering out loud, "that motherless whore." She just starts laughing. "You're thinking about Tom Clancy again, aren't you?"

English
9
7
122
12.3K
Andy Rucker
Andy Rucker@rucker_andy·
@RSE_VB That’s still untrue…even adding all the RLs, Staff Corps, Medical Corps, and IW Line together, the URLs still outnumber them. Just look at the relative zone sizes and the promotion selection messages. The URL communities also have a supermajority of flag billets (rightfully so).
English
0
0
0
12
Rich "Corky" Erie
Rich "Corky" Erie@RSE_VB·
@rucker_andy I wasn't implying JAGs and PAOs outnumbered URL Officers. I was saying that ALL types of RL Officers outnumber URL but without going ino every conceivable type, to include all those you mentioned plus whatever other types there are.
English
1
0
0
10
Rich "Corky" Erie
Rich "Corky" Erie@RSE_VB·
There was an inflection point years ago that’s hard to pin down on the calendar. It was probably some time in the mid to late 90s. Two things happened at that time. First, Restricted Line Officers began to outnumber Unrestricted Line Officers. This means the number of lawyers, engineers, PAOs, was higher than warfare qualified Officers. The relationship between URL and RL is best highlighted by this fact: If an O1 Surface Warfare Ensign and an O10 Lawyer Four Star Admiral are in a lifeboat, the Ensign is in Command. The second thing that happened is that all those Restricted Line Officers were suddenly sitting “at the table” during operational staff meetings. Lawyers, PAO, Budget people were at the big table. And they were talking! Those positions had always been what’s called “back chair” meaning those folks sat in the chairs against the wall and not at the big table. They would generally speak when spoken to. It sounds harsh, I know. But in the military, those warriors and decision makers in the lead roles drive the battle. Chesty Puller and Chester Nimitz never turned to their lawyer or PAO or budget person and asked “whattya think?” Yes, those positions absolutely have tremendous value. But they don’t drive the fight. That’s what SecWar was getting at. ROE? Sure, there should be some. But they should never work to make our military hesitate in the face of battle. Their job is to close with and kill the enemy. That’s it.
Supersonic Redhead🛫@Supersonic_Red

Clearly she has never been in a position where restrictive rules of engagement cost the lives of the very people she was trying to protect. Waiting twenty minutes for permission from a politician and a lawyer to engage an active threat is impossible in a dynamic fight where seconds matter.

English
34
94
692
38.8K
Alex Luck
Alex Luck@AlexLuck9·
To pick an obscure example, but illustrating program management confusion even better: USN previously failed to formulate a coherent on cost-proposal for submarine tenders replacing the 45 y old Emory S Land-class via the CHAMP-effort. A tender. An auxiliary. 1/3
Alex Luck tweet media
chris@cwamidon

I keep seeing people here insist that the answer to the Navy’s problems is more shipyard capacity. I get the sentiment. We all want more ships. We haven’t delivered a major shipbuilding program on time and in budget in decades. But the part that gets missed is that extra capacity will not produce much if the programs feeding that capacity are broken at the requirement level. The Navy rarely has a firm idea of what it wants to build, and the requirement set drifts until the design becomes unmanageable. Take the Constellation class as a recent example. The original promise was to base it on the existing FREMM design with around 85 % commonality; fewer changes, faster build, lower risk. Let me emphasize once more that the baseline ship was already a real ship in service with the Italia navy. As of recent reports, the commonality has dropped to about 15 % because of added propulsion, sensor, survivability, hull, and combat-system requirements. The shipyard isn’t the root cause of the delay; the design evolution is. Other programs are the same story. The Littoral Combat Ship collapsed under a lack of clear mission definition. The Zumwalt became a tech-showcase instead of a combatant. The Ford class carrier stacked first-of-kind systems together and absorbed every new requirement. In each case, yards couldn’t build fast because the target kept shifting. Shipbuilders only gain rhythm and scale when design is fixed, repetition begins, and there’s a stable baseline.

English
5
27
349
47.6K
cdrsalamander
cdrsalamander@cdrsalamander·
So, three Zumwalts and two Constellations gives you what, a full house?
English
58
31
755
24K
Josh Brooks
Josh Brooks@F530Josh·
I need regular ass infantrymen with a story to tell from Operation Enduring Freedom. Pull up, we're working on a project. You need to be able to write (with samples), and we don't have time to chase you down to get your butt in the seat for the hard part.
Josh Brooks tweet media
English
46
56
314
118.7K
Ian TB
Ian TB@ian_tb03·
Weekend #wargaming—some players thought the standard “Wings of Glory” scenario I run should be, well, even harder, so I’m adding dynamic weather in the form of moving clouds to unpredictably obscure bombing targets. Didn’t hurt it gave me an excuse to acquire a new map as well.
Ian TB tweet media
English
1
1
6
280
Jeff Wright
Jeff Wright@1991Wolfpack·
@cdrsalamander I would assume your friend was a SWO. As a SWO, I can attest the Surface Navy is brutal. Surface Navy is unforgiving of any transgression however slight or historic.
English
2
0
15
1.3K
cdrsalamander
cdrsalamander@cdrsalamander·
Good. One of the best officers that I ever served with in my year group, with--literally--sustained superior performance on sea duty in multiple combat theaters, leading Sailors in remote locations, absolutely superb FITREPS, did not even make CDR. By any objective manner, he should have been selected early for O5 and for operational command, but he did not get the first, ever, so the second was not in the cards. Why? As an Ensign, over a dozen years prior to the CDR board, he had been caught at a DUI checkpoint, barely over the limit. No wreck. No one injured. Not snot slinging drunk. He made it to 20 as a LCDR doing solid service but in positions that did not fully leverage his talents, but that was it. What a HUGE loss to the Navy and its nation.
Aaron Rupar@atrupar

Hegseth: "You should not pay for an earnest mistake for your entire career. That's why today, at my direction, we're making changes to the retention of adverse information on personnel records."

English
46
87
1K
68.9K
Andy Rucker
Andy Rucker@rucker_andy·
Got a game of Battlefleet Gothic in last night. Played 1k points, taking my new Tyranids against my friends Space Marines. It was a lot of fun as always! BFG remains one of my favorite games. #battlefleetgothic
Andy Rucker tweet mediaAndy Rucker tweet mediaAndy Rucker tweet mediaAndy Rucker tweet media
English
0
1
3
119
Andy Rucker
Andy Rucker@rucker_andy·
@rArmyReddit @mcg1971 Can confirm. I was a mid when we traded in our beat-up M1s (probably in use as USNA parade rifles since the end of WWII lol) for “new” M14s. That was around 2004 or so.
English
0
0
1
20
/r/Army
/r/Army@rArmyReddit·
@mcg1971 I've learned since, looks like De-milled M14 actually
English
2
0
2
55
/r/Army
/r/Army@rArmyReddit·
If report is true; cadet, under the impression active shooter was dressed as security, attacked an armed security guard with a training rifle (rubber ducky?) to protect others and was only stopped after he was shot… Imma need to see an award for that cadet, what a fucking boss
Jim LaPorta@JimLaPorta

Just in: Naval Support Activity Annapolis, in coordination with local law enforcement, is currently responding to reports of threats made to the Naval Academy. The base is on lockdown out of an abundance of caution. This is a developing situation.

English
31
20
457
21.7K
Andy Rucker
Andy Rucker@rucker_andy·
Welp, it finally happened; I pinned on Captain! Still getting used to looking in the mirror and seeing an eagle. It’s weird being the same rank as old people 😂
Andy Rucker tweet mediaAndy Rucker tweet mediaAndy Rucker tweet mediaAndy Rucker tweet media
English
0
0
2
107